Mandatory union membership and mandatory dues imposed on
those who do not want to join are again at issue. On the heels of contentious
“right to work”disputes in several states, the Supreme Court has recently heard
arguments challenging an Illinois mandate requiring home health care workers to
pay representation fees to a union they did not want. That case, Harris v.
Quinn, has the potential to even challenge the Court’s 1977 Aboud precedent
upholding mandatory union dues for public sector workers. Such a result would
be a victory for liberty.
Unions and their allies in Harris v. Quinn
reiterate the claim, accepted in Aboud, that “union security” rules are
needed to prevent workers from unfairly opting out of paying for union
services. But that claim, which portrays the issue as defending the property,
contract, and freedom of association rights of unions (to be paid for services
rendered to workers they represent), intentionally misrepresents the core
issue, which is the liberty of workers and employers.....To Read More.......
No comments:
Post a Comment