The inevitable result when political science is substituted for real Science
By John Droz jr. May 28, 2024 @ Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues
I have written about certain bad aspects of wind turbines before — like here and here.
This post is a brief, simple overview of the many widespread adverse consequences of industrial wind energy. To keep it simplified, I’ve even minimized the references — but they exist for each of the statements below.
These “side effects” are the 100% guaranteed results when our technical policies are written by lobbyists, and passed by virtue-signaling non-critical thinking Legislators.
Put another way, this is what happens when Science is replaced by political science.
- Manufacture = Ecological Disaster (China are processing rare earths)
- Installation = Ecological Disaster (trees killed, farmland lost, hydrological impacts)
- Operation = Ecological Disaster (wildlife pillage, from whale deaths to eagle killings)
- Indirect Health Consequences: Fentenyl Deaths (Chinese criminal gangs are heavily involved in the huge amount of rare earths needed by wind turbines)
- Direct Health Consequences: very problematic infrasound
- Indirect Financial Burden: reduced tourism, homes devalued, agricultural losses, etc.
- Direct Financial Burden: electricity rate increase, etc.
- Indirect Security Threat: its unreliability will cripple US Electric Grid
- Direct Security Threat: weaker Military (due to radar interference, etc. See here.)
- Delays Climate Change Progress (wasted money that could have been spent on meaningful items, like nuclear)
- Makes Climate Change Worse: see my Report
- Direct Loss of Rights: leaseholders are talked into giving up their civil rights, etc.
- Indirect Loss of Rights: it is an excuse for legislators to extract US citizen rights. (E.g. in NY, citizens rights — home rule, etc. — have been profoundly eroded.)
- Undermines our Society: as we totally depend on inexpensive, reliable electricity.
Even in late 1800s it was totally inconsistent with our burgeoning, more modern needs for power. When we throw the switch, we expect that the lights will go on – 100% of the time. It’s not possible for wind energy, by itself, to EVER do this, which is one of the main reasons it was relegated to the junkyard of antiquated technologies (along with such other inadequate energy sources like horse and oxen power).
ALL those limitations are still true! Also, I listed twenty-five NEW liabilities of industrial wind energy some six (6) years ago… Since that time we have discovered numerous ADDITIONAL concerns (see above) that have monumental consequences.
Why do critical thinking citizens allow this travesty to happen?
The Bottom Line
Wind energy provides no Net Benefits to citizens. Lobbyists and their clients make billions as Legislators try to get donations and votes by imaginary virtue signaling.
Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:
Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.
WiseEnergy.org: discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.
C19Science.info: covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.
Election-Integrity.info: multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.
Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time - but why would you?
Thanks for reading Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues! Please pass a link to this article on to other associates who might benefit. They can subscribe for FREE to receive new posts (typically about once a week).
No comments:
Post a Comment