Have members of the Federal Reserve already engineered a
soft landing? And are they even asking
that question? The thought came to me
while reading Barry Ritholtz's recent piece on policy normalization: Today, the panic is a receding memory.
Interest at zero is an emergency setting. Why do we still have a Fed policy
designed for an economy that needed life-support? I believe monetary policymakers
generally concur with Ritholtz.
They see zero interest rates as an artifact of the
financial crisis. The economy today resembles normality—and so, too, should
monetary policy. Hence the push to raise rates this year, possibly as early as
the next meeting in September. Consider
instead that zero—or at least, very low—short-term rates reflect the realities
of the new normal for economic growth. In this scenario, quantitative easing
was the Fed's emergency policy setting. And by ending quantitative easing, the
Fed has already normalized policy.
Monetary policymakers will resist this interpretation. They do not believe that tapering and ending the bond-buying program reflects a tightening of policy. Regardless of what they believe, however, real interest rates rose at the suggestion that QE has a short half-life:…..To Read More…..
Monetary policymakers will resist this interpretation. They do not believe that tapering and ending the bond-buying program reflects a tightening of policy. Regardless of what they believe, however, real interest rates rose at the suggestion that QE has a short half-life:…..To Read More…..
No comments:
Post a Comment