By Rich Kozlovich
When viewing my stats I will occasionally find old articles that are being hit. I have no idea why, but when that happens I go back and read them to see what's interesting to readers. And if the article remains profound, I update it and republish it, as I am with this piece, which I originally published on Thursday, February 9, 2012. With current events, I think this is worth republishing.
Some months back, which means over ten years ago now, I read a commentary about the official lies promoted by
the Soviet government that was a complete reversal of historical fact.
The commentator bemoaned the fact that this has continued into current
times and that so many of the youth had been so indoctrinated by these
lies they were incapable of understanding the truth.
He went on to say:
“At the same time we continually hear official lies in Russian daily life, reminiscent of the lies in the Soviet Union during Stalinism and in the post-Stalin period,”….“The truth can hardly stand up to the total impact of so many lies. A young man once said to me of the Prague Spring: ‘That was when the Czechs attacked us.’ …“Brought up on lies, a society cannot mature or take on responsibility. It is an adolescent society, with all the characteristics of adolescence—needing a leader and his imitators, being aggressive and quick to take offense, simultaneously lying and trusting.”
It's been fifty years ago now (Boy-o-boy, am I getting old or what?) I had an acquaintance who had been in the Czech army when the Soviet Union sent its tanks into what was then Czechoslovakia to crush the Prague Spring. The only reason he wasn’t there at the time was because he was on leave and had traveled to visit relatives in the U.S.A.
So when the Soviets came into Czechoslovakia he never went back. He "knew" everything including the “fact” that Hitler and Stalin never signed a non-aggression pact. He confidently and smugly laughed saying, “you don’t really believe such a thing do you?” As if Stalin could ever commit such a heinous act. Imagine that!
Here
was a guy defending the very oppressors he was fleeing. Why? Because he
had been indoctrinated since the end of WWII into believing Stalin was a
great man. Indoctrination from a very young age can make someone as
foolish as ideology can make smart people stupid. I said I can prove it, to which he once again laughed...smugly....and said if I could prove it he's move back to Czechoslovakia, which meant prison since now he was a deserter. I dug out the historical references, gave them to him and said - Have a nice trip. He said it was all lies. No refutation and no rational arguments. It was a lie, and that was the end of it for him.
This story is foundational to the rest of the article. Remember, even today there are revisionists who
claim that Stalin didn’t really kill all those people; and if he did
kill them; he did it to stop the really insane communists from killing
more. And this is after all the monstrous facts have been made public by of all people Nikita Khrushchev. Why do people continue to believe things that actually defy all factual
history, not to mention the evidence of their own eyes? Ideology! It's really true that
ideology makes smart people dumb!
As I watch the world, read the news and watched as little of it as I did on TV in those days, which I don't watch at all now, I concluded that the lefties may be right about their intelligence. Lefties
are always trying to publish studies that show that leftists are so much smarter than conservatives. Well…..I’m not so sure they aren’t right.
Why? Because in order to bring reality into line with what they claim they believe must require an enormous level of mental ability and logical gymnastics. All of which must be mentally and emotionally exhausting in order to make the insane
things they say and do seem right.
Conservatives only have to concern themselves with facts. What's right and
what's wrong based on history and what they see going on in reality; as in one and one is two. Try
making it three or four or fifty without sounding insane. This kind
of mental gymnastics is something only the left can excel at with the goal of making insanity
seem rational to the casual observer. Why? Because the left has no parameters, and no moral foundation except to do and say whatever it takes to get power..
I watched O’Reilly occasionally in those days - I couldn't take too much of O’Reilly because
I thought he’s a phony, and time seems to support that. At any rate, he had Monica Crowley and Alan Colmes on his show. Colmes did the five things that are common among the leftists. He
wouldn’t stop talking, he interrupted, he talked over everyone, he
subtly changed the subject and spewed out logical fallacies by the
minute.
Changing the subject is a red herring fallacy leftists use constantly in
order to prevent a response to their already insane views. If you doubt
me all you had to do is watch Geraldo or one of the other leftists on these talk shows. They won’t
shut up, they won’t let others have their say without zings that have
nothing to do with the subject at hand, they use personal insults,
and smugly at that, as if their personal attacks are intellectually substantive. I find them to be self righteous, obnoxious, rude, smug, inaccurate in their statements, and nothing but a leftist stooges for the Democrat party. This is a common problem when dealing with leftists. They’re talking when they should be listening. They remind me of unruly
children, and like all unruly children a good slap would do them a world
of good.
It really is true….…
Definition leads to clarity, so let's try to get his right....just once....please. The left isn't just wrong, it's evil. Once we grasp that everything else falls into place.
No comments:
Post a Comment