Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Cops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cops. Show all posts

Thursday, November 16, 2023

Central Park Rape: The Secret File

Ann Coulter Nov 15, 2023

In an article about the election of Yusef Salaam, of the "Central Park Five," to the New York City Council last week, The New York Times' Jeffery C. Mays indignantly cited the full-page ad Donald Trump had taken out at the time, which never mentioned the Central Park rape but decried crime in the city and called for reinstitution of the death penalty.  Mays described the case against The Five thus:

"The confessions of Mr. Salaam and the four others who were convicted alongside him were coerced. There was no DNA evidence tying the teenagers -- Mr. Salaam, Korey Wise, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana and Antron McCray -- to the brutal attack. Mr. Trump's racist rantings only inflamed [racial] tensions."

Two of those claims are laughably false, and the third is utterly meaningless............. It's a sleight of hand to say that there was "no DNA evidence" tying The Five to the crime. Yeah, that's probably because in 1989, no one would have been looking for DNA............

Here's just some of the evidence against The Five:

-- When Santana was being driven to the precinct house for general mayhem, he blurted out: "I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman's tits."

At this point, the jogger's body hadn't been found yet. The police knew nothing about any rape.

-- Another boy, picked up with Richardson, told the police that he knew who did "the murder," naming McCray. Richardson concurred, saying, "Yeah. That's who did it."

Again, the police were unaware of any rape or murder.

The next morning, Richardson pointed to the 102nd Street transverse, telling officers, "This is where we got her."

-- Dennis Commedo, part of the larger group wilding that night, told the police that, when he ran into Richardson, he had said, "We just raped somebody."...............

Defense attorneys spent weeks attacking the confessions as "coerced," but two multicultural juries and the trial judge concluded that the confessions were voluntary. Taking the other side is some bimbo with a Netflix documentary, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. Moreover, recall that when The Five confessed, no one knew whether the jogger would emerge from her coma and be able to identify her attackers.

Newly elected councilman Salaam and the Times' Mays contend that the case against The Five was racism, pure and simple. Salaam says the single, solitary reason he and the others were accused was that "black and brown people" were "instantly [deemed] guilty, without a chance of proving their innocence."  "Black and brown people" were not only deemed guilty -- they were guilty. Reyes, the one even liberals admit was guilty, is "brown."................Salaam cites Scripture a lot. Everyone involved in the "exoneration" of The Five ought to remember Proverbs 19:9: "A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish."..................To Read More....

Editor's Note Please take some time and review, Feral youth just beat a 17-year-old to death, my

Thursday, September 21, 2023

America Out Loud

Editor's Note:  In order to highlight just how insane all that's going on I've added cartoons from other sites that seem appropriate. RK 

Selective Prosecutions at the US DOJ Blindsides Lady Justice - George McClellan - The DOJ has protected the Bidens the same as it protected the Clintons by ignoring their crimes. The contrast between how the FBI went full bore in its efforts to ruin President Trump but ignored the Bidens and Clintons until the statute of limitations on their crimes expired couldn't be more apparent. This scale of corruption, bias, and lawlessness affects the... 

 

Cops Arrested by Activist District Attorneys Targeting Officers - Lt. Randy Sutton - The Wounded Blue with Lt. Randy Sutton – American Law Enforcement Officers are being prosecuted by “activist” District Attorneys and Prosecutors at a rate never before seen in our nation. These prosecutions are destroying the lives of the officers emotionally and financially. Officer James Fotis founded The National Center for Police Defense to help...  

Venom's Role in COVID: A Shocking Revelation - Dr. Bryan Ardis - Looking 4 Healing Radio with Dr. Bryan Ardis – I unpack the transformative discussions from the Healing for the AGES event held in Dallas, Texas. We explore my new creation, Foreign Protein Cleanse, designed to detoxify and remove venom components from the human body. I also introduce you to groundbreaking research from the University of Arizona about a venom enzyme linked to COVID-19 and a pioneering company... 

 

The CIA & COVID: The Ultimate Betrayal of America -  Tom Renz, Esq. The Tom Renz Show – Diving deep into the murky waters of SARS-CoV-2's origins, this exposé reveals startling facts about its creation in a Wuhan lab, funded and facilitated by US agencies. From Anthony Fauci to the CIA, the layers of cover-up are extensive. Lawsuits are pending, whistleblowers are speaking out, and yet our leaders remain silent. If you're tired of the lies and want the truth about the real players in this global pandemic... 

 

Fueling the Fire: The Conservative Climate Language Trap - Tom Harris In a world where the language of climate alarmism has infiltrated conservative ranks, are we unknowingly fueling the very fire we aim to extinguish? From the Republican debate stage in the U.S. to policy conventions in Canada, conservatives are using words that only amplify climate scare narratives. I dive into how this language shift is not accidental but a deliberate act...

Monday, August 8, 2022

Nearly 2,000 NYPD cops quitting before getting full pensions — a 71% jump from 2021

By August 6, 2022

The NYPD is still hemorrhaging cops.  Ever-growing exodus figures show 2,465 police officers have filed to leave the department this year — 42% more than the 1,731 who exited at the same time last year, according to the latest pension fund stats obtained by The Post.  More disturbing is the fact that the number of cops hanging up their holsters early — before reaching 20 years for a full pension — has skyrocketed 71% this year from the year before (1,098 from 641)..............“This exodus is the result of cops in the prime of their careers deciding they have had enough. … The NYPD should stop trying to explain this staffing crisis away. Admit there’s a problem and help us fix it,” he said...........Being New York’s Finest has lost its luster for many of the rank and file, who have endured anti-cop hostility, bail reform, rising crime and the city’s vaccination mandate — currently on pause.............

My Take - "Admit there's a problem and help us fix it".  Well, how's this comment by one of the readers?

Until Democrats, Mayor Adams, Governor Hochul and the state legislators take the handcuffs off of the police and put them back on the criminals, early police retirements of pension vested officers will continue along with the resignations of younger officers even though they are not pension eligible. 
 
Well, that's not going to happen.  The people of New York and New York City are getting exactly what they deserve.  It's acknowledged that Mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg really cleaned up NYC and when they left who did they elect? Bill de Blasio, twice!  Even after a disastrous first term they chose him again, and now they've embraced another left wind racist disaster in the form of Eric Adams.   
 
Schadenfreude!

Monday, July 4, 2022

Jury rules city is liable for damages by SWAT team

Woman's home damaged by cops chasing fugitive

  Bob Unruh By Bob Unruh July 2, 2022

A jury has decided that a Texas city is liable for nearly $60,000 in damages its SWAT team did to a woman's home while they were chasing a fugitive. The Institute for Justice had fought the case on behalf of Vicki Baker after the SWAT commandos in McKinney, Texas, destroyed her home in July 2020. They were chasing a criminal suspect at the time, and smashed fences, destroyed doors and windows, launched tear gas canisters into the home, and more. Her insurance company refused to pay for the damages. So did the city. So the IJ joined forces with Baker to sue, which resulted in the jury decision recently at the city must pay her damages of $59,656.59.

"My priority has always been to make sure that cities like McKinney cannot treat other people the way I’ve been treated," Baker explained. "I expect today’s victory to send a message to governments across the country that they have to pay for what they break.”.........To Read More....

 

 

Wednesday, February 23, 2022

Police outraged as nineteen Austin officers slapped with felony charges: ‘New war on cops’

By

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE (Video Credit: FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth) Austin’s Democratic district attorney has indicted nineteen […]Police outraged as nineteen Austin officers slapped with felony charges: ‘New war on cops’

 
 War on cops’ rages on: Thirteen police officers shot across four states during 24-hour-period

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE Over a 24-hour-period on Friday, 13 police officers from Arizona, Maryland, New Mexico, […]

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Illegal dirt bikes and ATVs are turning Philadelphia streets into scenes from a Mad Max movie.

Thom Nickels June 28, 2021 @ City Journal. Published with permission. 

Five years ago while on assignment, I was riding with a police officer in Philadelphia’s Kensington section when we saw a large all-terrain vehicle (ATV) drive onto the sidewalk. A crowd watched as the rider performed a series of wheelies and tricks. The carnival atmosphere of the scene attracted an additional ATV rider intent on outperforming the first performer. The officer stepped out of the squad car and quietly told the drivers not to block the sidewalk. As the officer left the scene, I saw both ATVs merge with traffic, presumably to restart their wheelies and tricks.

The scene prompted more questions than answers: ATVs are illegal for street use, so why did the officer chide them only for driving onto the sidewalk? The officer told me that the Philadelphia Police Department had instructed its officers to go easy on ATV and dirt-bike riders because it was “a culturally sensitive issue.” The underlying message: officers should not take direct action because that might be deemed “racist.”

This incident occurred when the ATV/dirt-bike problem in Philadelphia was just beginning to mount, and members of the “street-riding community” were beginning to feel their strength in numbers. In those early years, riders in the city generally stuck to back roads or isolated bike paths along the Delaware River. The few renegade vehicles that made their way onto congested city streets were regarded as anomalous.

As the years passed, the numbers of riders slowly increased. After all, these were easy-to-get recreational vehicles that can be purchased online or at Walmart. You can order a TaoTao dirt bike, for instance, online for $779.95 (free shipping); a kids' ATV goes for $1,555, while the bigger Strokeshaft ATV goes for $2,939.95.

The pandemic and the June 2020 George Floyd riots seemed to quadruple the number of riders in Philadelphia. The riots set a tone of freewheeling anarchy. Riders traveled in larger and larger contingents and became much bolder in their disruptions of local traffic flows in neighborhoods and throughout Center City. Pedestrians had to contend with the sudden appearance of invading bikers, 30 or more at a time, blazing through crosswalks or taking sudden detours onto sidewalks.

In March 2021, a viral video captured a violent confrontation between an armed ATV driver and a driver of an SUV on Broad Street in South Philadelphia. A number of illegal vehicles driving in front of the SUV driver had stopped suddenly, causing the driver to hit the back of a bike. When the driver left his vehicle to see if the dirt-bike rider was okay, an altercation occurred that ended with the driver sustaining minor injuries. The 27-year-old dirt-bike rider was arrested and found to have a long record of assaults.

Last month, a community meeting of the Queen Village Neighbors Association drew more than 1,100 people to complain to city council members and the Philadelphia Police Department about illegal racing along pedestrian sidewalks, commercial corridors, and residential streets. Residents of luxury high-rise condos complained of the noise from dirt bikes rising from the street and imploding midair in a kind of “Sensurround.”

Metro Philadelphia reported last fall that the Philadelphia Police Department had deployed a detail dedicated to confiscating ATVs and dirt bikes. “Since May, they have taken 263 off the streets; however, the program can’t be utilized on a daily basis and may not be able to continue indefinitely due to budget constraints,” Metro reported.

On June 10, as a result of citywide protests against these vehicles, the city council unanimously passed a bill aimed at cracking down on them. The bill altered the city code so that dirt-bike riders face the same consequences as ATV riders: a $2,000 fine and police confiscation. At-large councilmember Allan Domb, one of the bill’s sponsors, said, “There is a safety issue here. We’ve seen people ride on the sidewalks. The safety is not just for the residents, it’s also for the people actually operating these vehicles.”

Two days after the bill’s passage, more than 1,000 bikers congregated at 3800 Aramingo Avenue in a spectacle of noise, fireworks, drag racing, and “civil disobedience.” During the event, biker Angel Rodriquez, 21, was fatally shot by an anonymous rider who left the scene and remains at large. The incident, happening as it did just days after the city council’s crackdown, was further proof that the illegal bike problem isn’t going away anytime soon. Skeptics now wonder if police will continue to look the other way or find excuses not to fine or confiscate the bikes of lawbreakers. What’s the use of a new law if it’s not enforced?

As if to underscore the skeptics’ concerns, district attorney Larry Krasner has called for a more nuanced understanding of how dirt bikes and ATVs are used in Philadelphia. “It is very (important) for us not to lump everyone together and for us not to stereotype,” Krasner said. “There is a big difference between driving a vehicle down the street and endangering people by driving up and down a sidewalk. There’s a difference between traveling at a normal speed and going at an extremely high speed, or going against traffic, or blowing through traffic lights. We have to be willing to see those distinctions if we’re not going to fall into some of our old traps.”

Local media outlets report that bikers say they are riding because they are “trying to get out of neighborhoods riddled with violent crime.” They said that police crackdowns won’t stop them. One rider told NBC10 News: “I’ve been doing this for years. This is my stress reliever. I’m not going to stop. I’m never going to stop.” Another rider said that if his ATV were confiscated, he would just go out and buy another one.

The city council, in an attempt to appease the bikers, is considering creating an ATV and dirt-bike park somewhere in the city. A park of this sort would have to be built from scratch, and many questions linger, like how bikers would transport their vehicles to and from the location. “I think realistically that could take some time. We want to find a location that’s not going to be in a residential or commercial setting,” Domb said.

But for many riders, performing in a public environment for an “unwilling” audience seems like the whole point. If that’s the case, then any effort to contain riders in an enclosed, theme-park setting, where they are expected to obey the rules of containment, is bound to fail. As the rider said, street biking is a “stress reliever.”

City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).

 

Take the City of Tahlequah Case

The Supreme Court should settle a confusion over how police tactics preceding an officer-involved shooting may affect constitutional rights. 

Robert VerBruggen June 28, 2021 @ City Journal. Published with permission.

Five summers ago, a woman in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, called 911. “Hey, can I get somebody to come over to my house?” she asked. “My ex-husband is in the garage, he will not leave, he’s drunk, and it’s going to get ugly real quick.” In the brief conversation that followed, she added that her ex was a registered sex offender, that he did not live there, and that he still had some tools in the garage. Perhaps unsurprisingly, tragedy ensued—and the subsequent legal battle has produced a confusion that the Supreme Court ought to resolve.

After the woman’s 911 call, three officers came out, and they ended up speaking to Dominic Rollice, the ex-husband, near the side door to the garage. The police told Rollice that they wanted to get him a ride elsewhere; he said that he already had one coming. An officer asked to pat Rollice down for weapons, finding the man “fidgety,” but he refused.

What happened next was captured on an officer’s bodycam video (though the audio doesn’t kick in for about half a minute). An officer stepped toward Rollice, who moved into the garage. When he reached the back of the garage, Rollice grabbed a claw hammer and turned around, wielding it in both hands. The officers have claimed that Rollice said “one of us is going to fucking die tonight” at this point, but the recording’s audio is still missing.

The cops backed up and drew their guns. Rollice walked to the side with the hammer held high in one hand behind him and the other hand outstretched in front, stepping out from behind a chair so that there was a clear path between him and the officers—who stood within about ten feet of him. They repeatedly told Rollice to drop the hammer, but he refused. One officer replaced his handgun with a Taser.

Then, the fateful motion: Rollice pulled the hammer back as if, perhaps, to throw it or charge the officers. The officers opened fire, with the Taser missing but several handgun rounds striking him. Rollice crouched to the ground and lifted the hammer yet again, and an officer fired one last round. Rollice died from the wounds.

A Cherokee County prosecutor declined to charge the officers, given that Rollice was on video menacing them at close range with a deadly weapon. But Rollice’s estate sued the two officers who shot him, as well as the city, in federal court, alleging that the police had violated the deceased man’s Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure (including apprehension by force). The estate argues that the officers were wrong to open fire, because Rollice’s movement with the hammer was defensive rather than aggressive; that the final shot was unjustified even if the initial barrage wasn’t, as Rollice no longer posed a threat; and that even if all the shots were justified at the moment they were fired, the officers should still be liable for the death, because the officers created the dangerous situation to begin with.

After several rounds of legal back-and-forth, the matter sits on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. That last argument advanced by Rollice’s estate could lead to a major ruling if the Court accepts a “cert” petition to hear the case.

City of Tahlequah v. Bond originated in the Tenth Circuit, where an appeals panel ruled that the case against the cops could go to trial. In the panel’s view, a reasonable jury could conclude that the officers’ actions before the shooting—including walking toward Rollice after he refused to be patted down and “cornering” him in the back of the garage near his tools—“recklessly” created the situation that led to lethal force, thus making the lethal force a violation of the Fourth Amendment. In some other circuits, the issue would simply be whether lethal force was constitutional at the moment the officers opened fire. That’s a question the Tenth Circuit panel pointedly declined to answer, saying it would be a “close call” and that the proper analysis involved looking at the bigger picture.

For its part, the Supreme Court has offered rather confusing guidance. In the seminal 1989 case Graham v. Connor, for instance, it said that courts must consider the “totality of the circumstances,” but it also spoke of reasonableness “at the moment” and cautioned that courts should make “allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments—in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving—about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.” In 2017’s County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, the Court held that even a clear Fourth Amendment violation at one point in time “cannot transform a later, reasonable use of force into an unreasonable seizure”—yet explicitly declined to rule on the similar issue of whether courts could consider “unreasonable police conduct prior to the use of force that foreseeably created the need to use it” when deciding whether the force itself was reasonable.

Nonetheless, the logic of the appeals panel is breathtaking. The officers had been called to remove an inebriated ex-husband from the home of his ex-wife, and up until the point Rollice grabbed the hammer, the police stand accused of little beyond talking to him and walking toward him. Nothing in the Constitution guarantees a right to trespass on your ex-wife’s property without being aggressively pestered by the cops, and yet in the Tenth Circuit’s view, such pestering can turn a subsequent shooting that would otherwise be allowable into a constitutional-rights violation. If such reasoning became standard, the natural reaction of police officers would simply be to give wider berth to criminals, so as to avoid “recklessly” provoking them and ending up in court.

None of this is to say that all courts should entirely ignore everything that happens before a shooting. There is room to hold officers and departments accountable for needlessly antagonizing, or otherwise severely mishandling, a situation that didn’t have to turn deadly—if not by labeling their actions a violation of the federal Constitution, then perhaps by tailoring state laws to cover such cases. But the boundaries need to be drawn far more carefully than the Tenth Circuit has drawn them.

The Tahlequah case, though brought under federal law, would be handled very differently in different parts of the country. The Supreme Court should take the case—and lay out, in a precise and fair way, exactly how police tactics leading up to a shooting may affect a court’s analysis of whether the shooting itself violated the Constitution.

 

Friday, June 11, 2021

Three Ohio police officers face criminal charges over response to George Floyd demonstrations

By Jake Dima, Breaking News Reporter | June 09, 2021

A trio of Columbus, Ohio, police officers was slapped with criminal charges over their response to last summer's protests and riots that followed the death of George Floyd.

All three law enforcement personnel have been charged with dereliction of duty, while two face additional offenses of assault and interfering with civil rights, special prosecutor Kathleen Garber, who helms the city's effort to investigate complaints against officers, announced on Wednesday. All of the charges are misdemeanors.

“I was asked by the City of Columbus to independently evaluate the allegations of police misconduct from last summer’s protests so that both citizens and police officers are held to the same standard of accountability,” Garber said in a statement obtained by the Washington Examiner. “We appreciate the community’s patience over the past year while we have made continued attempts to interview witnessing officers and identify officers committing the alleged misconduct during the protests.”........... 

The string of charges follows an early May ruling from federal Judge Algenon Marbley that barred officers within the department from employing force — including tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets — against nonviolent protesters and said law enforcement ran "amok" during summer protests. Marbley sided with a group of 26 protesters who filed a class-action lawsuit against the law enforcement body alleging mistreatment.................To Read More....

 

Thursday, June 3, 2021

Willful blindness about the America’s violent crime wave

The wave of violent crime in America is so pronounced that the mainstream media can’t help but report it. But that doesn’t mean the media must mention some obvious reasons why the nation might be experiencing the surge of violence.  This weekend, the Washington Post featured two stories on the the crime wave. This one focused on crime in Prince Georges County, Maryland, a predominantly black county just outside of Washington, D.C. This one reported on the nationwide surge.

According to the Post, Prince Georges County had suffered at least 56 killings as of this Sunday afternoon. Last year at the same time, the number was 30. And guess what. “For the first time in a long time, lawmakers say, residents are once again citing safety as a top concern.”  To what does the Post attribute the County’s rise in violent crime? “The pandemic, historic unemployment, and ebbing social services.”.................Like Mayor Bottoms, the Post is tying itself in knots trying to avoid two obvious possible explanations for the crime wave — less policing and more violent criminals released from prison......To Read More.....

 

Thursday, May 27, 2021

The NAACP’s Counterfactual Claim About Racial Inequity in Police Stops

By James D. Agresti May 25, 2021 

In a recent Newsweek article, senior reporter Jason Lemon alleges there is “significant data showing” that the U.S. is plagued by “systemic racism.” As evidence of this, he claims the “NAACP found that from 2017 to 2020, Black men were five times more likely than white people to be stopped by law enforcement without a valid reason.”  The hyperlink Lemon uses to support that claim leads to another article by Lemon, which links to an earlier article by Lemon, which dead ends with no link or reference to an actual study or data.

A search of the NAACP website revealed a “Criminal Justice Fact Sheet“ that claims: “A Black person is five times more likely to be stopped without just cause than a white person.” The “fact sheet” contains no link or evidence for this claim.  Just Facts emailed the NAACP three weeks ago requesting proof of its statistic and then followed up a day later with a phone call and an email. The NAACP never replied.......

Like other accusations of systemic racism, these claims of Newsweek and the NAACP about unjust police stops have no demonstrable basis in reality. Moreover, they are undercut by the research of scholars who buried vital results deep within their publications. False accusations of racism have a range of harmful and even deadly effects, including but not limited to:

  • stoking strife and violence between people of different races.
  • forging victim mentalities, which are associated with weak self-control and less ability to persist in challenging tasks.
  • misidentifying the causes of poverty and other social ills, which can impede their resolution or worsen them.

..............To Read More.....

Saturday, May 22, 2021

Cruel and Unusual Prosecutions

Federal charges against three of the officers in the George Floyd case are unwarranted and ill-advised.

The Biden Justice Department has announced that it will seek federal civil rights charges against the three police officers who, along with Derek Chauvin, participated in the fatal arrest of George Floyd. This decision can’t be reconciled with the Justice Department’s own policy guidelines on second prosecutions. What’s more, prosecuting these officers will have serious negative consequences for police work in this country.

Let’s be clear here: we’re not talking about Derek Chauvin. We’re talking about J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane, and Tou Thao. These three cops are not accused of using excessive force; nor are they accused of illegally seizing Floyd. Moreover, two of them were inexperienced—Lane had been on the force only four days—and were following directives from Chauvin, the senior officer.

The government’s argument is that the three officers violated Floyd’s civil rights by assisting Chauvin, who seized Floyd in arguable violation of the Fourth Amendment. But Officer Thao was merely keeping bystanders away and had no part in restraining Floyd; he couldn’t possibly be accused of an illegal seizure. The other two, Kueng and Lane, held Floyd’s legs and back down, but this, too, does not constitute an illegal seizure, since the arrest was lawful, and Floyd had to be restrained when he refused to enter the patrol car. Furthermore, the force these two officers used was a far cry from the neck pressure Chauvin employed.

The indictment alleges that the three “willfully failed to intervene to stop Defendant Chauvin’s use of unreasonable force.” “Willful” means that the accused cops knew they were wrong. This will be difficult to prove, given that the inexperienced defendants were following the directions of a senior officer and the force used was not obviously excessive, such as in the case of a suspect being shot or clubbed.

These prosecutions are sending a clear message: that junior cops must second-guess their superiors in use-of-force incidents, lest they run the risk of federal imprisonment. But this is contrary to police training and discipline in the United States, and it puts inexperienced officers in an impossible situation. On top of all the other pressures they face, young cops must now choose between jeopardizing their careers by turning in or even restraining a superior, on the one hand, or facing federal prosecution if officials subsequently decide their partners’ use of force was excessive, on the other.

This prosecution puts police, who must make split-second judgments when confronting suspects who may be armed and dangerous, in a real bind. In an earlier time, the public understood this predicament. This meant that spur-of-the-moment decisions that, in hindsight, were mistaken—what looked like a gun wasn’t a gun—would not be held against the officer. The result was that prosecutions of police were difficult; unfortunately, this meant that abusive officers sometimes got away with excessive force. Now the pendulum has swung. The days of benefit-of-the-doubt are over. The police must get it right nowadays, even if the situation they confront is ambiguous.

The indictments pose another problem. The Justice Department has a long-standing policy—the so-called Petite rule—that is supposed to govern federal prosecutions that follow state charges for the same alleged misconduct. The policy states that the department seeks to “protect persons charged with criminal conduct from the burdens associated with multiple prosecutions and punishments for substantially the same act(s).” The state of Minnesota has already charged Kueng, Lane, and Thao with aiding and abetting murder by failing to restrain Chauvin and assist Floyd. In other words, the misconduct the state is alleging is identical to the acts serving as the basis for federal charges. Under Petite, the federal prosecutions shouldn’t be happening.

To anyone who isn’t an attorney, all this sounds like a violation of the Constitution’s provisions against double jeopardy. However, the Supreme Court has held that the federal government has the authority to enforce its own laws, even if the conduct involved also violates state law. The Petite policy seeks to moderate the harshness of this rule by requiring a “substantial federal interest” to support the federal charges. But there is no federal interest in prosecuting officers who did not themselves willfully and affirmatively violate someone’s constitutional rights.

The government will argue that there is a federal interest in getting police to restrain overly aggressive colleagues. But the state prosecutions are already serving this end. (The state prosecutions have been postponed until March 2022 to avoid prejudicial publicity; the federal prosecution may face the same problem.) Control of the police is still a state and local matter in the United States, and Minnesota is exercising due diligence. In this case, the prosecutions, along with investigations of entire departments for civil rights violations, may signal the Biden administration’s intent to increase federal control over state and local police.

At a time when many big cities are experiencing rising crime, demoralizing the police is bad policy that will make recruiting new officers more difficult. Why take up a career in which second-guessing your boss can get you fired for insubordination and failing to do so can land you in prison? The prudent person is apt to pick a safer line of work, while the more heedless will enter the next class at the police academy. Isn’t this the opposite of what we want?

Sunday, May 16, 2021

Mad Max-ine Waters Abused Air Marshal Protection on Visit to Minnesota Protests: Complaint


Spencer Brown Spencer Brown May 14, 2021
 
Mad Max-ine Waters Abused Air Marshal Protection on Visit to Minnesota Protests: Complaint
Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Congresswoman Maxine Waters made headlines and raised eyebrows when the California Democrat showed up in the middle of a volatile crowd in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota in April. She called for agitators who'd already turned violent "to stay in the streets" and "get more active, more confrontational" ahead of a verdict in the trial of now-convicted former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. "We are looking for a guilty verdict," Waters told media on the scene.  

At the time, Katie reported on the hypocritical request Waters made for security on her jaunt to the North Star State: 

New documents obtained by Townhall show Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters requested an armed police escort to Minneapolis over the weekend, where she called for violent activists to "stay in the streets" during a protest against law enforcement.  Waters flew from Dulles International Airport to Minnesota-St. Paul International Airport on Saturday, April 17, just days ahead of a verdict in the George Floyd, Officer Derek Chauvin trial.  That night, Waters went to meet with protestors and demanded a guilty verdict for Chauvin "or else."

What we didn't know at the time was where the security personnel assigned to Waters came from and what her request meant for their usual duties. But now we do.........To Read More....


Friday, May 14, 2021

Baltimore mayor announces that mental health ‘counselors’ — instead of police — will be sent to some 911 calls

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott (D) has announced a new pilot program that will direct some 911 emergency calls to mental health professionals in lieu of notifying law enforcement officials.  According to a report from WJZ-TV, 911 dispatchers in the city receive about 36 emergency mental health calls a day.  Those calls will now go to dedicated mental health counselors trained in conflict resolution.

"Think about the sheer number of hours that our police officers are actually out dealing with something that they're not trained to do, versus being out there going after someone who's committed an armed carjacking," Scott reasoned.  Last week, The Baltimore Sun reported that the program — 911 Diversion Pilot — "aims to connect callers with the most appropriate resources and responses for their needs."

The outlet cited a 2015 study from the Treatment Advocacy Center that found "people with untreated mental illness were more likely to die during an altercation with police officers than those without mental illness."...........To Read More....

 My Take And who exactly are these "counselors". Was anyone amongst this group asked if they thought this was a good idea?   I can just see it now.   A call comes in about a deranged and angry drug dealer, or a deranged rapist, or a drunk beating his girlfriend or wife,  all potentially armed to the teeth being confronted by a mental health "counselor" who asks them to stop doing what their doing and be good little boys and girls.  Really?  I gotta see this!  And I hope the mayor of Baltimore is going to be right there by their side to show just what a good idea this is.  Yeah, right, don't bet on that.

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Obama Woman’s Circus Performance Promoting Police Hatred

By Mychal Massie  May 10, 2021 @ Daily Rant

There was a time witches were burned at the stake to the joyous applause of the villagers, because doing same was one specific avenue of ridding the village and the surrounding countryside of their evil.  Today witches (and no I didn’t misspell the word), are celebrated by factions only marginally less demonic than the maleficus, i.e., witch, herself.  Take for example the Obama woman.

The Obama woman may not exhibit the oft-mentioned eccrine bromhidrosis of Hillary Clinton; but the woman is grotesquely more unattractive in appearance and much less accomplished.  However, she is able to play the ‘skin-color and white people out to get me’ card.  And play it she does – at every opportunity.  Especially in situations she is able to co-opt and prostitute skin-color animus that undermines civility and promotes a toxic environment for law enforcement.

The woman recently made the laughable claim that she fears for her daughters Sasha and Malia “every time they get in a car by themselves.” It is apparent that either this woman is the worst liar in history or she thinks all black people are led by the nose stupid and ill informed.  And let there be no doubt whatsoever; her comments were singularly intended to insight more protest, and encourage instantaneous combustion the moment another lifelong hoodlum is confronted with the consequences of their wicked and wasted lives with a finality that circumvents another lengthy prison sentence.

Juxtaposed to being in some seedy Chicago motel providing ten-dollar favors, she was on CBS This Morning with Gayle King, for the express purpose of fomenting resentment of police.  King has a documented history of shoddy interviews intended to elevate herself at the expense of others, not least of which was her Lisa Leslie interview; which was a left-handed attempt to besmirch the late Kobe Bryant’s public image.  An interview for which she was justly criticized by the people the world over and from every economic walk of life.  But I digress.

The Obama woman’s pathetic claim was a transparent attempt to vilify police officers.  You would need a reading and comprehension Flesch-Kincaid score lower than that of LeBron James to believe her obvious lie.

Her daughters are the children of a former presidential family.  Even though the children of former president’s by law only receive Secret Service protection until they are 16-years old, is there anyone who believes the children of former president’s wander around without personal private security.  Good grief!  No one in the Obama stratosphere travels without security.  Besides, judging from the sexualized trashy behavior of her  daughter captured on Instagram at a Bryson Tiller concert and her alleged public ingestion of dope on multiple continents, I’d say the Obama woman has more to be concerned about with her daughter(s) than the outrageous lie that white police officers are laying in wait to hurt either of them.

No one gets close to the child of a former president; they’re protected by security at all times. Just living in their Martha’s Vineyard zip code ensures personalized private security as a matter of status quo.

I’m surprised the pathetic caricature of parenthood didn’t have someone waiting off camera to hand her a box of tissues to dry her eyes as she opined:“…many of us still live in fear as we go to the grocery store or worry about walking our dogs or allowing our children to get a license.”

Of course the “us” she was talking about are black people.  The only thing missing with the show she was putting on was a banana. Her not-so-veiled reference to blacks in the ghetto was her way of trying to come off as “one of the people.”  Black folks in the hood are not known for walking their Pit Bulls and Rottweilers on tree lined streets with plastic bags of dog poop they conscientiously pick up as a courtesy to others.  And, the only time she goes to a grocery store is for a photo-op.  She should have referenced bloody streets, sidewalks, and parks, from drive-by killings and gang violence.

She spread it on thick saying: “But every time they get in the car by themselves, I worry about what assumption is being made by somebody who doesn’t know everything about them – the fact that they are good students and polite girls, but maybe their playing their music a little loud.  Maybe somebody sees the back of their head and makes an assumption.” 

She was conveying the message that a white person and white police officers specifically, are waiting on every corner to kill a black person.  I would say she’s confusing V.F.W’s. and Police Departments with the Planned Parenthood industrialized extermination centers strategically located in the ghettos.

Even by her low standards of propriety, this performance was a disgrace.  The circus atmosphere and the unchallenged claims are typical of a Gayle King interview.  I guess something could be said for her not wallowing around on the floor, doing pushups and jumping jacks, as she did to the perverse pleasure of lesbian Ellen DeGeneres.

Mychal Massie

Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here

Sunday, May 9, 2021

Violent Crime Surged in These Cities After Mass Black Lives Matter, Anti-Police Protests

by Thomas Catenacci

Violent crime surged in several U.S. cities that saw massive Black Live Matter and anti-police protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death last summer.  The upswing of violent crime, including homicides, coincided with the protests, increased anti-police sentiment among Americans and declining morale in police departments, which have since struggled to recruit new officers. The number of murders alone increased by 36.7% in 2020 compared to 2019, according to public information compiled by data analytics reporter Jeff Asher.

“We are definitely at a critical manpower shortage here,” Louisville police union spokesperson Dave Mutchler told the Daily Caller News Foundation last week. “The climate that we all find ourselves in right now is a lot more demanding and stressful on officers.”

“Morale is basically in the toilet,” he continued....................To Read More........

Nolte: Democrat-Run Chicago’s Police Staffing Crisis Has Detectives Sitting on Street Corners

John Nolte

The police department in the Democrat-run city of Chicago is so under-staffed detectives are being told to put on a uniform and go sit on a salt truck. Yes, you read that correctly, plain-clothes detectives who are trained and paid to investigate crimes like homicide are being ordered to put on a uniform and “sit in a fixed position or on a street corner, sometimes with a ‘city asset’ such as a salt truck[.]”

The “memo” in question was obtained by CWBChicago and lays out just how bad things have gotten under Democrat Mayor Lori Lightfoot and David Brown, who was installed as Chicago Police Department Superintendent in April of 2020.

Obviously, a lot’s happened since April of 2020, namely the 1619 Riots launched by the domestic terrorists in Black Lives Matter and Antifa. All around the county we—Sorry, allow me to back up a bit… In Democrat-run cities all around the country we have seen countless examples of the quislings who run these cities doing everything in their power to prove their fealty to the terrorists while at the same undermining their own police force.

To prove their fealty, many Democrat-run cities have given into the terrorists’ demands by drastically reducing police budgets................To Read More......

Thursday, May 6, 2021

'Alarming rate': Demoralized cops flee police departments in record numbers

By Emily Zantow - The Washington Times Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Police officers nationwide are turning in their badges at record rates amid budget cuts, policy changes and anti-brutality protests.  An estimated 5,300 officers quit or retired from the New York Police Department last year, 200 or more cops have left the Seattle force, and in the nation’s capital, the union reports that the 3,700-strong Metropolitan Police Department is down 300 badges since the D.C. Council enacted sweeping police reforms last summer.  “Officers are leaving at an alarming rate, and crime is spiking in a lot of different areas,” police union chairman Gregg Pemberton told The Washington Times on Tuesday.

In Baltimore, the department has lost nearly 300 officers since last year, leaving detectives “overwhelmed with their caseload because they, too, are short-staffed,” said the leader of the local Fraternal Order of Police..............To Read More....

My Take - The "Inevitability Factor" is when reality reaches it's apex.  Now I just hope all these citizens of these cities who've been demanding less police and more accountability by the police to the misfits who are working to defund them enjoy their "Inevitability Factor".  As for me....Schadenfreude!


Friday, April 30, 2021

Michigan’s Youngest Ever Lawmaker, 26, ‘Threatens to Call Governor on Cops After Crashing His Car While Drunk

A Michigan state lawmaker threatened to call Governor Gretchen Whitmer on cops who arrested him after he crashed his car while drunk, according to a police report.  Rep. Jewell Jones, 26, is accused of driving at twice the drink-drive limit with a loaded gun in his cup holder when he crashed his black Chevy into a ditch on the side of I-96 in Fowlerville, about 65 miles outside of Detroit.   He allegedly taunted state troopers who responded to the scene on April 6, telling them he ran their budget, and was pepper sprayed and tasered twice while resisting arrest, police say. .............To Read More....

A Great New Idea for Reducing Police Shootings

Plus, why Nicholas Reardon is an American hero. 

Dov Fischer by Dov Fischer  April 26, 2021 

Our country’s social stasis is disrupted terribly by police shootings. Now that police wear body cams and members of the public scour the streets for interesting events to film on smartphones and then to post to social media, more police shootings get disseminated than ever before. When the target of the shooting is Black, we become infused with the news. When the target is White, we instantly move on because a White target generates few clicks and followers and fails to accord with the left-media narrative. In the same way, on the rare occasion that an Arab Muslim is attacked, the media run wild, but when a Haredi Jew is attacked in broad daylight on the streets of Brooklyn it barely merits a mention in the Food & Wildlife section.

As with the left-media cartel’s preferred and disdained targets, it is much the same when it comes to shooters who generate their interest. A Bernie Sanders supporter shot Rep. Steve Scalise at a baseball practice session. Not interesting, so just one story. Gabby Giffords was shot by her own  Democrat supporter. Not interesting. A nut with orange hair shot up a movie theater showing Batman. Not interesting. An Arab Muslim shot up a military site. Workplace violence. The active Colorado supermarket shooter a few weeks ago generated a storm of interest. Then the media found out that the arrested guy is named Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa. End of that coverage..........To Read More....



Thursday, April 29, 2021

Black Supremacy

The hate that dare not speak its name. 

Wed Apr 28, 2021 David Horowitz and John Perazzo 7 comments

When a white police officer in Ohio shot and killed Ma’Khia Bryant, stopping her from plunging a butcher knife into the chest of an unarmed black teenager, the racial melodrama that is destroying the very fabric of American society reached what the “woke” refer to as an “inflection point.” At that moment, the narrative of the national lynch mob – verdict first, due process be damned – collided with an impossible reality: a white cop saving the life of a black child. Unable to resolve this dilemma, the woke mob simply refused to see it.

It was left to Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors to formulate their denial bluntly:

The verdict of George Floyd’s murder was a victory in accountability but not a victory towards abolition [of the police]. While we watched Derek Chauvin be convicted for murder, a Black child named Ma’Khia Bryant was murdered by police, proving there is no justice.

Patrisse Cullors is a racist whose sociopathic premise is: all cops are guilty and all black criminals are innocent. This is also the premise and rationale of all the riots and protests of the year just passed: White cops are racists, and blacks their innocent targets, even if they happen to be armed criminals resisting arrest. Through these ideological blinders, the Ohio event - a white cop rescuing an unarmed black teen about to be murdered by a knife-wielding black teen – was simply impossible. The fact that the knife-wielding black teen was shouting “I’m going to stab the fuck out of you, bitch” as she thrust a butcher knife towards her intended victims chest was just inconceivable. If white cops protected black victims from black criminals, the goal of abolishing the police could not be justified...........

In a sermon delivered in 2011, Farrakhan said: “There is no human being on earth that has murdered more living things than the Caucasian. He is a murderer and a liar.” “White folks … cannot be reformed [because] you cannot reform a devil…. You have to kill the devil.” In a sermon delivered in July 2015 Farrakhan said:

I’m looking for 10,000 … fearless men who say death is sweeter than continued life under [white] tyranny…. [I]f the federal government won’t intercede in our affairs, then we must rise up and kill those who kill us; stalk them and kill them and let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling!

Despite – or maybe because of – these views, Farrakhan is arguably one of the most influential black voices in politics today. One of his disciples is Al Sharpton, the MSNBC host, racial arsonist, and principal eulogist at the black martyr George Floyd’s memorial. In a notable speech in 1994 at Kean College, Sharpton boasted,.................To Read More....