Jefferson E. Holcomb, Ph.D.
Tomislav V. Kovandzic, Ph.D.
Scott Bullock
March 2010
Editor's note: This appeared here.
Civil forfeiture laws represent one of the
most serious assaults on private property rights in the nation today. Under
civil forfeiture, police and prosecutors can seize your car or other property,
sell it and use the proceeds to fund agency budgets—all without so much as
charging you with a crime. Unlike criminal forfeiture, where property is taken
after its owner has been found guilty in a court of law, with civil forfeiture,
owners need not be charged with or convicted of a crime to lose homes, cars,
cash or other property.
Americans are
supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but civil forfeiture turns that principle
on its head. With civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it
innocent.
Policing for
Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture chronicles how state and federal laws leave innocent property owners
vulnerable to forfeiture abuse and encourage law enforcement to take property
to boost their budgets. The report finds that by giving law enforcement a
direct financial stake in forfeiture efforts, most state and federal laws
encourage policing for profit, not justice.
Policing for Profit also grades the states on how well they protect property owners—only three states receive a B or better. And in most states, public accountability is limited as there is little oversight or reporting about how police and prosecutors use civil forfeiture or spend the proceeds.
Federal laws encourage even more civil forfeiture abuse through a loophole called “equitable sharing” that allows law enforcement to circumvent even the limited protections of state laws. With equitable sharing, law enforcement agencies can and do profit from forfeitures they wouldn’t be able to under state law.
It’s time to end civil forfeiture. People shouldn’t lose their property without being convicted of a crime, and law enforcement shouldn’t be able to profit from other people’s property.
Policing for Profit also grades the states on how well they protect property owners—only three states receive a B or better. And in most states, public accountability is limited as there is little oversight or reporting about how police and prosecutors use civil forfeiture or spend the proceeds.
Federal laws encourage even more civil forfeiture abuse through a loophole called “equitable sharing” that allows law enforcement to circumvent even the limited protections of state laws. With equitable sharing, law enforcement agencies can and do profit from forfeitures they wouldn’t be able to under state law.
It’s time to end civil forfeiture. People shouldn’t lose their property without being convicted of a crime, and law enforcement shouldn’t be able to profit from other people’s property.
No comments:
Post a Comment