Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts

Thursday, October 23, 2025

Character Counts

When a man takes an oath, he's holding his own self in his own hands like water, and if he opens his fingers then, he needn't hope to find himself again. Sir Thomas More, Man For All Seasons

By Rich Kozlovich

As I watch the candidates....from both parties....running for political office I just chuckle, roll my eyes, and shake my head, and think to myself nitwits are like cockroaches, you just can't get rid of them. 

It's being touted that former Senator John Sununu (R-NH), a "scion of a prominent GOP political dynasty, Sununu, 61, likely gives Republicans their best chance of flipping the seat after his brother, former Gov. Chris Sununu, rejected the party’s recruitment efforts for another cycle", with him saying " “somebody has to step up and lower the temperature. Somebody has to get things done.”   He thinks he's the guy who can do that.... Really? 

 Two things.  

He's been a supporter of John Kasich, which shows there's something seriously wrong with the man, and Nikki Haley, both now Republican outcasts, and he's been an anti-Trumper.  It appears the Democrat running is beatable, and allegedly, Sununu is considered the best Republican to win.... but.... polls are polls.  Show me the crowds not the polls, and Trump hasn't weighed in on who he thinks is the best Republican.  Based on his relationship with the RINO Sununu clan, I would normally be betting it wouldn't be John Sununu, except I have no doubt the Maine Republican party, like most state Republican organizations is filled with RINO's, who will offer no alternative to Sununu.  

In New Jersey ....and this is a shocker.... a Republican actually has a chance to become the governor, as the Democrat, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, running for governor has issues.  She's a graduate of the US Naval Academy, who wasn't allowed to march with her graduating class because she violated the Honor Code over a cheating scandal at the Academy.  A classmate testified she either "lied or obscured the facts".  Apparently they couldn't prove that for sure, but it's clear they had no doubt she violated the Honor Code.  And while she graduated, the author notes that "outcomes are not exonerations when the process was tainted by dishonesty", and time hasn't been on her side as more information has come forward, and she keeps dodging and twisting to avoid releasing her whole record.  

In Maine Senator Susan Collins has been a thorn in the Republican backside, and in my view, a disgrace since first elected in 1997.   But as far left as she is, she actually seems rational compared the Democrat candidate running against her.  A guy sporting a Nazi tattoo, who Bernie Sanders thinks is just grand.  Talk about having two strikes against you.  Graham Platner claims he's shocked that's a Nazi tattoo....imagine that!

Now, ya just gotta see the humor in that given the Democrat penchant for declaring anyone who disagrees with them is a Nazi.   He's been busy deleting  social media posts showing he's an out and out communist and hates the police and he's made it clear he approves of violence.  What could possibly go wrong with a Senator like him?  

Then we have Virginia.  The Democrat gal running for governor started out with a huge lead...and that's crumbling.  Why?  Let's do the numbers.

  1. Is it because of she supports mass amnesty for anyone in the world who makes it into the US?  
  2. Could it be because she babbles "word salads" about males in girls’ locker rooms, clearly fearing to offend the LGBTQIAXYZCNNCBSABCMSNBCMSNOW movement, totally unconcerned about the girls? 
  3. How about the possibility that overall she has a woke DEI, pro-trans, pro-illegal immigrant agenda and loved Joe Biden's massive spending bills that caused record inflation? 
  4. Or perhaps it's because she's really unhappy voters in Virginia expect her to condemn the violence promoted by Democrats primarily the Democrat running for Attorney General for the State of Virginia, Jay Jones?

Nah, that's not why her numbers are starting to crash.  It's because, according to MSNBC sexism is the source for her troubles.  Oh, wait, they're blaming sexism for her problems when she's running against another woman and they're calling it sexism? A black woman at that.  So.... is that racism? 

Let's talk about Jay Jones who's running to be Virginia's next Attorney General.  He's been exposed for his reckless disregard for the law, and somehow thinks he deserves special privileges. His willingness to support violence is well documented, including wanting the "head of the cop who donated to the Rittenhouse defense".  This is the guy who claimed he wanted to put bullets in the head Todd Gilbert, the Republican Speaker of the House and "hoped that Jennifer Gilbert’s children would die in her arms, adding,  “I mean do I think Todd and Jennifer are evil? And that they’re breeding little fascists? Yes.”  This is another disgraceful leftist lunatic who if elected claims he will prosecute President Trump because he's bad.  
 
He's anti police and anti-law an order, even wanting to defund the police, and he's running for the top law enforcement job in the state?  Where have we seen that before, and the consequences of those actions?   He's aligned himself with BLM invoking their thug icons George Floyd and Jacob Blake, "wants to pull police from schools, end qualified immunity for law enforcement, and end cash bail", and wants to end the "system that's oppressing black people."  He's an anti white racist, saying, "the daily indignities of being black can be burdensome. If we respond to it all, we would have riots daily.”  
 
He's a race baiting racist, and the Democrat party stands behind him.  Why? According to the Chairman of the DNC Virginians have accepted his apology for those statements. Polls suggest otherwise, except among Democrats.  It turns out 93% of Virginia Democrats think calling for the murder of Republicans and their children dying in their mother's arms is perfectly acceptable.  The Democrat party has descended into violence, willing to assault and even murder anyone who challenges their insanity, and it's contagious on a national scale, even at local level politics such as this school board race.
 
I've written and/or posted a lot about the NYC race, so I won't go into it here, but I really think this is telling.  Both Mamdani and Cuomo say a vote for the other is a vote for Trump, which in a round about way is saying they would vote for each other rather than Donald Trump.  How insane is that?  
 
I think New Jersey and Virginia are going to choose Republican governors, and the NYC race has set off a shocking chain of events exposing the insanity of the Democrat party, exposures that are making an impact nationally.  Even Dana Perino of FOX News,  who isn't one to jump out in front of an issue, believes Democrats will lose New Jersey and Virginia.  Imagine that!
 

Thursday, November 9, 2023

Election Day 2023 Results, Rimshots, and Ramifications

Warning shots were fired, but for whom? 

by | Nov 8, 2023 | Articles, Opinion, Politics @ Liberty Nation News

Virginia Slim

All eyes were on the Commonwealth of Virginia, which was voting on every seat of its General Assembly. The major question was whether Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin could see through his campaign slogan of “Keep the House, flip the Senate.” As the final results trickle in, it seems the political capital he hoped to accrue by turning the state from purple to red didn’t materialize. Democrat cheerleaders will almost certainly be heralding the defeat of yet another conservative “big beast,” but delving into the results perhaps indicates a setback rather than a slaying for Youngkin’s higher office hopes.

Before election day, the GOP held the House of Delegates with 48-46 seats with six vacancies (four of which were originally occupied by Democrats), while Democrats held the Senate 22-18. With almost all the votes counted, the morning light looks only fractionally changed (albeit a slim difference with a huge impact). Democrats now hold 51 seats in the House, and Republicans presently have 47 – there are two races not yet fully counted (57th and 82nd districts), but both are leaning GOP at the time of publishing.

As for the Senate, a similar picture emerges. Dems hold 21 seats, with the GOP on 17, and two seats not yet concluded. Again, both of these are leaning Republican, meaning that although Democrats kept the upper chamber, they did so with a reduced majority.

Election Day in the Governor’s Mansion

FLOWOOD, MISSISSIPPI - NOVEMBER 07: Mississippi incumbent Republican Gov. Tate Reeves speaks to members of the press after an election night watch party at The Refuge Hotel & Conference Center on November 07, 2023 in Flowood, Mississippi. Gov. Reeves won reelection against Democratic challenger Brandon Presley, a second cousin of Elvis Presley. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Gov. Tate Reeves (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Two gubernatorial races were on the ballot yesterday, Kentucky and Mississippi – the former held by a Democrat, the latter by a Republican. Each party had hoped to flip the opposing governor’s state, and each side was disappointed.

The Magnolia State saw GOP Governor Tate Reeves returned to office after facing a stiff challenge from Brandon Presley (yes, a second cousin of Elvis). Democrats had hoped they could unseat the incumbent based on a handful of polls that suggested a victory was in striking distance. However, as Liberty Nation reported:

“It is again worth looking a little deeper into the surveys, as the sourcing of some is, perhaps, questionable. FiveThirtyEight lists five significant polls. In two unbiased surveys, Mason Dixon and Siena, Reeves wins by 8 and 11 points, respectively. In a poll commissioned by Reeves, he scores a whopping 18-point victory. The remaining two polls were both commissioned by Presley’s party (Democrat Governors Association and Presley himself); these put him just one point behind and dead level.

“Based on these numbers, it would be a major surprise if Reeves did not romp home with at least a six-point lead.”

In fact, with almost 98% of the vote counted, Reeves has a five-point lead – currently on 51.8%.

In Kentucky, Democrat Governor Andy Beshear comfortably held off GOP challenger Daniel Cameron with a final count of 52.5% versus 47.5%. In a deep red state, Beshear has demonstrated that he can hold appeal across the partisan divide. During his Tuesday night victory party, he said:

“Tonight, Kentucky made a choice, a choice not to move to the right or to the left but to move forward for every single family … A choice to reject ‘team R’ or ‘team D’ and to state clearly that we are one team, Kentucky.”

It was perhaps this jettisoning of party labels that convinced the voting public to send him back to the governor’s mansion. Strangely enough, he now appears to be in much the same boat as Governor Youngkin was in 2021 – a rising party star who can win in “enemy territory” and is young enough to be a draw for any future potential presidential ticket.

Abortion On and Off the Ballot

Abortion was a significant factor in the 2023 election results. In Ohio, the issue appeared on the ballot to determine whether access should become a state constitution-protected right. In Virginia, Glenn Youngkin – if both chambers had gone GOP – would have sought to enshrine a 15-week limit.

Ohioans voted to ensure abortion access, with the measure getting 56% support. The result suggests a couple of salient points to Republicans. First, abortion is a highly divisive issue, even in red-leaning states that can deliver “out of character” outcomes. And also that any state campaign on this issue will receive nationwide attention. This measure, for example, was backed by funds and support from the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and a considerable number of Democrat or Democrat-aligned organizations flush with cash and electioneering skills. On the other side of the argument were state politicos making a case that abortion is already legal in Ohio up to 22 weeks.

The Groundhog’s Shadow?

Naturally, political prognosticators will be sifting the facts and figures to determine what smoke signals were sent up by Tuesday’s elections. While pundits will safely be able to declare that the GOP is not in the ascendency, will they be able to claim that President Joe Biden is looking good for 2024?

This was not a good night for the Republican Party, but neither was it a victory for Joe Biden. In the lead-up to these contests, Democrats were no doubt hoping the looming shadow of the president would not signal a frosty voting climate ahead. It is notable that the president did not campaign for any state or candidate in these off-year elections; in fact, considering he is standing for re-election in precisely 12 months, the commander-in-chief kept a remarkably low profile. Campaigners for 2024 will be wondering how they can pull off the same strategy in just 12 months’ time when Biden will be the most significant name on the Democrat ballot.

Read More From Mark Angelides

 

Wednesday, November 8, 2023

Foolish Views and America in Crisis

By Rich Kozlovich

Let me say this as clearly as I can.  Abortion is a sin against God and man. It's the murder of the innocent unborn.  When reports about the horrors perpetrated on innocent babies in Israel by Hamas the outrage was palpable, among the sane and moral.  

Truthfully, I foolishly felt this would certainly impact Issue 1 in Ohio demanding unlimited and unbridled murder of these innocents.   How wrong can you be?  

Abortion foes suffered a grave defeat in Ohio Tuesday. A referendum to establish abortion as a protected right in the state’s constitution was overwhelmingly approved by voters. With 97% of the voting in, the measure was coasting to passage by a 56-44% count.........

Protect Women Ohio made this statement:

We know that Issue 1 does not represent Ohio values. It took $35 million in out-of-state funding and ads filled with fear and deceit to push through the most radical abortion agenda in the country. An agenda that will cement late-term abortion in our constitution, strip parents of their rights, and wipe out health and safety protections for women. This is not the Ohio way, and we are united in our fight against these extreme policies.

My question is this.  Why would all that funding by out of state misfits influence anyone?  The issue isn't funding, the issue is a matter of fundamental morality.  The issue is the willing acceptance to allow the murder of the innocent unborn.  That's a fundamental moral value, and now we know 56% of Ohioans have no moral values that can't be bought and paid for. 

Now Ohio has a Constitutional Amendment, via a ballot initiative, that permits abortion even at nine months.  I failed to realize the number of immoral and insane people out there.  While the moral and sane were outraged at the horrors perpetrated on Israel by Hamas, another foolish view was my failure to realize the untold thousands who celebrated these outrages right here in America (and they weren't all Muslims) wasn't just a mere fraction of society organized and paid for by a handful of wealthy leftist elitists. 

With all the insanity being imposed on the nation and the world by the Democrat party you would think society would be outraged and act accordingly.  Another foolish thought by me.  

From Liberty Nation News it's being reported that in spite of the excellent work done in Virginia by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin the Democrat party now controls both houses of the General Assembly and Democrat Gov. Andy Beshear won re-election  won in Kentucky, and it seems this might well be a trend, in spite of the Republican victory in Mississippi's Republican Gov. Tate Reeves won a second term.  Also, in spite of all the outrageous judicial overreach and corrupt decisions, Democrats win Pennsylvania’s statewide judicial races

Don't let the censuring of Rashida Tlaib by the House fool you.  It's quite possible they House will go right back to the radicals in 2024. 

America's in crisis because of massive corruption in Congress, a corrupt judiciary, illegal Democrat immigration polices that allow anti-American misfits to ignore our immigration laws, an educational system, from Kindergarten to advance degrees, that has been contaminated with far left misfits who hate the American culture, people, economy, and the Constitution, and an out of control federal bureaucratic deep state. 

What could possibly go wrong?   Foolish thought.

Thursday, September 14, 2023

Giant utility rejects net zero power, big fight follows

September 13th, 2023 72 Comments @ CFACT

Dominion Energy, Virginia’s big electric utility, is telling the State it does not foresee complying with the 2045 net zero power target in the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA). The preferred option in Dominion’s latest Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) retires no fossil-fueled power generators, other than the few old ones that are already in the process of retirement. In fact, it adds a lot more fossil juice.

Up front in the IRP, Dominion puts it this way: “Due to an increasing load forecast, and the need for dispatchable generation, the Alternative Plans show additional natural gas-fired resources and preserve existing carbon-emitting units beyond statutory retirement deadlines established in the VCEA. The law explicitly authorizes the Company to petition the SCC for relief from these requirements on the basis that the unit retirements would threaten the reliability or security of electric service to customers.”

So, in effect, this is a notice to Virginia’s utility regulator, the State Corporation Commission (SCC), that Dominion is prepared to petition for permission to not comply with the net zero power generation mandate in the VCEA.

In fact, this IRP may constitute such a petition. The anti-fossil forces apparently think so because they have petitioned the SCC to reject the IRP because it includes more gas-fired generation. In response, the SCC has initiated a formal legal proceeding to consider this request. A number of green groups have joined the proceeding; there has been a hearing, public comments have been taken, etc. The whole rulemaking deal.

The impetus for this unexpected bout of rationality from Dominion is, as the quote says, an increased load forecast. Specifically, the SCC requires Dominion to use the load forecast from the regional grid operator, which is PJM. They issued a whopping new forecast that is roughly double their earlier ones going back years.

So Dominion is saying they don’t think we can service this enormous new load and comply with the VCEA net zero mandate. They specifically propose not to retire most of their fossil fleet, plus adding almost 3,000 MW of gas-fired generation over the next 15 years. No wonder the anti-fossils are apoplectic.

Unfortunately, they also add a ridiculous amount of renewables. This is about 11,000 Megawatts (MW) of solar and 3,000 MW of mostly offshore wind, on top of the 2,600 MW of offshore already in process. With their usual smoke and mirrors, there is virtually no storage to make this intermittent junk reliable despite costing tens of billions of dollars. If the gas-fired power does that, why not just use it instead of the renewables? Plus, offshore wind is hell on whales. But I digress.

Dominion has 7 million customers in 16 States, so its Virginia no net zero action has much wider implications. Beyond that, it could be a national precedent, so other utilities, States, and interest groups should be watching closely.

What the SCC decides could be very important. Ironically, in a ridiculous sense, the SCC does not exist at this time. Due to a political stalemate, there is only one Commissioner, out of the called-for three, and it takes a quorum of two to issue a formal order. It looks like the most that can happen is that an administrative law judge can render an opinion on the anti-fossil petition.

The SCC legal mess is beyond my knowledge or understanding. Rejecting an IRP seems odd to begin with. Then, too, the VCEA seems to allow what Dominion is describing specifically. Nor is it at all clear that an IRP is a petition when the matter is just presented as an option. Perhaps it is a petition to be allowed to suggest it. The whole fight strikes me as an absurd confusion, but alarmism is like that. Maybe that is the message. Anti-fossil alarmism is an absurd confusion.

This confused action should be fun to watch. Stay tuned to CFACT as the no net zero drama unfolds.

Author
  • David Wojick

    David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. For origins see http://www.stemed.info/engineer_tackles_confusion.html For over 100 prior articles for CFACT see http://www.cfact.org/author/david-wojick-ph-d/ Available for confidential research and consulting.

Thursday, July 20, 2023

Could Federal courts roll back climate regulatory overreach?

By July 18th, 2023 72 Comments @ CFACT

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recently decided two cases which indicate that federal district courts are prepared to roll back the relentless onslaught of regulatory overreach advanced by the Biden Administration.

For years, meaningful judicial oversight of the regulatory deep state bureaucracy has been stymied by a legal doctrine known as “Chevron Deference”, named after the 1984 Supreme Court case,

Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council, which held that courts should defer to bureaucratic “expertise” when deciding cases where the underlying law and facts are ambiguous.

In American Public Gas Association v. US Department of Energy, decided July 7, 2023, the District Court specifically rejected Chevron Deference in a case involving DOE’s regulation of the commercial gas boiler market, and ruled that the DOE failed to provide “clear and convincing” evidentiary support for a rule that would have upended that market in the name of energy efficiency.

Similarly, in Maine Lobstermen’s Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, decided June 16, 2023, the same court specifically declined to adopt “aggressive Chevron deference” and ruled that NMFS misapplied the Endangered Species Act when it passed a rule which would have effectively shuttered the lobster fishing industry in the name of saving the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.

Both decisions required the Court to dig deep into the weeds of the market mechanics underlying two private sector markets – lobster fishing and commercial gas boiler manufacturing – in order to conclude that the bureaucrats of DOE and NMFS did not interpret facts properly in applying the underlying law. The intricacies and details of these markets are not commonly known and required detailed investigation. In the case of gas boilers, the Court was not afraid to devote pages of its opinion to the intricacies of “Monte Carlo simulation and the probability distributions” of DOE’s market demand models. Similarly, in the lobstermen case, the Court took pains to research the history of the Right Whale as a species and undertake a detailed investigation into its relationship to the NMFS rule regarding lobster fishing equipment, which would purportedly reduce Right Whale deaths.

This rejection of Chevron Deference will be critically important in upcoming cases where the plaintiffs will be seeking to have the courts employ the Endangered Species Act to halt offshore wind development. The ESA requires the government to “ensure” that the leasing of offshore federal waters is “not likely to jeopardize the continued existence” of a protected species – in this case the critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.

The huge Virginia offshore wind project is a case in point. In the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for that project, NOAA has admitted that “it is not possible to predict with certainty the potential long term behavioral effects on marine mammals of the project-related pile-driving or other activities [vessel movements, vessel noise, high resolution geophysical surveys, geotechnical drilling, dredging activity, and operational noise]”. “The exact level and extent of impacts on the North Atlantic Right Whale is impossible to predict with certainty”. In other words, the answer of NMFS to the question of whether the Virginia offshore wind project will jeopardize the continued existence of the Right Whale as a species is:

We don’t know.

Based on the Lobstermen’s >and American Public Gas Association cases, that defense, while forthright and accurate, would be met by the DC Circuit (and other federal courts which follow its lead) with a resounding rejection. The “we don’t know” defense not only fails to meet the “clear and convincing” standard, it doesn’t come close to meeting the “not likely” to jeopardize standard.

So from a legal standpoint, a case brought in the DC circuit by a plaintiff against NMFS, based on the ESA, challenging the Virginia (or other East Coast) wind projects would have these two powerful precedents to rely on, and the government would be burdened with an admission that it lacks critical facts to support any decision approving the project.

There is ample room for hope that the federal courts will at least slow down, if not halt, the insane rush to destabilize the US electricity grid in the name of resolving “climate change”.

Author  

Collister Johnson 

  Johnson has spent the last four decades working in the public and private sectors in Virginia, primarily in the fields of project finance and maritime transportation. He began his career in public service as Chairman of the Board of the Virginia Port Authority. He was appointed by President George W. Bush, and confirmed by the Senate, as a member of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and most recently, as Administrator of the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. In that capacity, he became knowledgeable in the field of climate and its impact on the Great Lakes. He currently serves on CFACT's Board of Advisors. Johnson holds a B.A. degree from Yale University, and a J.D. from the University of Virginia.

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

Vital energy lessons for Virginia and America

Legislators shouldn’t Californicate Virginia or America on EVs and Green Energy

By Paul Driessen        

When they open their 30-day session January 11, Virginia’s Senate and House of Delegates must correct some serious energy mistakes they made two years ago, when Democrats controlled nearly the entire state government and passed the “Virginia Clean Economy Act.”

One of its party-line provisions requires that Virginia adopt California’s requirement that only low emission vehicles (LEVs) be sold by model year 2025 and only zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) by MY 2035. That means in barely twelve years only new electric vehicles (EVs) could be sold in Virginia.

Again mimicking California, in addition to EVs, the VCEA also requires a massive shift from affordable, reliable coal and natural gas-generated electricity to expensive, weather-dependent, land-intensive wind and solar electricity, stabilized and backed up by huge batteries.

As I’ve explained previously (here, here, here and here), this is unworkable. Texas, Buffalo and the Midwest have demonstrated that heavy reliance on wind and solar can bring deadly blackouts during blizzards. California told residents not to charge their soon-to-be-mandatory EVs during last summer’s heat waves, to prevent blackouts. Switzerland might ban EV charging this winter for the same reason.  

The Suburban Virginia Republican Coalition PAC (SUVGOP) recognizes these realities, and understands that the wind turbines, solar panels and transmission lines will not be in Democrat strongholds like Alexandria, Arlington, Falls Church and Richmond. They will be in beautiful rural Virginia, which will also be hardest hit by bans on gasoline and diesel vehicles. SUVGOP has therefore gotten the ball rolling on reversing these ill-advised laws, by launching a campaign to repeal LEV/ZEV mandates.

SUVGOP calls its campaign “Don’t CA my VA.” (When I lived in the Centennial State, bumper stickers proclaimed a crasser version of this message: “Don’t Californicate Colorado.”)

Arguments for avoiding or terminating LEV/ZEV mandates are compelling – for Virginia and America.

* While great for short hauls and some motorists, EVs don’t get you far along on your 800-mile vacation trip; recharging can take hours, depending on multiple factors; and charging stations are more limited off main highways.

* You don’t want to get caught in your EV during a hurricane evacuation or blizzard, especially since already limited battery life decreases in cold weather and with heater or AC use.

* EVs (and backup batteries) can burst into chemical-fueled infernos, especially if they get immersed in water. That can be catastrophic and deadly if the EV is in a home or underground garage (or on a cargo ship loaded with EVs). The fires cannot be extinguished with water.

* EVs require 3-4 times more metals than internal-combustion cars: copper, iron, nickel, aluminum, cobalt, lithium, rare earths and others. Those materials don’t just appear via Materials Acquisition for Global Industrial Change mechanisms (MAGIC). They must be dug out and processed, somewhere.

China’s BYD Auto company alone used 13,000 tons of copper to make EVs in 2016. Based on average porphyry ore deposits today, every 100,000 tons of copper requires processing 23,000,000 tons of copper ore, after removing 35,000,000 tons of overlying rock – using explosives and fossil fuels!

Start calculating how many billions of tons of copper and other metals and minerals would be required for all the EVs, wind turbines, solar panels, transmission lines, and grid-stabilizing and backup batteries Virginia, or your state, or the United States or entire world, are planning to mandate. Then calculate how many trillions of tons of ore that would require – and how much mining, blasting, processing and fuel.

Where will all that work take place? In whose backyards? With how much ecological destruction, air and water pollution, hazardous waste generation, slave and child labor, and human health risks?

“Clean” energy and vehicles? There may be zero emissions out of Virginia EV tailpipes – maybe even at the electricity source, if it comes from wind or solar power, when the wind is blowing and sun is shining.

But there is no “zero emissions” for mining, processing and manufacturing. It just happens somewhere else, often in Africa or Asia, often by Chinese companies – affecting someone else’s air and water quality, scenery, croplands, wildlife habitats, wildlife, health and wellbeing.

Meanwhile, millions of acres of Virginia and US lands would be covered with turbines, panels, transformers and transmission lines; millions of birds, bats and other animals would be killed annually.

Bottom line: There is no such thing as “clean, green, renewable, sustainable” energy or vehicles. It’s just a matter of where and how and how much the mining and materials processing, manufacturing and emissions take place. It’s just a matter of how good the “green” PR programs are; and whether US environmentalists, journalists and politicians recognize ... or cancel and censor ... these realities.

Earth’s atmospheric, oceanic and climate systems are global. The loss of habitats and species is a global problem. We should think globally, and act locally.

Regarding backup batteries, the VCEA mandates acquisition of 3,100 megawatts of storage. Assuming legislators meant 3,100 megawatt-hours, this would require some 36,000 Tesla half-ton 85-kWh modules; and it would still meet less than 1% of Virginia’s average daily electricity consumption (and less than 0.5% of its peak demand). This doesn’t include batteries to stabilize wind-solar grid fluctuations.

Virginia legislators therefore need to address these vitally important issues, as well – with some precision:

* How many wind turbines, solar panels, transformers, backup/grid-balancing battery modules, and miles of new transmission lines will The Old Dominion need to replace existing coal and gas generation?

* How many more will it require after half of all cars, trucks and buses are electric? After restaurants and new and remodeled homes are forced to have electric home and water heating, stoves and ovens, instead of gas – and upgrade home and neighborhood electrical systems to handle the added loads?

* Where and on whose property will all these “renewable” systems and power lines be installed? How many millions of acres of land and coastal areas (and their wildlife) will be impacted? Will residents or local governments be able to veto developments? How often will eminent domain be employed?

* How many millions (billions?) of tons of metals, minerals, carbon-fiber composites, plastics, concrete and other materials will be needed? How much ore, overburden and fuels? How many tons of pollution will be emitted, cumulatively, throughout the mining-processing-manufacturing-transportation process?

* How many of these materials (and turbines, panels, battery modules and transformers) will come from China or other adversarial nations, or their surrogates?  

* Under what pollution control, wildlife habitat and endangered species protection, workplace safety, slave and child labor, and other “responsible sourcing” laws will all this work be done?

* Where will worn out, broken and obsolete solar panels, enormous wind turbine blades and other non-recyclable equipment be landfilled?

* How many billions or trillions of dollars will all this cost Virginia and US ratepayers and taxpayers?

It takes more than declaring that actions taken under “clean economy” laws are “in the public interest” to make it so. It’s vital that legislators look beyond tailpipes, and beyond Virginia or US borders, to avoid destroying the planet with wind and solar, to save it from fossil fuels and “manmade climate change.”

The 2023 legislative session is a perfect opportunity to start reexamining “clean economy” assumptions, misconceptions and mandates – and implementing reality-based Environment-Social-Governance (ESG) principles. Are Virginia’s legislators up to the task?  


Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, environment, climate and human rights issues.


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Election machines reported more votes than ballots in two Virginia precincts, nonprofit alleges

The two precincts were in Virginia's 7th and 10th Congressional Districts.

By Natalia Mittelstadt

Election machines reported more votes than physical ballots cast in two precincts in an influential Virginia county, raising concerns about election administration in the midterms after the county's former registrar was charged earlier this year with multiple election-related offenses. In Prince William County, one of Virginia's most important electoral counties, at least two precincts had more ballots reported on the machine scanners' tallies of ballots than were tabulated by election officers, according to a report by Electoral Process Education Corporation (EPEC), a nonprofit that performs election data analysis........To Read More...

Monday, April 18, 2022

Glenn Youngkin Signs Bill Requiring Parents’ Notification of Sexually Explicit Curriculum

By April 12, 2022

On Friday, Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin (R-Va.) signed a bill into law that requires all school districts to notify the parents of students if any sexually explicit material is to be taught in the classroom.

The Daily Caller reports that the bill was authored by State Senator Siobhan Dunnavant (R-Va.), which gives the state’s Department of Education the authority to develop and enforce the policy. All local school boards in the state must enact the policy by January 1st, 2023.

Under the new law, parents will be allowed to “review instructional materials that includes sexually explicit content,” and may be allowed to instead show “non-explicit instructional material” to their children as an alternative if they decline...........To Read More.....


 

Thursday, February 10, 2022

American Civil Liberties Union Files a Lawsuit to Stop Allowing Civil Liberties in Virginia

It’s not the apex of institutional hypocrisy, rather it’s the unmasking of political ideology.  The ACLU is filing a lawsuit today in Virginia demanding that mask mandates against parents and student civil liberties be reinstated.  The ACLU wants the Virginia mask mandate reinstituted.  The ACLU does not want parents and students to have a choice on whether to wear a mask.

The Washington Post headline is akin to folding the universe upon itself and looking back through the mirror: “ACLU challenges Youngkin order mandating choice on school masks.”  The civil liberties organization is arguing against allowing civil liberties.........To Read More....


Wednesday, February 9, 2022

The Deep State control of the education system

February 8, 2022 By John Dietrich

Progressive control of the U.S. educational system, operating secretly via entrenched bureaucrats and cooperating elected officials, has been exposed by incidents in Loudoun County, Virginia.  In other words, the Deep State rules the classrooms of America.

A major factor affecting the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election (and destined to affect the 2022 midterm elections) is the public's reaction to progressive control of the educational system.  This control had been successfully concealed by the major media until an incident at a Loudoun County school board meeting made national news.  At this June 22, 2021 school board meeting, parent Scott Smith was arrested. 

Smith was protesting the fact that his daughter had been raped in the girl's bathroom on May 28 by a "transgender" student.  School officials' first response was an attempt to cover up the incident.  School board member Beth Barts proclaimed, "Our students do not need to be protected, and they are not in danger."  Superintendent Scott Ziegler claimed: "To my knowledge, we don't have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms."

Ziegler, who is paid $295,000 a year, intentionally lied to the public about this incident.  In fact, he was the creator of one of the records covering the incident.  On the day of the attack, he wrote school board members a note entitled  "CONFIDENTIAL School Incident."  It stated, "This afternoon a female student alleged that a male student sexually assaulted her in the restroom."  When this lie was exposed, he responded, "I regret that my comments were misleading and I apologize for the distress that error caused families."  He added, "My heart aches for you and I am sorry that we failed to provide the safe, welcoming, and affirming environment that we aspire to provide.".........To Read More....

Saturday, February 5, 2022

CFACT President testifies against harmful VCEA climate law before the Virginia House of Delegates

By February 4th, 2022 Energy 3 Comments

On February 3, 2022, CFACT President Craig Rucker testified to the Commerce and Energy Subcommittee of the Virginia House of Delegates in opposition to the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA). The VCEA, signed into law in 2020, mandates Virginia’s electric grid transition to 100% so-called “clean” energy by 2050. The law is going to drastically increase energy prices and destroy much of Virginia’s forests and farmland in order to build solar facilities.  At the subcommittee hearing, the bill aiming to repeal the VCEA (HB 118, sponsored by Del. Nick Freitas) was reported out favorably and referred to the full House Commerce and Energy Committee for consideration......

Yet, not everyone was in favor of repealing the VCEA .......... What was most strange was that they were all in agreement with Dominion Energy – Virginia’s largest energy utility. Dominion testified against repealing the VCEA as well. Dominion isn’t eager to lose all the government subsidies in the VCEA; no matter the negative impact such programs are going to have on consumers...........To Read More.....

Electric power reforms gain ground in Virginia

By February 4th, 2022 Energy 5 Comments @ CFACT Two big Bills designed to fix Virginia’s broken electric power system have cleared the first legislative hurdle, on the road to becoming law. Both of these Virginia House Bills were approved by the cognizant Subcommittee of the House Commerce and Energy Committee.

HB 118 fully repeals the damaging (and nutty named) Virginia Clean Economy Act. VCEA foolishly mandates the complete elimination of fossil fueled electric power by 2045, with forced plant retirements beginning in 2023.  

The full Bill is here:

HB 73 amends VCEA to eliminate many of its worst features. 

You can read it here: 

Strategically it is often easier to amend a law than to repeal it. As Jefferson Institute policy analyst and power guru Steve Haner puts it, HB 118 is a hammer while HB 73 is a scalpel.

Both Bills next go to the full Committee, then if passed to the full House. Both were approved on straight party votes and the Republicans have just taken control of the House, so prospects for one or both passing are pretty good. The real fight is likely to be in the Senate where the Democrats still have a slim majority.

For this reason the proponents of VCEA repeal or reform are gearing up to get the word out. CFACT is a big part of this effort, because VCEA is arguably the worst alarmist power law in America. In fact CFACT President Craig Rucker testified at the Subcommittee hearing in favor of HB 118.

I myself filed the following Comment on HB 118, challenging Virginia’s giant electric power company Dominion, to provide an honest assessment of VCEA’s damaging cost and unreliability.

“Dominion has no plan that complies with VCEA and provides reliable electricity. In their 2020 IRP they said they would have to import up to 10,000 MW in winter because solar was completely unreliable. But then in their 2021 IRP Update they say that imports like this are not feasible because everyone is going solar. The only alternative is huge amounts of storage, hundreds of thousands of MWh, costing hundreds of billions of dollars, but their plan only provides 16,000 MWh. It is completely unreliable, beginning next winter. VCEA simply cannot work.

See my article for details: 

Several CFACT analysts besides me have done detailed analyses of VCEA’s absurd consequences. Just use the search feature at CFACT on VCEA.

Another excellent resource is the “Repeal The Virginia Clean Economy Act” website at https://repealvcea.com/. Of particular interest is a county by county breakdown of the nearly 800 square miles of solar slabs now in the VCEA development lineup. Repeal VCEA senior adviser Collister Johnson led off the Subcommittee testimony for HB 118.

Unfortunately the short Virginia legislative session is a mad scramble, with hundreds of Bills under cursory consideration. Those of you who live in Virginia, or have contacts there, are urged to take quick action. Letters, phone calls, or even brief emails to Senators are most important at this time.

If the green Democrats manage to block meaningful electric power reform this session you may be sure our fight for sanity will continue. But now is the time to push and push hard.

This is not just a Virginia issue. As Governor Youngkin has said, it is time to “change course on electric power”. This is certainly true for all America, and for the whole world. It is time to steer away from renewable madness.

Saturday, January 29, 2022

CNN’s Jim Acosta Accuses Youngkin of Turning VA Into a 'Soviet-style Police State'

"In office less than two weeks and Governor Glenn Youngkin has already set up an email tip line for parents to report teachers for teaching divisive subjects,” said CNN's Jim Acosta. “I seem to remember Glenn Youngkin campaigning in a fleece vest in Virginia. He was running as a different kind of Republican. I was told there was going to be a vest, not a Soviet-style police state across the Potomac from Washington."

Virginia’s Attorney General Jason Miyares responded, noting that Acosta should open a history book. “I think what Jim Acosta said — listen, my family fled Communist Cuba. You want to talk about what ‘Soviet-style’ looks like? It’s the opposite of freedom,” he said. “So clearly, Jim Acosta maybe needs to take some history classes of what Soviet-style communism actually looks like. And [Virginia is] the opposite.” 

Your humble servant actually attended elementary school while living in the prototype of a “Soviet-style police state” (Castroite Cuba). Snitching was definitely part of the curriculum encouraged by the school officials—but it was snitching against your parents for any “counter-revolutionary” words or actions. This, of course, amounts to the exact opposite of what Youngkin proposes, which is to give parents  some level of control over what their children are taught at school. 

Fascinatingly enough, Jim Acosta’s father, much like Miyares' parents, was born in Cuba and fled to the U.S. to escape a literal Soviet-style police state.  So that urgently needed “history lesson” for Acosta should not be difficult to arrange. 

Problem is, publicly telling the truth about Soviet-Cuban-style-police-states might imperil Acosta’s CNN gig. To wit:  

Jim Acosta, unlike most Cuban exiles in the U.S. and their descendants, is warmly welcomed by the KGB-mentored communist apparatchiks who (still) run Stalinist Cuba.  Since 2009, upon his first visit to the Castro-Family-Fiefdom, Jim Acosta has been dutifully following his CNN/Democrat Party instruction-manual  and dutifully propagandizing against the (so-called) Cuba embargo -- the lifting of which has been the Castro-Family-Crime-Syndicate’s obsessive goal for decades. 

“It's not that my dad was an anti-Castro ideologue shaking his fist at his former homeland,” Acosta wrote upon arriving in Havana in March 2016 with the Obama media entourage. “He was never that guy…. Also, he grew up in Virginia, not Miami. It was just a different Cuban-American experience.”

See there, amigos? It’s not that Acosta’s Stalinist hosts hadn’t completely vetted him – and knew his and his family’s political views frontwards and backwards – before issuing his visa. It’s that on top of publicly preening his “trustworthiness” to his Stalinist hosts, Jim—for the benefit of his CNN audience–had to also distance himself from that insufferable majority of tacky “right-wing Cuban-exiles.”

 In brief, you’re not getting and keeping a Cuban journalist visa (much less a Havana Bureau) unless you shamelessly (and genuinely) collude with Cuba’s KGB-founded and mentored ministry of propaganda—i.e. unless you create Fake News. This isn’t rocket science, amigos.   

In sharp contrast to his roaring, snarling, chest thumping manner of addressing Republican officials  in front of cameras, Jim Acosta’s nervous brown-nosing of Raul Castro back in March 2016 outdid both Eddie Haskell upon his every greeting of June Cleaver and The Scarecrow’s upon meeting the Wizard of Oz. 

Jim Acosta: Thank you, your honor…I mean your Excellency…I mean your Wizardry…

Raul Castro: You have the effrontery of asking me about political prisoners, you billowing bale of bovine fodder?!

No…Seriously, amigos. Here’s the exchange: 

Jim Acosta: “Gracias, President Castro. Thank you, President Castro, for your hospitality here in Havana. I wanted to know, please sir, if you have Cuban political prisoners and why you don’t release them.”

Raul Castro (whose regime, over the decades, has jailed and tortured political prisoners at a higher rate than Stalin’s during the Great Terror and murdered more political prisoners in its first three years in power than Hitler’s regime murdered in its first six):

“Well, give me a list of the political prisoners and I will release them immediately. Just mention the list. What political prisoners? Give me a name or names or when — after this meeting is over, you can give me a list of political prisoners, and if we have those political prisoners, they will be released before tonight ends.”

END OF STORY! That was IT, amigos.That future ROARING LION of a Sarah Huckabee Sanders interrogator promptly tucked his wagging tail between his shivering legs, whimpered another “please” and “thank you” to “President” Castro (who everybody with half a brain knows keeps hundreds of political prisoners hidden from the Red Cross) shut up, and sat down.

Several organizations including the Cuban-American National Foundation, Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation and the Center for a Free Cuba quickly compiled lists of Cuban political prisoners to present to Castro. But we are unaware of any follow-up by Jim “Roaring Lion!” Acosta with “President” Castro regarding the list of political prisoners or the Stalinist dictator’s pledge to promptly release them.

Actually, CNN’s Acosta is simply upholding a long and sniveling CNN tradition. Indeed, no serious Cuba-watcher expects a network bestowed a Havana bureau by KGB-trained apparatchiks to even feign honesty, or even play-act its professed duty “to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.”

“Fidel Castro is one hell of a guy!" CNN founder Ted Turner gushed to a capacity crowd at Harvard Law School during a speech in 1997. "You people would like him! Most people in Cuba like him." 

Within weeks CNN was granted its coveted Havana Bureau, the first ever granted by Castro to a foreign network. Bureau chief Lucia Newman (later with Al Jazeera) assured viewers, "CNN will be given total freedom to do what we want and to work without censorship." Right.


Sunday, November 7, 2021

MSNBC Slammed Over ‘Disgusting Racist Rant’ Attacking Black Republican: ‘Unbelievably Insidious’

ByDaily Wire News>Nov 5, 2021 

MSNBC host Joy Reid and frequent guest Michael Eric Dyson faced backlash online late on Thursday evening after a video clip went viral from Reid’s show that was widely panned as blatantly racist. 

Dyson purportedly made the remarks about Virginia Lieutenant Governor-elect Winsome Sears, a Republican, who won her election on Tuesday night as Republicans dominated across the state. Dyson said:............To Read More....

Sunday, October 24, 2021

McAuliffe Can't Draw Crowd in Blue Arlington, and Other Cringe Details in the Final Days of Virginia Race

Rebecca Downs
Rebecca Downs Oct 23, 2021

In the final days leading up to the Virginia statewide races, there continues to be plenty of cringe details for Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe. For instance, at a tour bus stop the candidate did in Arlington, Virginia, one of the bluest parts of the commonwealth, hardly anyone showed up...........

A Friday email from Matthew Hurtt, the Communications Director for the Arlington GOP, noted with original emphasis:

Not counting reporters (~ two dozen), paid staff (~ a dozen), elected Democrats (half-dozen), and paid SEIU "activists," there's maybe 20 people here -- in Arlington... 11 days from Election Day.

If I'm Terry McAuliffe, I'm thinking the wheels are coming off the campaign bus. This is *not* a good look. It's getting so bad, he's bringing Sleepy Joe Biden back to Arlington next week.

Low-energy Terry can't even generate enthusiasm in the most far-left community in Virginia............To Read More....

 

My Take - This article claims:  In dead-even Virginia governor's race, McAuliffe battles Dems' enthusiasm gap.  I've stated I'm not a believer in polls.  Don't show me the polls, show me the crowds, and the only thing that can overcome that is massive voter fraud.  I'm willing to bet Democrats will work to make massive fraud to happen in Virginia in order to get him elected.

Monday, September 27, 2021

Judge rejects leftist Fairfax prosecutor’s deal of three years for child rape

September 25, 2021 by Paul Mirengoff in Crime, Lenient sentencing

Earlier this week, I wrote about a plea deal reached by far-left, Soros-backed Fairfax County prosecutor Steve Descano under which a serial child molester whose offenses carry a life sentence would instead receive only 17 years. A Fairfax County judge reluctantly accepted the deal but called it “woefully inadequate” and said the prosecutors had “victimized” the child in question.

Now a second Fairfax judge has done what the first was unwilling to do. Judge Randy Bellows has rejected a Descano plea deal. In this one, a man indicted for raping a girl four times during a period in which she was in fifth-through-seventh grade would have received only a three-year prison sentence.

Three years for four instances of raping a minor. That’s justice, George Soros style.............To Read More...  

Meet Steve Descano, the Rogue Prosecutor Whose Policies Are Wreaking Havoc in Fairfax County, Virginia

This commentary is part of a series on the rogue prosecutors around the country who have been backed by liberal billionaires such as George Soros and Cari Tuna and the threat those prosecutors pose to victims and others alike. Previous entries in the series have focused on prosecutors in BaltimorePhiladelphiaChicago, and Boston

One of the most disturbing features of rogue prosecutors is their utter disregard for real victims of crime and for victims’ rights under state law. 

It’s one of the cancerous features of this radical new breed of prosecutors.

As we discussed in our major paper on the subject hereGeorge Soros-backed rogue prosecutors also: (1) usurp the constitutional power of the legislative branch by refusing to prosecute entire categories of crimes; (2) abuse their offices; (3) enable crime to explode under their watch; and (4) harm the very people they pretend to care about the most, including low-income and minority individuals............To Read More...

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Virginia’s ‘Clean Economy Act’ Will Have Dirty Results

Paul Driessen Mar 03, 2020

Largely with party-line, urban-vs-rural votes, Virginia’s legislature is poised to enact a Clean Economy Act that would eliminate coal-based electricity generation, prevent construction of new gas-fired power plants – and replace reliable, affordable fossil energy with wind, solar and battery-backup power. The bills offer important cautionary lessons for voters, workers and consumers in Virginia and the United States.

Senate Majority Leader Dick Saslaw has said Virginia has “a climate problem, and you can’t fix it for free.” However, the climate crisis is mostly exaggerated, imaginary or based on faulty computer models. Worse, the “fix” will be anything but free, and it won’t make an iota of difference to the global climate.

The USA has actually had  fewer violent (F3-5) tornadoes the past 35 years than during the previous 35, and not one in 2018. Hurricane frequency and intensity has barely changed since 1850 – except that the USA enjoyed a record 12-year absence of Category 3-5 hurricanes, 2005-2017. After rising some 400 feet since the last Ice Age, seas have been rising at just 7-12 inches per century for over 150 years, and a lot of apparent sea level rise is actually land subsidence, including around the Norfolk-Virginia Beach area.
Water, ice and water vapor have vastly greater influences on Earth’s temperatures, climate and weather than do carbon dioxide and all the other atmospheric gases combined, Greenpeace cofounder Patrick Moore notes. The oceans have 1,000 times more heat than the atmosphere. Clouds both trap heat and reflect incoming solar energy. And scientists still cannot separate human from natural factors in all this.

But Virginia Democrats insist there is a climate crisis, and are determined to end fossil fuels to prevent it.

Virginia’s “carbon-free” bills would shut down some 6,200 megawatts of coal-based electricity and ban construction of new gas-fired units. Meanwhile, China already has 900,000 MW of coal-fired power plants, has another 200,000 MW under construction, is planning an additional 150,000 MW (all in China), Greenpeace reports, and is building or financing numerous coal and gas power plants in Africa and Asia. India already has hundreds of coal-fired units and is planning nearly 400 more. China and India are building or planning to build hundreds of new airports, and to put millions more cars on their roads.
So even if CO2 does play more than a minor role in climate change, Virginia’s actions might reduce future warming by an undetectable 0.001 to 0.01 degree. The bill’s details are revealing, and troubling.

The nearly enacted law would close America’s newest and cleanest coal-fired power plant, unless it can slash CO2 emissions 83% by 2030, using still unproven “carbon capture and storage” technology. But even if it worked, that technology would cost millions per year to operate – and require a third of the power plant’s electricity output to operate. Talk about not being free, especially for local residents.

To replace all the eradicated electricity, Virginia energy companies would install 5,200 MW of offshore wind turbines – apparently GE 12 MW Haliade-X turbines manufactured in a new factory in Guangdong Province, due south of Wuhan. That would require 433 of these behemoths, each one rising 850 feet above the waves some 27 miles off the Norfolk-Virginia Beach coastline, in 50-70 feet of water.
Constant saltwater and frequent storms will corrode the turbines, causing them to perform worse every year. Actually getting 5,200 MW of electricity would require that the 433 turbines operate at 100% of rated capacity 24/7/365. If they work only half the time, Virginia would need 866 monster turbines.

Climate activists and Big Wind developers expect up to 30,000 MW of offshore wind along the East Coast by 2030. That could mean 2,500 gargantuan Heliade-X turbines! The impacts on radar, aviation, submarines, surface shipping and fishing would be enormous. Turbine blades would kill countless birds. Vibration noises and infrasound would impair whale and dolphin sonar navigation systems for miles.
Since these turbines would be in federal waters, the Interior Department, National Marine Fisheries Service and other federal agencies must fully and carefully evaluate their cumulative impacts on all these human activities and environmental values. They must also address the cumulative impacts of all the global mining, processing, manufacturing and other operations required to build and install the turbines.

These monster windmills will require millions of tons of concrete, steel, copper, rare earth elements, carbon-fiberglass composites and other raw materials. Obtaining them will require removing billions of tons of ore and associated rock, in new or expanded mines all around the world, but probably not in the United States. Wind (and solar) energy would be almost totally dependent on foreign materials, components and finished products – mostly Chinese. Pollution, workplace conditions, land and habitat destruction, child labor and human rights violations, cancers and other terminal diseases among workers and local communities, would be rampant, and abhorrent to most Americans.

Right now, there are few or no derrick barges capable of installing 12-MW turbines. Imagine how long it will take to install 400 to 2,500 of them along the East Coast – and repair or replace them as they age, or after a huge storm like the Great Atlantic Hurricane of 1944 wipes out offshore electricity generation.

The Clean Economy Act states that another 16,100 MW of fossil fuel replacement power would come from photovoltaic solar panels. Based on data for a 400-500 MW Spotsylvania County, Virginia, solar operation, those panels would completely blanket a land area 3 to 3.5 times larger than Washington, DC.

Arizona conditions don’t exist in Virginia. Clouds, nighttime, and sub-optimal sunshine during much of the day and year make it likely that these millions of panels will actually generate little more than 3,200 megawatts – unpredictably and unreliably. To get the full, legislated 16,100 MW of electricity, Virginia would have to cover up to 18 times the land area of Washington, DC with panels: some 700,000 acres.

The Virginia legislation (HB1526 has passed both chambers) also requires that utility companies construct or acquire 3,100 megawatts of energy storage capacity, presumably batteries. This is confusing, since batteries don’t generate electricity (megawatts); they simply store power generated by coal, gas, nuclear, wind or solar sources (megawatt-hours, MWh). If the legislators mean 3,100 MWh, Virginia would need 36,500 half-ton Tesla 85-kilowatt-hour battery packs, requiring still more lithium and cobalt sourced from places with terrible environmental and human rights records.
Will Virginia require that all of its wind, solar and battery materials and components be responsibly sourced? Will it require independently verified certifications that none of them involved child labor, and all were produced in compliance with US and Virginia laws, regulations and ethical codes for workplace safety, fair wages, air and water pollution, wildlife preservation and mined lands reclamation?

Getting power from offshore wind and eastern region solar facilities to communities on the western side of the 2,200-mile-long Appalachian Trail will require many new transmission lines across the trail. Environmentalists have adamantly opposed gas pipelines that would pass 700 feet beneath the trail. How will they respond to multiple transmission lines and towers crossing the trail and impairing scenic views?

Wind, solar, battery and biofuel alternatives are simply not clean, green, renewable or sustainable. The Clean Economy Act represents greenwashing, virtue-signaling and government control at their worst. It replaces reliable, affordable electricity with expensive, unreliable power. Simply declaring, as this legislation repeatedly does, that all these actions are “in the public interest” does not make it so.

Eliminating fossil fuel electricity means lighting, heating, air conditioning, refrigeration, computing and other costs will soar – for families, hospitals, schools, churches, businesses, factories and government agencies. Local, state, US and global environmental impacts will skyrocket, with no climate benefits.

In Virginia and across America, liberal cities and counties have provided “sanctuary” status for illegal immigrants, including repeat criminals. Numerous Virginia communities have declared themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries. Perhaps it is time for them to resist the onslaught of climate alarmism and pseudo-renewable energy craziness – by declaring themselves fossil fuel sanctuaries, as well.