Mike's Musings: The Joy's of Old Age
We're all travelers in this world - from sweet grass to the packin'
house - birth till death - we travel between the eternities. Prentice
Ritter
By Rich Kozlovich
Some years ago when I was in my late 60's one of my elderly accounts (in their 80's) handed me a book entitled, the Joys of Old Age. I chuckled and said, there is no joy in old age. They insisted I look at it, so to be polite I did. I opened the book and the first page was blank, as were all the rest. I chuckled, they laughed, a lot, and then we all laughed. I've tried to find this "book" to give as a gift to friends, but alas, I can't seem to.
Last week my long time friend Mike sent another one of those "what happens when men get old" pieces, which I'm going to share with you. However, I've deleted parts, restructured parts, paraphrased much of the rest, and even added some things as I see it.
As I grew older it became obvious pleasing everyone is simply impossible, but it turns out I have an amazing innate ability to really tick people off, and for me, that's pretty much become a piece of cake now. In dealing with people I've decided it isn't important if they're happy with me, its only important if I'm happy with them. Life seems to work better that way. I’m responsible for what I say and do, not for what they choose to understand and like.
Old men are often considered impolite and grouchy, but is it possible that's the definition for honesty? An old acquaintance got divorced for the third time and I asked him if he intended to marry again. He adamantly said no. I said, good, because it's clear your not very good at it. So, in some cases RSVPing to a wedding invitation by saying "Maybe next time" may not be the
polite response, but it may be the honest one.
People have suffered from a lack of common sense forever, it's just so much more pronounced these days because they just insist on publishing their views online for the world to see, as if the world really cares, and for which I was more than happy to remain totally ignorant of before this. Common sense is like deodorant. The people who need it the most never use it.
My tolerance for idiots is extremely low in my old age. In younger years I had a bit of natural immunity to idiots, but there's new strain out there that's overwhelmed my immune system, and I've totally lost any tolerance to stupidity, for those choosing to be ignorant, and irrational social paradigms.
Society fails to understand old people, especially those with arthritis, which are most old people, and which makes doing things painfully difficult, but we're not lazy. We prefer to think of it as efficient use of energy, which means on some days, I don't get one darn thing done, and I'm totally happy with that. As for working out, I prefer avoiding any pain associated with deep knee bends and pushups, but I am willing to do sit-ups via my electric recliner.
I believe in diets. I thought more that one was better. That way I got sufficient nourishment, but unfortunately I have a bathroom scale that constantly lies to me. So I ignore the little creep by shoving it into a corner, and it will stay there until it apologizes for lying.
I hear women say men keep pushing their buttons. If that were true, why isn't there a mute button, and if there is, why can't we find it? Someone said:
"God promised men that good and obedient wives would be found in all corners of the world. Then he made the earth round. . . and laughed and laughed and laughed".
Nah, God never said that, he never said that at all. He knew better.
Everything is so confusing and complicated these days. My wife laughs at me and say's you sound just like your mother, who was in her 90's at the time. Well, she was right, everything is entirely too complicated these days, and "user" friendly government web sites offer unending proof of that, so when struggling to open these stupid self sealing plastic bags, (remarkable how inanimate objects can be stupid) I decided to evaluate that effort against the fact it took 20 years, trillions of dollars, and four presidents to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.
Finally, we're watching an entire generation of people who are stunningly ignorant about history try and rewrite our history, and when they're done there will be three things about which I'm adamantly sure of.
It will be inaccurate, misspelled and have no punctuation.
Tuesday, June 28, 2022
Mike's Musings: Quotes For the Day, From John Kennedy, Republican
By Rich Kozlovich
I have a long time friend from my industry named Mike, and he sends me stuff quite often, mostly bits of wisdom, something humorous, sometimes straight up serious, but all reflective, and I would call them musings. Musing is defined as a period of reflection or thought. So, I've decided to create a page called, Mike's Musings. Mike has once again sent this bit of wisdom for my perusal, and I think I would be doing my readers a disservice by not sharing it.
First of all, I'm John Kennedy, not that John Kennedy. I'm the other John Kennedy, (R) Senator Representing the Great State of Louisiana. Permit me to tell you what I believe.
- I believe America was founded by geniuses but is now run by idiots.
- I believe you can't fix stupid, but you can vote them out of office.
- When was the last time you heard of anyone trying to sneak into China.
- America is so great that people who hate it, refuse to leave it.
- Let me say something about the Biden administration. So far, the Biden administration sucks.
- I don't like to brag about the expensive places I've been to, but this morning I went to the gas station.
- Welfare should be a bridge, not a parking lot.
- Weakness invites the wolves.
- We must arm for peace.
- We don't have a gun control problem, we have an idiot control problem.
- Free advice friends, if government tells you not to buy a gun, buy two.
- I believe if you hate police officers, the next time you are in trouble, call a crack-head.
- Here's a free tip, cops will leave you alone of you don't do stupid things.
- I believe we need an election day, not an election month.
- I believe you should be able to prove who you say you are when you vote.
Conclusion? When the Republicans take over the Senate, he would be an excellent replacement for Mitch McConnell.
Let Me Tell You About Perry Como
By Rich Kozlovich
Over this last week I've posted two articles about AOC (Part I and Part II) and her whining about how she's suffering. As it turns out I also came across this piece by Marta Djordjevic about Perry Como, which she titles a Tragic Real-Life Story. I thought the comparison between Como and AOC would be worth discussing. A pampered petulant pouting crybaby, versus Perry Como, a man who represented what Americans were and need to be again.
Like Como, I grew up in Southwest Pennsylvania, and all this brought back many memories. I'll be 76 in a few weeks, and I remember Perry Como, his songs, his career and all the talk about him, and the similar life patterns of my parents, grandparents and family during the Great Depression and WWII. Stories I heard so often I felt like I lived through it also. Como's story was well known, and he was admired by everyone for starting out with nothing and becoming one of the greatest singers of his time, but mostly for his commitment to his family over his career.
While Perry Como had his share of pain and hard times, I wouldn't consider his life tragic. I would consider it a life well lived, with his life being and example of how a life should be lived. Djordjevic starts out saying:
During the course of Perry Como's life on the A-list, it was difficult to find a single soul who had a negative thing to say. It turns out, the post-World War II-era singer's lighthearted and easygoing tunes were just as enjoyable as his personality. "He doesn't have an enemy in the world — personally or professionally," recalled singer Steve Lawrence to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. "He's not a controversial person, and he has a wonderful personal life with his wife and kids," Lawrence added, noting that Perry is simply "at peace with himself."
"I'm a bad interview because, aside from making records and my radio and television activities, not a lot has happened to me in the past fifteen years," he once told The Saturday Evening Post, quipping, "I was a barber. Since then I've been a singer. That's it."
Born in 1912 he was number seven of thirteen children of Italian immigrants, and started working at age 10, not uncommon in those days as times were hard, especially with a family that large, all of whom turned out well. He started his day by getting up at 6 a.m. and going to the a barbershop sweeping the floors, then went to school only to return after school to shine shoes and perform other odd jobs around the shop. At 14 he became a barber at 50 cents a week, and he sang at the shop for the pleasure of singing.
His father had serious heart problems and at 14 he became a important bread winner for the family. His father got him his own barbershop, making what was big money in those days, a net profit of $125.00 a week. Remember the Great Depression was in full swing.
He gave it all up to start his singing career for $28 a week and got married to Roselle Belline, who he spent the rest of his life with, and whom he absolutely adored saying, "If it wasn't for her I'd have the best barbershop in town", and she returned that love and devotion saying: "When you make your wedding vows as a commitment to each other and to God, you will keep them." They had three children, two adopted, and family always came first. Her death so many years later completely devastated him.
He once said, "My only regret in life is that I didn't spend as much time with my kids as I now wish I had"...... "I missed out on a lot of wonderful moments, missed watching my kids grow into the wonderful people they are today."
While they struggled, they were careful and lived on his earnings, he nonetheless considered giving up until he got a singing job with a band and started earning $50 a week. Again, big bucks in the midst of the Great Depression. That would be the purchasing power of $1,051.42 today.
He was a great singer, extremely popular and successful, but I'm not going to cover his songs and career because it's not important to what I'm wanting to say. Perry Como was all about family, hard work, humility, caring for others and strong moral values, all the things that make a society successful, and according to Eddie Fisher: "After 60 years in show business, they say Perry Como hasn't lost a friend."
At the end of his life he suffered from bladder cancer and Alzheimer's disease, and died at the age of 88, beloved by thousands of fans, but most importantly beloved by his children and 13 grandchildren.
We're now seeing violence, crime and massive discontent and one the major reasons is the destruction of the American family. The abandonment of the Judaic/Christian ethic that made this country great in favor of that neo-pagan secular religion of socialism has promulgated the massive illegitimacy rates that are destroying the values and cohesiveness of American society. The problem in America isn't guns, its culture, and we need to stop rationalizing about this and recognize the true reasons our society is crumbling, something I never dreamed could ever come into being during my youth.
There has been a effort over the last 125 years to destroy of the American culture, the American identity, the American economy and the Constitution. It's being done deliberately because destroying the foundational social bonding of family eliminates parameters for social behavior generating violent fanaticism that creates conditions totalitarians need in order to take control, all of which we're seeing playing out today.
Perry Como's values were the admired norm, not the exception, so when I see these celebrities screaming they "don't recognize their country any longer" because Roe v Wade was overturned, it boggles my mind because they and their vision of America is what's abnormal, not the normal that existed in America until the late 60's, when America's institutions became infested with leftist misfits, and then the transformation really began.
Perry Como was a clear representation of who we once were, and who we need to be again. Not AOC and her misfit colleagues in the Congress and these bands of "mostly peaceful" rioters with it's wave of destruction, all supported by a corrupt deep state, corrupt politicians, corrupt academia, a corrupt media and Hollywood, but we need to get this: Hollywood isn't America, nor are the media or the rest of these misfits.
A Living Wage?
June 27, 2022 By Allan J. Feifer
On the left, there's considerable discussion of the idea of raising the minimum wage, and creating a "living wage." Who could disagree with such an idea, right?
Actually, it's another bad idea that looks like a good one from the far left that will do more harm than good if enacted.
Let's start by discussing how the Living Wage movement came to be and what the laws of economics tell us about attempting to conjure out of thin air, ever higher wages decoupled from productivity. We will also talk about how socialism and communism are closely tied to this subject. Let’s begin with a definition of what a Living Wage is:
“A Living Wage is a socially acceptable level of income that is meant to provide adequate coverage for basic necessities such as food, shelter, child services, and healthcare.”
Investopedia states that a Living Wage for a family of four was $68,808 as of 2019. That is more than this country’s Average Median Income of $67,521 in 2020. ‘Socially Acceptable?’ Now, that describes my problem. Socially Acceptable to whom?
Consider this: The idea for a Living Wage began in the Soviet Union. Or, as Marx liked to say: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."............To Read More....
My Take - You may wish to view my Minimum Wage file, there's some really good stuff there. I particularly like this one, If $15 Minimum Wage Is Such a Good Idea, Why Did AOC's Bar Close Down?, especially after my rants about AOC, here, an here, but more especially since it discusses one of the world's greatest thinkers, Thomas Sowell.
Shareholders Over Stakeholders, Part II
June 26, 2022 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty
In Part I, I warned that “stakeholder capitalism” is not just empty virtue signaling. Some advocates are using the concept to promote a statist agenda.
For Part II, let’s start with this video.
The main message of the video is that ethical profits are good for shareholders, but also good for everyone else (the supposed stakeholders).
By contrast, companies that don’t prioritize profits wind up hurting workers and consumers, not just the company’s owners (i.e., shareholders).
Let’s dig deeper into this topic.
Stakeholder theory reflects the more interventionist approach of continental Europe’s “civil law” while the shareholder approach is more consistent with the “common law” approach of the Anglosphere (the United Kingdom and many of its former colonies, including the United States).
That’s a key observation in Samuel Gregg’s column for Law & Liberty, which reviews a book by Professor Nadia E. Nedzel.
…stakeholder theory reinforces continental European rule through law inclinations and vice-versa, not least because of shared hard-communitarian foundations. …Such goals undermine the ability of corporations to produce prosperity. An emphasis on stability and maintaining levels of employment, for instance, exacts a cost in terms of organizational dynamism, not least by discouraging risk-taking and entrepreneurship. …
Without such adjustments, however, a business will become complacent and uncompetitive. Eventually it will disappear, along with all the jobs once provided by the business. Likewise, if boards of directors are not focused on delivering shareholder value because profit is considered only one of many company objectives, a decline in earnings is sure to follow. …
To the extent that stakeholder theory draws upon hard-communitarian principles which it shares with continental European rule through law models, it risks undermining already fragile commitments to rule of law in America and elsewhere. That’s just one more reason to shore up the priority of shareholder interests throughout corporate America. These priorities help explain the weaker economic performance of many corporations in civil law jurisdictions compared to those businesses located primarily in the Anglo-American sphere.
Allison Schrager of he Manhattan Institute wrote for the City Journal that Biden is on the wrong side and that his mistake, along with others, is failing to understand that so-called stakeholders benefit when companies are profitable.
…one thing that stood out was Biden’s vow to “put an end to the era of shareholder capitalism.” …disdain for the notion that a corporation’s primary objective is to maximize value for its shareholders has united the disparate likes of Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and the Davos/Larry Fink crowd. It’s no surprise that Joe Biden is against it, too. …Maximizing shareholder value…does not create conflicts between different stakeholders, because economic success is not zero-sum. …long-term success requires happy and loyal employees, a healthy relationship with the community, and a thriving environment.
In a column for the Wall Street Journal, and
…we dug deeper, investigating an array of corporate documents for the 136 public U.S. companies whose CEOs signed the statement. …we found evidence that the signatory CEOs didn’t intend to make any significant changes to how they do business. …We’ve identified almost 100 signatory companies that updated their corporate governance guidelines by the end of 2020.
We found that the companies that made updates generally didn’t add any language that elevates the status of stakeholders, and most of them reaffirmed governance principles supporting shareholder primacy. …We also found that about 85% of the signatory companies didn’t even mention joining the “historic” statement in their proxy statements sent to shareholders the following year. Among the 19 companies that did mention it, none indicated that joining the statement would cause any changes to how they treat stakeholders.
Speaking of insincere hypocrites, that’s a good description of the Davos crowd. Matthew Lesh of the Adam Smith Institute wrote about their trendy support for stakeholders in a column for CapX.
…the man behind the World Economic Forum has declared that Covid warrants a ‘Great Reset’. With tedious predictability, Klaus Schwab’s bogeymen are the twin menaces of “neoliberal ideology” and “free market fundamentalism”. …he’s also calling for a “stakeholder model of corporate capitalism”…
But it’s an idea based on a false dichotomy. A business that fails to return a profit to its shareholders cannot do anything for its other stakeholders, such as providing useful products to customers, paying its staff, procuring from suppliers… Delivering for shareholders is ultimately indivisible from benefiting your other ‘stakeholders’ because you can’t do one without the other. …
Shivaram Rajgopal of Columbia Business School has found that top European companies who brandish their social and environmental credentials do no better in these criteria than American companies. But the European firms are much worse at ensuring good corporate governance. For example, worker representation on Germany’s supervisory boards has often meant worker representatives teaming up with managers to push against new technology and methods. In the longer run, this undermines returns to shareholders, but also means poorer products for customers, lower salaries for employees.
The bottom line is that there are lots of misguided attacks against capitalism, but none of the criticisms change the fact that free enterprise is the only system to ever deliver mass prosperity to ordinary people.
And that’s true even if big companies don’t support the system that enabled their very existence (perhaps because they fear they will got knocked from their perch by the the forces of “creative destruction“).
P.S. Just like yesterday, I can’t resist adding this postscript about the left-leaning executive who thought he was rejecting Milton Friedman, but actually did exactly as Friedman recommended.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)