Daniel Greenfield December 29, 2021
When Biden's Afghanistan retreat first
brought tens of thousands of Afghans to the United States without any
visas or vetting, officials at Fort McCoy warned about numerous
incidents of Afghan child brides. Democrats and senior military
officials have denied these allegations, but shocking new statistics out
of Fort McCoy raise new questions of just how pervasive this is.
When
thousands of Afghans first arrived at the military base in rural
Wisconsin, local residents in Sparta, the “Bicycling Capital of
America”, a small city of less than 10,000, began warning that the
Afghans being housed at Fort McCoy were putting a significant strain on
their infrastructure and their medical services. I was told that there
were as many as 800 pregnant refugees at the base. The number seemed
wildly implausible, but now the official number is out.
According to military officials, there have been 500 pregnant Afghans at Fort McCoy and, according to a local news report, “the numbers keep growing”.
“I am so happy that my son was born as a US citizen,” one Afghan evacuee declared.
Considering
that there were only 12,600 Afghans on the base, down to about 7,000
now, these numbers are staggering. According to the Pentagon, only 22%
of Afghan evacuees across all the bases are adult women. Around half of
the evacuees are children. Assuming that these numbers hold true for
Fort McCoy, that would mean that it housed only 2,772 adult women.
As
the number of Afghan evacuees fell to around 7,000, most recently, the
number of adult women would have averaged around 1,500. Even as its
highest population mark, that would mean that 1 in 5 Afghan women were
pregnant, while as its current number it would be 1 in 3.
All of that within a five month period.
In all of Wisconsin, a state of nearly 6 million people, there were only 60,615 births
last year. 1.6% of the adult women in the state had a baby in one year,
but between 18% to 33% of the Afghan women at Fort McCoy were pregnant
during their time there.
These staggering numbers reveal the
massive speed with which Islamic colonization takes place, fueled by
birth rates and then religious violence, but even with the high birth
rates within Islam in general and in Afghanistan in particular, the Fort
McCoy numbers are still too high.
At 4.32 children per woman (as
opposed to the American birth rate of 1.70), the Afghan birth rate is
high, but 1 in 5 Afghan women (let alone 1 in 3) are still not pregnant
at any given time. Some of the Afghan female refugees must be older
which narrows down the population further. The only way to account for
such a high pregnancy rate is by factoring in the underage girls.
Shortly
before September, Senator Tammy Baldwin, Rep. Mark Pocan and other
Democrats toured Fort McCoy and falsely claimed that the evacuees were
being reliably vetted and screened.
"There are no cases in Fort
McCoy right now with a child, 15 or under, who is married," Senator
Baldwin insisted. The careful wording by the former lawyer leaves plenty
of room for loopholes. It does not address the question of whether
there are any pregnant children, 15 or under. And it doesn’t even touch
on how many 16 and 17-year-olds are pregnant. And, since many of the
Afghan evacuees had no documentation, there’s no way to know if any of
those 16-year-olds are actually 15, 14, or even 13, despite how old the
men trafficking them claim that they are.
Why else did the State
Department demand "urgent guidance" after “intake staff at Fort McCoy
reported multiple cases of minor females who presented as ‘married’ to
adult Afghan men, as well as polygamous families?” Afghanistan has a 57%
child marriage rate. Senator Baldwin and the Democrats expect us to
believe that what the media is now describing as the “baby boom” is
entirely due to 500 women, out of 1,500 to 2,700, all somehow being
pregnant at Fort McCoy.
The only way to make sense of these numbers is to include many of the underage girls.
But
why are so many Afghan women and girls at Fort McCoy pregnant?
Obviously having a baby on American soil solidifies their legal status
and provides them with assorted benefits. Demographic colonization of
infidel nations through reproduction is also considered a form of Jihad.
But for the men who bought and sold young girls for the trip,
impregnating them is also a way to control them. It will be a lot harder
for those girls to get away once they have a baby.
State Department personnel asked for guidance and the Biden administration began a coverup.
The
media reporting on the “baby boom” at Fort McCoy state that the “base
is partnering with local hospitals for deliveries”. Locals have long
complained about the enormous demands that the Afghans at Fort McCoy are
placing on local hospitals and medical personnel. For the first time
we’re getting a small sense of just how enormous that demand really is.
In
all of Monroe County, there were only 534 births in 2017. The Afghan
migrants are set to equal all of the American births in a county with a
population of three-quarters of a million.
When 12,500 Afghans
can outnumber 741,770 Americans, what will happen when over 100,000
Afghans are brought to America? After Biden brought 53,000 Afghans to
America, another 60,000 are waiting on visas in Afghanistan. That’s
113,000 Afghans and it’s just the beginning.
At a time when
hospitals are already under strain and there are shortages of medical
personnel, Biden’s decision to dump over 12,000 Afghans into rural
Wisconsin has proven to be catastrophic. Gundersen Health Systems, one
of whose hospitals has been used to deliver Afghan babies, has claimed
that it's near capacity with COVID patients. Could Americans lose their
lives because of shortages created by the Afghan strain on our medical
system?
Either way, the Afghan influx has hit the region hard and
as their wave of demographic change transforms the country, the next
phase of the war in Afghanistan will take place in America..
A
few days after September 11, Rep. Ilhan Omar signed a letter to the
Secretary of Defense in response to complaints from the evacuees,
claiming that the Afghans at Fort McCoy were suffering "mistreatment"
and had been spoken to in a "rude condescending manner".
The next
Omar, nurturing a grievance against America, is already at Fort McCoy.
If the flood of Afghan migrants doesn’t stop, within another decade or
two, she’ll be sitting in Congress.
Click here to subscribe to my articles.
Thank you for reading.
About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and
the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz
Freedom Center
No comments:
Post a Comment