What accounts for the New York Times' change from a dark presentation of absentee voting to a decidedly rosy one? The 2020 election, it appears.
“There have been numerous independent studies and government reviews finding voter fraud extremely rare in all forms,” wrote Linda Qiu. That includes “‘absentee ballots’ and ‘vote-by-mail ballots’” between which there is “no meaningful difference.” Not only are both “secure forms of voting,” according to Qiu; they are considered the “gold standard of election security.”
To pass a law limiting absentee ballots, as Georgia recently did, is no longer to choose a side in a legitimate debate over how to balance ballot integrity and ease of voting. Instead, to express concern about the risk of election fraud is seen as being engaged in a different sort of fraud — an illegitimate effort to disenfranchise the poor and minorities.
The New York Times has aggressively insisted the last several months
that worries over absentee and mail-in ballots, in particular, are
dishonest violations of voting rights. Times staff opinion editor
Spencer Bokat-Lindell wrote late
in October that “[t]he effort to discredit and discourage mail-in
voting” was the “culmination of a decades-long disinformation campaign
by the Republican Party and others to suppress votes, especially those
cast by Black and Latino Americans.”........To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment