A syndrome is defined as: a characteristic combination of opinions, emotions, or behavior. And that's what we are seeing with all those who are in the Church of the Warming Globe, including, and maybe especially Greta Thunberg.
I really hate to pick on a kid, but Greta Thunberg and her parents have put her on the world’s stage, and in a situation that makes her subject to serious criticism. In my view, she's a brat, and in times past this brat ranted to the world:
"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words!”
As Andrew Bolt noted:
She's just 16, refuses to go to school, claims her Asperger's is a "superpower", and is ascribed such mystical powers that her mother even claims "she can see carbon dioxide with the naked eye ... how it flows out of chimneys".
Well, her parents certainly failed this silly child with her cultish worship of Mother Earth and the State. This isn't about climate or the environment. This is about imposing a worldwide system of leftist control over humanity. Her position on climate:
"Climate... is a crisis of human rights, justice, political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression created, fueled it."
Now ask yourself, does that sound like a scientific analysis of climate or leftist rhetoric for destroying capitalism? This was from a child who is incapable of speaking without a script or discussing any science behind her views.
What we have here is an ignorant spoiled brat with emotional problems (more here regarding those problems) who has been turned into
spokesperson for the worldwide “Warmists” movement! As this piece points out:
I’m sure she’s been a puppet for someone since the day she came on the scene with her ‘how dare you’ blather to the world on Climate Change. Essentially she’s just a ‘Climate Change actress’ because I’m sure she’s getting paid well for her ‘activism’
Can there be clearer demonstration of how desperate these “Warmist” misfits have become to push an agenda few believe in. This child is a clueless prop for her parents, the green movement and the media. Her 15 minutes of fame has pretty much run out, no matter how much she’s pushed by the media. No one cares what she thinks. The "invincible ignorance" of these warmists and their actors demonstrate the less factual they are, the more dogmatic they become.
In her case, I wonder how this isn’t considered child abuse.
- The Tragedy of Greta Thunberg
- Countering Greta’s rant and the UN’s chicanery
- Sorry, Greta, even your fellow Swedes aren't buying the climate change claptrap anymore
So let's get to reality, The Green 'New' Deal is the Old Agenda 21, and that's politics, it's not science, so, let's do a little science. First of all, that ridiculous claim that 97% of scientists agree on the fraudulent claims of anthropogenic climate change, isn't even 97 scientists, which I explain here. More here.
However, it turns here are 1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”
The political fiction that humans cause most or all climate change and
the claim that the science behind this notion is ‘settled’, has been
dealt a savage blow by the publication of a ‘World Climate Declaration (WCD)’
signed by over 1,100 scientists and professionals. There is no climate
emergency, say the authors, who are drawn from across the world and led
by the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever.
Climate science is said to have degenerated into a discussion based on
beliefs, not on sound self-critical science.
While that's recent, this contrary view has been held by prominent scientists from very early on and were ignored.
More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report — updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus” — features the skeptical voices of over 1,000 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC. This updated 2010 report includes a dramatic increase of over 300 additional (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the last update in March 2009. This report’s release coincides with the 2010 UN global warming summit in being held in Cancun.
- 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition. including 9,029 with PhDs
- 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
- Hansen and Schmidt of NASA GISS under fire for climate stance: Engineers, scientists, astronauts ask NASA administration to look at empirical evidence rather than climate models
- Professor Lindzen has systematically destroyed every CAGW argument:
And on and on and on - the list is nearly endless. and anyone can easily pull far more off the internet, and yet the misinformation and lies that are peddled to the public on climate change dwarf the misinformation on covid.
The only reason that's true regarding covid is because the lies of catastrophe regarding global warming has been going on longer and the consequences of policy predicated on these lies will create far more devastation, take for example that really strange head of the Department of Energy, Jennifer Granholm’s who is all in on energy transition.
How romantic is the notion that electric power from wind turbines can replace power from fossil fuels or nuclear reactors! Dreamy thoughts of soft breezes, those sweet zephyrs gently billowing sails, aspens ruffling, oat stems waving, wispy cirrus drifting. Solar photovoltaic panels emitting no noxious fumes, and requiring no smelly boilers, nor grotesque water-cooling towers. And here’s the latest nostrum on “energy transition” from Biden’s Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, “pressing the accelerator, move to clean energy”.
But there is no such thing as “clean” energy. Energy is mass times speed of light squared. (at least that’s what Albert Einstein proffered before theoretical physics was declared a racist social construct). Nothing clean about it. In fact, transforming stored potential energy -- molecules and nuclei -- into usable power defined as watts and torque needs an explosive event -- by definition dirty -- to get it all going, period.
- California to Cover Canals With Toxic Solar Panels
- California Urges Residents Not to Charge EVs after 4pm
- Oops: Alaskan Electric Buses Run Out of Power in Winter
We have California insisting they will only allow electric vehicles to be purchased in their state by 2035, but they can't produce enough power to run the state as it is now. But what has that to do with narrative!!!! Climateers simply will not tolerate any contradiction to "the narrative". And if the narrative is questioned, then the questioners must be silenced. Australian Academy of Science Demands Dissent be Silenced.
As the e-mail correspondent who sent this to me states:
Great way to prove beyond doubt you're not remotely acting as a scientist at all. Without dissent, without questioning and picking nits and arguing and debating and finding every flaw possible, it's simply not "science." That's the very foundation of science. The Aussie Academy.of Science is acting as a religious body or totalitarian group - not science one whit.
Let's stop tolerating these claims of global warming being "settled science". It's not! In point of fact, it's not science at all. It's neo-pagan, secular, misanthropic green religion, and the scion of that movement is a mental aberration. The Thunberg Syndrome! Get over it!
No comments:
Post a Comment