Part 225 of 237 in the series Wisconsin's Secret War
MADISON, Wisconsin — This is what an abusive, politically motivated investigation looks like: The sun had yet to rise when deputies pounded on the door of Deborah Jordahl’s home in a quiet suburb of Madison. They had a warrant, and they were coming in. Armed law enforcement officers, led by Milwaukee County District Attorney investigator Anna Linden, proceeded to root through the home. They hauled out computers, smart phones, paper records and an array of “evidence” that had nothing to do with the investigation, private possessions that weren’t listed on the sweeping warrants.
DEBORAH’S STORY:
Deb Jordahl, a Madison political consultant, was one of several Wisconsin
conservatives targeted for years in the unconstitutional John Doe probe.
Through it all,
Jordahl, her husband, and her teenage children were confined to the home’s
family room, guarded by Dane County Deputy Sheriff Linda Kohlmeyer.
“At one point
early on, I started to get up from the sofa,” Jordahl told Wisconsin Watchdog.
“I told the deputy who was guarding us that I wanted to call my lawyer. She
backed me down on the sofa and told me I could not call anyone.”
“I felt
completely helpless in my own home.”
Jordahl has had
a lot of helpless feelings since the coordinated
John Doe raids of Oct. 3, 2013, but maybe nothing compares to
watching her 15-year-old daughter, her “little girl,” sitting in her pajamas on
the living room couch, crying, as a deputy told her she could tell none of her
friends at school about that morning.
It has been
described as “Wisconsin’s shame,” and now that the John Doe investigation
is legally dead, Wisconsin and the nation are learning more about the
horrifying accounts of the political probe — from the people who lived it.
Thanks to the Wisconsin
Supreme Court’s 4-2 ruling last week, which killed the investigation
launched more than five years ago, people such as Deb Jordahl finally feel safe
to tell their stories.
That’s bad news
for Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, the Democrat who launched
the John Doe, special prosecutor Francis Schmitz and the “nonpartisan” state Government Accountability Board that
worked alongside the prosecutors in targeting and, accounts like Jordahl’s
attest, intimidating dozens of conservative groups.
Jordahl, her
business partner R.J. Johnson and long-time conservative activist Eric O’Keefe shared their
experiences with Wall Street Journal senior editorial writer Collin Levy in a piece
published Wednesday night.
While O’Keefe
has publicly led the charge against the investigation and its prosecutors,
Jordahl and Johnson are telling their stories on the record for the first time.
Doing so before the Supreme Court’s ruling could have landed all three in jail,
the consequence of the John Doe’s “screamingly unconstitutional” gag order.
In fact, it
seems in January 2014 Schmitz was pushing for John Doe presiding Judge Gregory
Peterson to hold O’Keefe in contempt of court for disclosing the “existence of
his subpoena and the fact that search warrants were executed.”
Prosecutors were
keenly interested in Johnson and Jordahl, political consultants who had worked
with Republican Gov. Scott Walker.
In the Wall Street Journal piece, Johnson recounts being on a plane
when the 2013 raids went down, and that his 16-year-old son was home alone at
the time, awakened by six law-enforcement agents with guns and a warrant.
“He was told he
couldn’t move, that he couldn’t call a lawyer, that he couldn’t call his
parents. He was a minor and he was isolated by law enforcement,” Johnson told
the Journal.
“My first
reaction was incomprehension. We were baffled. We had no idea what this was
about or that this is what they do over campaign finance issues. . . . It
wasn’t until much later that we even began to understand that it was connected
to the first Doe (investigation).”
He and Jordahl
confirm what Wisconsin Watchdog in its series, “Wisconsin’s
Secret War,” recently reported: That the John Doe prosecutors were
engaged in a multi-year spying operation into conservative targets, some of whom
still do not know that they were being monitored.
Jordahl told
Wisconsin Watchdog the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s office sent its
lead investigator, David Budde, to search her Madison office — without her
knowledge. The DA’s office has yet to provide an inventory of confiscated
items.
Budde could not
be reached for comment.
Chisholm did not
return Wisconsin Watchdog’s call seeking comment Thursday. He and his
assistants have not returned dozens of calls regarding the John Doe probe.
While the investigation
may be over, Jordahl says the abuse continues. She said the prosecutors
continue to mislead the public about their activities, particularly the raids.
Chisholm, Schmitz and others have downplayed their role in the raids. In fact,
Chisholm refuses to refer to the predawn operations as “raids.”
“If those
unidentified persons feel that the unidentified sheriff deputies violated their
rights in any manner, they may vindicate their rights in the proper forum,
wherever that may be,” Douglas Knott, Chisholm’s attorney, wrote in an earlier
motion.
But Milwaukee
County District Attorney investigator Anna Linden was at the raid on Jordahl’s
home, leading the activities. She signed the return warrant, according to a document obtained by Wisconsin Watchdog.
Speaking to Bill Lueders of
the left-leaning Wisconsin
Center for Investigative Journalism, Dane County Sheriff Dave Mahoney, a
Democrat, earlier this year called accounts of the raids in National Review “highly suspicious,” and said he couldn’t believe “there would
be a warning that you could not call an attorney or tell others of the
warrant.”
Mahoney spoke
specifically of the raid his deputies and FBI agents conducted in 2011 on the
home of former Walker aide Cindy Archer, who has since filed a civil rights
lawsuit against the prosecutors in state court.
Jordahl says she
has four witnesses — her family — who will gladly testify they were told they
could not contact their attorney while the raid was going on. It was Mahoney’s
deputy who gave that order.
The warrants
insist on secrecy.
“This John Doe
search warrant is issued subject to a secrecy order,” read the warrants,
reviewed by Wisconsin Watchdog. “By order of the court pursuant to a secrecy
order that applies to this proceeding, you are hereby commanded and ordered not
to disclose to anyone, other than your own attorney, the contents of the search
warrant and or the fact that you have received this search warrant.”
The warrants
conclude, “Violation of the secrecy order is punishable as contempt of court.”
Schmitz released
a statement saying he was disappointed by the Supreme Court ruling and
asserting that there has been “no fact-finding hearing conducted at any level
establishing, for example, that search warrants were executed unprofessionally
or that persons were denied an opportunity to contact their attorneys.”
Jordahl says the
damage from John Doe continues.
“Our rights have
been repeatedly abused and, given what we’ve learned from various lawsuits, we
may not even know the half of it,” she said. “Yet even now that the Wisconsin
Supreme Court has ended the investigation, the prosecutors continue their
assault by claiming that our accounts of the raids are not true. I cannot stand
by while they lie to media about what they did, what my children saw them do.”
No comments:
Post a Comment