By Jim Beers
Editor's Note: I originally published this on September 14, 2015, and given what's going on by firing all these administrative state "experts", and the recent condemnation of science journals, I thought it worthwhile to republish this. RK
According to
medical Dr. Carey Franklin:
“I don’t believe most of the studies published
in the medical journals anymore....A review of more than 2,000 articles
retracted by major journals revealed that more than two-thirds were retracted
because of some type of fraud....Medical journal editors openly acknowledge
that they cannot find article reviewers without any financial ties to private
companies.....Medical
researchers aim for articles that will attract the mainstream press......There is no quick
fix for the erosion of trust in medical studies.....If the current
trend continues, medical studies will become the ‘reality television’ of
science – difficult for outside observers to tell what has been manipulated and
what hasn’t.”
Dr. Franklin - If
you think the medical “experts” are corrupt in the field of medical science
where human lives, and cause and effect should make bastardized “science”
evident and minimal: take a look at the ocean of “environmental” “scientific”
“studies” and “research” burying western civilization about environmental
“facts” that are little more than hidden agenda “preferences”. You may feel
some consolation knowing that your concerns regarding the current state of
medical research are but one area of a generally collapsing field of
“scientific” research.
The recent rash of
shark attacks that severely injured and maimed children playing in shallow
Atlantic surf is but one recent example of this phenomenon of “experts”
misleading and bamboozling the public.
The “experts” tell
us such attacks are “rare”. Four children attacked along our coast in a month
is four too many when the cause is dangerous sharks present where children are
enjoying the beach and this is not acknowledged as amenable to shark control or
management in such places by “experts”. Targeted shark population and area
controls through various means where human use is significant are simply
unspoken, marginalized or shouted down as inappropriate by “experts”; just like
managing or eliminating wolves/grizzly bears/panthers where they seriously
distress and impact human activities are forbidden by “experts” partnered with
bureaucrats.
This is somewhat similar to gun control “experts” and bureaucrats
discouraging “the public” from buying guns or arming themselves while killers
that escaped from a “maximum security” prison roam the rural countryside. Such
behavior by government and their associated “experts” defies common sense and
endangers human lives.
Shark “experts”
tell us that last year only 200 or 300 shark attacks occurred worldwide. As if
Madagascar or Indonesia or a thousand such remote places know or report such
things, or that someone really knows how Abdul or Freddie “disappeared”. Or
even that nearby resorts or towns where an attack occurs suppresses such
reports like the town fathers in the movie “Jaws” worried about business.
The shark “experts”
(like the wolf/grizzly bear/panther/native ecosystem/etc. “experts”) are nearly
all either government bureaucrats whose careers depend on “saving”
sharks; professors and researchers who have lifelong attachments to
sharks and adult needs for making a living from grants and donations; or non-government
organization staffs and members that manipulate the general public by
creating faux environmental hobgoblins to bamboozle unaffected and mostly urban
dwellers into donating money and voting for the steady increase in central
government tyranny that rural Americans are increasingly aware of as I write.
Wolf advocates told
us wolves are not mortal dangers to children and the elderly; that there have
“never been recorded wolf attacks”; that they don’t spread disease; that they
don’t destroy ranches and livestock operations; that they don’t destroy big
game herds and the hunting that supports so much State conservation programs;
that they don’t kill thousands of dogs; that their numbers are minimal; that
they should not be managed or controlled; that local people should have no say
or rights where wolves roam: these are all lies disguised as “scientific”
emanations from the mouths of “experts”. “Experts” that by the way (like the
medical/bear/panther/native ecosystem/ etc. “experts”) neither have nor
acknowledge any responsibility or liability for the mayhem and destruction that
they create for others.
It is the same for
grizzly bear advocates that blame the increasing attacks, destruction and
deaths as these animals spread into more and more settled landscapes (like the
sharks on bathing beaches or wolves and panthers in the settled landscapes of
the Lower 48 States) ON THE VICTIM’S behavior or simple human presence instead
of the animal that does not belong there. The bear/wolf/panther “experts” are
only distinguishable from shark “experts” in one regard: the shark “experts”
disguise their advocacy regarding an omnipresent animal; while the wolf/grizzly
bear/panther advocates lie and forcibly impose their dangerous and destructive
animals in vast areas that were once purposely and at great expense cleansed of
these animals from Europe to The Lower 48 States. These latter “experts” that
justify and enable these re-introductions have much more to ultimately answer
for despite their current celebrity status.
An “expert” should
first and foremost be concerned with human welfare, human rights,
Constitutional government and the economy that supports all of us. Instead,
today’s “expert” is a no-holds-barred advocate for the critter in these
instances I just mentioned as well as many others. They think the critter
should be more abundant, never killed, never controlled or bothered in any way.
They think WE need to be suppressed, prevented from supporting families or
living as free men in order for the sharks to occupy the beach; and the wolf,
grizzly bear and panthers to roam everywhere and reach densities our forefathers
knew all too well bode disaster for men, families and their communities. Look
no further than the absence of recommended lethal controls or even the ability
of free men to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their
livelihoods from these animals that we once hired these “experts” to tell us
how to maintain WHILE WE WENT ABOUT OUR LIVES.
When anyone tells
you to listen to the “experts”, remember the years of propaganda about the
“native” ecosystem. You know the silliness about “they were here first”, “they
belong here”, “the ‘native’ ecosystem is best and ‘belongs’ everywhere it can
be established”. These are little more than romantic notions camouflaging a
host of hidden agendas. Some brie-nibbler on the North Side of Chicago or some
young woman (often the daughter of a big donor) transferring from a
Congressman’s staff in Washington to a job at The Nature Conservancy or
Defenders of Wildlife might think that doing whatever is necessary to forcibly
allow wolves/sharks/grizzly bears/panthers galore is wonderful. However, that
is NO DIFFERENT than me as a young man wanting more pheasants and ducks for
hunting and being willing to manipulate the terrible force of government to
force my notions upon others, no matter their cost in human suffering.
Eliminating or
minimizing deadly animals where humans live in settled landscapes (be it
Minnesota or Tanzania) is no more wrong or inappropriate than forcing everyone
to support more game animals for my hunting desires, despite what “experts” say
and think. A settled human-oriented landscape and Constitutional freedoms are
what have become increasingly “endangered” not the animals that “experts”
believe should be allowed to destroy human lives and the liberties that were
once responsible for building the most prosperous nation on earth that not only
freed and supported others but was a magnet for 200-plus years for people
worldwide that hungered for the safety and freedoms that no other nation
offered.
If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.
