Nancy Pelosi: Dementia, Alzheimer’s, or Just Plain Nuts?

By Rich Kozlovich

(Editor's Note:  I updated this article with this cartoon by Branco because it really seems to fit.  It's true a picture is worth a 1000 words. RK)

 

Such a big deal was made by the media about Trump not shaking Pelosi's proffered hand.  Well, frankly, I don't know if Trump deliberately snubbed Pelosi's handshake or not, that's not clear, but it's clear by her antics during his speech, and her theatrical tearing up of his speech after, this was nothing more than part of a planned stunt.

She claimed that tearing up his speech so publicly and theatrically was the most "gracious" thing she could have done, but that's a lie. She doesn't have a gracious bone in her body.  As Melanie Arter notes in her article,

Conway: Pelosi Ripping Up SOTU Speech Shows How Petty, Peevish, Partisan Dems Are:

 “I think it shows you how petty and peevish and partisan the Democratic Party has become, and for all the people out there who fancy themselves the armchair psychiatrist, trying to analyze certain people, gotta shift their craft over to Nancy Pelosi. What is wrong with her? Who mutters to themselves through a State of the Union?” Conway told “America’s Newsroom.”

She could have gone home without this little performance, like a normal person.  But noooooo, she had to have her preplanned theatrics to get leftist applause.  And it was preplanned.  Monica Showalter notes in her article, So Nancy Pelosi had planned out her toddler-like rip stunt all along:

From Fox News here, you can see the little pre-torn centers to ensure clean rips for the speech's conclusion, not a stray corner rip that might mess up the camera shot

Pelosi has always had a problem with keeping her stories straight.  In one interview she claimed she torn it up “because it was a manifesto of mistruths.”  Really Nancy, name one! Name one you're not lying about!

 

Even issuing a statement claiming:

 “The manifesto of mistruths presented in page after page of the address tonight should be a call to action for everyone who expects truth from the President and policies worthy of his office and the American people.”

But the fact of the matter is she not only theatrically tore up the speech, she did it in sections and moved each time in order to make sure all the cameras got a shot at this stunt. At one point she even had the nerve to claim Trump Looked 'Sedated'; 'Imperative' to Have 'New President' Next Year, in an article by Susan Jones.  Please read all of Susan's article as she extensively quotes Nancy Pelosi demonstrating just how deranged Pelosi and the Democrat Party has become. 

 

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) filed an ethics complaint to the House Committee on Ethics on Wednesday. Will it go anywhere? Not in 2020, but after November the House Republicans need to take strong action against these misfits.

Are Americans sick of the disgraceful behavior and failed leadership that was clearly exposed and demonstrated by Pelosi and the Democrat party? Are Americans outraged at the spending by Congress, of both parties?  Do Americans believe the best option available to fix this is by electing a Republican Congress and re-electing Donald Trump?

 November will tell the tale!

 

Going back to the original point about shaking her hand.  If he had shaken her hand she would have then later sprung her trap saying:  "See, I tried to be gracious, but his speech was disgusting, it was impossible. It's Trump's fault!" All preplanned.

Oh, as for me, I wouldn't have shaken her hand either, only it would have been deliberate. I would have smiled, with a "my turn is coming" smile, and turned away. And I wouldn't have cared what anyone thought.

 

From this point on it should be made clear that those who committed crimes are going to jail and as for the vile tactics practiced by the House Democrats:  There are going to be consequences.

 

Trump made that clear in an article by Cortney O'Brien at the National Prayer Breakfast, where Nancy had to sit and listen to Trump say:

"I don't like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong," he said. "Nor do I like people who say I pray for you, when we know that that's not so," he added. "So many people have been hurt and we can't let that go on."

Nancy of course claims: "I don't know if the president understands prayer or people who do pray. … I pray very hard for him, because he's so off the track."

So a presumed Catholic who believes in and defends abortion wonders if the President of the United States understands prayer.  Really?  I find that amazing since any Catholic who supports abortion is condemned by church law, which makes her a heretic.  But according the Nancy it's the President who is off track.  Perhaps it's Nancy who doesn't understand prayer, and the track she's been taking doesn't lead to heaven.

Imagine that!