Based on the radical decimation of our environment thanks to greenie “clean energy” initiatives, I can only assume they’ve never heard of a cost–benefit analysis. Or, maybe they have, and I’m just giving them more credit than they deserve. Maybe they’re so wrapped up in their erroneous morally superior identity, they’d rather turn every majestic landscape into a barren hellscape before they would concede that political conservatism is best in show. Now that I think of it, I suspect the latter. From a report over at Cowboy State Daily:
According to a 2017 study published in the scientific journal Waste Management, the world’s wind industry will be producing 43 million tons of blade waste annually by 2050........The U.S. and Europe will account for 41% of that...........Currently, there are no scalable, cost-effective technologies to recycle the blade, and most of them are going into landfills.
Of all the ridiculous notions pushed by the left, demands for “green” energy remain one of the most irritating, for several reasons:
First off, there is the reality that the “green” agenda is just communism by another name, even though the useful idiots really do believe it’s about conserving and preserving the environment. Funny enough, I recently read an interview piece over at The Guardian, titled, “A greener Marx? Kohei Saito on connecting communism with the climate crisis”. Saito, a “degrowth communist” and an academic, believes Karl Marx’s lesser-known ideas on the environment are the answer to the current climate “crisis.” The man whose ideas helped to inspire 20th century governments to kill more than 100 million people? Um, no thanks!............To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment