July 24, 2021 — Scott Johnson
We may as well try to close the loop on our efforts to understand the issue between Senator Rand Paul and the fallacious Dr. Fauci. Neil Cavuto gave Fauci the opportunity to respond to Josh Rogin’s Washington Post column taking up the issue (I excerpted it here) on his FOX News show yesterday.
Cavuto is a friendly interlocutor for Fauci. On Tuesday he judged Fauci “a good man, a good doctor.” He declared that “[Fauci] has been vilified to the point that you’d think he was Lex Luthor, and I don’t know how productive that is.”
Cavuto failed to press Fauci on any of the several subjects he
covered in the course of the 16-minute segment. FOX News has posted the
16-minute video clip of the segment here.
On the question of gain-of-function research, I find the evasiveness of
Fauci’s response and the appeal to the character of everyone involved
telling, but you be the judge. The clip below comes at 11:00 of the
Cavuto segment...........To Read More.....
- Don't fall for Alabama doctor's Wuhan Virus fear porn July 24, 2021 As often as leftists hype the Wuhan Virus — along with the vaccine, masks, lockdowns, etc. — they keep getting put in their place by the data............ To Read More
- When leftists shun ivermectin, they show how scientifically illiterate they are July 24, 2021 Why are the health authorities and the media embracing a stance of deliberate stupidification? .........To Read More
- CDC/FDA confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus -Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world. Other than that, it’s perfect. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.......To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment