There were voluminous reports, from eyewitnesses and experts, of widespread election fraud in the so-called battle states and beyond. Specific allegations were made, and evidence of election rules violations and statistical anomalies were collected. Yet the courts refused to listen to virtually all witnesses and experts, rejected most of the evidence, and refused to subpoena more evidence requested by the plaintiffs. Many state government officials and some top representatives of companies supplying voting machines and software categorically denied any election fraud.
on the one hand, there is plenty of evidence strongly suggesting that
the widely observed election fraud took place during the 2020
presidential elections. On the other hand, all we have are assurances
of the election fraud–deniers that there was no election fraud, which
were later changed to admissions that although election fraud did take
place, it wasn't large enough to sway the results. No verifiable facts
that would clearly invalidate the specific election fraud allegations
were presented to the public as of time of this writing, while quite a
lot of obstruction of investigations, like denials to subject the
vote-counting software and hardware to examination by independent
experts, took place. Some of this obstruction had all appearances of a
cover-up.........To Read More....
Post a Comment