New studies undercut the ‘scientifically empty’ warming narrative, says astrophysicist and aerospace engineer.
By Alex Newman Oct 11, 2023
Leading voices in the climate community are in an uproar as their warming hypothesis comes under fresh assault by new scientific papers. The
authors of the papers are being attacked and say that “activist
scientists” threatened by the new findings are “aggressively conducting
an orchestrated disinformation campaign to discredit the papers and the
scientific reputation of the authors.” Indeed, from insults on
social media and furious blog posts to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
requests demanding emails from a journal editor and federal scientist,
the controversy is getting heated. Several scientists who spoke
with The Epoch Times expressed shock at the tactics used against those
whose latest research is casting renewed doubts on the official climate
narrative........
“Of course the climate cult will be dismissive of any information—no
matter how scientifically correct—that is politically incorrect," he
told The Epoch Times, noting that the new findings made important and
valid points. The
reason that climate activists are so upset is that the findings of the
new papers—a trio of peer-reviewed studies by astrophysicist Willie Soon
and dozens of other scientists from around the world—are casting
further doubt on the narrative of man-made global warming. The
papers are also fueling even more public skepticism about the U.N
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which the authors say
ignores the facts as well as climate science more generally.........To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment