Church of Wokeness and Voter Fraud

By Rich Kozlovich  

 

I have to admit, even I was shocked at the brazen attempts by the talking heads in the media who were trying to force those they interviewed to say there was "no evidence" of any voter fraud and Biden was not fraudulently elected.  

Well, as is common amongst old geezers, I had an old guys breakfast group I used to meet with regularly, and I told them over two years ago voter fraud was the only way Trump would not be re-elected, and the Democrat party was going to go all out with it during the 2020 election.  Which surprised them!  

People just didn't believe, or didn't want to believe it could happen in America.  But I've been watching this for many years, going back to the fraudulent election of John F. Kennedy, and I honestly believe Obama was a major recipient of that fraud.  Having losers like John McCain and Mitt Romney as opponents didn't help either, since millions of conservatives refused to vote for them, so the fraud wasn't blatantly obvious, or for that matter, as necessary.

But the fact is, I was right about the 2020 election, and I said so right from the git go.  I recorded all I could find about this right from beginning, and the evidence was massive:

• P&D Today: Voter Fraud and Abounding Corruption Everywhere. 
• Voter Fraud and the Media 
• Texas: The Eyes of the World Are Upon You! 
• What Americans Are Up Against? Dolchstosslegende, American Style!
• Here is the rest of my

No evidence of voter fraud?  You got to be kidding me.  The evidence was so obvious, so public, so available, and available so early, the only answer for their actions is the media is in on the corruption.  There's no way any rational person could conclude this was a legitimate election.  Which explains the views of  many RINO's, including John Kasich, and , both of whom have serious emotional issues in my opinion.

The question everyone should be asking is this.  If a retired bugman can find all this evidence of fraud,  how could all these people at the center of the information universe have missed it?  Unless they were part of the corruption, it was impossible!

On June 23, 2021 Fredo Cuomo, who is as intellectually corrupt and as contemptable as his brother, went on a tangent claiming the Republicans, by refusing to crumble to the Democrats and winning on the filibuster, set voting rights back fifty years, and "screamed" into the screen:

“So, how about now? How about now, Democrats? Are you ready to play to win, now? Have you had enough"

So, what exactly is he advocating? The Democrat party holds the House, the Senate, and the White House, so does that mean he wants the Democrat party to abolish any resistance to their agenda, even it if means abolishing the Constitution?  He then went on to twist history regarding MLK's comments to support his views.  If it wasn't for his brother, he'd almost have a monopoly on gaggability.  

Then we have Biden's Department of Justice suing the state of Georgia because they're claiming Georgia's new laws, while made to look neutral, are in reality racist, as their true in intent is a racist effort to prevent minorities, especially blacks, from voting.   Andrea Widburg claims, The DOJ’s suit against Georgia’s new voting laws is a joke.  She outlines their case claiming "the DOJ's complaint against Georgia is surreal", then lists their complaints, and after reading them you can't help but conclude, she's right, their case is ludicrous.  

It's also clear this case is being driven by a radical leftist anti-police activist, Kristen Clarke, and an equally radical, or gutless Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who was the "moderate" Obama wanted appointed to the Supreme Court.  After Widburg outlines what's so ridiculous about this case she concludes saying:

"If this is an example of the quality of Biden’s DOJ, they all should be summarily disbarred for incompetence."

Which bring us to an interesting question:  Why Isn’t the DOJ Suing Delaware or Other States With More Restrictive Election Laws?

Then Barack Obama  jumps into this mess arguing the federal government needs to take over control of elections to prevent another January 6th ‘Insurrection’.  Insurrection?  An insurrection where there was almost no property damage, and no one was killed except one woman, and that was done a policeman who is being protected by authorities.  Of course the woman was white, so that apparently makes the difference.  And that was an "insurrection".

Yet all the outright violence, crime, murder, brutal beatings and billions of dollars of damage done by Antifa and Black Lives Matters thugs and criminals in Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis and other cities was deemed "mostly peaceful", and were according to the propaganda wing of the Democrat party, the Main Stream Media, were actually expressions of real Democracy?  

Did I get that right?  Did I miss something?  Am I the only one who thinks the real "insurrection" is being done by Democrats, leftist thugs, BLM, Antifa and their enablers in the?

There's a reason I don't watch CNN, and it's the same reason I don't drink water out of toilets, and here's a clear example of that, CNN Attempts to Generate More Panic After Georgia Cleans Voter Rolls.  This is a subscription piece, so I'm going to outline the writer's comments by saying:

CNN is outraged that "Georgia Removes 100,000 Names From Voter Registration Rolls.", yet this is "a regularly scheduled maintenance, one that is fully revealed to the public, and the same type of voter roll cleanup seen in most other states. In other words, it hardly counts as news."

The real problem for the Democrats, the Biden administration, along with their radial leftist colleagues and allies is this:  As time is going by evidence of massive voter fraud is growing rapidly, and in many states.  

This piece by Daniel Payne is an important step in finding out exactly what went on in Georgia, Huge Victory’: Judge Names Members of Fulton Election Board in Lawsuit; Ballot Audit Will Proceed, saying: 

Suit seeks to learn if major Georgia county mishandled absentee ballot counting. An order handed down by a Georgia judge today named several individual members of a county elections board as respondents in an election-related lawsuit, clearing the way for an intensive audit of 2020 absentee ballots in Georgia's largest county. ......... the filing will help the complainants "get an audit and get to the truth" and that the audit will move forward following the decision. .......“This is a huge victory for everyone who wants to get to the truth about the way in which Fulton County mishandled the absentee ballot count,”

So, what's happened to make a judge issue such a ruling? Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed.

So, why is this decision so important? 

Georgia was conducting a "Secret 2020 Ballot Review -- Keeping Plaintiffs in the Dark".  Guess what?  Frances Watson, chief investigator for the secretary of state’s office.......“Our investigators looked into it and didn’t find anything”.   I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, paraphrasing Captain Renault.

However, here's what went on the state investigators "couldn't find" and why: 

• After several Fulton County, Ga., poll monitors testified last year that boxes of mail-in ballots for Joe Biden looked liked they’d been run through a photocopy machine, state investigators quietly broke the seal on one suspicious box and inspected the hundreds of votes it contained for signs of fraud………
• Suzi Voyles, Fulton County poll manager: Said state investigators pressured her to recant her account of unusually “pristine” mail-in ballots while sorting through them during last November’s hand recount. At the same time, a key whistleblower told RCI that state investigators pressured her to recant her story about what she and other poll monitors had observed -- what they called unusually “pristine” mail-in ballots while sorting through them during last November’s hand recount………
• the state never disclosed its probe to the public or to election watchdogs suing to inspect the ballots.  State officials also neglected to inform the judge hearing the lawsuit that they were conducting such an inspection, even though the judge had issued a protective order over the ballots
• oll monitors involved in last November’s hand recount had described the mail-in ballots in sworn affidavits as devoid of creases and folds and featuring identically bubbled-in marks for Biden. But the state said it could not find any ballots matching that description.
• the state has failed to inform the judge overseeing their case that they broke the chain of custody over the pallets of shrink-wrapped absentee ballots warehoused in a locked county facility in Atlanta.
•  “They would have had to ask for a court order to unseal and inspect those ballots and they never did that.

"Fulton, Georgia's largest county, was a key to Joe Biden's 2020 win in the state and, ultimately, the nation. The county has long been suspected as a locus of election mismanagement and incompetence. Last year's election in Fulton — which, as with the rest of the United States, included mass absentee balloting on an unprecedented scale — has continued to draw scrutiny for apparent failures of election security and protocol."

• ‘Horrendous’: Georgia Audit Lawyer Demands Full Investigation into Fulton County’s Ballot Irregularities
•   One state is conducting secret ballot review of 2020 election 'I smelled a rat when they didn't know the batch numbers'

And Georgia isn't alone in this effort.  Bernard Kerick Went to AZ and Discovered The Actual Reason Dems Are So Scared of The Audit saying: 

They brushed it off as a bunch Q kooks taking part in “tech warriors” to pacify offended Trump supporters........increasingly state politicians began visiting Arizona and taking a look at what Cyber Ninjas have been really doing, and being so impressed, that they needed THAT audit n their state as properly. It was at that time when Dems realized this wasn’t some “joke” audit, and so they rapidly stopped making jokes and obtained very severe.  So severe, as a matter of truth, that Dems tried to halt the audit. And when that didn’t work, Biden’s Handlers sicked the DOJ on them, and after that didn’t work, Biden’s Handlers began writing tweets accusing any election integrity transfer of being “Jim Crow 2.”...........

The Democrats aren’t “simply” afraid of the result – however they’re afraid that the audit outcomes shall be irrefutable and unimpeachable. They know that their efforts to discredit the audit course of in Arizona won’t stand as much as scrutiny and right here’s why. The Arizona audit is being run impeccably, using safety and surveillance procedures with a longstanding observe report of effectiveness.

The Democrats, Marxists, socialists, leftists, progressives......there I go again repeating myself.....have another really big problem. It turns out there's landslide support for voter photo I.D.'s,  "80% support photo ID for voting, including 62% of Democrats an overwhelming share of minorities"

So we can see their "need" to put state elections under federal control, which clearly violates the Constitution, but they're using Civil Rights as the reason, because Civil Rights legislation did give the federal government a lot of control over state elections because states were violating the right of black citizens to vote, a Constitutional guarantee.  But that won't fly now, as the evidence show more minorities voted in states where voter integrity laws were passed and enforced.  

And here's what Americans really think of the Democrat efforts to thwart state control of elections with their "For the People Act".  And guess what? Virtually everything the Democrat party wants or has been doing to fraudulently get their people elected is not what Americans want.  They don't like, public campaign financing they don't like ballot harvesting and they really didn't like the left's efforts to thwart requiring a photo ID to vote. 

So, now their efforts must turn to censorship.  They're now demanding more censorship over any discussion regarding voter fraud and the 2020 election.   The fact of the matter is every state should be conducting a voter audit.  Not a re-count, since recounting invalid ballots isn't the answer.  Audits are the answer, and this great piece by Jay Valentine, Want to End Electoral Fraud? Light Up the Infrastructure, shows why and how it should be done.

• Election Integrity: The Firewall That Keeps America Free

The fact of the matter is every state should be conducting a voter audit.  Not a re-count, since recounting invalid ballots isn't the answer.  Audits are the answer, and this great piece by Jay Valentine, Want to End Electoral Fraud? Light Up the Infrastructure, shows why and how it should be done.  

Time's running out for these misfits.  We now have a totally reasonably expectation of exposure of the most massive voter fraud in American history that put Biden into office, is clearly on it's way.  But what happens when that fraud is totally exposed?  Under every state and federal law fraudsters are not allow to profit from their fraud.  But what can or will be done to remove a fraudulently elected President of the United States, and possibly members of Congress? 

It's also clear this will present a Constitutional Crisis since the Constitution says nothing about such an occurrence, and maybe SCOTUS will have the opportunity to make law legitimately for a change rather that finding Penumbras of the Constitution for their rulings. 

• Stare Decisis is Like a Street Sign: "Drive Only On the Left!"

Can SCOTUS overturn this election if massive fraud is shown?  

• "During an interview with Dr. Gina Loudon on Real America's Voice, Epshteyn, a former Trump 2020 strategic advisor, predicted that the matter will land in nation's high court. ....."Boris Epshteyn said that no one can state for certain that it would be unconstitutional for former President Donald Trump to be reinstated to the presidency since the U.S. Constitution does not prohibit reinstatement and the issue has never been ruled upon."

As the reporter said in Charlie Wilson's War: We'll See.

Updates: 

• Sen. Shaheen: 'I've Been Showing My ID to Vote Since I Turned 21'
• Sen. Moran: 'I Support' Voter ID
• Sen. King: Voter ID Not Needed in Maine, 'No Fraud, No ID'
• Sen. Crapo: 'Definitely Yes' on Requiring Voter ID 
• Sen. Markey on Voter ID: Republicans 'Want to Make it Hard' for Older Blacks to Vote
• Sen. Inhofe: Voter ID is 'One of the Safeguards That We Need'
• Scalise: ‘Absolutely’ Require Voter ID  
• Rep. Davidson: ‘Absolutely’ Show ID to Vote