Nancy Pelosi has a Lot of Class: All Low!

 By Rich Kozlovich

On September 21, 2021 Brett Davis posted this piece, Pelosi Gets Nasty Greeting in England: Protesters Shout 'Trump Won,' 'Get Back to Epstein's Island' saying:

It wasn’t exactly the welcome wagon for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi in jolly old England, with protesters shouting, “Trump won” and “Go back to Epstein Island” during the California Democrat’s visit to the northern part of the country on Saturday. One man proclaimed, “The whole world knows that Donald Trump won the 2020 election, Nancy!” “Shame on you!” another person shouted.

Other cries included, “You’re not welcome here! Go home!”...........Pelosi, who was in the United Kingdom for a conference of Group of Seven nations’ heads of parliament, used her visit to bash former President Donald Trump and Republicans while making several tone-deaf statements at odds with reality.  Because nothing says class like disparaging your political opposition from foreign shores.

Nancy has a lot of class alright, only it's all low.  However, she does have a compassionate feeling for the Republican party.  Of course your first thought is: Really, you're kidding me, right?  No, and here's why?  She wants to save the Republicans from being cult like followers of Donald Trump.  She pleads with Republicans to "take your party back", so, I have to assume she's really worried the Republican party will cease to exist otherwise.  Right?  

Then again........and this is just a passing thought mind you....  maybe what she really means she would really like to see them become Bushlike invertebrates once again and just talk the talk while blindly walking with the Democrats into the Church of Wokeness to destroy the Constitution, and America.  Wow!  Is that possible?  Did I miss something? 

Another demonstration of her deep sense of compassion is understanding the genocide being practiced by China against their Uighur Muslim population.  It may however be unfortunate, but it's not nearly as important as climate change, since China is the overriding CO2 emitter of the world.  Therefore, it's best to not upset the Communists in China over some silly human rights issue involving genocide. 

 

So, let's see if I understand this correctly.  That which is criminal, provable and observable is less important to that which is mythical, unprovable and unobservable and constantly being shown up historically, and factually, as fraudulent junk science, is more important than the lives of all those human beings.  Did I get that right?  I didn't miss anything did I?

 

Since China doesn't really care about her, or the world's views, on either of those issues it's good she said it in England, where according to this article, they don't care what she thinks either. 

However, we now know Nancy Pelosi doesn't know how to read!  How do we know that? In spite of the fact the world, especially our western "allies" think Biden is an intellectual buffoon, and not only over the Afghanistan disaster, she thinks he's perfect and knows his foreign policy.  She didn't mention the Americans he left behind and are still trapped there.  

 

Now all that's been in the news for many days, and apparently she's unaware of all that, so she must be illiterate?  Right?  Of course she could get her news from MSNBC, CNN, and other media collaborators who merely parrot her views so that would be an excuse for her ignorance.  Otherwise, either she's illiterate or she's intellectually and morally corrupt.  Is that possible?  Did I define that properly? Answer: Yes, I defined that properly, because based on her abortion stands and her twisted logic, I think is intellectually and morally corrupt to her core, and after defining this piece in this way I fail to see how anyone can disagree with the author when he says:

 

More hot air was emitted from Pelosi during her appearance at Cambridge.....It appears the 81-year-old Democrat’s relationship with the truth is tenuous at best........

Nancy Pelosi is a disgrace, but her days in power is almost over.  The House will turn over after 2022 and if she runs she's going to be a nobody for two reasons.  She will not be speaker and I don't think the House Democrats will allow her to be minority leader or have any other position of authority in their caucus.  However, in spite of her prostestations the Democrats will hold the House in the 2022 election, I don't think she really believes that and I don't think she's going to run again anyway.  

 

Either way, at 81 she will soon have the opportunity to explain her views on abortion, where hissy fits, logical fallacies, and refusing to answer honestly won't work.