During the time she was "running" for a seat on the court there was all this clabber about Ketanji Brown Jackson being one of America's
great legal minds from the leftist media. That actually turned humorous
because she couldn't give a definition for what a woman is. After all,
she's not a biologist. That came out so smooth it clearly had to have been rehearsed. Which means one of the
nation's "greatest legal minds" needed coaching? Did I get that right? I didn't miss anything there did I?
So then what is the definition of a "great legal mind". Clearance Darrow was considered one such person. He
pridefully would debate anyone on anything, and would willingly take
either position in the debate, and usually won. But what did he believe
in? Did he believe some things really are right and some things really
are wrong? To quote Shania Twain: "That don't impress me much."
With apologies to Jane Austen, it is a truth universally
acknowledged that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson must have been appointed based
on her XX chromosomes (even though she doesn’t know what a woman is) and her
melanin level. Take those away, and she is a truly dim bulb. But now that she’s
on the Supreme Court, she’s a dim bulb with dreams of an all-powerful (leftist)
judiciary.
However, showing that the more intelligent people on the
Court have finally lost patience with her, in today’s excellent decision saying
that lower courts may no longer issue universal (or nationwide) injunctions,
Justice Amy Coney Barrett gives Jackson a smackdown the likes of which I’ve
never seen in a Supreme Court decision.
In the article she links posts showing some public comments.
OMG Justice Amy Coney Barrett
basically implied Ketanji Jackson is too dumb or unwilling to read
"legalese" - literally her JOB description She is the most
unqualified justice in Supreme Court history. DEI.
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a great
example of how DEI feeds racial prejudice. When you elevate morons just because
of their skin color, people get the mistaken idea that all people of that skin
color are morons. It's a terrible thing to do to people.
Everyone on the Left loves to
note that Biden made Ketanji Brown Jackson the first black female Supreme Court
justice. But they never give him any credit for appointing the first mentally
handicapped justice. That’s ableism, and it’s wrong.
Jackson has no desire to have her views, many of which are hardly based on any rule of law, impugned by a bunch of “mind-numbingly technical query”. C'mon man, all that legalese is really boring, and since she's absolutely sure the real job of the federal courts is to tell everyone, including the President to do as they're told and shut their mouths, the Constitution, and their sworn oath to uphold the Constitution, notwithstanding, there's no need to waste time on legalese.
Anyone with a brain
knew she was a dunderhead right from the beginning, and now I would love to see what former
Speaker Paul Ryan, who’s related to her through marriage, and claimed
she was an excellent choice to be a SCOTUS justice thinks now. Don’t
hear much from him these days, and that's a good thing.
However, there is one person who really appreciates her. Sotomayor. Now she’s no longer the dumbest member on the court. In the race to be the courts number one nitwit she's reached the top, but it is a close
race. The fact is the only bench Jackson is qualified to sit on is a park bench.
Update, 6/29/25:
Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson: “What Good is the Constitution?” “Those things Americans call constitutional rights seem hardly worth the paper they are written on!” Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson is laughably unqualified for the
position she was appointed on based on only three things: none of which
had anything to do with her ability to understand the law, its history
and the relevant precedents. Let alone the Constitution. But she is a radical leftist and what she lacks in reasoning ability, she more than makes up for in her dislike of America. Here’s where the two come together in her dissent.......
The Martian chronicles - Yesterday
we took a look at Justice Barrett’s dismissal of Justice Ketanji Brown
Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc.. Justice Jackson’s overlong and
underthought dissent seems to me most notable for its poor writing. It
reads like a New York Times op-ed column, or rather like 10 of them.
Times readers are probably her intended audience. On X James Taranto
draws attention to “[a]n underappreciated passage of Justice Jackson’s dissent............Jonathan Turley assesses the merits of Justice Jackson’s dissent in “The Chilling Jurisprudence of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.”
Update, 6/30/25:
Justice Jackson Is Even Worse Than We Thought - We’ve previously covered Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent in Trump v. CASA Inc.,
yet it somehow manages to be worse than we initially thought. I think
we can easily say that her dissent proves that she’s not a serious
member of the Supreme Court...........The Supreme Court should be a fortress of reason — not a stage for
activist grandstanding. At PJ Media, we’re exposing the radical rewrites
and restoring common sense to the conversation. Become a PJ Media VIP today with the code FIGHT for 60% off
and get privileged access to in-depth reporting, zero ads, and a
community of true constitutionalists. The stakes have never been higher —
join us and help keep the judiciary in check. Take action — join today!
Update, 7/1/25:
Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Thunderclap Heard Around the Republic - Andrea Widburg called it “the nastiest judge-on-judge smackdown I’ve ever seen.” She wasn’t wrong. Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s rebuke of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in Trump v. CASA, Inc. was sweeping and ferocious—and for good reason. Jackson’s dissent did not merely differ in tone or jurisprudence. It
was a judicial manifesto, a radical blueprint to recast the federal
judiciary as the final, universal enforcer of national policy. Justice Barrett met fire with fire—and then buried the dissent beneath the ash.................
Marlow: We Can’t Remove KBJ from SCOTUS, But We Can Mock Her for Being a ‘Dumb Libtard’ - Marlow said that Justice Barrett’s opinion that was essentially saying
Jackson is “a dumb libtard” last week, “does usher in an era where we’re
going to have to use mockery and ridicule for Ketanji Brown Jackson. …
[T]here is, of course, nothing we can do. We can’t remove her from the
bench or anything, but you can make fun of her and you can hold her up
as an example of the problems with DEI hires.".......
Constitutionally Illiterate Imbecile - This nasty, intellectually dull totalitarian that puppet Biden put on
the Supreme Court has actually upheld the authority of lower level
federal judges over the President of the United States.........Even this Constitutionally illiterate imbecile understands her own
radical ideology: All things leftist are upheld; all things nonleftist
are struck down. It’s really as simple as that. This is the dictatorship
that “progressives” seek to impose. They will not stop until they get
it.............
Update, 7/9/25:
Just like the many hours long ramblings and mumblings of Cory Booker and
Hakeem Jeffries, her multi-page dissents say nothing, but just like
Booker and Jeffries, her dissents demonstrate dumb is infectious, and
the desire to demonstrate that lack of smarts with an overwhelming
attempt to explain how dumb is really a super power.
Ketanji Jackson’s wacko dissent to a Supreme Court order allowing agency heads to plan to trim their departments- It’s no secret that Joe Biden nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson to serve
on the United States Supreme Court because she is a black woman.* In
other words, she was not chosen for her judicial acumen, but for her
political identity. That goes a long way to explaining the absolutely lunatic dissent she
issued to a Supreme Court order. That order stayed a California
district court judge’s ruling blocking President Trump from ordering
agency heads to produce plans for possible
“Reductions in Force.” What makes Jackson’s dissent even crazier than
its lack of any intellectual foundation is her open hostility to her
fellow justices and the president...
It Gets Worse for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as She Gets Schooled by Sotomayor - Progressive Justice Sonia Sotomayor explained that the Court can’t
declare an order of President Trump’s to be unconstitutional if the
order does not actually exist. Sotomayor told Justice Ketanji Jackson that she agrees with her that
President Trump can’t restructure federal agencies in a way that is
inconsistent with constitutional mandates. However, that question is not
before the Court...........
First It Was Barrett - Now Even Sotomayor Embarrasses Ketanji Brown Jackson with Her Opinion in SCOTUS Ruling - It was bad enough for Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
when the court’s conservatives were shredding her legal chops to pieces
in published opinions............Justice Sonia Sotomayor got
attention for having to remind Jackson — whose opinion in a universal
injunctions case decided last month drew widespread mockery — that her opinion didn’t actually deal with the the matter before the court...............
Based on the torrent
of information that has been made public about Ketanji Brown Jackson,
it is shocking that any member of Congress would vote to confirm her to
the SCOTUS. Add to this that thousands of documents from her four years
on the Sentencing Commission have been withheld, presumably by Dick
Durbin. Those four years of her record must be damning, for never
before has a nominee’s record not been made available to the Judiciary
Committee.
Despite this breach of protocol, and thanks to Mike Davis of the Article3 Project,
the members of the committee and the public have been able to
familiarize themselves with her judicial history. Just in the last few
days, an eighth case has come to light,
withheld by the White House, that again shows Jackson’s penchant for
handing out the briefest sentences possible. In this one, the offender
had 6,500 images of children being reprehensibly abused. If confirmed,
she would be the most radical justice ever to sit on the Supreme Court...........To Read More.....
As most of you know I've been kept a running log on this event (See the Ketanji Brown Jackson story log) and many of the links are from that log. Now, it's time for the conclusion.
By Rich Kozlovich
Well, it looks like the
hearings for jurist, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has been nominated by the Biden Administration, are over. A jurist who, according to Biden, has a brilliant legal mind, and she has been treated worse
by Republicans than the Democrats treated Kavanaugh. At least according to Cory
Booker, the media,and of course the usual, or depending on you views of reality, the "unusual" Hollywood characters.
Cory Booker
slobbered all over himself about how badly she was treated,
and how he's so proud of her. Why? Because she's black? Apparently! Booker is full of tears, full
of emotion, full of horsepucky, and not one question about her judicial
philosophy, or her
rulings. It was race baiting...period. As for his claims she was
treated worse than Kavanaugh. Well the record shows something different. Here, Here, Here.
But this one, Kavanaugh/Ford Media Aftermath, lists another 28 articles on how vile and corrupt the Democrats were, and that's not the end of my list.
When I saw that look of moral outrage on the faces of contemptible
people like Dianne Feinstein, Cory Booker, Keith Ellison,Mazie Hirono, and Kamala Harris,
I wanted to
gag. Their personal lives have been filled with corruption and
tolerance of corruption. The proven corruption of Democrats is a absolute
indicator of how disgusting these people really are. Democrats, and the
left in general, have a serious problem with history, facts, integrity, decency, truth and
consistency.
For their own political gain they're willing to destroy a
good man's reputation. They created a big TV production of moral outrage, and yet it was nothing more than a conspiracy of lies, out right hypocrisy, perjury and leftist corruption, and they knew it.
So we shouldn't be surprised now. Cory Booker is a blatant race baiting liar,
making up stories about people in his life who never existed, and what
his life was all about in order to milk the cow of race baiting to its
limit.
Not
one Republican asked her about her sexual practices. Not one
Republican accused her of sexual misconduct. Not one Republican
questioned her about her alcohol use. Not one Republican attacked her
on a personal level at all. So then, what did the Republicans do that
was so terrible? They actually challenged her knowledge of law, which
at best seems to be sketchy, along with her judgement and her judicial philosophy, all of which bears serious scrutiny.
She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott
case. How does she expect to converse intelligently with thoroughly
prepared lawyers regarding precedent and relevance in cases that will
appear before her in the Supreme Court? Judge Brown is no scholar.Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here,
She thinks the Constitution is racist,
and the thrust of her rulings should leave everyone with serious concerns. All of
which the Democrats are desperately trying to hide by refusing to show
48,000 documents regarding her work and views.
She
can't define what is a woman, claiming she's not a biologist. If you
can't define something how can you rule on it? This has become the
pattern with all of these nominees by the Biden administration. Using
metaphors and abstruse logic to defend that which can't be defended with
simple, plain and understandable use of language. Their goal? This is a sloppy misuse of language as a deliberate effort at obfuscation and deceit for political purposes. This piece by Matt Vesta shows how insane this has become, not only involving the judiciary, but science as well.
She supports court packing, but I'm willing to bet if she was a Republican, nominated by a Republican President and supported by a Republican Congress who supported court packing the Democrats and leftists would be screaming insanely - "it's an outrage, an outrage I tell you"!
She's not an originalist, which is the common lie spouted out by far left nominees, as did Elena Kagan,
in spite of her latest claims that she is. In fact it's clear she
supports judicial activism, as is demonstrated by her sentencing child
porn criminals. Here, Here, Here,Here, Here, Here, Here,Here, Here, Here,Here.
It isn't just her lax sentencing that's at issue. Its the idea she's going to supplant the guidelines with her understanding, injecting her views on "social justice" into the Constitutional view of "justice". It's clear her views and likes are what will take precedence over law if she's confirmed.
She supports Critical Race Theory, the historically flawed 1619 Project, Marxism, and thinks the Constitution is racist, called the President of the United States a terrorist. All the while being weak on criminals and terrorists.Here,Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here. Here.
If that's what she believes she disqualifies herself because:
“Every lawyer and judge promises to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution, but she cannot uphold this oath if she believes that the
Constitution and the principles of America’s foundation are racist and
inherently flawed. Neither can a judge remain impartial and administer
justice independently if she holds a philosophy that correcting racism
requires affording privileged classes less justice than oppressed
classes”.....
Her views on immigration demonstrates she thinks her views should override the laws passed by Congress and the President. Here
Her
smug and flip answers demonstrates she either fails to understand the
laws she's supposed to be enforcing, or simply doesn't care what the law says. All carrying a strong contaminating
stain of judicial activism. Ketanji Brown Jackson wants to redesign the entire justice
system based not on law, but on some ethereal, parameter-less and unendingly
changeable concept of "compassion"! And if confirmed, she will use her
seat on the court to do it.
How can I be so sure of that? Because if she wasn't a believer and advocate of all the schemes
of the far left she wouldn't have been nominated. There's no doubt she subscribes to altering the Constitution based on a leftist agenda. Biden's Chief of Staff, Ron Klain, is quoted as saying:
"We need to prepare for a complete reversal of the role the Supreme Court plays in our lives. ............Even in recent years, when the court has been less protective of individual
rights and has chipped away at prior protections, advocates have clung
to the hope that the Supreme Court might intervene whenever the
nation's conscience and laws need a jolt in a progressive direction."
Senator Kennedy asked her if she agreed with that, she punted saying:
"Senator, that's a political statement made by someone in the executive branch."
More, evasion, more misdirection in just another effort to avoid showing that in no way should
she be seated as a justice on the Supreme Court, and in point of fact,
she shouldn't be a judge at all. But, when you consider the federal
judiciary is filled with political hacks, she fits right in, but in no way does that doesn't change the fact that any judge who doesn't believe in the Constitution, but believes in critical race theory, is unfit to serve as a jurist on the United States Supreme Court.
As for the Republicans, there's only one thing they need to do and remember .....Never Ever Ring the Bell.
Originally
published on March 18th, however, I've added more links to this story
and comments of my own. I will keep updating this as a log for
reference. Also, the number of links in this article is getting out of hand, so, I've reorganized the links by topic, starting with Overview and Qualifications and then the rest are listed alphabetically:
Abortion, Child Porn, Democrat Corruption, Democrat treatment versus Republican Treatment, Gender, Media Corruption, Immigration, Judicial Activism, Media Corruption, Racism-Marxism-CRT, Terrorists. Finally at the end: The Conclusion!
For weeks I've been watching these YouTube hearings on Biden's nominees
to the judiciary, and other positions. One thing, and one thing only
seems clear from their answers: They must have all gone to the same
school of clabber as they started all their answers with "Senator, Thank
you for that question", and then failed to answer it.
It amazes me the people that are
being chosen by Biden ...or whomever.... since they're are so stunningly unqualified
it's almost as if they have a conservative spy in their midst finding
and trying to appoint the most distasteful people to important positions, especially to the federal judiciary,
in order to expose who and what the left is, and what they want.
Editor's Note: Now we know who is responsible for these picks. Look for the answer under the topic, Dark Money.RK
Now
this SCOTUS nominee, who Biden thinks is a "top flight legal mind", and
who Paul Ryan is so thrilled about because she's so "obviously qualified"....... is coming
under scrutiny...... and she's not looking good. Will she be confirmed?
As
of right now, a substantial majority of Democrats support her
nomination, a little over 20% of Independents support her, and there's a
poll showing (I have no confidence in polls) 29% of Republicans say she
should be confirmed. There's a reason the Republican party is called
the Stupid Party. But what I find interesting is 75% of Americans don't
like the idea of Biden choosing someone simply because of their gender
or race.
If
all this is true, it makes you wonder at the cause of such cognitive
dissonance in the American mind, let's explore this whole story and the
difference of reprehensible abuse and treatment Democrats heaped on
Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, versus the tough questions on
judicial philosophy, public policy and law the Republicans are taking.
Let's
try and get this....just once.... please. Conservatives don't care
that this nominee is a woman or that she's black. Conservatives don't
care about the gender, race, or ethnic origin. There's not a
conservative I know that doesn't think Justice Thomas is one of the
truly extraordinary jurists of SCOTUS history. This identity
qualification clabber being imposed on the nation is racist. Racism
falls under the purview of America's historical party of racism.
Democrats, and nothing has changed.
Conservatives only care if
they believe in the rule of law, and that the Constitution is what is
says, not what they think it should say. If this nominee filled those
requirements, she would have had no issues with the Republicans on that
committee, but make no mistake: If she was an honorable jurist and
filled those requirements, she wouldn't have been nominated. That has
been the pattern of each and every one of Biden's picks for every job in
his administration and the judiciary. Why should be we think it's any
different now? Answer? We shouldn't.
Overview and Qualifications
How good a judge is Biden’s nominee to the D.C. Circuit? ByPaul Mirengoff - Joe Biden has nominated Judge Ketanji
Brown Jackson to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia. She currently sits on the U.S. District Court in D.C. This
nomination was 100 percent expected. In fact, there has been
speculation that Biden promised to nominate Judge Jackson to pacify
radicals unhappy with the selection of Merrick Garland for Attorney
General (as if the selections of radical race mongers Vanita Gupta and
Kristen Clarke for top DOJ jobs weren’t enough). Garland’s move to the
Justice Department opened up a seat on the D.C.
Circuit...................Judge Jackson is a left-liberal, but doesn’t appear to fall outside
the mainstream of left-liberal thinking on legal issues. All of this —
her credential and her ideology — point in the direction of Senate
confirmation. However, Ed Whelan,
who follows these things much more closely than I do, raises a salient
point. He contends that Judge Jackson is a mediocre jurist at the
district court level........
Jackson is not highly regarded as a judge. Inquiries I have made
recently of folks knowledgeable about her work confirm that she
continues to have a middling reputation. This criticism, I’ll emphasize,
is on grounds of quality, not ideology. Indeed, she is not regarded as
ranking high among the ten or so district judges that President Obama
appointed to the federal district bench in D.C. . . .Jackson has a
striking record of reversals by the D.C. Circuit—including by liberal
judges—in her high-profile rulings:.........The D.C. Circuit reversed
Judge Jackson. All three judges on
the panel agreed that she got things very wrong. They differed only on
which error required vacating her injunction.........
There is a good chance, then, that Judge Jackson is an affirmative
action nominee for the D.C. Circuit. In other words, she was selected
because of her race, which trumped her mediocre record.............it’s unsettling to think that the quality of the appellate
bench — especially that of the all-important D.C. Circuit — might be
diluted in the name of diversity..........
Carlson: How Did Ketanji Brown Jackson Do on the LSAT? -Jeff PoorWednesday,
during an appearance on FNC’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker
Carlson called on President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji
Brown Jackson to reveal her law school entrance exam score.........
Jordan Dixon-Hamilton - President
Joe Biden erroneously claimed his U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji
Brown Jackson, is “one of our nation’s top legal minds,” even though no
legal scholars consider her as such...........
Exclusive—Alan Dershowitz: My Encounter with Ketanji Brown Jackson at Harvard in 1991 - Alan M. DershowitzWhen Ketanji Brown Jackson was at Harvard 30
years ago, a white student whose family had supported the Confederacy
despite their opposition to slavery, decided to fly a Confederate flag
from her dorm window. She said her motivation was to stimulate a
conversation about the complexity of the Confederacy. As you can
imagine, her action stimulated outrage among many students of all races
and ethnicities. One African American student responded to the
Confederate flag by flying a Nazi flag from her dorm window—not to show
support for Nazism but to make students whose families were victimized
by Nazis better understand why the descendants of slaves react so
strongly to the flag that symbolizes their enslavement. I hope Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson will be questioned about her general
views regarding the centrality of the First Amendment to our
constitutional system............
With Friends Like These…—On Conservative Supporters of KBJ - By Ed Whelan - I therefore find it baffling that some conservatives—including folks I
like and admire—have urged Senate Republicans to vote for Ketanji Brown
Jackson’s nomination on the basis (as one group letter*
puts it) of “her breadth of experience, demonstrated ability, and
personal attributes of intellect and character” and to set aside their
“disagree[ments] with many of Judge Jackson’s legal views.”.............
Blackburn: Jackson Is to Ginsburg’s Left on Gender, Won’t Oppose Court-Packing Like Ginsburg Did - Ian Hanchett 23 Mar 2022 - On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “America Reports,”
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) argued that “everything is so woke” that
Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is to the left of
former Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on gender because Justice Ginsburg
argued that “Physical differences between men and women…are enduring”
and cited a prior ruling that “the two sexes are not fungible” and that Jackson won’t state her opposition to court-packing like Ginsburg did. Blackburn said Jackson’s answer on the definition of a woman “shows
you how politicized this process has become and how the left-wing dark
money groups are feeding into this to the point that everything is so
woke, she will not even give me the definition of the word ‘woman.'”......
Pollak: Ketanji Brown Jackson Proves Conservatives Have Won the Legal Argument - Joel B. Pollak 24 Mar 2022 - Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had trouble defending
her sentencing record in child pornography cases during her Senate
confirmation hearings this week. She also evaded questions about her
judicial philosophy, insisting that she had a judicial “methodology”
instead. Curiously, however, Judge Jackson seemed to identify herself as a
judicial “originalist,” criticizing “judicial activism” and claiming
that she did not even know what the left-wing view of a “living
Constitution” meant........
“I believe that the Constitution is fixed in its meaning,” Jackson said.
“I believe that it is appropriate to look at the original intent,
original public meaning of the words when one is trying to assess [a
constitutional provision] because, again, that is a limitation on my
authority to import my own policy views.”.......
What Cornyn
discovered next, though, revealed that Judge Jackson is not an
“originalist” at all............. Judge Jackson is pretending to be a
originalist because conservatives
have won the argument over legal philosophy, and because the public will
reject a judge who admits pursuing what Judge Jackson once called “personal hidden agendas.”........
Fr.
Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life, told Breitbart
News that President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson
“cannot even see that partial birth abortion is wrong” and asserted that
the Democrat Party has become an “arm of the abortion industry,”
despite the fact that most Americans oppose such extremism.........
As for whether or not she supports abortion: If she didn't she wouldn't have been nominated.
40 Pro-Life Leaders Expose Biden Supreme Court Justice Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ‘Pro-Abortion Extremism’ - Susan Berry, PhD - A coalition of nearly 40 national pro-life leaders sent a letter to
the chairs of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Monday specifying the
radical pro-abortion record of Biden Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown
Jackson. Led by the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List), the coalition’s letter
was addressed to the committee’s chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), and
ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) as confirmation hearings
began for Jackson, who was chosen by Biden following the announcement
of his commitment to nominate a black woman to the nation’s highest
court. The letter explains how the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade has been harmful to the fabric of the country.............
Child Porn
Hawley Lists Seven Times Ketanji Brown Jackson Issued Soft Sentences in Child-Porn Cases - Craig Bannister | March 21, 2022 - At Monday’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Senator Josh Hawley
(R-MO) listed seven child pornography cases in which President Joe
Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, sentenced
the convicted defendant to a lesser sentence than federal guidelines
recommended and prosecution requested..........
Judge Jackson Denies GOP Claim of Being Soft on Child Porn Possession - By Joseph Lord March 22, 2022 - During her second day of confirmation hearings in the Senate, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
denied claims that she has been too lenient on child porn offenders.
The issue was first brought up against Jackson by Sen. Josh Hawley
(R-Mo.) in a March 16 Twitter thread.
“I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson,
reading her opinions, articles, interviews, and speeches,” Hawley wrote.
“I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s
treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.” Prior
to becoming a federal appellate judge, Jackson served on the U.S.
Sentencing Commission, a group created in 1984 for the stated
purpose of “[reducing] sentencing disparities and [promoting]
transparency and proportionality in sentencing.”.........
Sen. Cruz Spars With Supreme Court Nominee Over Child Porn Sentencing Decisions- By Joseph Lord March 22, 2022 - During the second day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson,
President Joe Biden’s pick to replace outgoing Justice Stephen Breyer,
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Jackson herself heatedly debated her record
in sentencing those accused of child porn possession. Republicans have said that Jackson has been too lenient in sentencing
people convicted of possessing child porn, while the White House,
Democrats, and Jackson have said that her decisions were largely in
accord with federal sentencing standards.....
My Take - According to Chairman Durbin Senator Hawley lacks "credibility" quoting
Jackson's
opinions.....verbatim? Now, just how can anyone find fault with that
kind of logic. Right? Or perhaps, just perhaps, logic isn't Dick
Durbin's long suit? Let's face it, facts, history, logic and
consistency of thought isn't the strong suit for anyone on the left. Hawley, Cruz and the others are going to be attacked in every way possible,
including being accused, even if not directly, of promoting violence
against this nominee. Yet it's the most radical groups who are
demanding she be affirmed to the court. Sen. Graham Wonders Why 'Extreme' Leftists 'Spent the Money They Spent' to Have Biden Pick Jackson.Does anyone see anything wrong
with all that horsepucky besides me?
Dick Durbin blocks documents showing Ketanji Brown Jackson's judicial record - March 22, 2022 By Monica Showalter - The
Senate hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court
nomination are not going well. Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick
Durbin is blocking the release of documents showing Brown Jackson's
actual record as a judge, taking a page from the tactics of
impeachment-obsessed Rep. Adam Schiff. That's how Democrats do hearings
these days.According to John Solomon's Just The News:.........
March 23, 2022|Kevin Haggerty - The Senate Judiciary Committee grew fervent when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
and several colleagues accused the chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL),
and his party of withholding records of Supreme Court nominee Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson and demanded to know, “is there anything else that
Democrats have access to in this case that they’re not sharing with
Republicans?”..........“I asked the chairman about Senator Hirono had referenced five
probation reports that were not in the record,” Cruz stated. “I asked
the chairman whether the Democrats had access to information about Judge
Jackson’s judicial record that Republicans did not. You did not answer
me at the time.”.......Cruz would have no more of the outlandish sentiment that members of the
committee should somehow know to ask for specific records from the White
House and issued a blanket proclamation against the chairman, “I am
hereby requesting all other information you magically have that you
haven’t told us you have, and you’re not sharing with the other side.”
Let's start with: “You stop for a moment and
you see the exchanges that we have seen so far and the way the day has
gone so far for this nominee, and you are reminded what, you know, Brett
Kavanaugh went through, Amy Coney Barrett, and the stark difference in
the way that the nominee is being questioned by in this case Republicans
of the nominee.” “There’s no question there is a huge difference in tone and tenor.
She has not been asked even whether she drinks beer, let alone what beer
she drinks”.
The lady should answer a few questions - By Silvio Canto, Jr.March 22, 2022-
Don't expect anyone to appear out of the blue with a story about
what Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson did when she was 17 or some crazy
college parties that she went to. Do expect some serious questions
about her judicial philosophy or her attitudes about the U.S.
Constitution. I found this analysis from Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America to be on target:..........
How Is ‘Boofed’ Pronounced? And Other Vital Questions Ketanji Brown Jackson Must Answer -I & I Editorial Board March 22, 2022 - By all evidence, Ketanji Brown Jackson’s
nomination to the Supreme Court will be a shoo-in. Not because she’s
supremely qualified, but because her nomination — as the press reminds
us in every headline — is “historic.”......Nevertheless, if Democrats want to at least give the appearance of
fairness, they should ask Jackson the same questions they asked the last
two Republican nominees to the court ...........Questions
such as these (which are taken directly from previous Supreme Court
nomination hearing transcripts):...........
Judge Brown Jackson Tore Down One of the Progressive Left's Major Dogmas - Larry O'Connor
Mar 23, 2022 - I think it's fair to say none of us saw this one
coming... certainly not Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson..........Senator
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) asked the good judge to perform the
simple task that most pre-schoolers can accomplish. The exchange
reflects a level of intellectual stupidity that only can be attained at
America's leading graduate schools... in this case, Harvard. Blackburn
asked, "Can you provide a definition for the word woman?" Jackson
responded, "No. I can't...I'm not a biologist." ........How is this
relevant in a SCOTUS confirmation hearing? Oh, I
don't know... maybe it's possible that at some point in the
not-too-distant future, the court will have to make a determination
about Title IX protections for women's sports............
The Freeport Question of Our Time - The “Freeport Question” refers to Abraham Lincoln’s devastating
question posed to Stephen Douglas in his second debate against Douglas
on August 27, 1858, held in Freeport, Illinois. The question was
seemingly simple: “Can the people of a Territory in any lawful way,
against the wishes of any citizen of the United States, exclude slavery
from their limits prior to the formation of a State constitution?” Douglas’s answer split the Democratic Party in half.......Today’s Freeport Question—the question that has the potential to split
the Democratic Party off from a majority of voters—is: what is a woman?
Watch – Ted Cruz: Can I Decide ‘I Am a Woman’ and Sue, Then Change My Mind? - Wendell Husebø 23 Mar 2022 - Sen. Ted Cruz (D-TX) questioned Ketanji Brown
Jackson on Wednesday during her Senate confirmation hearing if a
plaintiff could alter his or her gender or race and continue to hold
legal standing during a lawsuit involving race or gender. “Yesterday, under questioning from Senator Blackburn you told her that
you cannot define what a woman is — that you are not a biologist, which I
think, you are the only Supreme Court nominee in history who has been
unable to answer the question — what is a woman.” Cruz prefaced.........“Under the modern, leftist sensibilities, if I decide right now that I
am a woman, then, apparently, I am a woman, does that mean I would have
article three standing to challenge a gender-based restriction?” Cruz
asked. Jackson refused to answer the question. “Those kinds of issues are
working their way through the courts, and I am not able to comment on
them,” she claimed........
Matt Vespa Mar 25, 2022 - When did this happen? When did science cease to become absorbed into
the minds of liberals? By default, they’re idiots, but this is
different. This is now a mental defect that prevents them from
determining things that are grounded; things that are true on its face.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had difficulty
defining what is a woman. She wouldn’t say. Her answer was that she’s
not a biologist. So, she doesn’t know herself? Is her daughter a female?
C’mon, judge. You know the answer. Yet, this is ‘woke’
America. It’s the supplantation of facts for feelings. This is snowflake
syndrome but in its second phase of evolution—and it’s horrifying....
My Take - One of my 200 Rules is: Definition leads to clarity. Clarity leads to understanding. Understanding leads to good decision making. More and more writers keep asking: If you can't define something how can you possibly rule on it? One writer asked it she really is the "first" black woman to be nominated to the court? After all, if "woman" is indefinable, perhaps "black" is also indefinable. Since the left now demands we can self identify to whatever we wish to be, and society "MUST" accept that, perhaps she's not black or a woman? How's this. Not only can someone self identify, everyone else can identify them as they please, and they "MUST" accept that?
The first black woman...or is she?March 24, 2022Even she, if she is a she, cannot explain why she's a she. And the gobbledygook is, in her mind, a reasonable response ..........does she have a definition for "black"?.........The SCOTUS is not a jobs program for political activists. Let her go
work for one of George Soros' businesses if that's her goal.......She is historic in one sense — that of giving the stupidest answer ever to a simple question...... More
When we lose sight of the basics there's no end to the insanity.
The left destroys us with our own values, and for the left, there are no boundaries, barriers or foundational values to which they subscribe. They use every emotional tactic possible and lie, making accusations they know are false. They will embrace the philosophical flavor of the moment with great enthusiasm and self righteous fervor, until that no longer works, and then embrace a view that's diametrically opposed to their previous position with equal fervor if needs be to get and hold power.
The left isn't wrong, it's evil! Anyone picked to be a part of the federal judiciary by the Biden administration supports all their evil, or they wouldn't have been nominated, and they share in that evil.
President Joe Biden’s nominee
to replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji
Brown Jackson, apparently refuses to use the term “illegal alien” in her
court opinions, opting instead for “noncitizen.” In a handful of immigration-related cases that Jackson has ruled
on U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, she has made a note
to employ the term “noncitizen” or “undocumented non-citizens” rather
than the terms “alien” or “illegal aliens” that are regularly used in
court and in federal statutes. For instance, in Make the Road New York v. McAleenan, Jackson wrote a footnote in her ruling stating:.........
"To my mind, he's
also like the liberal's purported view of American history—irredeemably
evil," Jackson wrote of Feder, whose column also attacked black civic
leaders such as Louis Farrakhan. The judge disclosed the letter in a
questionnaire for the Senate Judiciary Committee. Law clerks seldom
share political opinions in a public forum during their terms..........To Read More....
Ketanji Brown Jackson Accused of Judicial ‘Activism’ for Halting Deportations of Illegal Aliens - John Binder - President Joe Biden’s nominee to replace Justice
Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, was
accused of judicial “activism” for a ruling where she halted quick
deportations for newly arrived illegal aliens despite federal law............. Jackson issued a
preliminary injunction to halt the policy on the grounds that the
administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and did
not sufficiently weigh the impact that the policy would have on illegal
aliens. “That, to me, is exhibit A of activism,” Graham said. “… you’re
not convincing me that it is anything other than activism.”.......
Judicial Activism
Cruz Challenges Left-Wing SCOTUS Nominee: 'Will You Protect Freedom or Restrict It?' - Michael W. Chapman | March 21, 2022 - In his opening statement about Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown
Jackson before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, Sen. Ted Cruz
(R-Texas) indirectly alluded to her long history of left-wing judicial
advocacy by raising questions about abortion, gun rights, religious
liberty and free speech.
Bushrod League - March 21, 2022 — Steven Hayward The
confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson are off to a
predictable start, with Sen. Ted Cruz mentioning the forgotten late
18th-century Justice Bushrod Washington, who was confirmed to the
Supreme Court in 24 hours, provoking a spasm from the left, which may
have been Cruz’s intent. Gillian Brockwell, a staff writer for the
Washington Post‘s “history blog,” found this all too much to take: Ted
Cruz told Ketanji..............
Ketanji Brown Jackson College Thesis Argued Judges Have ‘Personal Hidden Agendas’- Sean Moran
- Supreme Court Justice nominee Ketanji Brown
Jackson’s 1992 Harvard University thesis argued that court officials,
including judges, have “personal hidden agendas,” which may raise
questions about her alleged tendency to be soft on criminals as a
federal district court judge. Jackson’s thesis, “‘The Hand of
Oppression”: Plea Bargaining Processes and the Coercion of Criminal
Defendants,” argued that
defendants sometimes are “being coerced into relinquishing their
constitutional rights as a prerequisite for sentencing consideration”
through the use of plea bargains. Jackson wrote:...........Jackson’s
argument that court officials have “personal hidden agendas”
regarding plea bargains raises questions about her time as a federal
district court judge, as many Republicans have accused her of being soft
on criminals........
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson Caught in Contradiction over Judicial Activism - Joel B. Pollak Cornyn began in disarming fashion, telling the judge that he planned
to “nerd out” with her over obscure matters in legal doctrine. Often,
Senators use such discussions to preen about their own supposed legal
expertise on national television. This time was different. Cornyn asked Judge Jackson about the Supreme
Court’s past decisions on gay marriage, when it discovered a right that
was not explicitly written into the Constitution, and superseded dozens
of state laws, for and against.........
Sen. Graham Shows Judge Jackson How Her Ruling Flouted Congress’ ‘Sole and Unreviewable Discretion’ Proviso - Craig Bannister March 23, 2022 - At
Wednesday’s Senate confirmation hearing of Supreme Court nominee
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) reminded
Judge Brown of one of her rulings that was overturned because a higher
court determined that she ignored the crystal-clear intent of a statue.
In a case regarding the administration’s authority to employ expedited
removal of illegal aliens, Judge Brown’s ruling
ignored a statute’s declaration that the U.S. Attorney General has
“sole and unreviewable discretion” in the matter, Sen. Graham
explained:.........“So, this is an example to me, and you may not agree,
where the plain
language of the statute was completely ignored by you. You reached a
conclusion because you disagreed with the Trump
Administration.”.............
Media Corruption
That’s Racist: The Morons On The View Hype Ketanji Brown Jackson - Derek Hunter Mar 22, 2022 - Ketanji Brown Jackson is the smartest woman in the world.
That’s not a controversial statement, it’s science…or something. At
least according to the morons who make up The View. The
View was always dumb, but at least when Barbara Walters started it she
brought some semblance of intelligence and reality to it. If she were
dead now, the current show would have her rolling over in her grave. But
Walters isn’t dead, she’s just retired. Hammering checks – mailbox
money – from the idiot factory she started. And everyone who watches it
is getting dumber every single day.................the idiots who now make up the goon squad over on
The View believe that because of that skin color, Judge Jackson is the
brightest legal mind the world has ever known…or something.......Goldberg, who once insisted Jill Biden should be Surgeon General because
she’s such an amazing doctor, only to discover Jill has an Ed.D. and is
no way qualified to put on a Band-Aid, let alone offer medical advice,
continued, “Her abilities are outstanding. I mean, she's outstanding.
So, you put in Amy Coney Barrett, you put in the other one, you know,
and you're questioning her?”.......... Hosts of The View don’t know much of anything, they simply bark out what
they’re told by producers and the Democrat establishment like good
dogs..................
My Take -This
last link is a favorite of mine, so there's a bit more than the others,
and the reason why is because I'm baffled, and I quote, "ABC's “The
View” ranked No. 1 in Households and Total Viewers 1.7 rtg and 2.385
million, respectively".
Are
there really that many really dumb people in America? Well, I've
thought about this and now, in an odd sort of way, I find that
encouraging. Why? If there are, as claimed, 122.4 million TV households
in America, that means 120 million households don't watch The View.
It
gets better. As of 2019 there were 1.7 billion TV households worldwide.
That means 1,697,615,000 households world wide not only don't watch
The View, most of them never heard of The View. Now that's encouraging.
So, That's the ONLY Worry an MSNBC Host Has Regarding Biden's Supreme Court Nominee - Matt Vespa Mar 21, 2022 - I keep chuckling over this notion that the liberal media doesn’t take
sides. It’s nothing new, but these folks keep repeating it. They claim
that there either is no liberal media bias, which is quite a detachment
from reality or that they don’t take sides. There are outright examples
of this, along with a cumulative effect when you analyze all the
coverage. Luckily, we have one organization that does just that at the
Media Research Center. They record every show in daytime and primetime
on all the networks. The Newsbusters team will find these Democratic
operatives masquerading as ‘reporters’ and expose their hijinks. Right
now, we have a Supreme Court battle upon us, and MSNBC’s Chuck Todd is
worried that the possible confirmation of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
(KBJ) won’t save Joe Biden...........
Lemon said, “We are watching what’s happening in Washington D.C. and
just listening in the last moments, in my ear, here in Ukraine and
Senator Marsha Blackburn was asking the potential jurist about the
definition of a woman and talking about Critical Race Theory, it has
become the new buzz term, right, like Acorn did or Antifa and on and on
and on. It’s really amazing to watch someone who is, quite frankly, an
intellectual giant be questioned by people who have really no idea about
the law and what judges actually do, Laura.”.......
My Take -Well,
there you have it folks, that intellectual lemon - Lemon - knows these
lawyers on the Senate have no idea about law. Now, who can find fault
with that?
Racism, Marxism and CRT
Biden SCOTUS Nomination Fueled by Statistical Ignorance - By Hans Bader
| March 18, 2022 - President Biden has nominated Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, following through on his campaign vow to
name a black woman. Three-quarters of Americans disagreed with Biden's
decision to consider only black women for the Supreme Court vacancy; in
an ABC news poll, they wanted
Joe Biden to consider "all possible nominees," regardless of their race
or gender. Progressives support this race-based appointment based on
the
assumption that blacks are underrepresented on the Supreme Court. But
Jackson's confirmation would make the Supreme Court 22% black, even
though America is only 12%-13% black, and the legal profession is less than 5%
black. One of the nine Supreme Court justices is already black
(Clarence Thomas); Jackson will be the second. Two out of nine justices
is 22%, well above the percentage of Americans who are black................
Confirmation Hearing Flares Up As Questions Raised on Jackson’s View of Critical Race Theory - By Mark Tapscott March 22, 2022 - Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court
nominee, attended Harvard Law School at the same time as Sen. Ted Cruz
(R-Texas) and the two had, he said, a “very friendly and cordial”
relationship despite their conflicting views. “You and I had a very positive and productive meeting in my office,”
Cruz also noted at the outset of what became one of the most intense
question-and-answer sessions on the second day of Jackson’s confirmation
hearing before the Senate Judicial Committee.
At issue was Jackson’s understanding of and apparent enthusiasm for
Critical Race Theory (CRT), the view that America is an inherently and
irredeemably racist society, and the New York Times’ controversial “1619
Project” that is based on CRT. The Times project claims the American
colonists declared independence primarily to protect the institution of
slavery..........
Pollak: We Cannot Have a Supreme Court Justice Who Thinks Constitution Is Racist - Joel B. Pollak Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is an admirer of
Critical Race Theory, the “1619 Project,” and Black Lives Matter, all of
which hold beliefs about the United States and its laws that make it
impossible for her to serve in good faith on the Supreme Court. Her beliefs were revealed in a recently unearthedlecture delivered
to the University of Michigan Law School — not as a young student, but
as a sitting federal judge in 2020, confirmed a year later to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Somehow Judge Jackson’s radical
beliefs escaped close scrutiny in previous confirmations, but the
Supreme Court defines the central principles of our republic, and its
nominees invariably receive more careful attention, and quite deservedly
so. Moreover, Judge Jackson is the first Supreme Court nominee to be
selected explicitly because of her race and gender. President Joe Biden
declared that his first nominee would be a black woman, thereby invoking
the kind of discrimination that the Supreme Court itself has said is
unconstitutional.........
Judge Jackson Wants to 'Meld' American Law with CRT, Social Justice - Spencer Brown Mar 22, 2022- Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, currently testifying before the Senate
Judiciary Committee as her nomination to the Supreme Court is
considered, has a track record not too dissimilar from any other woke
academic. And despite the Democrat spin that says criticisms of Biden's
SCOTUS nominee to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer are trumped up
claims based on sexist racist bigotry, KBJ's own words in her Senate
Judiciary Questionnaire (SJQ) make her beliefs clear. In
one document included in the SJQ, remarks titled "Fairness in Federal
Sentencing: An Examination" lay out what Judge Jackson believes and has
sought to impart (emphasis added):........ KBJ's woke streak doesn't end there, though.........
WATCH: Lindsey Graham vs. Dick Durbin Fight over Guantánamo Terror Detainees - Joel B. Pollak Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Senate
Judiciary Committee Chair Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) clashed Tuesday over
the issue of the release of detainees from the military prison at
Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, during the confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji
Brown Jackson. Graham had just concluded his questioning of Judge Jackson, noting
that in her previous career as a federal public defender, she had
provided legal services for terror detainees in the early days after the
9/11 attacks. Jackson stressed that she had been deeply moved by the attacks, and
noted that her brother had been motivated to join the military by the
attacks. But she also stressed that under the Constitution, every
individual had the right to a legal defense.........
Conclusion
Ketanji Brown Jackson should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court - March 25, 2022 By E.W. Jackson - As an American of
African descent and a great-grandson of slaves, I am certainly not
opposed to the appointment of a black woman to sit on the Supreme Court
of the United States. However, I am categorically against confirming
Ketanji Brown Jackson to that post. One day, a woman of her background
will sit on the highest court, but Jackson should not be the person to
break that glass ceiling. Here is why.
She is an adherent of the far left. Some
Republican senators are willing to overlook this. They are treating
her confirmation as a fait accompli. They would rather not go on record
against the "first black woman" nominated to the Court. This is the
kind of political expediency that has brought our country to the
precipice.......
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a Trojan Horse - March 25, 2022 By Anony Mee - For crying out loud, it’s 2022 and, in the federal government women
are still being promoted based on their looks rather than their
qualifications for the job. And by POTUS no less! Well, Biden is just a
derivative iteration of Harvey Weinstein.
Around twenty years ago, he twice
participated in filibustering (Black, female) Judge Janice Rogers
Brown’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals. She finally was
approved in 2005. Then, Biden advised President Bush that if he dared to
nominate Brown to the Supreme Court, he would filibuster her again and
prevail. At the same time, Democrats also filibustered a Hispanic male
judge, two other female judges, and a male judge of Lebanese descent,
among others. How very diverse, inclusive, and equitatious (sic) of them..
Reject Ketanji Brown Jackson - Josh Hammer Mar 25, 2022 - The issue with Ketanji Brown Jackson, the 51-year-old federal appellate
judge who is our senile president's Supreme Court nominee, is not
necessarily her on-paper qualifications. By most traditional metrics,
she is "qualified": She has served as both a district court and
appellate court judge, served as vice chair of the U.S. Sentencing
Commission, formerly clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer (the man she has
been nominated to replace) and is a double-Harvard alum. In terms of
"objective" criteria, this is an impressive resume.....
Ketanji Brown Jackson's Favorite Critical Race Theory Book Rejects the Constitution - Daniel Greenfield Fri Mar 25, 2022 - A judge who does not believe in the Constitution, but believes in critical race theory, is unfit. The existence of a speech by Biden's Supreme Court nominee,
Ketanji Brown Jackson, praising Derrick Bell, the godfather of critical
race theory, and citing his book, “Faces At the Bottom of a Well”, as an
influence has been widely reported. Conservatives have covered Bell's
racist views, his praise for Farrakhan, his antisemitism, and attacks on
America. Much of this was already hashed out during the exposure of the
relationship between Barack Obama and Derrick Bell. But it's important to specifically focus on Jackson's interest in "Faces At the Bottom of the Well."......Such racial conspiracy theories, ubiquitous in the work and
thought of black nationalists and supremacists, who always begin and end
with the premise of white evil, pervade Bell’s work. .........The Constitution, according to Bell, is merely the whim of a
white agenda that serves its purposes. To the extent that the law has
outlawed segregation and slavery, it did so only because it temporarily
served white purposes and the moment that it would serve white purposes
to enslave black people again, it would be done within the Constitution..........In the process of her lecture, Jackson invokes critical race
theory, the pernicious concept of "white privilege", and
intersectionality. ............And that’s the problem.
Absorbing the paranoid racism of the godfather of critical race
theory during her formative years at Harvard makes for a bad judge and a
worse justice. Bell’s approach to the Constitution, like that of black
nationalists, was that it was a trick to lure black people into lowering
their guard.
White people, he believed, could never be trusted and all that mattered was seizing power. Any laws or documents made by white people would only serve
them. Only black people could secure the rights of black people. Like
the Nazis, the ultimate truths were race and power. Everything else was a distraction...........
My Take - This jurist with an allegedly brilliant legal mind, has been treated worse by Republicans than the Democrats treated Kavanaugh, according to Cory Booker and the media. Cory Booker slobbered all over himself about how badly she was treated,
and how he's so proud of her. Why? She's black. Full of tears, full of emotion, full of horsepucky, and not one question about her judicial philosophy, or her
rulings. It was race baiting...period. As for his claims she was treated worse than Kavanaugh. Well the record shows something different. Here, Here, Here
And we shouldn't be surprised. Cory Booker is a blatant race baiting liar, making up stories about people in his life who never existed, and what his life was all about in order to milk the cow of race baiting to its limit.
Not one Republican asked her about her sexual practices. Not one Republican accused her of sexual misconduct. Not one Republican questioned her about her alcohol use. Not one Republican attacked her on a personal level at all. So then, what did the Republicans do that was so terrible? They actually challenged her knowledge of law, which seems to be at best sketchy.
Judge Brown is no scholar. She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott
case. How does she expect to converse intelligently with thoroughly
prepared lawyers regarding precedent and relevance in cases that will
appear before her in the Supreme Court?
She thinks the Constitution is racist, and her rulings should leave everyone with serious concerns. All of which the Democrats are desperately trying to hide by refusing to show 48,000 documents regarding her work and views.
She can't define what is a woman, claiming she's not a biologist. If you can't define something how can you rule on it? This has become the pattern with all of these nominees by the Biden administration. Using metaphors and abstruse logic to defend that which can't be defended with simple, plain and understandable use of language. Their goal? This is a sloppy misuse of language is a deliberate effort at obfuscation and deceit for political purposes. This piece by Matt Vesta shows how insane this has become, not only involving the judiciary, but science as well.
She's not an originalist, which is the common lie spouted out by far left nominees, as did Elena Kagan, in spite of her latest claims that she is. In fact it's clear she supports judicial activism, as is demonstrated by her sentencing child porn criminals.
She supports Critical Race Theory, the historically flawed 1619 Project, Marxism, thinks the Constitution is racist and calls the President of the United States a terrorist. Here,Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here
She's weak on dealing with criminals and terrorists. Here,
Her views on immigration demonstrate she thinks her views should override the laws passed by Congress and the President. Here
Her smug and flip answers demonstrates she actually fails to understand the laws she's supposed to be enforcing, and carry a strong contaminating stain of judicial activism. Can we be sure of all this? Absolutely! Why? Because if she wasn't a believer and advocate of all the schemes of the far left she wouldn't have been nominated, and in no way should she be seated as a justice on the Supreme Court, and in point of fact, she shouldn't be a judge at all. But, when you consider the federal judiciary is filled with political hacks, she fits in.
As for what Republicans need to do and remember .....Never Ring the Bell.....
