Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Leftist Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leftist Media. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

You Don't Despise the Corrupt Pravda Media Nearly as Much as They Deserve

"The vast majority of us know the mainstream media (MSM) is comprised of vapid, lazy liars, mindless ideologues in reporters' clothing. Most are agenda-driven morons apparently incapable of objectivity, and seemingly bereft of critical thinking skills." Eric Utter 

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags:

 

No one in this world, so far as I know, and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me, has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.  Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby - H.L. Mencken, 1926

Well, that's because there wasn't an internet in those days.  It's taken some time, but now we're seeing the demise of the Pravda media, as online news is overtaking traditional news sources.

Why?  Because they've been exposed as the corrupt biased liars they are.  As Jack Hellner writes, It is a joke when journalists claim they care about journalistic integrity saying:

Using the word 'integrity' and 'journalism' in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

He then goes on to list the many lies the media has perpetrated, promoted, and continue to do so, "because they have no integrity!"

The media rarely fact checks the continuous lies but can't stand the thought that any journalist would write a kind piece on Trump or want him to be reelected. And they pretend they want to unite the country and are for diversity. They can't stand diversity of thought. Most of the media has as much integrity as the 51 intelligence officers who falsely claimed the Hunter laptop looked like Russian disinformation........

Which they've been stunningly silent about since the DOJ has confirmed the Hunter Biden Laptop is real. 

Victor Davis Hanson has noted the Pravda media's lies are adding up, Russian collusion, Steele Dossier, the hysteria over Trump's impeachments, and much more.  Mark Kelly claims it's : Trump, who wants to send you to jail for disagreeing with him, but it's the Democrats who want to censor and even imprison people for publishing "misinformation" and they will decide what's disinformation.  They're implying Christians and patriots who disagree with the left are KKK members

The Pravda media is stunningly corrupt. They not only make up their own lies, they brazenly accept and promote lies of others, and anything that refutes those lies is labeled as misinformation destroying democracy, which should be criminalized to stop anyone from refuting the lies. 

Is there a sane person on the planet that's not been aware the media has been biased for the left for decades?  They're so isolated in their little head nodding bubble they're incapable of understanding how anyone could possibly vote for Trump.  But that's not bias?  

Mollie Hemingway Says Media Is Gaslighting Nation Just Like They Did in 2024 [VIDEO]

Eric Utter  asks, Are they just toadies— or is it worse? saying:

The vast majority of us know the mainstream media (MSM) is comprised of vapid, lazy liars, mindless ideologues in reporters' clothing. Most are agenda-driven morons apparently incapable of objectivity, and seemingly bereft of critical thinking skills........no matter how much disdain one might have for those in the de facto state-run media, it is nowhere near enough...........it was then that it dawned on me that there must be something more to this remarkable phenomenon. 

It does not seem probable that virtually every member of the mainstream media is inherently naught but a toady who shares precisely the same leftist views as the ruling Democrats. So it slipped into my consciousness that MSM “journalists” are likely being simultaneously bribed -- and threatened -- ..........Bribery and threats were pretty much what they did to Mark Zuckerberg, who admitted as much in a letter to Congress. That's how they roll. 

This article has a lot more to it than is reported, CNN Anchor Dumbfounded as Colleague Lists Kamala Harris' Radical Positions: 'She Actually Said She Supports That?

Then there's NPR.  Is there any news organization that's more biased than NPR?  No, probably not, so why are tax dollars being used to fund this left wing propaganda machine?  Hopefully, that will end after the election. 

From the fake interview by Dana Bash which has destroyed what limited credibility she had,  to Operation Harris for President we're seeing their corrupt efforts to protect Kamala, and big tech's efforts to promote her.  Google is as corrupt and evil as the rest of the media.

Who's to blame for all that really serious corrupt mess in ? Well, you have to know, it's all Trump's fault.  And remember the old FDR theme, The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself, to explain his economic failures.  The according to the media it's all those bad thought that's causing a recession.  But one thing the media is absolutely sure of, nothing is the fault of Democrats.  Then we have the Israel/Hamas war.  Everything is Bibi's fault. 

The media is like Satan constantly changing themselves into Angels of Light, unendingly harping on the needs of the "common people", people they have nothing in common with, don't know, don't understand, and don't care.  They promote globalism, a form of economic slavery.  They think poor people should not have air conditioning, it's bad for the environment...global warming you know.  Stop being delusional, the media and their masters in the Democrat party care about one thing and one thing only, power, and as with all leftists, ya just gotta break a few eggs to cook an omelet, and the common folk are the eggs they're going to break.

 They support unbridled illegal border crossers  and then lie about the disaster it represents to the "common people".   Disagree with abortion, it's racist

Then there's the unbelievable nonsense in the media's defense of Tim Walz.  If Tim Walz's lips are moving, he's lying.  He lied about this military record, and there's undeniable proof of that, except for those  who work at PBS, or a failed Department head, Buttigieg, who claims this is just an act of desperation by the GOP.  CNN doubles down on defending Walz, while acknowledging he lies, and then attacked JD Vance record, in spite of the fact he embellished nothing and did exactly what he said he did. 

And the foreign media is not any better, demanding censorship over anti-migration riots, and this is from a media that plays fast and loose with rules, as the BBC broke its own rules over 1,500 times in its Israel reporting, and that's the tip of the iceberg.  


Monday, February 13, 2023

Why don't leftist media conned by Russiagate reveal their sources?

I have long wondered why rock star columnists at the nation's most prestigious media outlets haven't outed the sources that led them, by the hand, down the primrose path to "Russiagate." Here's a professional journalist asking this same question far more eloquently than me.

Winston Churchill offered two brief, brilliant definitions of socialism: (1) “Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” (2) “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” In other words, unhappiness is socialism’s lifeblood. It needs unhappy people to be the revolution’s foot soldiers and, after the revolution, its praetorian guard. Viewed that way, it makes sense to learn that a University of Michigan survey revealed that the larger the campus’s “diversity, equity, and inclusion” program, the more unhappy students were.............To Read More....


Wednesday, November 9, 2022

Media are the Real Threat to America and the World!

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDdJXy3OAHLJn_MpiNbbpiEfmKMk5o52EaM_ErYTz_AQiD3zo-sQWOUuwWSVBiV4IJ3FlQV6T-I03A9NYvk-Cw_z_XUAGBaqiTjOITYXOGIJAACqAjGX9XDktXKqx-gc3w6FR9l1Ki6Us/w41-h54/My+Picture+2.jpg By Rich Kozlovich, Tags:

The media in America and the western world is filled with partisan hacks who care little for the truth, facts or the consequences of their actions.  And in America they've supported every leftist monster of the 20th century, and to be blunt, they share in the blood guilt of the 100 million innocent souls murdered by these socialists.  That's especially true of the New York Times, albeit they're not alone.

Communism and fascism are forms of socialism, two sides of the same coil, and equally as murderous, and the media has supported them.  Here's a list of articles I've been saving dealing with this media corruption problem.  Also, I didn't realize how much I've written about the media, I've gone back and tagged , especially the New York Times, I really enjoyed beating up on them.

Going back into my files I came across this 2018 statement I made in my commentary, We Need to Get This: The Media Lies....Constantly! 

"These few cases are by no means isolated. Please allow me to introduce you to Mr. Randall Hoven’s media fraud list as of August 16, 2007. If you had any delusions as to the integrity of the main stream media I would think this would put those delusions to rest.  His final question: "If this the tip of the iceberg, how big is the iceberg?"

As I said, I didn't realize how much I've written about my distaste for the media going back to at least 2010.   I've listed them below, and I guess these are my media book.  So, pick and choose, and hopefully, enjoy! 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

My Media Commentaries, 2022-2010
Bias and Outright Leftist Lies

Sunday, May 30, 2021

EXCLUSIVE: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with 'retro-engineering' to make it seem like it naturally arose from bats, explosive new study claims

By Josh Boswell For Dailymail.com, 8 May 2021

  • An explosive new study claims researchers found 'unique fingerprints' in COVID-19 samples that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a laboratory
  • DailyMail.com exclusively obtained the new 22-page paper authored by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen set to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery
  • The study showed there's evidence to suggest Chinese scientists created the virus while working on a Gain of Function project in a Wuhan lab 
  • Gain of Function research, which was temporarily outlawed in the US, involves altering naturally-occurring viruses to make them more infectious in order to study their potential effects on humans 
  • According to the paper, Chinese scientists took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible COVID-19
  • The researchers, who concluded that COVID-19 'has no credible natural ancestor', also believe scientists reverse-engineered versions of the virus to cover up their tracks
  • 'We think that there have been retro-engineered viruses created,' Dalgleish told DailyMail.com. 'They've changed the virus, then tried to make out it was in a sequence years ago.'
  • The study also points to 'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' in Chinese labs and notes that 'scientists who wished to share their findings haven't been able to do so or have disappeared' 
  • Until recently, most experts had staunchly denied the origins of the virus were anything other than a natural infection leaping from animals to humans
  • Earlier this week, Dr. Anthony Fauci defended US funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, saying the $600,000 grant was not approved for Gain of Function research ...........Continue Reading

Sunday, February 16, 2020

It’s All Trump’s Fault

Derek Hunter

Whatever it is, whatever might be wrong in your life, it’s all Donald Trump’s fault. You probably didn’t know that, you likely thought it was something you did, some bad choice you made in the course of your life that resulted in your being in whatever situation you might find yourself, but you’re wrong – it’s Trump.
At least that is the message you’re currently being bombarded with if you consume any media whatsoever.

Have your health insurance premiums increased? It’s not the fault of Democrats and their Obamacare mess, it’s Trump’s refusal to “fix” the problem. Of course, when Obama was still president and Republicans attempted to point out obvious flaws in the law, even before it was implemented, they were denounced as racists. When they tried to change any part of it, they were told they couldn’t because it was “settled law.”........

For having the same thought, the Washington Post declared the Attorney General to be the president’s “wingman” rather than someone interested in actual justice. Not mentioned: when Barack Obama’s AG literally called himself the president’s wingman. (Honestly, it’s like these journalists didn’t follow the news or history didn’t exist between 2009 and 2017.)..............To Read More....

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Our Unpatriotic Press Coddles Dictators

Brent Bozell and Tim Graham Jan 08, 2020

On Jan. 5, after American drones took out Iranian terrorist mastermind Gen. Qassem Soleimani, CNN's Brian Stelter launched into one of his Sunday-morning sermons, insisting that patriotism flows like a river in America's newsrooms. His definition might vary from yours, however.

Patriotism equals tough questioning, the "Reliable Sources" anchor stated in a tweet: "It is patriotic to ask for evidence. To question official accounts. ... It is patriotic to hold our leaders accountable."

There's nothing wrong with skeptical questions of our government. But why is it impossible to celebrate blowing up the man responsible for the deaths of untold thousands, including over 600 Americans? And why do the media so often fail to muster that same sort of skeptical questioning for the tyrants and thugs opposing American interests? Theirs is a long, sordid history of offering unchallenged platforms, and even buttery sympathy, to our enemies........To Read More.....

My Take - The fact of the matter is the news media became infested with communist agents going back to the beginning of the 20th century.  The faces have changed, but the underlying philosophy hasn't.  The mainstream media is corrupt to the core.  The New York Times support of Stalin during the 1930's when he starved million of his people do death, is history, history that's incontestable.  They're Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, Walter Duranty, did everything in his power to deny  Stalin's crimes against his people, even calling reporter liars who tried to tell the truth......and the New York Times leaders knew it, and so did all the other reporters who covered Russia.  Most of whom didn't have the guts to fight the good fight. 
Duranty was a Satanist, a deviate and a liar of massive proportions who worked to hide the fact Stalin starved five million people do death.   demonstrates all this in his article, Duranty’s Lethal Lies, saying:
"In the early 1930s, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocent victims were deported to Siberia’s uninhabitable hinterlands and abandoned to their fates. Millions more, possibly 10 million, starved to death in their ancestral homeland, surrounded by fertile land that once served as the breadbasket of Europe. In a scandalous infamy far worse than the Blair episode, Walter Duranty, in the pages of the New York Times, said the genocide didn’t happen — even though he and the Times knew that it did. For both Duranty and the Times, casting Stalin’s “workers’ paradise” in a favorable light was more important than telling the truth that the Soviet government was murdering millions of innocents."
If it weren't for the "alternative media" we would still be being misled by these liars, hypocrites and traitors to humanity.

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

NY Times Embarrasses Itself Again – On Iran-9/11 Ties

No wonder the president calls them “fake news.”


Kenneth R. Timmerman Jan 7, 2020 17

The sloppy New York Times is once-again embarrassing itself. In a prominent “fact-check” piece appearing on Friday, cub reporter Zach Montague ripped into Vice President Mike Pence for a series of tweets that described the terror-drenched record of the ex-Quds Force commander, Qassem Suleymani.

At issue was Pence’s account of Suleymani’s links to the September 11, 2001 attacks on America. In one tweet, the vice president noted that Suleymani and his terrorists “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the Untied States.
Assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States. — Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence)
January 3, 2020 This prompted the NY Times to snipe, “How Mr. Pence arrived at this number and this account is unclear” since there was nothing in “public United States intelligence” [sic] linking the two, or indeed, anyone in Iran to the 9/11 attacks.

Montague could have consulted former NY Times Philip Shenon, whose 2008 book about the 9/11 Commission reprised a story I revealed several years earlier about the discovery by Commission staff of some 75 highly classified NSA intercepts that spelled out in great detail the help Iran offered al Qaeda in furtherance of the 9/11 plot.

If he had just Googled, “Iran 9/11 ties,” he would have discovered a July 18, 2004 article by Shenon stating that the final report of the 9/11 Commission would include “information drawn from intelligence reports about Iran’s ties to the al Qaeda hijackers.”..........

So there is lots of evidence that Vice President Pence was 100% right – just none of it accessible to the phony newsmen wearing ideological blinders at the New York Times. When someone pointed out the Times article to me over the weekend, there was a button labeled “suggest a correction,” so I suggested that the reporter look at p. 240 of the 9/11 Commission report, and to be helpful, included a brief quote.

Since then, the Times has removed the correction button, but has not made any corrections. No wonder the President calls them “fake news.” ........To Read More.....

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

Pompeo Wrecks MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell for Portraying America as the Real Threat to Iranian Culture

Katie Pavlich @KatiePavlich Jan 07, 2020

During a press conference at the State Department Tuesday morning, Secretary Mike Pompeo pushed back on assertions from MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell that the United States is a threat to Iranian culture.

"Every action we take will be consistent with international rule of law. The American people can be rest assured that is the case," Pompeo said.

"Let me tell you who's done damage to the Persian culture. It's not the United States of America. It's the Ayatollah. If you want to look at who has denied religious freedom, if you want to know who has denied the Persian culture's rich and steeped in history and intellect and they've denied the capacity for that culture to continue. If you go back and look at the holidays around Cyrus and Nowruz they have not permitted people to celebrate. They have not allowed people that they have killed, that Qassem Soleimani killed, they have not allowed them to go mourn their family members. The real risk to Persian culture does not come from the United States of America. There is no mistake about that."............To Read More....

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Left Exposed Profile: Center for Public Integrity

Ron Arnold, @ Left Exposed

The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) is a foundation-funded, non-profit investigative journalism corporation registered in Washington, D.C. CPI, founded by disgruntled television investigative reporter Charles Lewis, states its mission is “to serve democracy.” In practice, the organization works more like the journalism arm of leftist activist groups. Invariably, the targets of its investigations are institutions and individuals that oppose its progressive-left view of “integrity” – be they nonprofit groups, conservative/libertarian donors, or Republican politicians.

CPI describes itself as “strictly non-partisan,” but zealously promotes Democrats, particularly President Barack Obama and his climate change policy. The CPI website’s Climate Change Lobby page contains only hostile attacks on climate realists – such as the libertarian Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute – which question Obama’s climate-alarmism orthodoxy. CPI does not attack pro-Obama climate change lobbyists for exaggeration or scare mongering but instead give praise and approval to alarmist pressure groups such as Bill McKibben’s 350.org and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
 
Controversies

Illegal Report Sources

In November 2010, CPI published a report on bluefin tuna overfishing titled “Looting the Seas.” Politico reported that “to obtain key information for the project, reporters accessed a database maintained by an intergovernmental fisheries regulatory body with a password given by a source, likely breaking the law.”

CPI’s own lawyer and an outside law firm both determined that CPI’s staff likely broke the law in obtaining information for the report. In addition, one of the experts quoted in the associated documentary was paid $15,000 as a project consultant to CPI. The investigative methods used to produce the report became a point of contention within the organization when CPI employee John Solomon made a number of accusations against the team that had worked on the series.

Activist Journalism

The Washington Post, the Boston Globe, and Politico all ran stories in August 2011 exposing coordination between CPI and Greenpeace on a CPI story about supposed Koch Industries wrongdoing. According to Politico:
Last Wednesday, the Center for Public Integrity published a tough look at Koch Industries’ lobbying against post-Sept. 11 attempts to tighten safety regulations on its chemical businesses. 
Shortly afterward, Greenpeace published its own report on essentially the same topic.
The timing was enough to prompt Koch Facts, the Koch Industries website that rebuts reporting about the company, to declare the two reports “a coordinated campaign against Koch that has been underway for some time.”
Politico also reported in December 2011 that Pew Charitable Trusts, a funder of the “Looting the Seas” report, hosted a screening of a CPI documentary and then organized a call to action with other NGOs for the protection of bluefin tuna.

Liberal columnist Alex Beam of the Boston Globe wrote of CPI’s obsession with the Koch brothers:
I’ve been hanging out on the website of the Center for Public Integrity which calls itself a “nonpartisan, nonprofit investigative news organization.’’ At the CPI, it seems as if every day is Fear the Dread Koch Brothers Day. 
Last week, the Center noted that the Kochs – pronounced like the drink “Coke’’ – who own a vast pile of refineries and chemical plants, have been resisting post-9/11 security regulations. In April, in a lengthy report on “Koch’s web of influence,’’ the Center wrote that “Koch Industries is spending tens of millions to influence every facet of government that could affect its global empire.’’ 
No Koch misstep evades the gimlet eyes of the Integrity People! Earlier this summer, they noted that “a foreign subsidiary of Koch Industries has been fined $4,700 by the Federal Election Commission for making 12 illegal donations totaling $26,800 to seven non-federal committees over a four-year period.’’ Where did this “investigative news organization’’ glean this tidbit? Hilariously, the Koch baddies reported the infraction voluntarily to the FEC.
In 2008, CPI published a report on tobacco that was both funded by and promoted by an advocacy group called Tobacco Free Kids.”

Betrayal of a Rich Donor

According to a March 9, 2008 article in the New York Times Magazine, Lewis’ departure from CPI surprised and upset billionaire donors Herb and Marion Sandler – who were also the founding funders of John Podesta’s leftist think tank, the Center for American Progress. The Sandlers’ foundation had just sunk three grants totaling $350,000 into CPI’s coffers to help pay Lewis’ $187,000 salary and felt betrayed. According to the story:
“They [the Sandlers] are keenly interested in the management of nonprofits, and they are struck by how badly managed most of them are,” says Chuck Lewis, the founder of the Center for Public Integrity, an investigation-oriented nonprofit that got a few small grants [$350,000] from the Sandlers a few years ago. “They have almost a fetish about it. They have an absolute infatuation with focusing on management. Who are the leaders? What is their background? Is it getting bigger or smaller? They rigorously chew over what they are about to do, much more than others do.” … 
“So that’s one part of their philanthrocapitalist approach: They want their money to go to organizations they feel are well run and led by people they can count on to keep them that way. They want some control. This is true, it turns out, even when they’re not the biggest donors. Lewis, for instance, had been running the center for about 12 years when the Sandlers showed up and made a relatively small grant. “Chuck was a terrific leader,” Herb recalls.
But the Sandlers felt the center needed a better management structure, and so they began working with him on that. When Lewis decided a few months later that the time had come for him to leave, the Sandlers were furious and took his departure as a betrayal. “We had put in an enormous amount of effort,” Marion says.
For his part, Lewis felt he should be able to quit without giving the Sandlers advance notice and was angered by their reaction. There were hurt feelings all around. “They are high-maintenance donors,” Lewis says now.”

Attacking Republicans, Protecting Democrats

In January 2008, the Media Research Center exposed a Center for Public Integrity attack against President George W. Bush. The report, titled “Iraq – The War Card: Orchestrated Deception on the Path to War,” made headlines across the nation. Excerpts from the Human Events report, “The Center for Public Integrity and a Media Scam,” exposed CPI’s highly partisan, selective condemnation tactics – such as CPI’s one-sided “study” claiming Bush deliberately lied about weapons of mass destruction:
The Establishment Media howled the study’s lead “finding”: 935 false statements by Bush Administration officials in the two-year period leading up to the launch of the War. The Associated Press, CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post and – of course – the New York Times were all exhilarated to once again climb aboard the “Bush Lied – People Died” Express. … 
President Bush said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq immediately prior to our invading Mesopotamia. Saddam Hussein indeed at one point had them – we know this because he had used them, twice, on the Iranians and the Kurds. His every move right up to the moment we went in was calculated to foster the appearance that he had them still, lest his neighbors think him weak and vulnerable. 
But in we went, and we found nothing.  We had the wrong information.  This is not a lie — this is an error of fact. … According to the CPI study itself, at least 532 of the “false statements” cited – more than half the grand total – had to do with assertions that Iraq indeed had these weapons. So let us trip down memory lane and revisit some other “false statements” on the subject made at the very same time as those made by the Bush Administration, by non-Bush administration individuals. 
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.  He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”  — Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002. 
“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. “[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real …” — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. 
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”  — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. 
“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.” — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

Background & History

The Center for Public Integrity was incorporated in the District of Columbia on March 30, 1989 by Charles Lewis, a former producer for ABC News and CBS News 60 Minutes. Lewis recruited two trusted journalists, Alejandro Benes and Charles Piller – whom he had met through his television work – to serve on the board of directors while he ran the nascent CPI from his home.

All three, according to Lewis’ 2014 book 935 Lies: The Future of Truth and the Decline of America’s Moral Integrity, had grown frustrated and dissatisfied with what was being done in the name of investigative journalism by established news organizations. They chose the name “public integrity” as a way of underlying the “ultimate purpose of investigative journalism” which is “to hold those in power accountable and to inform the public about significant distortions of the truth.”

Lewis led the group for 15 years and left the lasting stamp of his activist liberalism on the organization until he abruptly departed in January 2005. As of 2016, Lewis holds a position at the American University School of Communication in Washington, D.C. His faculty profile identifies him as a professor and executive editor of the Investigative Reporting Workshop.

CPI’s board of directors chose television journalist Roberta Baskin as Lewis’s successor. She led the organization until May 24, 2006, when she was replaced by interim executive director Wendell Rawls, who was in turn succeeded in 2007 by William Buzenberg, a vice president at American Public Media/Minnesota Public Radio. In 2010 The Huffington Post Investigative Fund merged into the CPI, and eight Huffington Post journalists moved to CPI.

In April 2011, with support from the Knight Foundation, the organization’s all-time top donor, CPI launched iWatchnews.org as its main investigative reporting website. In August 2012, CPI stopped using iWatchnews.org and returned to its original domain. In December 2011, CPI eliminated 10 staff positions in order to compensate for a $2 million budget shortfall. Buzenberg and other senior staffers also took salary cuts. CPI board chairman Bruce Finzen said the budget would be “reduced between $2 and $3 million, more like $2.5 million. The budget for next year will be in the $6 to $7 million range.” Buzenberg stepped down from CPI at the end of 2014, at which time Peter Bale, former vice president and general manager of digital operations at CNN International, was named CEO.

CPI releases its reports for publication in media outlets throughout the U.S. and around the globe. CPI lists on its official website its donors’ names without amounts or earmarks. CPI’s annual reports are also posted on the organization’s website. In 1997, CPI launched the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). This international network, based in Washington, D.C., is not incorporated or recognized by the IRS, and is solely a project under the tax exemption of CPI. It includes 165 investigative reporters in more than 65 countries. Its website publishes The Global Muckraker, focused on issues such as “cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power.” In 2013, the consortium reported having 160 member journalists from 60 countries but does not reveal any international financial transactions.

The organization claims it has 66 employees on a $5.6 million payroll (2014) and 19 volunteers, making it one of the largest private non-stock investigative journalism corporations in America.

Government Influence

The Center for Public Integrity is cited in 692 Congressional Research Service Policy Reports from 1995 to 2016. (Paywall)
Source: Legistorm.

Finances

Financial data from Center for Public Integrity 2014 Form 990, most recent available in 2016
  • Grants received $9,313,650
  • Program Service Revenue (contractual services) $39,235
  • Investment income $207,489
  • Other revenue (gifts, honoraria) $56,624
  • Total revenue $9,616,998
  • Salaries and employee benefits $5,632,462
  • William Buzenberg Executive Director compensation, $237,944
  • Robin Heller Chief Fundraiser compensation $203,521
  • Gerard Ryle Director, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists compensation $198,380
  • Total fundraising expenses $861,330
  • Total assets $8,650,411
  • Total liabilities $863,793
  • Net assets $7,786,793

Network Interactions

Visit the Muckety Map for the Center for Public Integrity for an interactive social network diagram.

30 Most Important CPI Donors 1998-2014

From 1998 to 2014, 103 foundations gave CPI 442 grants totaling $58,280,008
Only a selection of top dollar donors is listed. Most significant are in bold:
  1. JOHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION $6,774,000
  2. JOHN D & CATHERINE T MACARTHUR FOUNDATION $6,338,000 (Lewis won a “genius” grant)
  3. FORD FOUNDATION $6,250,000
  4. PARK FOUNDATION INC $3,530,000
  5. CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK $2,742,400
  6. OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE (Soros) $2,169,430
  7. FOUNDATION TO PROMOTE OPEN SOCIETY (Soros) $2,025,000
  8. OMIDYAR NETWORK FUND INC (e-Bay) $2,000,000
  9. J HOWARD PEW FREEDOM TRUST (Pew Charitable Trusts) $1,874,000
  10. THE ANNENBERG FOUNDATION $1,015,000
  11. WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION $925,000
  12. JOYCE FOUNDATION $745,000
  13. ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND INC $625,000 (major climate alarm funder)
  14. NATHAN CUMMINGS FOUNDATION $532,500
  15. W K KELLOGG FOUNDATION $525,000
  16. SCHUMANN CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC $500,000
  17. SANDLER FOUNDATION $350,000 (major Democratic Party ally and donor)
  18. SURDNA FOUNDATION INC $315,000
  19. V KANN RASMUSSEN FOUNDATION $300,000 (funded skeptic prosecution workshop)
  20. DAVID AND LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION $250,000 (major climate alarm funder)
  21. TIDES CENTER $177,301 (major wide-spectrum leftist group incubator and mentor)
  22. ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION $150,000 (major climate alarm funder)
  23. ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC $145,000 (major climate alarm funder)
  24. PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS $100,000 (major wide-spectrum anti-industry funder)
  25. THE HEINZ ENDOWMENTS $100,000 (major progressive project funder)
  26. NOVO FOUNDATION (Warren Buffet) $100,000
  27. ARCA FOUNDATION $75,000 (Reynolds Tobacco heiress funded Tides creation)
  28. SUNLIGHT FOUNDATION $70,000
  29. BARBRA STREISAND FOUNDATION $65,000
  30. TIDES FOUNDATION $28,000 (major wide-spectrum leftist group funder)
Source: Foundation Search