Five "W's" and an "H". Kamala Harris and the Media

"Math is finite and logical. Incompetence is not.  Yup. As Einstein said, "The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that there are limits to intelligence."'

By Rich Kozlovich

Forever there was what's called the "The Five W's" of journalism.   Which was the sacred checklist of good journalism.  Who, What, When, Where, and Why.  Then followed up with "How".  The five W's ensued the lead would answer all these question, and then the story told "How".  Those were the six fundamental questions they actually taught to journalism students.  Believe it or not, it's claimed they still do!  (Insert laughing rolling on the ground emoji here.)

There was a lot of stuff about the Kamala/Walz interview, mostly negative.  She lied, she shifted all the blame to Trump, and she babbled out word salads refusing to explain anything, a child sitting at the adult table.  

The analyses from the interview were almost all negative, and when it came to the "sacred checklist", apparently Dana Bush missed that day in journalism school, because the interview with Bush was clearly designed to support Kamala, and none of those type of questions were asked or answered.... at least I think that's true because we never saw the entire interview, only 18 minutes out of 41.   They cut out over half the interview, and the last I saw they refuse to release the rest, so who knows what was asked and answered.  And we need to ask why that has has been hidden by CNN? 

Then we had Trump/Harris debate with moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, and it turns out the debate didn't matter after all. The world in general felt Trump won, and the Pravda media assures us Kamala "destroyed" Trump, but did anyone think they would say anything different.  You can't breath the fumes of the leftists fever swamps for so long and still be sane, but the fact is the polls remain the same.   And it's generally agreed that Kamala didn't do as badly as everyone expected....and now we know why.

It appears ABC may have rigged the debate and possibly may have given the questions to Kamala ahead of time.   And now there's a claim it can be proven ABC News deliberately rigged that debate, in short, if true, ABC cheated to help Kamala win.  Now we have Linsey Davis admitting the plan was to fact check Trump only, and not Kamala at all.  So...there was a plan  It's also being alleged the Harris campaign demanded these questions would not be asked:

• No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
• No inquires regarding her tenure as attorney general in San Francisco.
• No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.

People really aren't as unique as they think they are.  The patterns of life play out over and over again, so it's easy to believe she had the questions in advance when watching her smirks and arrogant facial expressions.  That was the same kind of conduct we saw at Senate hearings where she was in a protected environment.  It's my view she was going to be protected, and she knew it, and a substantial number of Americans believe that as ABC News' David Muir's Show Gets Trashed in the Ratings After Debate Moderating Disaster.

Now, in spite of all the fallacious bragging by the left that Kamala won, we know they don't really believe that, even ABC’s own poll shows it didn't move the needle.  So now she's going to do interviews.  Maybe! After this disastrous interview that may change.  This is the Kamala everyone expected to see in the debate, irrational word salads wandering off like Alice in Wonderland. 

Here was Matt Vespa's take on that interview:

It’s not like we didn’t see this coming. CNN most definitely edited their softball interview with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, and this one-on-one sit-down interview Harris took with a local Philadelphia outlet only reinforces what we already know about the vice president: she’s laughably inept in grasping the issues. The interview was with Brian Taff for Action News 6 ABC, and it was a disaster. Luckily, the entire clip is on social media, but that’s not what aired............. This is another example of the Democrat media complex at work. The good news is Kamala’s schtick isn’t selling, and everyone knows it.

Even gets worse.  In this interview people were questioning if she was drunk. 

Conclusion?  I do think she got the questions in advance, which gave her the opportunity to practice the answers in advance.  As for her unending flip flops, senior campaign official, Adrienne Elrod, justified them saying it was necessary because things chance, and "you want someone who’s open-minded".  Okay, I get that, but what if they're so open minded their brains spill out? 

You get Kamala.