Perhaps I could encourage Allison Hopper and Scientific American to read my annual article, Shall Every Knee Bow?, which has been called brilliant by one of my science friends, and outstandingly logical by others, albeit some remain atheists. But agreeing or disagreeing on evolution versus creation isn't the issue. No one can claim my piece is unscientific, and most certainly there's no way anyone can claim that position is racist in nature in any way.
Then there's climate change "deniers". First of all, those opposing the Global Warming activists aren't climate change deniers because they're totally aware Earth's climate has changed over and over again for it's entire existence. What they're denying is man's ability to effect climate change as a result of CO2 emissions, and all the fraud and lies attached to their so-called "settled science".
Apparently, the climate and how temperatures affect Mother Earth due to solar flares, water currents around the earth, and volcanic oceanic eruptions above and below earth are now caused by environmental racism. That and trees, or the lack there of is racist, which of course means if they're attacked by pests, disease, fire and drought, that's racist also!
Crossword puzzles have Hidden Bigotry . "The popular puzzles are largely written and edited by older white men, who dictate what makes it into the grid—and what is kept out, and "in comments sections on crossword blogs,.........debate raged. It wasn't about race, but it was about the underlying problem, mental gymnastics to create division.
And since insect names are now racist (as I point out in a past piece), fish names are now racist. Worries about racism in our waterways has caused the renaming of the Asian Carp, which now is to be called "invasive carp". The past history of the naming landmarks and locations must also be thoroughly researched to discover any possible connection that might inspire racism.
We already know enforcing laws against crime are racist, and now Car accidents are being used to smear police officers as racist, but this one of my favorites. A Landmark Civil Rights Lawsuit where:
"a teacher in Evanston, Illinois, filed a landmark civil rights lawsuit against her school district. Her complaint: the district segregated staff by race for professional development, subjected students to race-shaming “privilege walks,” instructed teachers to take race into account in student discipline, and taught students that treating people equally “helps racism.”
So, now, let me see if I've gotten this right. Race shaming, privilege walks - whatever that is - separating staff by race, and ignoring the rules for disciplinary purposes based on race isn't racist, but promoting equality is? Did I get that right? Did I miss something? Oh, yes! Did I mention that filming and exposing these fanatical CRT teachers in the classroom would be racist?
And you had better not deny you're a racist, because that's proof positive you're a racist, and the worst kind of racist, a denier! And that statement is from a radical black activist who goes by the name of Ibram X. Kendi who called his parents racists. Why are they racists? They worked hard to give him the good life, which they did provide, and he accepted, and that made them racists! Not him for accepting all that parental goodness though. Critical race theory makes children into the enemies of their parents.
Then there's rape and murder. That's not crime, it's politics!.
This is typical liberal insanity. What “racism,” a “sexist society,” “capitalism” or “patriarchy” had to do with the rape and murder of this girl cannot be explained. The crime can only be attributed to the criminals who committed it. Which, of course, is what liberals in Austria, as in the U.S., cannot abide.
In America we have misfits in leadership roles like the racist Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms
"the word “thugs” was racist.....and...... being accused of corruption was racist."
Now the study of disease and viruses is racist. It appears there are those in one university wants to "decolonise" these studies, saying:
White supremacy and European colonialism are embedded in the study of viruses and other diseases according to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), which has vowed to decolonise its curriculum after advising the British government on the coronavirus pandemic. The alma mater of the Chief Medical Officer for England Chris Whitty, who has led the government’s scientific response to the coronavirus, has vowed to reform its curriculum in order to make the study of tropical diseases “anti-racist”.
And what exactly is this "decolonise" crap? It's a Marxist concept that has nothing to do with land, but everything to do with the mind. Here's the short version. They want to make Europeans, and whites in general, believe they don't deserve what they have, they need to repent of their privileges and need to be punished.
If America is so racist why is it so many races are wanting to leave their socialist equity paradisaic conditions to come here? Buck: If America’s Racist, We Should Have a Border Wall to Stop People From Coming Into a Racist Country
Make no mistake, none of this would have been tolerated in any of these communist nations leftist applaud. Communism survivor slams down Dem who claimed 'white nationalism' more dangerous than communism:
"an Arizona lawmaker who arrived in the country as a refugee from war-torn Vietnam took to the floor of the state House to deliver a lesson on historical realities leftists would prefer to ignore. And when Quang Nguyen was speaking, every liberal should have been listening.
“If we don’t stand up to teach communism to our children, we’ll lose this country,” he said in a speech last week in Phoenix that’s now attracting national attention after its spread on social media. Nguyen was responding to a speech by Democratic state Rep. Daniel Hernandez, who claimed that "white nationalism" was the greater threat to American democracy.
Yeonmi Park said Berry likely would have been "executed" for disrespecting the flag of her former country.
The left and its avatars (feminism, Antifa, BLM, Marxism, socialism, communism, environmentalism, etc.) is very effectively dividing America. Having taken over education, entertainment and social media, it is now endlessly engaged in pitting groups against each other. Blacks against whites. Haves against have nots. Rich against poor. Elite against plebeian. Religious against atheists. Gays against straights. Victims against oppressors. Women against men. Even the vaccinated against the unvaccinated. Have I missed anything?
As enemies of leftism, conservatives are – they must be – painted in the worse possible light: intolerant, racist, sexist, white supremacist, neo-Nazi, patriarchal and every other epithet you can dream up. But if you were to ask the common conservative on the street what his or her true bias is, it comes down to this: left against right.
Take racism, for example. The accusation of racism has become the
default go-to allegation for anything and everything the left doesn't
like. But Dennis Prager once wrote a column explaining how to tell whether or not someone is a racist in three easy questions:
1. Do you have more in common with, and are you personally more comfortable in the company of, a white leftist or a black conservative?
2. Would you rather have nine white leftists or nine black conservatives on the U.S. Supreme Court?
3. Would you rather your child marry a black Christian conservative or a white non-Christian liberal?
For a conservative the answers are easy. We would go for the conservative, period!
So, what's this really all about? This piece,
UN Attacks Western Democracies for So-Called “Systemic Racism” lays a good foundation for understanding what's really going on saying:
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights just issued a report that focused on the alleged failure of the United States, Canada, and other Western democracies to adequately address and correct so-called “systematic racism” against Africans and people of African descent. The UN report, commissioned by the dysfunctional UN Human Rights Council, praised the Marxist Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. And it parroted the Critical Race Theory’s attempt to tie every adverse condition and experience that blacks claim to suffer today in the U.S., Canada and other Western democracies to “systemic racism” rooted in the continuing legacy of slavery and colonialism.
- UN Rights Chief: Countries That Profited From Slavery, Colonialism Must Make ‘Reparations’
- Jamaica to Petition U.K. Queen for Billions in Reparations