Wisdom is the application of knowledge and understanding.
By Rich Kozlovich
Over the years I've written and posted a lot about "the wise Latina!", Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, and none of it's been nice. It has been all factual however, and the hits just keep on coming.
On May 25, 2024 Andrea Widburg posted this article, The existential horror of Sonia Sotomayor’s life on a conservative court, outlining the "horrors" Sotomayor suffers but this courts rulings saying:
It’s tough being a wise
Latina on the United States Supreme Court, especially when you must
share your position with people who believe that their job is to
interpret the Constitution and laws as written, not as you wish they
were. That was Sotomayor’s message when she received an award at
Harvard’s Radcliffe Institute yesterday.
|
She's a typical leftist making up her own set of facts, and she cries when the court just won't go along with her version of the Constitution. Cries mind you, because the court just won't abandon their reasoned views to a justice who's integrity, intelligence, and legal understanding is seriously open to question. Imagine that!
Sotomayor has joined in some opinions that could make other humans cry, two of them had to do with freedom of religion issues. Not only cry, but fear for the Constitution.
Andrea goes on to say:
This is what happens when you place people on the Supreme Court who
are unqualified at a very fundamental level. Sotomayor is there, not
because she has the brain wattage, wisdom, and knowledge, but because
she checks an identity politics box and toes the line. She is an
ideologue first and a justice last.
Wisdom is the application of knowledge and understanding, and if that's true, and it is, we know her knowledge is either limited or inaccurate, meaning her understanding is flawed. Ergo, this “wise Latina” utterly lacks wisdom.
I will also state, for those who’ve read the history of the Supreme Court, this isn’t anything new. In days past, there were appointees who everyone thought or knew was insane, and non partisanship has always been an elusive concept for the court.
The big difference is back then, the Congress understood the Constitution gave them the power to determine the jurisdiction of the federal courts, there weren’t as many federal judges, and there weren’t nearly as many laws, regulations, or agencies, which has been fertile ground for the abusive and idiotic rulings coming out of the courts, as a result, “The Supreme Court has broken through the firewalls constructed by the framers to limit judicial power.”
But Sotomayor is no longer the dimmest bulb on the court. Now we have Ketanji Brown Jackson, so Sotomayor is only second from the bottom. But on their best days, both are dim flickering light bulbs as a result of their low wattage intellects.
Too bad the Senate didn't ask Jackson if she was a woman, and if she said she was, they should have then asked her how does she know? The stupidity of these mental midgets is mind boggling.
Conclusion:
- Sotomayor is not a "wise Latina".
- Sotomayor is either ignorant of the law, or chooses to ignore the law.
- Sotomayor's logic is flawed
- Sotomayor's conclusions are stupid.
- Sotomayor's views are based on falsehoods
- Sotomayor is unfit to be a judge on any court, let alone the Supreme Court.
The only bench Sotomayor should be allowed to sit on is a park bench, and I put Jackson and Kagan in that same category, and there are four more "so-called conservative justices" who are marginal, with the Chief Justice leading the pack.