The four scientists are pretty close to embodying a Mt.
Rushmore of global warming activists. They are James Hansen at the Columbia
University Earth Institute, Tom Wigley at the National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Kerry Emanuel at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Ken
Caldeira at the Carnegie Institution.
Continued opposition to nuclear power threatens humanity’s
ability to avoid dangerous climate change,
the scientists wrote. We call on your organization to support the development
and deployment of safer nuclear power systems as a practical means of addressing
the climate change problem. Global demand for energy is growing rapidly and
must continue to grow to provide the needs of developing economies. At the same
time, the need to sharply reduce greenhouse gas emissions is becoming ever
clearer.
Nuclear power is about 50 percent more expensive to
produce than conventional power. Much of that cost disadvantage is due to
excessive government regulation that is unique to nuclear power, but there is
no reason to expect government will ease such regulation anytime soon.
Nuclear power is much more reliable and substantially
less expensive than wind and solar power. Also, nuclear power avoids many
negative environmental impacts of wind and solar power, including millions of
bird and bat kills each year and a huge land development footprint.
It will be interesting to see how other warmists, and
particularly the large environmental activist groups, respond to the embrace of
nuclear power by some of the most prominent scientists leading their cause. SOURCE: Forbes.com
IN THIS ISSUE
Ocean temps contradict alarmist Cullen on Philippines
typhoon … Raw measurements show decline in summer temperatures … Study
finds sinking islands are a matter of fiction … Kamchatka Peninsula was much
warmer in recent past … 97 percent of models predicted too much warming …
CO2 levels reach record highs, nothing happens
OCEAN TEMPS CONTRADICT ALARMIST CULLEN ON PHILIPPINES
TYPHOON
Global warming alarmist Heidi Cullen claimed warm water
caused the Category 5 typhoon that struck the Philippines this week. Objective
water temperature data, however, show nothing unusual about surface water
temperatures in the typhoon’s storm track. Cullen’s claim continues a practice
of blaming extreme weather events on global warming even when objective data
contradict such claims.
SOURCES: Climate Depot
and JunkScience.com
RAW MEASUREMENTS SHOW DECLINE IN SUMMER TEMPERATURES
Raw data from surface temperature stations show U.S.
summer temperatures are in long-term decline since the 1930s. Government
employees at the National Climatic Data Center, however, add approximately 1
degree Celsius to recent temperature readings to give the impression of
unprecedented summer heat.
SOURCE: Real Science
STUDY FINDS SINKING ISLANDS ARE A MATTER OF FICTION
Islands in the vicinity of Tuvalu are growing rather than
sinking as the planet warms, scientists report in the peer-reviewed Sustainability
Science. Despite the widely held perception that reef islands
around the perimeter of coral atolls are eroding and will disappear as a
consequence of sea-level rise resulting from global warming, this study shows
that the total area of reef islands on Tarawa Atoll has increased over recent
decades, the scientists report.
SOURCE: NIPCC Report
KAMCHATKA PENINSULA WAS MUCH WARMER IN RECENT PAST
The Kamchatka Peninsula in Northeast Asia was much warmer
than the present for thousands of years in the recent past, scientists report
in the peer-reviewed Quaternary Science Reviews. For a period of 500 years
approximately 4,000 years ago, temperatures were very close to current
temperatures, the scientists report. Then, during a 3,000-year period between
4,000 and 1,000 years ago, consecutive warm periods brought temperatures
substantially warmer than the present.
SOURCE: NIPCC Report
97 PERCENT OF MODELS PREDICTED TOO MUCH WARMING
Climate scientists Patrick Michaels and Chip
Knappenberger published an article documenting the near-universal disconnect
between climate models and real-world temperature trends. After charting
computer model predictions versus real-world temperatures, the scientists
observed, Less than 2.5 percent of model runs show that global warming is
really global lukewarming to the degree that real-world observations
indicate. (emphasis in
the original)
SOURCE: Watts Up With
That?
CO2 LEVELS REACH RECORD HIGHS, NOTHING HAPPENS
The Daily Caller published a very good
summary of the many ways in which real-world climate is defying alarmist
predictions in the wake of rising carbon dioxide emissions. If carbon dioxide
emissions are the primary driver of dangerous climate change, why are
temperatures flat and extreme weather events less frequent and severe as carbon
dioxide levels continue to rise? The Daily Caller article, Greenhouse gas
levels reach record highs, nothing happens,
presents excellent information and citations giving context and answers
to that question.
SOURCE: Daily Caller
RECOMMENDED SITES AND NEWSLETTERS
Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation
Global Science Report
Climate in Review, by C. Jeffery Small
International Conferences on Climate Change, The Heartland Institute
Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, The Heartland Institute
Climate Policy, The Heritage Foundation
Global Warming, Cato Institute
Center for Global Food Issues, Hudson Institute
JoNova, hosted by Joanne Nova
GlobalClimateScam.com
Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute
GlobalWarming.org
Cooler Heads Digest
Climate Crusaders
Power for USA
Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)
ClimateWiki
Master Resource
The Climate Bet
International Climate Science Coalition
Climate Scientists’ Register
Science and Public Policy Institute
Climate Depot by Marc Morano
World Climate Report by Dr. Patrick Michaels
E-FACT Report by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)
Biweekly Updates from the Cooler Heads Coalition
Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change by Craig Idso et al.
Watts Up With That? by Anthony Watts
ICECAP by Joseph D. Aleo
Junk Science by Steve Milloy
Global Science Report
Climate in Review, by C. Jeffery Small
International Conferences on Climate Change, The Heartland Institute
Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, The Heartland Institute
Climate Policy, The Heritage Foundation
Global Warming, Cato Institute
Center for Global Food Issues, Hudson Institute
JoNova, hosted by Joanne Nova
GlobalClimateScam.com
Center for Energy and Environment, Competitive Enterprise Institute
GlobalWarming.org
Cooler Heads Digest
Climate Crusaders
Power for USA
Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)
ClimateWiki
Master Resource
The Climate Bet
International Climate Science Coalition
Climate Scientists’ Register
Science and Public Policy Institute
Climate Depot by Marc Morano
World Climate Report by Dr. Patrick Michaels
E-FACT Report by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)
Biweekly Updates from the Cooler Heads Coalition
Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change by Craig Idso et al.
Watts Up With That? by Anthony Watts
ICECAP by Joseph D. Aleo
Junk Science by Steve Milloy
The ongoing climate change is that the planet stopped warming more than a decade ago. Meanwhile, since 2001 the CO2 level has increased by 29% of the increase prior to 2001. Carbon dioxide change has never had a significant influence on climate and never will. At http://danpangburn.blogspot.com/ see an eye-opening graph and a simple equation that, with only one external forcing, calculates an average global temperature anomaly trend since 1610 and, with 90% accuracy (correlation coefficient = 0.95), calculates measured average global temperature anomalies since 1895. See why the LIA and Global Warming both ended. CO2 change had no significant influence.
ReplyDeleteI would like to draw attention to some of Dan's work in his work, "Historical Data on Global Warming
ReplyDeleteprovided by U.S. Government Agencies
By Dan Pangburn, P.E."
http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/pangburn.html