FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January
6, 2015
MEDIA
CONTACT
Maurice
A . Thompson
(614)
340-9817
Private
Pipeline Companies May Not Immediately Seize Ohioans' Properties
Rampant
Eminent Domain Abuse Continues Throughout
Rural
Ohio; However, Ohioans Have Legal Defenses
Columbus,
OH - The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law today moved to counter the
aggressive legal actions taken by Texas Eastern Transmission, a private Texas
pipeline corporation, against Ohioans Roger and Lana Barack of Belmont County,
alongside hundreds of other Ohio landowners.
The
Barack family's opposition takes aim at abusive eminent domain practices
frequently used by private out-of-state corporations to seize Ohioans property
by force, and without legitimate compensation.
More
specifically, the 1851 Center's opposition asserts the following:
· Recent
federal court decisions reaffirm and revitalize the principle that Congress may
not delegate its power, including the power to seize property, to purely
private companies: taking of Ohioans property without sufficient government
oversight is unconstitutional.
· Government
agencies must provide Ohio landowners with notice of any hearings that may
result in government permission allowing the seizing of their properties. In
this case, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") failed
to notify Ohioans of the proceedings affecting their properties.
· Federal
approval of a pipeline route does not mean that private pipeline companies may immediately
seize Ohioans private property: the Ohio Constitution prevents "quick
takings" other than in the case of roads and emergencies. Even with
federal approval, pipeline companies must abide by the Ohio Constitution.
"While
we fully support energy development in eastern Ohio, that development does not
preclude Ohioans' property rights - - through an unholy alliance of government
and big business, both state and federal statutes claim to authorize private
pipeline companies to take Ohioans property. However, Ohioans should know that
even in the case of federally-approved pipelines, they maintain important
constitutional rights protecting their property: in many cases, private
pipeline companies altogether lack the eminent domain authority they claim to
have; and even where such authority may be legitimate, these companies may not
immediately seize Ohioan's properties," explained Maurice Thompson,
Executive Director of the 1851 Center.
"Simply
asserting the proper defenses can force pipeline companies to choose a pipeline
route that goes around objecting landowners properties, or for enterprising Ohioans,
raise offers for their land by hundreds of thousands of dollars."
Section
19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution protects property rights above and
beyond the federal baseline protections, forbidding takings that are not for
legitimate "public use," and forbidding immediate takings, other than
in limited circumstances.
Read
the Landowners' Opposition to the Pipeline Company's "Motion for Immediate
Possession" HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment