And We’re Surprised Why?

By Rich Kozlovich

In an article entitled, “Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards: Does it Matter if We’re Killing Living Humans?", Leon H. Wolf talks about an interview with Cecile Richards, the President of Planned Parenthood, saying Planned Parenthood is “an organization that aborts hundreds of thousands of unborn children a year. You would think, given this, that Cecile Richards would have some sort of coherent philosophical belief about when life begins that would indicate (at least to her) that she doesn’t oversee mass infanticide.”

An organization founded by Margaret Sanger whose goal (although Sanger was personally opposed to abortion) was to prevent the ‘inferior’ brown races from populating America, and yet they apparently have no “coherent philosophy”, no boundaries, no restrictions and no moral foundation to justify what amounts to infanticide.   Richards was asked “when life begins. She responded that the answer to that question isn’t “really relevant” to the conversation.” 

Based on the numbers this is a truly a  far more racist organization than the KKK who “lynched 3,446 blacks in 86 years, and yet abortion claims that many black babies in ‘less than four days’.  At every self promotional opportunity Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the NAACP will find racism in the most innocent of things, and yet I have not seen one word of condemnation for this practice as racist from any of them? 
During a debate on the floor of the United States Senate a prominent U.S. Senator, Barbara Boxer, made it clear she believes “life begins not at birth, but when the family decides to take the baby home from the hospital.

Once the idea became acceptable that people we’re going to be allowed to determine whether and when unborn children were alive or not, the idea became acceptable that ripping one’s unborn baby apart was not a moral issue, but a personal choice because of economic issues or some other inconvenience.  Once all of that became acceptable then why in the world wouldn’t we think that concept wouldn’t be pushed beyond any limits or restraining concepts of morality?

 

We have conservative politicians afraid to stand up and call their opponents supporters of “unbridled infanticide” because they’re afraid if they do so the media (who are beneath contempt) will attack them and as a result they won’t be elected.  If they don't have the courage of their convictions, or can't articulate those convictions, you wonder why they're running in the first place?  No guts, not glory!   

The Vatican finally has someone take as stand on Catholic politicians who support abortion declaring they shouldn’t receive communion.  It would appear no one is paying attention at the lower levels and these politicians, including now dead Ted Kennedy who was a huge supporter of abortion and was yet buried in the church, are supporting a position that is egregious to church doctrine and not one has been excommunicated. 


Among other ‘Christian’ groups we find a “former Planned Parenthood pastor (that must be an oxymoron) who claims abortion Is A ‘blessing’ not A ‘curse’, in spite of all the scriptural foundation to show the Supreme Justice of the universe – the one they’re supposed to be working for - thinks otherwise. 


A doctor “regularly and illegally delivered live, viable babies in the third trimester of pregnancy – and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors”,  and media tries to ignore it because it doesn’t fit their liberal narrative.   


Is he alone in this lack of morality, or even medical ethics?  We now have those who believe it’s acceptable to kill ‘born’ children up to four months old saying;

“They claim the child is not a person until they are capable of understanding they are a sentient being and until then “the interests of actual people over-ride the interest of merely potential people.”  “Gualberto Garcia Jones, of Personhood USA, said the statements in the article should not shock to anybody, as they have been the same views advocated by Peter Singer, a bioethics professor at Princeton who also has argued for the right to kill infants.”

“Jones pointed out that Singer is a Laureate Professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne, where Minerva teaches.”  “Last year appearing on “Up with Chris Hayes” Singer said. “A person is a being with some awareness of who they are, existing beyond simply the physical organism.”  “When asked if that would exclude a four month old baby, he said, “Possibly. I don’t think that’s problematic to say a four month old baby is not actually a person, that’s simply true.

Abortion has made the term "medical ethics" an oxymoron! 


Going back in time “Singer wrote as long ago as 1979;

“Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons.” In 1993, he stated that newborns should not be considered a person until after at least 30 days after birth and doctors should kill some disabled babies immediately.”

It was obvious to many that this was going to be the natural logical progression of legalizing infanticide. 

The terms Pro-life and Pro-Choice are misnomers adopted by the media. Pro-Life people are not pro-life. They are anti-abortion. The media and the left are so fond of pointing out how as a group seem to support the death penalty, claiming hypocrisy. That is a false narrative.  What they opposed is the murder of innocent life. Those who face the death penalty are being executed for heinous crimes. They are not innocent and they will not be murdered.

Those who support abortion are not Pro-Choice, they are pro-abortion, although you don’t you dare call them  that.  They support the murder of innocent life while emotionally and dramatically opposing the death penalty for those who lack every vestige of innocence due to their actions. Who are the hypocrites?

Let’s not have any mistakes over this, there is only one argument that applies to this abominable practice:
 

“There is only one reason to be in support of abortion - you don’t believe it’s murder.  There is only one reason to believe that abortion isn’t murder - you don’t believe in God!”

“There is only one reason to be against abortion - you believe it really is murder! There is only one reason to believe that abortion is murder - you believe in God!”

If killing the innocent unborn is murder then it’s murder…… always.  It isn’t murder on Monday and an option on Tuesday because of unpleasant circumstances. 

In ancient times, in an effort to appease their gods, it was a common and blood thirsty practice to throw infants alive into burning pits.  This was even common practice in first century BCE when the Carthaginians fought the Romans. It is believed that Hannibal had an older brother sacrificed in such a manner. Why? Because they believed this would guarantee good harvests and good fortune for their people. It was an economic issue.

Why is society presumably doing this today? Because it is said in would inconvenience the parent(s), therefore the lives of the women would be affected economically or emotionally if an innocent child is born to them.  We moderns with our scientific rhetoric and psycho babble are as guilty of murder as were the ignorant ancients. They did it in the name of their gods and we do to prove we have no God. 

When Western societies chose to abandon the traditional Judaic/Christian principles – a foundation that gave them the strong and clear moral foundation for their success - in favor of socialism - they chose to make the state the supreme arbiter of morality, i.e., a socialist god.  Since socialism has no moral foundation the latest philosophical flavor of the day becomes the morality of the moment - which means there is no morality - and now this secular ‘god’s” blood lust for the world’s unborn children is worse than anything ever devised by the ancient pagans.

We shouldn't be surprised at all!  We have failed in foundational logic by failing to define things properly and as a result we fail to have clarity of thought.  Without clarity of thought we are incabable of having understanding and when there is a lack of understanding we are incapable of making good decisions.  And societies the world over are a mess. 

And we're surprised at this why?

But make no mistake about this, at some point those who have promoted this will have to answer to a final court for that blood that cries out from the ground.