Nothing has changed, and in point of fact it's getting worse, and will get far worse in the coming years because now any nitwit, or group of nitwits with computers and a "twitter" account can force science to reject anything they don't like. Nitwits are now part of the peer review process. The article about the study in question went on to say:
Apparently the average IQ for college
undergraduates has dropped, and a lot from "around 120 to 102, just slightly above the
average of 100." Let's not delude ourselves, that's huge, and apparently it's true. The authors went on to point out the ranks attending college is no longer from the higher IQ members of society, and as a result, "academic standards and curricula might have to be adjusted." After what we've seen at Harvard, does anyone doubt that?
Well, this set up a fire storm of protest because they really didn't like the author's "tone". It was demeaning, and lacked sensitivity, and criticized the peer reviewers for not finding fault with their paper, including the Frontiers in Psychology handling editor.
The editor of that journal, Eddy Davelaar, overrode all that and attempted to refute the evidence presented, and he did so....... with his opinions.......and has refused to respond to challenges over his actions and his opinions.
But none of that changes the fact these young academics are dumber than ever, and are no longer required to perform mentally challenging tasks. Academia is more about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion than it is with honest education, that teaches critical thinking, versus Critical Race Theory.
Diversity without accomplishment is philosophy without form and incompetence without consequence. Unfortunately, as with all these schemes, humanity pays the penalty, and in the future the consequences are going to be dramatic. Negatively dramatic.
One more thing, this whole Preconceptual claptrap mentality doesn't just apply to science. It works for economics also.


Well, since academia is a sewer of intellectual and moral rot, there's a reason "he doesn't identify what" that deep rot is, and he thinks more ethics classes will do the trick. Well, let's face it, he's an academic, so I'm not shocked he can't identify what's wrong, and so offers meaningless solutions. He's part of the problem. However, I'm willing to be fair and help him understand, not that it will do any good. So, here, allow me to properly define all of this.
This academic moral and intellectual problem in academia is a foundational social paradigm problem.
Everything is "The Basics", and here's the foundational source of all that moral equivocation and ambivalence in academia. We've filled our institutions with atheists, Muslims, racists, anti-semites, anti-Christians, anti-America sewer trout, communist/socialist/Marxists, and anti-whites, who now teach nothing but hate, discontent, and insane propaganda telling these young minds to hate everything about America. Worst of all, the nation is filled with entirely too many nominal Jews and Christians who allow it, and even support these institutions with their donations, along with sending their children to these toxic viper's pits.
None of that is fixable at the university level, or by the government. It can only be fixed by American society embracing it's past. But we've allowed leftists with their immigration policies to fill America with an unending list of virulent anti-America immigrants, and they've destroyed any sense of harmony in our demographic makeup.