The Ketanji Brown Jackson Story: In Conclusion

As most of you know I've been kept a running log on this event (See the Ketanji Brown Jackson story log) and many of the links are from that log.  Now, it's time for the conclusion.  

By Rich Kozlovich

 

Well, it looks like the hearings for jurist, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has been nominated by the Biden Administration, are over.  A jurist who, according to Biden, has a brilliant legal mind, and she has been treated worse by Republicans than the Democrats treated Kavanaugh.  At least according to Cory Booker, the media, and of course the usual, or depending on you views of reality, the "unusual" Hollywood characters. 

Cory Booker slobbered all over himself about how badly she was treated, and how he's so proud of her.  Why? Because she's black?  Apparently! Booker is full of tears, full of emotion, full of horsepucky, and not one question about her judicial philosophy, or her rulings.  It was race baiting...period.  As for his claims she was treated worse than Kavanaugh.  Well the record shows something different.   Here, Here, Here. 

First, saying that to me is a serious error in judgement as I tracked all that filth, distortion and lies spewed out by the Democrats, the media and Hollywood about Kavanaugh. From my files, I know just how false that is:  Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here,  Here Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here. 

But this one, Kavanaugh/Ford Media Aftermath, lists another 28 articles on how vile and corrupt the Democrats were, and that's not the end of my list.

When I saw that look of moral outrage on the faces of contemptible people like , Cory Booker, , and I wanted to gag.  Their personal lives have been filled with corruption and tolerance of corruption.  The proven corruption of Democrats is a absolute indicator of how disgusting these people really are.  Democrats, and the left in general, have a serious problem with history, facts, integrity, decency, truth and consistency.   

For their own political gain they're willing to destroy a good man's reputation.  They created a big TV production of moral outrage, and yet it was nothing more than a conspiracy of lies, out right hypocrisy, perjury and leftist corruption, and they knew it.

So we shouldn't be surprised now.  Cory Booker is a blatant race baiting liar, making up stories about people in his life who never existed, and what his life was all about in order to milk the cow of race baiting to its limit.  

Not one Republican asked her about her sexual practices.  Not one Republican accused her of sexual misconduct.  Not one Republican questioned her about her alcohol use.  Not one Republican attacked her on a personal level at all.    So then, what did the Republicans do that was so terrible?  They actually challenged her knowledge of law, which at best seems to be sketchy, along with her judgement and her judicial philosophy, all of which bears serious scrutiny. 

She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott case. How does she expect to converse intelligently with thoroughly prepared lawyers regarding precedent and relevance in cases that will appear before her in the Supreme Court? Judge Brown is no scholar. Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here,

She thinks the Constitution is racist, and the thrust of her rulings should leave everyone with serious concerns.  All of which the Democrats are desperately trying to hide by refusing to show 48,000 documents regarding her work and views.  

She can't define what is a woman, claiming she's not a biologist.  If you can't define something how can you rule on it?   This has become the pattern with all of these nominees by the Biden administration.  Using metaphors and abstruse logic to defend that which can't be defended with simple, plain and understandable use of language.  Their goal?  This is a sloppy misuse of language as a deliberate effort at obfuscation and deceit for political purposes. This piece by Matt Vesta shows how insane this has become, not only involving the judiciary, but science as well.  

She supports court packing, but I'm willing to bet if she was a Republican, nominated by a Republican President and supported by a Republican Congress who supported court packing the Democrats and leftists would be screaming insanely - "it's an outrage, an outrage I tell you"!

She supports abortion.  Here , Here, Here, Here, Here, Here 

She's not an originalist, which is the common lie spouted out by far left nominees, as did Elena Kagan, in spite of her latest claims that she is.  In fact it's clear she supports judicial activism, as is demonstrated by her sentencing child porn criminals. Here, Here, Here,Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here.  

It isn't just her lax sentencing that's at issue.  Its the idea she's going to supplant the guidelines with her understanding, injecting her views on "social justice" into the Constitutional view of "justice".  It's clear her views and likes are what will take precedence over law if she's confirmed.

She supports Critical Race Theory, the historically flawed 1619 Project, Marxism, and thinks the Constitution is racist, called the President of the United States a terrorist. All the while being weak on criminals and terrorists. Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here,  Here,  Here,  Here. Here.  

If that's what she believes she disqualifies herself because:

 “Every lawyer and judge promises to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution, but she cannot uphold this oath if she believes that the Constitution and the principles of America’s foundation are racist and inherently flawed. Neither can a judge remain impartial and administer justice independently if she holds a philosophy that correcting racism requires affording privileged classes less justice than oppressed classes”.....

Her views on immigration demonstrates she thinks her views should override the laws passed by Congress and the President.   Here,  Here, Here 

Her smug and flip answers demonstrates she either fails to understand the laws she's supposed to be enforcing, or simply doesn't care what the law says.  All carrying a strong contaminating stain of judicial activism. Ketanji Brown Jackson wants to redesign the entire justice system based not on law, but on some ethereal, parameter-less and unendingly changeable concept of "compassion"!  And if confirmed, she will use her seat on the court to do it.

How can I be so sure of that? Because if she wasn't a believer and advocate of all the schemes of the far left she wouldn't have been nominated.  There's no doubt she subscribes to altering the Constitution based on a leftist agenda.  Biden's Chief of Staff, Ron Klain, is quoted as saying:

"We need to prepare for a complete reversal of the role the Supreme Court plays in our lives. ............Even in recent years, when the court has been less protective of individual rights and has chipped away at prior protections, advocates have clung to the hope that the Supreme Court might intervene whenever the nation's conscience and laws need a jolt in a progressive direction." 

 

Senator Kennedy asked her if she agreed with that, she punted saying: 

 

"Senator, that's a political statement made by someone in the executive branch."  

More, evasion, more misdirection in just another effort to avoid showing that in no way should she be seated as a justice on the Supreme Court, and in point of fact, she shouldn't be a judge at all. But, when you consider the federal judiciary is filled with political hacks, she fits right in, but in no way does that doesn't change the fact that any judge who doesn't believe in the Constitution, but believes in critical race theory, is unfit to serve as a jurist on the United States Supreme Court.  

As for the Republicans, there's only one thing they need to do and remember .....Never Ever Ring the Bell. 

Update:  This appeared today, 4/1/22 on American Thinker, and should add more shock to this judges rulings:   Who will vote to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson and why?