Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Racist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racist. Show all posts

Friday, September 6, 2024

Kamala’s Racist ‘White Devil’ Pastor

@ Sultan Knish Blog 



After the Biden coup, Kamala phoned Rev. Amos Brown to pray for her political campaign. Kamala, an “old timer” and “dues paying” member of Brown’s church had turned to one of the most hateful political figures in her old city to offer spiritual inspiration for her presidential bid.

“America has not changed” since the days of segregation, Kamala’s pastor had argued while revisiting the killing of Emmett Till. “This sin of race is so deep, so pervasive in the body politic of America that if we don’t find a remnant to help turn things around, America is going to go down.”

Rev. Amos Brown, a politically influential minister known to some as the Sharpton of San Francisco, had a long history of race-baiting and of accusing America of racism.

“I know America. America is a racist country,” Brown had previously claimed.

“Greed, bigotry and too many whites with this evil, brutal system, built the American economy,” the radical preacher who was a member of the national board of the NAACP argued.

White Americans are “in a state of denial about what was done”. Rev. Brow claimed. He defended the racist dogma of critical race theory, arguing, “that’s what all of the brouhaha is about in America about critical race theory because the oppressors do not want the world to know who we really are.”

One woman described her personal experience with Brown at a memorial service for a friend’s father. “Amos always has an agenda and used his platform to go off on the sins of the world while gesturing at us and about the ‘white devil’ while glaring at me.”


This was the bigot of whom Vice President Kamala Harris had said, “for two decades now, at least, I have turned to you… And I will say that your wisdom has really guided me and grounded me during some of the most difficult times. And – and you have been a source of inspiration to me always.”

Others in San Francisco have found Rev. Amos Brown less inspiring and more hateful.

When Brown was appointed as the vice chair of California’s reparations task force, his rhetoric grew even uglier and more extreme. He claimed that the task force “ought to study what’s wrong with the white power structure” and when the previous San Francisco reparations proposal for $5 million payouts for a slavery that had never existed there were opposed, he grew furious.

Opponents of racial reparations were the “personification of evil,” Rev. Brown argued. “Five million is not that much.” And after “246 years of slavery. I can’t overstate the importance of reparations. It isn’t enough to apologize. Somewhere there has to be reparations.”

California had actually entered the United States as a free state.

San Francisco’s small black community made Brown a big fish in a small pond and he was known mainly as a local race baiter until the rise of Rep. Nancy Pelosi and then Kamala Harris put the city and its political culture at the heart of the Democratic Party and its political machine.

Pelosi was forced to disavow Brown early on when he turned a 9/11 memorial service into an ugly hate filled rant about America.

“America, is there anything you did to set up this climate?” Rev. Amos Brown demanded while Paul Holm, the partner of Mark Bingham who had been one of those fighting the Muslim hijackers on Flight 93, sat in the audience. Holm approached Sen. Barbara Boxer, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and other top Democrats to protest Brown’s disgraceful remarks.

“America, what did you do two weeks ago when I stood at the world conference on racism, when you wouldn’t show up?” Brown demanded, referring to the Durban conference whose antisemitism was so extreme that the United States had withdrawn from the proceedings.

At the conference in South Africa, copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and a flier with a photo of Adolf Hitler and the message “What if I had won? There would be no Israel” had been handed out. A banner read, “Hitler was right.” This was the hatefest that Kamala’s pastor not only felt comfortable attending, but suggested that America deserved 9/11 for not attending.

“Ohhhh — America,” Brown gleefully chanted after 9/11, “what did you do?”

While Pelosi tactfully disavowed Brown’s remarks, without condemning him personally, and apologized to Holm, the hate preacher continued to enjoy a powerful political presence.

When Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s pastor, went viral for his similar “God Damn America” rant after 9/11 and his antisemitism, Brown stepped in to defend his friend and invited him to speak at his Third Baptist Church where Kamala Harris has been a longtime member.

Kamala claimed that Brown “has been on this journey with me every step of the way, from when I first thought about running for public office almost two decades ago.”

That would suggest that Kamala was associated with Brown and the Third Baptist Church when it was being used as a platform for a racist who had said of Obama, “them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me”, claimed that America invented AIDS to kill black people and called Italians “garlic noses”. While we don’t know what Kamala’s response to Wright was at the time, her pastor defended Wright and claimed “we just tell the truth with passion and enthusiasm.”

While liberal Jewish groups have invited Brown to speak, his friendship with Wright and rage at America for rejecting the antisemitism of Durban continued on and influenced Kamala.

During Israel’s campaign against Hamas terrorists after Oct 7, the Washington Post reported that “Brown took her hand and implored her to do something to help the Palestinians and speak up on their behalf. Their struggle is our struggle as people of color who have been oppressed.”

To Rev. Amos Brown, everything was determined by skin color. Jews, including those who had cultivated friendships with him for decades, were white oppressors. And their Muslim killers were “people of color” who were being oppressed by the Jews.

According to the Post, “Harris appeared moved by his plea”. And she began her anti-Israel public statements which, at the Edmund Pettus bridge, equated opposition to the Jewish State with the civil rights movement.

“She comes to synagogue with me for High Holiday services, and I go to church with her for Easter,” Doug Emhoff, Kamala’s husband, who had been born Jewish, told the DNC. What he did not mention was that the church he went to had been a platform for antisemitism and was headed by a pastor who opposed Israel’s campaign to stop the perpetrators of Oct 7.

But Rev. Amos Brown did not limit his hate to white people or Jews as recent events showed.

This year, Chino Yang, a Chinese restaurant owner in San Francisco, made a rap video complaining about crime and its impact on the city’s Asian population. Rev. Amos Brown visited Yang’s restaurant and reportedly threatened him.

According to a local Asian activist group, Kamala’s pastor used the term the “house is on fire” and “Brown allegedly conveyed a threat that, unless Yang repudiated the rap, the Rev. would turn the Black community against Yang; and if anything happened to Yang’s small business or family, it wouldn’t be Rev. Brown’s fault.”

Brown denied threatening Tang and contended that “nobody threatened him, and if he was threatened … he would have called the Police Department, the U.S. Marshal or the FBI.”

This did not stop Vice President Kamala Harris from having Brown deliver a prayer at the DNC.

Kamala previously claimed that Brown “has been on this journey with me every step of the way, from when I first thought about running for public office almost two decades ago.”

And after Kamala’s decision to call the ‘Sharpton of San Francisco’ to offer a private prayer for her campaign and then at the DNC, there is every reason to think that Rev. Amos Brown and his hate will continue to accompany Kamala Harris throughout the rest of her political career.
 
   
 
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.

Sunday, August 18, 2024

My Gazette: Kamala Is a Racist

By Rich Kozlovich 

This is part of a series of gazettes outlining who and what Kamala really is, what she stands for, what she represents, and the disasters that surrounds she and all of her peers, which is the desire to destroy America as it was founded, which is why they're doing everything in their power to destroy the Constitution, they only thing standing between freedom and a socialist system of world governance under the auspices of the most corrupt institution ever created, the United Nations, molded by the World Economic Forum, and controlled by China. 

This cartoon will be part of each gazette. 

 

Make no mistake.  Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are absolutely antisemites, anti-Christian, anti-White racists, and anti-American in their views and their actions.   Lies, deceit, corruption, and destruction is at the heart of who and what they are.  And if elected, that's what they will promote.  

The effort to whitewash their history is failing, but it's exposing the corruption that surrounds them, but that exposure isn't being done by what's now being called the 'legacy' media, including their desire to defraud the election process with these illegal non-citizens, and allowing them to destroy America's major cities. Cities that will take decades to recover, and some may never come back.  

If it walks like a communist, if it talks like a communist, it's a communist! 

Tags: The Kamala Policy Conundrum, The Reality of Kamala, Kamala Now Reigneth!, So, It's Kamala? Really? Then We Need a Little History Lesson!, Intelligence Alert!, Kamala Harris Weekly, Almost!,Kamala Harris Weekly, Part I, Kamala Harris Weekly, Part II, Kamala Harris Watch, Part III

RACE HUSTLE

Dem Rep. Frost: DEI Attacks on Harris Equivalent to N-Wor - Representative Maxwell Frost (D-FL) said Tuesday on CNN’s “Newsroom” that Republicans like Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), who say Vice President Kamala Harris is a DEI hire, are essentially using the N-word.....

 Susan Rice: Calling VP Harris a DEI Hire Is ‘Extremely Offensive and Dehumanizing’ - Former White House adviser Susan Rice said Tuesday on CNN’s “Situation Room” that it was “extremely offensive and dehumanizing” to say Vice President Harris is a DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) hire.....

 Joy Reid: ‘People of Color’ Who Do Not Vote for Harris Are ‘Real Weird - MSNBC talking head Joy Reid said “people of color” will look “real weird” if they do not vote for Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democrat nominee, in November......

 Kamala Endorsed ‘Reparations' - Vice President Kamala Harris endorsed “some form of reparations” for “black people,” an unearthed video from 2019 reveals.......

 The Left Ramps Up its Anti-White Bigotry - As the presidential election looms ever larger on the horizon, the desperate Left, saddled with a catastrophe of a candidate, is doubling down on the only tired old strategy it has, which is smearing their political opponents as racist – exposing their own anti-white racism in the process....

 Don’t draw attention to the same immutable characteristics Kamala campaigned on, or you might just be sexist and racist - Who is actually divisive, and what is off-limits when talking about Kamala? 

Donald Trump calls out Kamala Chameleon's racial shtick - Throughout her career, Kamala has played the race card—except her card changes depending on the needs of the moment.

Kamala Harris Is a Race Hustler Who Will Send White Men to the Back of the Line and Ignite Racial Animus - Vice President Kamala Harris is a race hustler, a divider when the nation needs a unifier. If Democrats make Harris the nominee for the nation's top job, Americans will be given a stark choice in November: between racial preferences and fairness. A President Harris would rub raw the racial divisions in this country and ignite new violence in our streets......

Kamala a ‘Dues-Paying Member’ of San Francisco Church with Radical Pro-Reparations Pastor - Vice President Kamala Harris, who Democrat leaders are backing to replace President Joe Biden in the 2024 presidential race, is reportedly a “dues-paying member” to a church where the pastor has called for reparations, even serving as a vice chair of California’s reparations task force.......

The philosophy of all leftists was exemplified by another criminal group in the 1948 film The Treasure of Sierra Madre, stated by Mexican bandit leader "Gold Hat" (portrayed by Alfonso Bedoya, trying to convince Fred C. Dobbs (portrayed by Humphrey Bogart), that he and his band of cut throats were legitimate.  I think my paraphrasing below is the perfect representation of the leftist philosophy, even if unspoken:
 
Rules?   We ain't got no rules.  We don't need no rules.  We don't have to show you any stinkin rules!
 

Monday, June 28, 2021

The Small Secessions of the New Civil War

June 22, 2021 @ Sultan Knish Blog 

That a battle over Atlanta would play nearly as pivotal a role in the country’s second civil war as it did in the first might have surprised few historians. What might have surprised them is that the battle would involve civic meetings rather than bullets. There are plenty of bullets in Buckhead, a part of Atlanta coping with runaway crime under the pro-crime rule of Mayor Keisha Bottoms, and those bullets have inspired local residents to secede and form their own police force.

Buckhead is not the first part of Atlanta to try and secede. Sandy Springs had already successfully seceded from Atlanta and a number of cities in Fulton County, which includes Atlanta, have tried to break away to form Milton County. These efforts to escape the blight and corruption of Atlanta aren’t new, but Buckhead’s fight to escape Atlanta’s pro-crime government has captured the imagination of millions of Americans from one coast of the country to the other.

The cold civil war is being shaped not by national, but local secessions like the one in Buckhead as neighborhoods try to secede from cities, cities from counties, and counties from states in a powerful struggle by conservative and centrist communities to define their own way of life.

Most Americans might associate Roswell with UFOs, but a proposed bill by Senator Cliff Pirtle of Roswell would have allowed it and other counties located near Texas to secede with the possible intention of joining the Lone Star State. In Oregon, 7 counties voted to secede and join Idaho, Weld County is considering seceding from Colorado to join Wyoming, and western Minnesota has seen proposals for its counties to leave and unite with South Dakota.

Secession talk isn’t new. Northern Californians have kept the dream of a breakaway state named Jefferson alive for generations. The Democrat machine illegally suppressed a ballot measure that proposed to split California in three. The secession proposals that succeed are more modest and limited in scope. Breaking up states may be a moonshot, seceding from states might be an uphill battle, but the rate of local secessions is growing rapidly.

The most popular form of secession is also the smallest and involves school districts.

An average of 5 school districts secede every year. And while such secessions may get less publicity than plans to split up entire states, they’re commonplace and effective. They also represent the same trend of communities escaping the social and political wreckage of urban rule. Even as Democrats go to war against the suburbs, the suburbs are fighting back.

The political geography of the new civil war is a tug of war between Democrats seeking to concentrate authority in as few places as possible and an opposition seeking independence.

While Democrats and their media complain about the electoral college and the composition of the Senate, the nation and its states are largely ruled by a handful of metropolitan areas. The wealth that buys and sells elections nationwide mostly flows out of New York and California, and, more specifically, out of New York City and Silicon Valley. Geographic regions of less than 1,000 square miles in total rule a nation of 3.8 million square miles with an economic fist.

The meltdown of the urban areas drove suburbanization. And the spreading blight of urban areas into suburban communities due to the concentration of statewide political power in the cities has led to a secondary exodus from suburban bedroom communities to other states.

California not only went blue, but it ‘blued’ Colorado, Wyoming, and a range of other states. The final casualty of California’s blue wave may even end up being Texas. New York has had a similar effect, not only regionally, but even to the south, driving an exodus to Atlanta.

The tide of blue state invasions has the potential to transform the state of states and the nation.

Neighborhoods and school districts seceding from failed urban centers are trying to halt the problem at its source. Rural counties, especially in western states, are pushing back against larger demographic invasions that have transformed smaller states into miniature Californias.

Polls show that most people prefer to live in communities with people that share their values. As politics becomes more tribal, the number of neighborhoods with an even share of lawn signs for both parties is decreasing. In a political system that forces cake makers to bake cakes, indoctrinates elementary school students with radical views on race and sexuality, and cancels anyone who doesn’t go along, coexistence with a radical leftist system is no longer an option.

Secession is. The new civil war is being fought locally. It’s not a regional movement, but a communal one. What brings together rural areas and suburban communities is a desire to control their own way of life and escape the destructive centralization of urban regimes.

The new civil war isn’t being fought between the North and the South, but between the cities and the rest of the country. It’s an economic and social war whose objective is independence.

That’s why the smallest scale secessions have paradoxically been the most successful.

Whether it’s the Buckhead movement or the Texas Senate passing a bill allowing Lake Austin residents to secede from Austin only to see it die in the House, the secessions are gathering strength. But so is the Left's battle to stop them through lies, racism smears, and judicial fiat.

Just because the public votes to create a separate school district or a city doesn't mean that it won't be blocked by Democrat activist judges who decide to override the will of the people.

The attempt by Gardendale to secede from the failed Jefferson County Public School system in Alabama was illegally blocked by federal judges. The Left is struggling to block the creation of the city of St. George in Louisiana with equally illegal lawsuits. But the pace of secession proposals is only growing as more communities struggle to escape abusive governments.

And as Democrats seek to illegally rig elections across the country with H.R.1, to transform the government city of Washington D.C. into a state, and to exercise total control over every local decision through its massive urban bureaucracy, the rate of secessions is only increasing.

Some only seek to restore control over local schools and police forces to communities, while others strive to reconfigure the borders of states to enable rural representation.

Though the term ‘secession’ and the idea of dividing a land summons to mind civil war, the more apt analogy may be the original secession of the United States from British rule.

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another," Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence.

America’s revolutionaries wanted self-government on their own terms. Their modern descendants are breaking away from New York and San Francisco, from Big Tech and Wall Street, the way that their ancestors sought to escape from London and its mercantile interests.

The fundamental issue at stake in the secessions is whether communities will be governed centrally or locally. Democrats and their media have worked to cloud the issue with false accusations of racism, but it’s not only white neighborhoods that are talking secession. A generation ago, black Boston residents proposed to create the breakaway city of Mandela. That movement has recently come in for a reexamination. It’s time to reexamine all of them.

The new generation of secessionism is driven by the unbearable pressure imposed on communities by the expansive ideological programs of radical leftist technocrats which leave little room for either individuality or human needs. Rather than learning from the profound failures of urban areas during the pandemic, all they learned is a need for greater control.

Secession is the natural human response to the control freak madness of cities which control entire states. Communities are confronting radical power grabs by taking back the power.

The cold civil war is being fought in civic meetings. The battles are local and the battle maps cover streets rather than continents, but it is a conflict driven by the impetus of revolutions and civil wars in which one people, as Jefferson wrote, seeks to part ways with another, not to rule over them, but to be free of their thievery, their abuses, and their tyrannical rule.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.  Click here to subscribe to my articles.   Thank you for reading.

Tags: ,
Author Image

About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center


Thursday, June 17, 2021

Obama: The Affirmative Action President

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.  How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.  He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator. 

And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor.  It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? 

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:

To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.

Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass -- held to a lower standard -- because of the color of his skin.  Podhoretz continues:

And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon -- affirmative action.  Not in the legal sense, of course.  But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be?  As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate.  All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.  What could this breed if not the sort of empty  narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?

In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.  Those people -- conservatives included -- ought now to be deeply embarrassed.  The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.  Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth -- it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character?  Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.  Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.  It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.  But really, what were we to expect?  The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.  When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense.  It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office. 

But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while.  And really, isn't that all that matters these days?

See also: The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events

Update:

Author's Note.  A lot of readers have written in asking me how I came to the conclusion that Obama was an unremarkable student and that he benefited from affirmative action.  Three reasons:

1)  As reported by The New York Sun: "A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors..."  In spite of not receiving honors as an undergrad;Obama as nevertheless dmitted o arvard Law. Why?

2) Obama imself as written e was a poor tudent s a young man. As the Baltimore Sun eported, in:

"'Obama's book 'Dreams from My Father,'....the president ecalled a time in his life...when he started to drift away from the path of success. I had learned not to care,' Obama wrote. '... Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it.' ut his mother confronted him about his behavior. Don't you think you're being a little casual about your future?" she asked him, according to the book. '... One of your friends was just arrested for drug possession. Your grades are slipping. You haven't even started on your college applications.'"

3) Most damning to me is the president's unwillingness to make his transcripts public. If Obama had really been a tellar tudent with impeccable grades as an undergrad, is there any doubt they would have been made public by now and rumpeted n he ront page of the New York Times as proof of is rilliance?  To me it all adds up to affirmative action.  

Mattpattersonline.com

If you would like to comment on this or any other American Thinker article or post, we invite you to visit the American Thinker Forum at MeWe. There, you can converse with other American Thinker readers and comment freely (subject to MeWe's terms of use). The Forum will be fully populated and ready for comments by midday (Eastern time) each day.

Friday, June 11, 2021

Three Ohio police officers face criminal charges over response to George Floyd demonstrations

By Jake Dima, Breaking News Reporter | June 09, 2021

A trio of Columbus, Ohio, police officers was slapped with criminal charges over their response to last summer's protests and riots that followed the death of George Floyd.

All three law enforcement personnel have been charged with dereliction of duty, while two face additional offenses of assault and interfering with civil rights, special prosecutor Kathleen Garber, who helms the city's effort to investigate complaints against officers, announced on Wednesday. All of the charges are misdemeanors.

“I was asked by the City of Columbus to independently evaluate the allegations of police misconduct from last summer’s protests so that both citizens and police officers are held to the same standard of accountability,” Garber said in a statement obtained by the Washington Examiner. “We appreciate the community’s patience over the past year while we have made continued attempts to interview witnessing officers and identify officers committing the alleged misconduct during the protests.”........... 

The string of charges follows an early May ruling from federal Judge Algenon Marbley that barred officers within the department from employing force — including tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets — against nonviolent protesters and said law enforcement ran "amok" during summer protests. Marbley sided with a group of 26 protesters who filed a class-action lawsuit against the law enforcement body alleging mistreatment.................To Read More....

 

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

You Won't Believe What Pelosi Blames For The Capitol Building Raid On

By Magnus McCoy - January 12, 2021 

Last week Antifa and a few misguided Trumpers entered the U.S. Capitol Building. The MSM and Dems claim that this is all Trump's fault, despite the fact that he never ordered anyone to raid/attack anything. But facts have never stood in the way of Dems... But Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi feels that there is another culprit behind the raid. She claims Trump supporters have chosen their Whiteness over Democracy...

During an online video meeting with constituents Pelosi said the following:

“I thought it was going to be an epiphany for those who were in opposition of our democracy to see the light,” Pelosi said. “Instead, it was an epiphany for the world to see that there are people in our country, led by this President, for the moment, who have chosen their whiteness over democracy. That’s what this is about.”

The Speaker ended her remarks by saying what she described as the "complicity” and the “instigation" of Trump will be addressed.

“This cannot be exaggerated. Not only the complicity, the instigation of the President of the United States, must and will be addressed,” Pelosi finished. “It’s only a number of days now before we inaugurate a new President.”

Dem's attempt to pass a resolution by unanimous consent has failed, so they will be bringing the 25th amendment resolution to the House floor to vote on Tuesday. But if this fails, which it likely will since they would need 2/3 of the House to vote to use the 25th amendment to remove Trump, they are already working to impeach Trump. In fact, they have 200 House Dems already sponsoring an impeachment resolution...........To Read More....


Wednesday, January 2, 2019

Those poor NFL wage slaves


Lebron James says NFL owners are “old white men” with a slave mentality. I think Lebron James is letting slip a very large craving for attention. Nobody forces anybody to play in the NFL. NFL players are well aware of the physical ramifications of pro football – the high possibility of brain damage and crippling injury.

They are also aware of the financial ramifications, and have not been slow to cash in. They enrich high powered lawyers who find ways to make them ever-more money. Taking advantage of still other ramifications, they father kids all across the fruited plain.

No slave ever dreamed of such a life..........Read more

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Keith Ellison Once Proposed Making A Separate Country For Blacks

Justin Caruso

Some newly discovered columns shed light on the shocking views expressed by one of the Democrat’s favorite politicians.  According to columns written several years ago in the Minnesota Daily, obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller News Foundation, Ellison was once a proponent of a blacks-only nation carved out of America and cash reparations paid from whites to blacks. Ellison also called the U.S. Constitution the “best evidence of a white racist conspiracy to subjugate other peoples.”

Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, now in the running to be DNC Chair, has attracted the support of Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Harry Reid. Many think that Ellison, an African-American Muslim, would make a powerful statement leading the DNC. Ellison’s past has gained attention from the media, with Ellison being accused of anti-Semitism and ties to the Nation of Islam.  The Washington Post also recently wrote about Ellison’s past columns, with an article published last week citing an Associated Press article about Ellison:......To Read More.....

Monday, November 25, 2013

Black leader to Oprah: Put up or shut up!

Peterson, a columnist for WND and the president of the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, or BOND, cites Winfrey’s recent “outrageous claim that blacks in America are still terrorized by whites because of their race.”  “Oprah Winfrey is sending a destructive and racist message to black youth,” said Peterson in a statement Tuesday.  “I’m calling on Oprah to back up her claims and give proof of blacks being terrorized by whites. She can’t – because it’s not happening.”….The only way for racism to disappear, she said, would be for “older [white] people who were born, bred and marinated in prejudice and racism to die.” Winfrey also alleged President Obama is the target of unprecedented criticism because “he’s African-American.”

“To the contrary, it’s black thugs who viciously attack and commit crimes against whites,” Peterson said. “Black criminals are also killing other blacks in cities like Chicago (Oprah’s hometown). Last year, the city had 500 black-on-black murders. When will Oprah talk about black racism and terror?

Peterson said she should back up her claims or apologize…… I believe that Oprah has always been a closet racist – she’s just free to express her racism because she’s no longer constrained by her show airing on a major network,” he said. “She should immediately apologize to the American public for her remarks.”…..To Read More…