Maxine & Co. – Why the Shouting, Singing, and Swearing Is Not Working

Another day, another silly protest.

By Leesa K. Donner Feb 16, 2025  @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

Even James Carville is flummoxed. As President Donald Trump moves at a breakneck speed to change the course of America, prominent Democrats have taken to the streets in small numbers to express their displeasure. Protesting, of course, is their right as US citizens. But why the loyal opposition believes trotting out the elderly likes of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will be effective is anyone’s guess. More and more, their vitriol – replete with fussing and fuming – appears to be, in the words of Shakespeare, “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” As Trump rips through the bureaucratic maze of misused funds and the holy mess of an administrative state gone rogue, progressives find themselves standing out in the cold – literally – lamenting their opposition in song and words that would make a sailor blush.

Maxine: Unhinged Optics

Television is a deceptive and shrewd liar. Zoom into a tight shot, and it looks like there is a big crowd. However, the tell comes through the audio. Even with the best sound equipment, audio techs can’t make a couple of dozen people sound like the roar of a large crowd unless they sweeten the track, which is generally a no-no in the news business. As well, someone should tell Ms. Waters that shouting into a microphone overmodulates it, and the sound becomes distorted. There is, in fact, never a reason to scream into a microphone because its purpose is to amplify sound.

Simply put, if she stopped shouting, people might actually understand what she has to say. But perhaps that’s not the point. It may be that her words are meaningless, and the real message is her anger.

That brings one to question why Maxine & Co. are so exasperated. Is it because billions of taxpayer dollars are being saved? As Ruy Teixeira, writing for the Liberal Patriot, averred, “[O]ddly, Democrats seem to have decided that hitching their wagon to government bureaucracies is just the ticket they need to storm back against Trump and GOP.” Thus, they rail in favor of the profligate spending of USAID, but one must wonder if this is an effective rallying cry. Teixeira points out: “[U]nsurprisingly, anti-foreign aid sentiment runs highest among working-class voters, precisely the people who have been defecting from the Democrats to Trump, and without whose votes the Party cannot recover.”

In running for office for a third time, Donald Trump astutely claimed the mantle of the change candidate, and thus far, he’s more than kept that promise. In the run-up to Nov. 5, an article in The New York Times postulated:

“Running on change is often smart politics. Voters are perennially unhappy with the country’s trajectory, and the pandemic made it worse. According to Gallup, it has been two decades since a majority of Americans said they were satisfied with the direction of the nation. No wonder politicians cater to them with promises of new beginnings.”

Democratic strategist James Carville has made no bones about the fact that he believes his party has turned off the working-class voter with its far-left progressive policies on gender, etc. “And it’s like, there’s a, a plant somewhere in quote, progressive, unquote America, that just to seize how many jacka–, stupid things that they can embrace, it’s stunningly stupid.”

Skip the Scrolling – Head to Roku!

One wonders if pitching a tent with Maxine & Co. is really helping the Democratic Party’s cause. Is it bringing more people into the fold? Is it a valuable fundraising mechanism?  Or is the ranting and raving just something to do because they have lost their seat at the table?

Less than a month into the second and final Trump era, old-guard Democrats appear to be sitting shiva over the remnants of a party in tatters. Perhaps they will rise again like the Phoenix from the ashes, but that doesn’t appear likely anytime soon.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Leesa K. Donner Executive Editor

The DOJ’s Abortion Civil Rights Violations

By Daniel Greenfield @ Sultan Knish Blog 

In May, Paulette Harlow, a 75-year-old grandmother, was sentenced to two years in prison for a civil disobedience protest at a D.C. abortion clinic.

In September, Amber Smith-Stewart was sentenced to 30 days in prison for pro-abortion attacks on a pregnancy center. She and her two co-defendants had been tied to attacks on three pregnancy centers in Florida during which threatening messages such as “If abortions aren’t safe than niether are you” and “YOUR TIME IS UP!!” had been scrawled on them that were linked to the wave of nationwide attacks by the pro-abortion Jane’s Revenge terror group.

Harlow was sentenced for what the Biden-Harris Department of Justice described as “a conspiracy that created a blockade” of the abortion clinic doors. Generally this is known as civil disobedience, but the FACE Act turned abortion clinics into ‘first amendment free zones’ where people can spend years in prison for doing the same things other protesters get away with.

However the FACE Act equally applies to the pregnancy centers attacked by Jane’s Revenge in the aftermath of the Supreme Court striking down Roe v. Wade as unconstitutional.

Despite the FBI’s nationwide armed raids on the homes of pro-life protesters, there have been virtually no arrests in the dozens of attacks on pregnancy centers by pro-abortion activists.

The arrests of Smith-Stewart and her three co-defendants were the sole exception and ended in sentences of a month in prison for the two women, and a year in prison for Caleb Freestone: the male defendant. That’s in sharp contrast to the years in prison typically dispensed to Harlow and the average pro-life protester prosecuted under the FACE Act. Lauren Handy, one of the female protesters at the D.C. abortion clinic, was sentenced to nearly 5 years in prison.

While the Department of Justice aggressively employs the Freedom of Access or FACE Act against pro-life protesters, it selectively fails to enforce it against pro-abortion activists. And on the rare occasion when it does, the two-tier political system of enforcement quickly kicks in.

Rather than respecting the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization which ended the fictitious legal claim of a constitutional abortion right, Attorney General Merrick Garland and top Biden-Harris DOJ officials responded by announcing the creation of the Reproductive Rights Task Force. Rather than enforcing the FACE Act without any political considerations, the task force was specifically geared to empower abortion.

“Dobbs dealt a devastating blow to reproductive freedom,” Acting Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, who established the RRTF task force, argued. “We established the Reproductive Rights Task Force to bring a whole-of-department approach to protecting access to reproductive health care following Dobbs.”

The explicit linkage of the Dobbs decision to the task force was an admission that the DOJ’s mission was to specifically protect abortion and not anything else in violation of the FACE Act.

In a summer press release, RRTF bragged that “since January 2021, the Department has brought 25 cases involving a total of 57 defendants accused of criminal FACE Act-related violations.” During this same period there were over 20 attacks on pregnancy centers. These attacks ranged from firebombings to death threats to vandalism. They included attacks on churches which are also illegal under the FACE Act and liable to federal prosecution.

Despite that, the FBI did not make a single arrest until it was faced with congressional hearings by the new GOP majority. It did however have the time and resources to send two dozen armed agents to arrest a pro-life protester accused in a shoving incident at an abortion clinic.

FBI Director Wray testified that “probably in the neighborhood of 70% of our abortion-related violence cases or threats cases are cases of violence or threats against… pro-life organizations. And we’re going after that through our joint terrorism task forces, through our criminal authorities, FACE Act and things like that.”

And yet out of 57 defendants only 4 were pro-abortion while 53 were pro-life which means that while 70% of cases involve attacks on pro-life groups but 92% of defendants are pro-life.

Only 7% of the DOJ’s FACE Act defendants are related to 70% of the cases while 92% are related to 30% of the cases. This is a completely illegal bias displayed in hard numbers.

It gets even worse because while the average pro-life defendant received a multi-year prison sentence, all the pro-abortion defendants got far lighter sentences.

After the sentencing of Lauren Handy to nearly 5 years in prison for civil disobedience, an FBI official falsely claimed that “the FBI and our judicial system will not tolerate the obstruction of civil rights.” In fact the FBI is dedicated to the violation of civil rights with a two-tier system.

After two years and at least twenty incidents of pro-abortion violence by a national network, the FBI and the Department of Justice did virtually nothing to arrest and indict the majority of the perpetrators. And while bias can be hard to prove, press releases by the DOJ task force and statements by top DOJ officials make it clear that its mission is pro-abortion, not pro-justice.

The language of DOJ officials including Attorney General Merrick Garland and Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta shows that rather than enforcing the FACE Act as it’s written, they have invented a new pro-abortion FACE Act and are enforcing that instead.

Garland and Gupta have defined the mission of the task force as protecting “reproductive freedom”, but the FACE Act protects “freedom of access” to clinics, whether pro-abortion or pro-life as well as to churches and synagogues. Replacing freedom of access with reproductive freedom has allowed the DOJ to enforce a law that they invented rather than one that exists.

The DOJ task force’s mission is not to enforce the FACE Act but to protect abortion. By turning over FACE Act enforcement to a pro-abortion task force, the Biden-Harris administration and its DOJ ensured the civil rights violations proceeding from systemically unequal enforcement.

What is at stake in the civil rights abuses of the Biden-Harris administration and the Department of Justice goes beyond personal opinions on abortion. A politicized justice system is the first and foremost threat to civil rights. The politically selective interpretation of laws leads to a two-tier justice system in which the political agendas of those in power become the only law.

The FACE Act was already inherently unconstitutional because the intent behind it was to criminalize protests by one particular political movement against another. While civil disobedience is illegal and may deserve some punishment, a system under which members of one political movement engaging in civil disobedience receive 5 years in prison while members of another usually get an easily dismissed misdemeanor is traditional form of political repression and not any fundamentally different than the legal systems of Russia, China or Cuba.

The only thing that kept the FACE Act from being the modern equivalent of WWI’s Sedition Act and other legislation that liberals used to abhor before they gained power and embraced their use was that the bias was in the agenda behind it rather than in the text. The DOJ’s selective enforcement of the FACE Act however has made it a full blown unconstitutional abomination.

The DOJ and the FBI had the opportunity after the Dobbs decision and the attacks by Jane’s Revenge to show that they could be trusted to fairly enforce the law despite their personal politics and the only thing that they demonstrated was that their politics are the law.

And if you doubt that, ask the pro-life activists being sentenced to years in prison or, better yet, ask the pro-abortion activists getting off with a slap on the wrist. You’ll only have to wait 30 days.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.  Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading. 

Welcome to Our Snake Oil World

By Rich Kozlovich 

Remember when the "Wonderful World of Disney" was enjoyed and loved by so many? Well, it's not any longer, and I'm glad Walt's dead and can't see what's happened to his Wonderful World.  Who could have dreamed anyone could have so thoroughly destroyed the wholesome entertainment Walt Disney presented to the world?   And that destructive behavior is ubiquitous.  Who replaced that wholesomeness with what we're seeing in the world today?  

Answer: The all wise, all knowing, all seeing, all powerful snake oil salesmen masquerading as world and national leaders. As Mark Twain said to a snake oil salesman. 

“You, sir, are the scion of an ancestral procession of idiots stretching back to the Missing Link”

A clear definition for these leftists who promote their corruption with fraudulent elections,  bad entertainment, multiple genders, treasonous government, failed  immigration, lies offered as intelligence, corrupt justice, fake meat, false medicine, propaganda as news, paid protestors, false racism, junk science, and a lot of real trouble!

I really love this fake meat issue.  They're even trying to force people to eat bugs, and naturally "that is a must" if we're to save the world from the disaster of global warming.  Global warming, a blatantly unscientific fraud.  Imagine that, eating bugs to save the world from a problem that doesn't exist.   Now, I have to ask: Who wouldn't want to be on board with that?  

The WEF even wants to ban home grown food.  And once again, an absolute necessity if we're to save the world from global warming.   Is global warming really terrible?  Well, here's a list of all the things global warming causes.  There's just no end to the horrors of global warming.  Unless of course it's all junk science, and it is.

This isn't the first time leftists tried to force people to eat what they tell them to eat versus what they want to eat. In 1930 Italy's fascists wanted to stop Italians from eating pasta.  What, no pasta in Italy? And why?   Because pasta was unhealthy and pasta was prevented Italy from progressing.  Right?  So, what was their solution?  They promoted rice, but it turned out there was an economic ulterior motive for that.  Rice could be easily grown in Italy, and a lot of wheat had to be imported.  

But no matter, that was just a temporary fix anyway, until they could replace all of that silly food with their "ultimate solution"....which was..."the government...... [would] replace all food with nutritional pills, powders, and other artificial substitutes."  Wow!  That really sounds tasty........... don't you think? 

In May protestors at UCLA found it unacceptable the university was blocking food and water from coming in to their illegal encampment.  According to them, "this is not normal. It’s unacceptable.”  With one nitwit faculty member saying all this was "torturing protestors".   

So....I'm gonna take a long shot guess here and say a hunger strike is out of the question for these protesters?  Waddayathink?   From the look of some of the “ladies”, they weren't gonna starve to death that afternoon.

I would love to know if this nitwit “faculty” member got fired. She certainly should have.  What company employee would be allowed to get away with this kind of crap in the real world?   Can you imagine a company executive, or any company employee, going out and bringing food to strikers, and not getting fired? I can’t, and she needs fired.

Protestors are the least of UCLA's problems.  It turns out their embrace of DEI is turning out  medical students that are a disaster.  Why? To fix the world of it's institutional racism of course.  After all:  "All Things Great and Small.....Are Racist".  

Academia is in serious need of purging, and that should start with an amputation of all their funding, end tenure, and make it illegal for them to accept foreign donations, and foreign students, which is a serious source of funding.  These students will not become Americanized any more than all those who received Rhodes Scholarships became Anglicized.   

No biggie, just the end of civilization:

It seems that in the hysteria that followed George Floyd's death in 2020, we agreed to destroy all of Western civilization -- law, music, art, education, policing, science and medicine -- to make up for black people not doing well on standardized tests.......thousands of institutions that have flung aside standards in order to more fully dedicate themselves to the sole, driving purpose of our nation: boosting black people's self-esteem.

The Double Standard on Campus Speech

By Daniel Greenfield @ Sultan Knish Blog

 

After weeks in which college students at campuses from Columbia to Harvard to UCLA celebrated murders and rapes, waved the flags of Islamic terrorist organizations and assaulted Jewish people, one student has finally been held accountable.

The student, a frat brother at University of Mississippi, was a counterprotester who allegedly mocked a pro-terror student as “Lizzo” and made sounds some thought resembled a monkey.

While no amount of calls for the destruction of America or assaults on Jewish students led to any outrage in the media or actual consequences (including Khymani James, a leader of the Columbia University encampment who talked to university officials about killing Jews), the incident at a decidedly non-Ivy school has actually generated outrage and consequences.

Knocking a Jewish female UCLA student unconscious didn’t do it. Barring Jewish students from being able to go to their classes didn’t do it. Assaulting staff members and faculty at universities didn’t do it. But call a fat black female activist Lizzo” and it’s an instant nationwide outrage.

The Biden administration personally condemned it. The New York Times, USA Today, The Daily Beast, NBC News, CNN and Newsweek all covered this urgent story. None of them condemned or addressed a Jewish girl being knocked unconscious at UCLA. Or other specific assaults.

What the ‘Ole Miss’ story really tells us is that the sudden concern for free speech on campuses is a hoax. The media and the rest of the Left believe that calling for the murder of Jews is free speech while calling another student “Lizzo” isn’t. Just as they believe that non-Mexican students wearing sombreros is a punishable offense but cheering for Hamas isn’t.

In 2019, Harvard rescinded admission to Kyle Kashuv, a conservative survivor of the Parkland massacre, because of racial slurs in a text message from 2016. According to Harvard, a student can be retroactively denied admission because of something stupid he texted when he was 16, but Hamas supporters can’t be disciplined when they promote violence and antisemitism because of a highly selective commitment to “free speech”. Harvard kicked out incoming freshmen over old memes, accusing them of a lack of “maturity and moral character”.

Supporting the massacre of Jews however doesn’t raise any issues of “moral character”.

If free speech on campuses meant the right to air any views, no matter how abhorrent, to hurl any insult, that would at least be fair. In reality though campuses closely police speech they don’t like while defending their inaction against leftist terrorism and violence as “free speech”.

Universities don’t believe in free speech. Neither does the media. What they do believe is that calling a fat black girl “Lizzo” is unacceptable but chanting “Intifada”, “Glory to Our Martyrs” or “Yemen, Yemen, make us proud, turn another ship around!” in support of the Houthi Jihadis attacking civilian ships near Yemen are legitimate and even praiseworthy forms of speech.

At Brown, “hundreds of students on the Main Green chanted” in support of a terrorist group fighting the US Navy under the motto, “Allahu Akbar, Death to America, Death to Israel, a Curse on the Jews and Victory for Islam.” But at least Lizzo didn’t come up.

(That’s the same university whose commitment to anti-racism is so wholehearted that it barred white students from one of its classes in violation of both state and federal law.)

No university would tolerate a KKK rally on its premises. When racists marched at the University of Virginia, it was a national outrage, but when UVA recently cleared an encampment of Hamas supporters, the president felt the need to offer multiple apologies to the terrorist supporters.

The terrorist rallies are not protected because of free speech, but because the Left backs them.

Even while defending the Hamas encampments, universities and the media have taken every opportunity to criminalize and punish opponents and counter-protesters. Whether it was assistant professor Shai Davidai being banned from the Columbia campus, Yale spending a year investigating Evan Morris, a Jewish engineering professor, for signing a letter condemning campus antisemitism, or blaming UCLA Jewish counterprotesters for fighting back against violent assaults by Hamas supporters or the Ole Miss incident, there’s a consistent pattern of harassing, penalizing and demonizing anyone who gets in the way of the Hamas supporters.

That’s not free speech either.

The double standard is not a new problem. In 2020, the same political systems that ruthlessly suppressed anti-lockdown protesters with violent arrests, widespread censorship and, at the furthest extreme in Canada, martial law, not only tolerated the BLM race riots, but punished the mildest forms of dissent against it with firings, cancel culture and even criminal prosecution.

The same political system that permitted tearing down and vandalizing statues also prosecuted drivers driving over BLM graffiti on streets. Tearing down a Columbus statue was “in the finest tradition of political protest”, but swerving over a giant yellow BLM was a hate crime.

While the double standards were defended at the time as a response to an oppressed minority, the Hamas campus riots pit two minority groups against each other with revealing results. The system is no longer just picking and choosing between a minority group and a nameless class of targets for its violence, but between two groups both protected by civil rights law.

What made universities and the media choose one group, Muslims, over another, Jews?

Islamists have become part of the larger leftist coalition. The atrocities of Oct 7 have been rebranded as a liberation movement. After months of rallies, the position initially adopted by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA) which openly endorsed the crimes of Hamas, has become widespread across the Left.

Rather than honestly address that the media has once again taken to lying about the riots, as it did in 2020 with CNN’s infamous “’fiery but mostly peaceful protest’ being reported on with flames in the background, depicting the violence as the work of a handful of fringe figures, suggesting that the only reason protests became violent were the police arrests, and falsely portraying the views of the protesters as moderates seeking an end to the fighting.

The media, eager for any distraction from the violent racist criminality of its cause, chose to make a woman who called the cops after getting into an argument in a park into a national villain, while looking away from the worst kinds of violence and looting across the country.

Now the unfortunate former frat brother at ‘Ole Miss’ is the latest national villain because it allows the media to distort the conflict between Jewish students and Hamas supporters in the Ivies into a more familiar story about a showdown between Southern racists and black people.

While the story of the frat brother was covered by every major national media outlet, the story of Eleanor Saghian, a Jewish UCLA student who was knocked unconscious, only appeared on FOX News. Milagro Jones, a formerly homeless non-Jewish UCLA student who was mistakenly assaulted by Hamas supporters, was likewise only able to tell his story to FOX News.

The perpetrators of the assaults have not been suspended or expelled from campus.

If Hamas supporters violently assault students, the national media will boycott the story, but if a counterprotester insults a Hamas supporter, the media will make sure it’s front page news.



Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.

Crossing the Rubicon: American Academia Surrenders to the Mob

Even the left admits a resemblance to Jan. 6. 

By Tim Donner | May 2, 2024 @ Liberty Nation News Tags: Articles, Good Reads, Opinion, Politics

When even far-left MSNBC is willing to call out the campus insanity spreading like a plague across the land, we may have reached a point of no return in the leftists’ depraved obsession with one of the most barbarous movements of modern times. These radicals are becoming ever more violent in defending and uplifting a proudly terrorist organization, Hamas, and its stated goal of wiping Jews off the face of the earth. Indeed, when students (and likely a host of masked outside provocateurs) stormed and took over Columbia University’s administration building on April 30, Mika Brzezinski, co-host of an MSNBC morning show, observed that the increasingly chilling anti-Semitic protests at the once-prestigious university have now moved “into the realm of violence” and “look like Jan. 6.”

That is about as bad as it gets for leftists with little else to offer beyond purveying fear of another 1/6/21. How will they continue to effectively demonize Donald Trump for the Capitol riot when they cannot control violent agitators associated with their own party? Democrats’ attempts to distance themselves from the protests are falling on the deaf ears of those who have become accustomed to Joe Biden-era radicalism. Thus, this president is experiencing the worst of both worlds: He is blamed for laying the groundwork for revolt with his embrace of the most extreme elements of his party and yet is subject to chants of “Genocide Joe” from leftist protesters expecting him to call for a permanent ceasefire and renounce his support of Israel.

The Democrats already got a pass for their tacit or outright support of riots across the nation following the George Floyd affair in 2020. At that point, people were still trying to cope with a pandemic, the likes of which we had never before witnessed, and so the Democrats’ radical activity and ability to change the subject to Trump allowed them to land the presidency. This time around, it is hard to envision how they can manage to sidestep culpability for the upheaval in academia.

Columbia — Tip of a Long-Forming Iceberg

Columbia is merely Exhibit A in the growing list of verbally or physically violent anti-Semitic protests clearly being centrally orchestrated, with George Soros topping the list of suspects despite his own Jewish heritage. UCLA canceled classes on May 1 following another violent protest that rocked the campus. Northwestern University gave in to the demands of radicals linked to the movement called BDS, meaning Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel, by placing anti-Israel activists on its advisory committee on university investments, among other concessions. More than 1,000 people have been arrested as no fewer than 51 colleges and universities, according to CampusSafety.com, have experienced protests and encampments, most of them scaring the tar out of Jewish students wanting simply to move freely about the campus and attend class.

 

It is undeniable that the protests and riots of 1968 represented ground zero for transforming academia into a cauldron of first liberal, then socialist, then Marxist indoctrination. Nevertheless, no matter your view of the student riots of the 1960s, with Columbia famously at the center of the most radical activity, those protests were against an explosively controversial war in which the United States was directly engaged. The protesters, already enraged at the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, were violently opposed to the escalating conflict in Vietnam, where thousands of young Americans paid the ultimate price or had their lives inalterably damaged by physical and mental injury. It was a humiliating and transformative chapter in American history, a conflict that radicalized the young and brought down a president who had won a landslide victory just four years earlier.

In stark contrast, the United States has not even participated in the Israel-Hamas war, even after no fewer than 32 Americans were slaughtered by Hamas on Oct. 7, and at least 10 US citizens were taken hostage. There can be no moral ambivalence about which side is responsible for the war, nor about the peril faced by a rock-solid ally surrounded by countries committed to its annihilation. And yet, there is zero sympathy among the protesters for the hostages or Americans murdered in cold blood, but instead a contempt for their plight. Living in a dream world, they have somehow turned the perpetrators of mass murder into the victims. Their utter nihilism continues to amaze.

Envy is one of the seven deadly sins and for good reason. Those poisoned by it are destined for lives of misery — for themselves and all whom they touch. Israel is an exceptionally prosperous nation with no ambition beyond its own borders. But most all of the states surrounding it, other than Egypt and a precious few brought into Trump’s Abraham Accords, are living miserable lives under brutal authoritarian rulers devoting extraordinary resources to the marginalization and ultimate destruction of the Israeli state and all Jews who inhabit it.

It is one thing to go to the mat for a widely unpopular and disastrously executed war on the other side of the world that cost some 50,000 American lives and resulted in the first defeat in American history. It is quite another to militantly protest on behalf of a movement defined by its savagery and contempt for fundamental Western values like free speech, a free press, and equal rights for women. Like Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968, Biden has lost control of a war and may soon experience what it feels like to be abandoned by the very people who, as in 2020, he had counted as supporters.

 

Read More From Tim Donner

Soros Funds the Protests and the Protested

By Daniel Greenfield @ Sultan Knish Blog 

Outside the mob of Hamas supporters were chanting “Genocide Joe” while inside Joe Biden was trying to raise more money.

Yet the terrorist supporters and the president both shared a funding source.

The Soros clan has been accused of providing an estimated $15 million to the pro-terrorist groups storming cities in support of Hamas, and an estimated $758,000 already to Biden.

Both of those are only partial estimates of much larger spending by the family of radical billionaires which have simultaneously been funding the anti-Israel movement, trojan horse Jewish groups and the Democratic Party politicians whom they are busy pressuring.

No accounting of Sen. Schumer’s infamous speech attacking Israel can overlook the fact that Alex Soros, the son of the elderly former Nazi collaborator who has defended Hamas, has met at least nine times with Sen. Schumer and called him “his good friend”. The younger Soros has continued meeting with Senate Dem candidates on whose victory Schumer’s Senate Majority Leader role depends.

The outside game of pressure campaigns, street blockades and violent attacks in the streets may get more attention, but is subsidiary to the inside game mastered by the Soros family.

$60 million has been pumped from the Soros network into its own Democracy PAC to help Democrats win. Millions from that PAC have gone to the Democratic Party’s Senate Majority PAC and House Majority PAC. And so when the Soros clan speaks, top House and Senate Democrats like Sen. Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries listen closely and then take action.

George Soros was always known as a savvy investor, but his son Alex has been even savvier as a political investor, building a spectrum of political funds that are not only vital to the election prospects of the Democrats, but that also cover an array of anti-Israel groups with different brands and tactics.

The Soros fortune extends to funding Linda Sarsour’s Arab American Association which took part in a rally celebrating the Oct 7 attacks where the pro-Hamas mob attacked police officers, Jewish Voice for Peace, a fake Jewish group which has blocked traffic to stop Israel from attacking the terrorists, J Street, which falsely claims to be “Pro-Israel” and “Pro-Peace”, but has actually lobbied against Israel’s fight against terrorists, and Bend the Arc: Jewish Action, a vanity group co-founded by Alex Soros, which tries to provide Jewish cover for members of the antisemitic ‘Squad’ while accusing their Jewish critics of “weaponizing antisemitism”.

Meanwhile, in Israel, Al-Haq, a Soros funded Muslim group tied to terrorists, had described Oct 7 as a case of “Palestinian armed groups engaged in an operation in response to escalating Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people” while the International Crisis Group has become so entangled with Iran that its members have been described as agents of the regime.

Viewed separately, JVP, J Street, Al-Haq, the Arab American Association, the Crisis Group and many others appear to represent different views, but actually represent different fronts in the war on Jews. While the groups may appear different, they follow the usual Soros tactic of networking smaller groups together into larger ones to create not just organizations, but a movement.

Soros money funds Muslims, leftists and people of Jewish ancestry who support killing Jews under a variety of banners and names, but they share the traditional hateful Soros agenda.

What Sen. Schumer or J Street believe about Hamas, may be less relevant than what George Soros thinks about Hamas. And what does Soros think about the Islamic terrorist group?

“America and Israel must open the door to Hamas,” Soros had once urged in an editorial. “Neither Hamas nor Hezbollah can be treated merely as targets in the war on terror because both have deep roots in their societies,” he argued in yet another editorial. “AIPAC must bear its share of responsibility for aiding and abetting policies such as Israel’s heavy-handed response to Hezbollah last summer and its insistence on treating Hamas only as a terrorist organization.”

Following the money is always a good idea and the profound shift made by many Democrats and liberal organizations from supporting Israel after Oct 7 to opposing it can be seen as a reflection of the agenda of their funder. Soros-funded groups quickly rallied after Oct 7 to undermine support for the Jewish State using everything from street violence to fake claims of Islamophobia and atrocities. But the invisible inside game is no less real even if it leaves behind no fingerprints. There is no way to know what happened behind the scenes at some organizations where the reversals were fast enough to make heads spin.

On Oct 9, J Street had issued a statement denouncing the attacks and stating that “we stand in solidarity with the Israeli people and with the Israeli armed forces that have been battling desperately to protect them. Two days later, J Street was back on track, condemning the “occupation of Palestinian Territory” and ten days later was labeling Israel’s campaign to stop Hamas as an “escalation.” What happened behind the scenes at the leftist group?

What we do know is that Alex Soros has continued his father’s tradition of elemental hostility toward the Jewish State.

On August 7th, months before the Hamas attacks, Alex Soros co-signed a letter falsely accusing the “current Israeli government” of a “campaign is so severe and so consequential that it merits a proportionate reaction by Israel’s chief ally, the United States of America” such as voting against Israel at the UN and other ways of undermining the Jewish State.

Despite the attacks of Oct 7, all 7 of the demands for actions against Israel were either enacted, moved forward or otherwise entered consideration by the Biden administration.

While the pro-Hamas mobs may condemn the Biden administration, both ‘Genocide Joe’ and the Hamas supporters share a common anti-Israel agenda and a common funding source.

The difference between the inside and the outside game, lies in the facades. What’s the real difference between Biden and Hamas supporters? Appearance. The combination of internal and external pressures, mob violence and massive checks, is a campaign of total warfare against Israel that is designed to appear as if it were coming from many diverse voices.

But behind many of the facades lies one agenda.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.

Authorities Treat Pro-Hamas and Anti-Drag Protests in Very Different Ways

By Daniel Greenfield  @ Sultan Knish Blog

After years of riots, including the latest outburst of pro-Hamas attacks targeting synagogues, churches, and Jewish restaurants, it turns out that there is a way to stop them after all.

New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella recently filed civil rights charges against a Neo-Nazi group which had been protesting outside a drag event at a cafe.

In December, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell filed civil rights charges against the same group for harassing drag events and migrant housing facilities. Campbell claimed that the Nationalist Social Club had “engaged in a concerted attempt to target and terrorize people across Massachusetts and interfere with their rights.”

The National Socialists didn’t actually do anything more (and arguably less) than BLM and Hamas supporters have spent the last three years doing to people around the country.

In New Hampshire, they were accused of banging on the windows and making intimidating gestures. In Massachusetts, they were charged with trespassing, intimidating hotel staff and disrupting the operations of hotels. They’ve also been accused of minor vandalism.  Name a leftist aligned protest movement that doesn’t routinely do all of these things.

The problem isn’t that Neo-Nazis are being charged when their behavior is illegal, it’s that the same kinds of behavior are treated as sacrosanct when practiced by eco-terrorists, BLM and now Hamas supporters who intimidate, threaten, interfere with operations and vandalize targets.

The two states claim that civil rights charges are legitimate because the Neo-Nazis targeted “minority groups”. But that’s exactly what Hamas supporters have been doing.

Massachusetts is the home of the ‘Mapping Project’ targeting Jewish institutions for protests which listed Jewish schools, synagogues and community groups.

This came after antisemitic incidents were at all time high in Manhattan.

In 2020, as part of a ‘Day of Rage’, terrorist supporters had marched to the offices of Jewish organizations while chanting calls for Intifada and the destruction of Israel. With a mob of 300, the Day of Rage had a much larger turnout than the paltry Neo-Nazi rallies.

No civil rights charges were filed.

Earlier in 2023, the National Socialists had been charged with a civil rights violation in New Hampshire for hanging up a “Keep New England white” banner. But at the University of New Hampshire campus, students had gathered to chant the “From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free” call for the destruction of Israel which was described as “protected speech”. Both are calls for getting rid of minority groups, but only one resulted in criminal charges.

Given the right political incentive, minor protest charges like trespassing, vandalism or disrupting a business that lead to nothing more than a desk appearance ticket (and usually not even that) for leftists are hooked up to civil rights laws that suddenly put real teeth into them.

Massachusetts and New Hampshire showed that the abusive behaviors we have been forced to take for granted from leftist protest movements have a legal recourse. Massachusetts had previously explored adding Neo-Nazis to gang member databases as an “unincorporated group”. Is there any reason that BLM rioters and Hamas supporters shouldn’t also be there?

During the BLM and pro-Hamas riots, the authorities insisted on describing any behavior short of blowing things up as “first amendment activities”. But they’re actually not. Blocking roads, streets and buildings is not a “first amendment activity”. And if you doubt that, try doing it while advocating for the Fourth Reich, Kim Jong-Un or some other socially unapproved cause.

The extended difference granted to leftist protesters is not a matter of law, but of privilege.

The same authorities that claimed that they are unable to do anything about even the most abusive protests enforce the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act under which even the most non-violent forms of civil disobedience in front of a Planned Parenthood clinic are a federal crime that can lead to serious prison time. In the last few years, the FBI has raided the homes of abortion clinic protesters who did the same things that leftist protesters routinely do.

Last year, Eva Zastrow, who sat in front of the door at an abortion clinic to block people from going inside, was charged with multiple FACE violations. Some of her fellow protesters were charged with engaging in a conspiracy against civil rights and face 11 years in prison.

How is that possible? The Clinton administration decided that access to abortion clinics was a federal protected civil right and protesting against them was therefore a civil rights violation.

Pro-abortion protesters who broke into the Supreme Court and disrupted hearings on abortion were sentenced to nothing more than unsupervised probation while anti-abortion protesters face 11 years in prison for doing less than that. Faced with a protest or a riot that they oppose, like Jan 6, the authorities find legal tools for throwing everyone involved in prison for a long time.

Break into Congress to oppose Biden and you will spend years in prison, but break into Congress to oppose Republicans or support Hamas, and you get off with nothing or less than nothing. That’s because the tools are there left over from the civil rights era, counterintelligence, counterterrorism, the war on drugs or other events that gave federal and local law enforcement extensive and arguably unconstitutional powers for dealing with the crisis of the moment.

Both the use of those tools and the failure to use them are themselves forms of discrimination.

In recent years, the Biden administration, under Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg began charging passengers with federal crimes for getting into tussles with flight attendants, yet Hamas supporters have been able to invade and besiege airports, and even fly a balloon to ground planes near JFK without a single word from Buttigieg or any threat of intervention. Have too many drinks and you’re a federal offender, attack an airport for terrorists, and you’re fine.

In every case there are selective reasons for applying the law and for choosing not to do so.

What is not true is that there are no legal remedies. Instead the authorities file the same problems and the same behaviors under different categories for political reasons. A BLM or pro-Hamas riot targeting churches and synagogues is filed as a first amendment protected activity because it is categorized as a civil rights protest, while Neo-Nazis doing the same thing outside a drag event get locked up because they are categorized as violating civil rights.

These are not differences in behavior or even intent, but in the politics of the perpetrators.

We don’t have to live in a country in which race rioters and terrorists can block roads and airports, harass churches and synagogues, and endorse violence and domestic terror.

All we have to do is start categorizing their behavior as a violation of our civil rights.
People have a right to leave their homes. They have a right to visit their chosen houses of worship. And they have a right to attend their university of choice without harassment.

The First Amendment does not extend to intimidating, terrorizing, threatening and preventing people from living their lives. Once people are being blocked, harassed or threatened, it is no longer a legal protest, but a civil rights violation. And it should be treated as such. The failure to do so has normalized radicals fighting police, blocking people and roads, and filming themselves stalking and harassing passerby before posting the videos on TikTok.

The authorities have shown us that the tools exist to end this nightmare. They just need to be used. And if elected officials and prosecutors refuse, then those ready to act will replace them.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.

They’re rich, American, live in China, and fund Hamas propaganda

November 19, 2023 By Andrea Widburg

You’ve probably never heard of Neville Roy Singham or his wife, Jodie Evans, nor are you aware of the company that made them rich. However, they are affecting your life and your world in profound ways. They are rich Marxists (which is an oxymoron only if you ignore that powerful Marxists always amass millions and billions) who live in China and finance anti-American and anti-Israel propaganda. I’ve been meaning to write about them for almost a week now and, with Sunday being a slow news day, I’ve finally got the space and the time.

A report from Francesca Block at The Free Press explains that most of the pro-Palestinian protests that have not-spontaneously popped up across America since October 7 have funding from a single source: 

Singham and Evans. 

It is they who, beginning in 2017, started donating to a Manhattan-based entity called The People’s Forum, which, in turn, is the moving force behind the protests. In just five years, Singham and Evans poured over $20 million in the organization which bills itself as a “movement incubator for working class and marginalized communities to build unity across historic lines of division at home and abroad.”...............But Singham and Evans aren’t just your ordinary rich leftists. These two are such committed Marxists that they’ve dedicated their lives to advancing the interests of…drum roll, please… China!..................To Read More...

My Take - I never heard of them before this either, so, here they are, and given their activity I think it's interesting they're flashing the peace sign.  But, then again, when did hypocrisy ever stand in the way of leftist's activities to destroy freedom, capitalism, justice, and America?

• Jodie Evans - (born September 22, 1954) is an American political activist, author, and documentary film producer. Evans was a Democratic Party political activist who managed the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign of former California governor Jerry Brown.^[1][2] Evans co-founded the women's anti-war activist organization Code Pink with Medea Benjamin and others.^[3] She is the board chair of the Rainforest Action Network. In 2023, The New York Times published an article detailing the connections between her husband since 2017, Neville Roy Singham, and the Chinese Communist Party, stating that Evans was critical of China's authoritarian government in 2015. Since 2017, 25% of Code Pink's funding has come from groups connected to Singham. Evans stated in 2023 that she now strongly supports China and regards it as a defender of the oppressed and a model for economic growth without slavery or war.^{[1]...............}
• ^.Neville Roy Singham (born May 13, 1954) is an American businessman and social activist. He is the founder and former chairman of Thoughtworks, an IT consulting company that provides custom software, software tools, and consulting services, which he sold to a private equity firm for $785 million in 2017. According to The New York Times, Singham has helped fund causes and groups that promote pro-Chinese government messages..........
• The American Multimillionaire Marxists Funding Pro-Palestinian Rage - The Free PressBy Francesca Block -   The pro-Palestinian protests over the last month, where tens of thousands in the U.S. have chanted for the end of Israel, are not merely a story of organic rage.   They are also funded in large part by an uber-wealthy American-born tech entrepreneur: Neville Roy Singham, and his wife Jodie Evans. Since 2017, Singham has been the main funder of The People’s Forum, which has co-organized at least four protests after 1,400 innocent Israelis were slaughtered by Hamas on October 7. One rally, in Times Square, happened on October 8 before Israel had even counted its dead. Neville Roy Singham and his wife Jodie Evans are China propagandists—and a primary source of the fury exploding on our streets........................

 

Who’s Behind the Pro-Palestinian Protests?

By Leesa K. Donner | Oct 24, 2023 @ Liberty Nation News   

Something is rotten, and it isn’t coming from Denmark.

The American public was largely caught off guard when pockets of pro-Palestinian protests erupted across the United States following the surprise October attack on Israel. Bearing in mind that more than three-quarters of US citizens polled consider themselves pro-Israel, it was unnerving to see so many well-organized Palestinian voices spring up with such speed. These made-for-TV events were not organic – the printed signs with messages from sponsoring organizations made that evident. So, who are these pro-Palestinian groups spreading anti-Israel messages?

At the top of the list lies the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). They self-describe as “the largest socialist organization in the United States, with over 92,000 members and chapters in all 50 states.” As the word socialism would indicate, the DSA claims to take up the cause of working people. Since the people who live in Israel work, it’s a bit murky as to why this group is championing the cause of Hamas. Perhaps the point is simply to generate unrest through its campus and community-based chapters. (As a side note, a broad-smiling Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is a featured picture on the DSA homepage.)

New York Rep. Ritchie Torres (D) openly seethed about the New York Chapter of the DSA on the social media platform X: “The NYC-DSA is revealing itself for what it truly is: an antisemitic stain on the soul of America’s largest city. There is a special place in hell for those who glorify the cold-blooded murder of civilians and children.”

Primary Organizers of Pro-Palestinian Protests

Another organization printed as a sponsor on pro-Palestinian rally posters is the A.N.S.W.E.R Coalition. The “about us” tab on its website explains its central mission: “Founded just three days after the September 11, 2001 attacks, ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) initiated the massive U.S. antiwar movement opposing the U.S. invasion of Iraq …”

The coalition openly supports the “Palestinian struggle for self-determination.” It has mobilized its people “to stop the repeated assaults against and massacres of the people of Gaza.” The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) also identified the Palestinian Youth Movement, Students for Justice in Palestine, and the US Palestinian Community Network as three other prominent players in the anti-Israel rallies occurring across the country.

In terms of making a big splash for the TV news crews, the winner of this prize goes to the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP). Last Wednesday, it marshaled thousands of supporters to protest in Washington, DC, and held a sit-in inside the rotunda of the Cannon Office Building on Capitol Hill. It was joined by another anti-war group called IfNotNow; these organizations come to the pro-Palestinian protests by way of their Jewish heritage, advocating for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Jewish Voice for Peace pacifist rally concluded with the arrest of 355 activists. The Anti-Defamation League has a few choice words for the JVP, calling it “a radical anti-Israel and anti-Zionist activist group that advocates for the boycott of Israel and eradication of Zionism.” It continues, “The spread of JVP’s most inflammatory ideas can help give rise to antisemitism, and sometimes it has espoused classic antisemitic tropes itself.”

Then there is the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) which has chapters all over North America, including Canada. The ADL categorizes it as “an anti-Zionist activist organization” that “frequently engages in inflammatory rhetoric about Zionism, including calls to stigmatize and ban Zionists from community spaces.”

The deeper one digs, the easier it is to see that the pro-Palestinian protests were not events that sprang up coincidentally or organically but had been orchestrated by well-oiled anti-Israel or pro-Muslim groups who were at the ready before the blood dried following the Hamas attack on innocent Israeli people. So whether these folks hold a sit-in on Capitol Hill or disrupt commerce and tourism in Times Square, it’s vital to note these are fringe groups of people and do not represent the majority opinion of US citizens.

 

Read More From Leesa K. Donner

Climate Change Protesters Storm the Field, Delay Penn-Yale Game

By Dylan Gwinn 22 Oct, 2022 

A swarm of climate change protesters rushed the field during halftime of the UPenn-Yale football game on Saturday and refused to leave, delaying the start of the second half. The protesters, numbering around 60, represented the Fossil Free Penn organization. The group is pressing the university to fully divest from fossil fuels. In addition, fossil Free Penn posted video of fans attempting to take their banners...........To Read More......

Stuck With Glue But Nowhere To Poo: Climate Extremists Get in Sticky Situation - Chris Tomlinson 21 Oct 2022 - Climate extremists who glued themselves to the floor of a Volkswagen exhibition in Germany complained that no one gave them the means to use the toilet after there were left stuck to the floor for hours. The group of nine climate extremists from the group ‘Scientist Rebellion’ glued themselves to the floor of the Volkswagen museum and car showroom Autostadt in Wolfsburg, which lies across from the automotive giant’s main factory after breaking in. 

@VW told us that they supported our right to protest, 

but they refused our request to provide us with a bowl 

to urinate and defecate in a decent manner while we are glued,

 and have turned off the heating.

Just two hours after the extremists glued themselves to the floor in the Porsche pavilion, they began complaining about food and drink, which was given to them by Volkswagen employees.  However, they later demanded a “privacy tent” and buckets in order to be able to go to the toilet, something the company did not provide, the German tabloid Bild reports..........

Climate Change Cultists’ Latest Eco-Terrorist Act: Mashed Potatoes Tossed on $110 Million Monet - By J.D. Rucker Oct. 23, 2022 -  Cults are destructive and dangerous as indoctrinated followers do stupid things on behalf of a person, group, or cause. But few modern day cults are as completely brainwashed as eco-terrorists in the climate change movement. These people take idiocy to a whole new level.  Last week, they hit an Aston Martin showroom. The week before that they tossed tomato soup on a Van Gogh. Now, they’ve defiled a $110 ($110.00 must be a misprint) Monet with mashed potatoes. Watch:........ 

Activists glue themselves to copy of Leonardo's 'The Last Supper,' adding to string of similar protests - Jacqui Palumbo - A group of climate activists who have disrupted major galleries this week to send a message to the UK government have struck again -- this time at the Royal Academy of Art in London.  On Tuesday morning, demonstrators from Just Stop Oil (JSO) glued themselves to a frame housing a copy of Leonardo da Vinci's "The Last Supper" that is believed to have been painted by two pupils of the Italian Renaissance master. The activists also spray-painted the demand "No New Oil" in white underneath the painting, a spokesperson for the gallery confirmed to CNN............

 

California Truckers Fight Ex-Communist Union Leader’s Mandatory Unionization

Daniel Greenfield July 24, 2022  @ Sultan Knish Blog

Last Wednesday, hundreds of truckers protested at the Los Angeles-Long Beach port, some trucks slowed down traffic on the 110 while others took part by refusing to take on loads. Their message was timed not just for Los Angeles County voters who backed the leftists threatening to put them out of work, but for retired general Stephen Lyons.  The former general who had served as the Commander of the U.S. Transportation Command had been picked by the Biden administration as its Port and Supply Chain Envoy and was there to see the ports through which much of the country's international cargoes flow. 

Or don't.

The truckers had a simple message for Lyons and his boss, they shouted it and waved it on signs, “No to AB5.” But Lyons had little to offer the independent truckers fighting mandatory unionization by California Democrats and their union allies except, “We need to retain drivers because they're critical to our economy."  With 70,000 California owner-operator truckers trying to figure out if they can even work, that’s not likely..............To Read More.......

Canadian Truckers Have Endured Lies, Looting, and Lockdowns. They Deserve Our Thanks

By Ilana Mercer | February 18, 2022

Where in the story of the travails of the world’s heroes, the Canadian Truckers for Freedom, are we?  Justine Trudeau, who fled like a girl into hiding when the lorry drivers, kids in tow, first arrived in Ottawa, has done what this writer had feared he’d do: After instituting some of the most diabolical COVID restrictions in the world, Justine has the dubious distinction of invoking “the never-used Emergencies Act,” martial law, in essence, to quash peaceful, democratic civil disobedience, with nary a democratic debate in the People’s House of Commons.  

“With the emergency powers,” warns legal scholar Jonathan Turley, “Trudeau can now prohibit travel, public assemblies, conduct widespread arrests, and block donations for the truckers. This also includes freezing bank accounts and ramping up police surveillance and enforcement.”..............

Inspired by the quixotic Canadians, liberty-loving Europeans are rising against the Continental COVID cartel that has created tiers of subjects, some better than others. In France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Austria, brave men and women are demanding their liberties be reinstated, many waving the Canadian flag in recognition of those who went before. They are doing the same in New Zealand and Australia, even in Israel. ..........To Read More....

WATCH: Police Run Over Freedom Convoy Protesters With Horses, Face Lawsuit

Nick Arama Feb 18, 2022

Police began their action against the Freedom Convoy protesters in Ottawa Friday morning. There are a lot of protesters and while the police have gained control of some streets and arrested some of the people, there are still many other protesters.  At least 100 people have been arrested, mostly for “mischief” charges — a charge that seems to be a catch-all for dissenting from the government — and about 24 vehicles towed. But based upon the number of folks who have come out, there are a lot of people left and now, more people are coming out. They may have just made more protesters after this police action. But Deputy Chief Steve Bell claimed that no protesters were hurt..........To Read More....

My Take - This was police conduct against completely peaceful demonstrators, and the "legacy" media is largely silent, and no one is calling for disbanding their police.   Yet, when "most peaceful protestors" were burning down buildings, destroying private property and attacking people the media went nuts against police trying to stop that, demanding police forces all across the nation be defunded and disbanded, and some calling for social workers to take their place. 

However, while I'm a law and order guy who supports police in general, and have been stunned at the stupidity or the "defund the police" crowd, we have to remember the police forces of the world are quasi-military units for civilian control, and tyrants pay their salaries also. 

• Ottawa Police Excuse for Horses Running Over Freedom Convoy Protesters Departs From Reality
• Trudeau government to start abducting truckers’ pets
• Did Canadian mounted police mow down or even kill an old lady?
•  Woman Trampled By Horse in Canada, and Police Have Gall to Say At Least Nobody Died or Was 'Seriously Injured'
•  Trudeau’s Crackdown in Ottawa Turns Violent as Mounties Trample Over Protestersm, By Debra Heine - Canadian Mounties on horseback plowed through a crowd of Freedom Convoy protesters in Ottawa, reportedly trampling trampling two of them. There were conflicting reports Friday night on the status of one of the protesters who was trampled. Police throughout the day reportedly made 100 arrests as they continued moved to end the three-week anti-vaccine mandate protest in downtown Ottawa near Parliament Hill. Authorities said the Mounties were brought in to prevent an escalation or further injury after the protesters had engaged in “assaultive behavior.”.......
• Tyrant Trudeau shows his true colors
•  Why are the police we revere doing the tyrants’ bidding? - By Patricia McCarthy - Without a doubt, being a police officer is one of the most difficult and dangerous job on the planet.  One has to admire those who take on the job.  The American left has made its contempt of our police abundantly clear for several years now.  Encouraging the BLM riots, excusing the damage done, decreeing no punishment for those who did billions of dollars in property destruction over the summer of 2020 was their coin of the realm.  Lacking common sense and any skill at predicting the consequences of idiotic policies, they have doubled down on stupid as cities like NY, Chicago, DC, and LA rack up homicides committed by career criminals repeatedly let loose on an unsuspecting public. 
• Video: Ottawa Protesters Link Arms to Block Police
• Justin the woke Canadian - The bell starts tolling for Justin. ........The truckers have succeeded in having provinces change their rules.  It's only a matter of time before Trudeau starts following the "political" science like his Democrat allies down here..........
• Justin Trudeau Eulogized Fidel Castro - “Canadian truckers: Ottawa police arresting demonstrators, clearing out streets.  Ottawa police announced Friday that some protesters 'are being arrested' during an operation to clear out those who have been demonstrating. ... There is a large police presence on Nicholas Street, protesters are being advised to leave immediately. Some protesters are surrendering and are being arrested, 'You will face severe penalties if you do not cease further unlawful activity,' Police tweeted.” (Fox News, 2/18.) ... 
• Justin Trudeau: Fidel Castro’s Son, If not biologically, then ideologically.  -Thu Feb 17, 2022 - Robert Spencer -The rumors have been circulating for years: it’s easy to find side-by-side photographic comparisons of Fidel Castro and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, showing the strong physical resemblance between the two. This rattles the establishment media to the extent that they “debunk” it regularly. Last Saturday, the New York Times ran a piece entitled: “An old falsehood resurfaces: that Justin Trudeau is Fidel Castro’s son.” On Tuesday, the Daily Beast chimed in with “Truckers Resurrect Bananas Theory About Trudeau’s Real Dad.” True to form for the establishment media, neither addressed the points journalist Karen Leibowitcz made in favor of the claim in 2020, but while the question is interesting, what is far more important is that whatever the true story of his parentage may be, in bringing authoritarian rule to Canada, Justin Trudeau has now shown himself to be the ideological son of Fidel Castro. ............. 101 comments
• Canadian Truckers Have Endured Lies, Looting, and Lockdowns. They Deserve Our Thanks