The NY Times gets it right on GMO labeling - almost

But their approval seems a little conflicted, since they suggest that companies should voluntarily provide such labels.

 Posted on November 8, 2013 by admin

 This morning the NY Times editorial board weighed in on the recent ballot initiative in Washington State, which would have required foods to carry labels if they contained any genetically modified ingredients. The initiative failed in Tuesday’s election by a 54 to 46 percent vote — although many ballots (all mailed in) are still uncounted.

 As the editorialists correctly noted, “The aim of the measure is to discredit crops that use genetic engineering, though the Food and Drug Administration has concluded that there is no scientific evidence to support the notion that genetically modified foods pose any more risk than conventional foods.” [emphasis added]. Continuing in a logical vein, they noted that it would make more sense to let food companies decide if and how to inform consumers. Read more.