Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Monday, September 17, 2018

Did Christine Blasey Ford Use Anonymity to ‘Get’ Kavanaugh?

The Democrats and the Washington Post knew who she was all along.

David Catron September 17, 2018

If you smelled the stench of skulduggery emanating from Dianne Feinstein’s “anonymous” letter concerning sexual misconduct by SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh, your nose didn’t deceive you. Feinstein has had the letter since July but waited until after Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings ended before referring it to the FBI. The Senator claimed its author had “requested confidentiality” and “declined to come forward or press the matter further.”

But, as the Washington Post admitted yesterday, Christine Blasey Ford contacted them at the same time she reached out to Feinstein. Did she collude with the Post and the Democrats to ambush Kavanaugh?

Did Ford make a deal with the Democrats and the Post to hide behind the shield of anonymity until it was too late for the Trump administration to replace Judge Kavanaugh with another nominee who could be confirmed before the midterms?

Their obvious hope is that the Democrats will eke out a majority in the Senate and prevent President Trump from appointing any further conservative justices to the Supreme Court. The Washington Post story says, in passing, that Ford is a registered Democrat. Her social media accounts appear to have been scrubbed, but some information remains suggesting that she is member in good standing of “the resistance.”

Her name can, for example, be found among 5,000 signatures on a letter sent by “Physicians for Human Rights” to Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. This tendentious missive protests President Trump’s border security policy and is typical of the hysteria surrounding the separation of some children from their parents that eventually culminated in the “abolish ICE” movement. She signed the letter under the name, “Christine Blasey Ph.D. Psychologist.” It is little more than a recitation of anti-Trump talking points, dressed up to read like a cri de coeur from a group of concerned professionals:...........To Read More....


My Take - Once again, it appears she's just another Democrat operative just as was Sandra Fluke.  Lawsuit time!  Once they get this woman into discovery her story will crumble, and this should be done even if Kavanaugh isn't confirmed as a warming to other schemers and fellow travellers. It should have been done to Anita Hill, and maybe this wouldn't have happened. 

3 comments:

  1. This is a standard Democrat tactic used on at least two other occasions, one being Judge Roy Moore and the other Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas. This particular charge, I believe made up is similar to the Anita Hill allegation that was proved to be jut that an allegation being made by a liberal Democrat as is Miss Ford, also a college professor as was Miss Hill. Now in Miss Hill's case it appears that this really helped her career rather than damage it and maybe Miss Ford is thinking a book, a movie and or speaking engagements, all of which ring with much money. I think if it the allegation is not proven that Miss Ford should spend a few years in jail because this is a very serious offense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your comments, and I agree. If there ever was a clear need for either criminal or civil action this is it, if for no other reason than as a warning to others this kind of thing won't be tolerated.

    Unfortunately, leftist loons like her are mentally disturbed and are legion, and nothing will deter them when they have co-conspirators like Dianne Feinstein aiding and abetting this kind of action. Unfortunately, Feinstein can't be prosecuted for this. Mores the shame.

    ReplyDelete