In
my previous post, I described the “California rule,”
which puts state governments in a legal straitjacket when trying to reform
underfunded public pensions. Specifically, it places pensions in a privileged
position relative to other types of compensation, like salary or health
insurance benefits, by making them more difficult to change. This post
highlights a real-world example of the California rule’s dangers.
The
place is Pacific Grove, California, a town of 15,000 residents on the Monterey
Peninsula’s northern tip, with an annual budget of $11 to $12 million. In 2008,
John Moore, a Pacific Grove resident and retired attorney, learned that the
City of Pacific Grove had issued $19 million of pension bonds two years
earlier, while at the same time it gave the police union a 30% raise.
After
making several requests under California’s Public Records Act, Moore uncovered
a tale of self-dealing by Pacific Grove and union officials to rip off
California taxpayers. The result of Moore’s investigation, “The Fall of Pacific
Grove,” was published in The Pine Cone, a Monterey County paper; it’s
now available online thanks to the California Public Policy Center…...In the end, this highlights the importance of Emory law professor Alexander Volokh’s recommendation of a state constitutional amendment to outright abolish the California rule in the 12 states that have adopted it....…To Read More……
No comments:
Post a Comment