They’re rich, American, live in China, and fund Hamas propaganda

November 19, 2023 By Andrea Widburg

You’ve probably never heard of Neville Roy Singham or his wife, Jodie Evans, nor are you aware of the company that made them rich. However, they are affecting your life and your world in profound ways. They are rich Marxists (which is an oxymoron only if you ignore that powerful Marxists always amass millions and billions) who live in China and finance anti-American and anti-Israel propaganda. I’ve been meaning to write about them for almost a week now and, with Sunday being a slow news day, I’ve finally got the space and the time.

A report from Francesca Block at The Free Press explains that most of the pro-Palestinian protests that have not-spontaneously popped up across America since October 7 have funding from a single source: 

Singham and Evans. 

It is they who, beginning in 2017, started donating to a Manhattan-based entity called The People’s Forum, which, in turn, is the moving force behind the protests. In just five years, Singham and Evans poured over $20 million in the organization which bills itself as a “movement incubator for working class and marginalized communities to build unity across historic lines of division at home and abroad.”...............But Singham and Evans aren’t just your ordinary rich leftists. These two are such committed Marxists that they’ve dedicated their lives to advancing the interests of…drum roll, please… China!..................To Read More...

My Take - I never heard of them before this either, so, here they are, and given their activity I think it's interesting they're flashing the peace sign.  But, then again, when did hypocrisy ever stand in the way of leftist's activities to destroy freedom, capitalism, justice, and America?

• Jodie Evans - (born September 22, 1954) is an American political activist, author, and documentary film producer. Evans was a Democratic Party political activist who managed the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign of former California governor Jerry Brown.^[1][2] Evans co-founded the women's anti-war activist organization Code Pink with Medea Benjamin and others.^[3] She is the board chair of the Rainforest Action Network. In 2023, The New York Times published an article detailing the connections between her husband since 2017, Neville Roy Singham, and the Chinese Communist Party, stating that Evans was critical of China's authoritarian government in 2015. Since 2017, 25% of Code Pink's funding has come from groups connected to Singham. Evans stated in 2023 that she now strongly supports China and regards it as a defender of the oppressed and a model for economic growth without slavery or war.^{[1]...............}
• ^.Neville Roy Singham (born May 13, 1954) is an American businessman and social activist. He is the founder and former chairman of Thoughtworks, an IT consulting company that provides custom software, software tools, and consulting services, which he sold to a private equity firm for $785 million in 2017. According to The New York Times, Singham has helped fund causes and groups that promote pro-Chinese government messages..........
• The American Multimillionaire Marxists Funding Pro-Palestinian Rage - The Free PressBy Francesca Block -   The pro-Palestinian protests over the last month, where tens of thousands in the U.S. have chanted for the end of Israel, are not merely a story of organic rage.   They are also funded in large part by an uber-wealthy American-born tech entrepreneur: Neville Roy Singham, and his wife Jodie Evans. Since 2017, Singham has been the main funder of The People’s Forum, which has co-organized at least four protests after 1,400 innocent Israelis were slaughtered by Hamas on October 7. One rally, in Times Square, happened on October 8 before Israel had even counted its dead. Neville Roy Singham and his wife Jodie Evans are China propagandists—and a primary source of the fury exploding on our streets........................

 

America's Crime Problem Began in College

By Daniel Greenfield April 13, 2023 @ Sultan Knish Blog 

 The pro-crime movement that swept America began in part with an article by Angela Davis, "Racialized Punishment and Prison Abolition." Davis, a UCLA academic, started by quoting Michel Foucault, a French academic with the Collège de France. 

Foucault's 'Discipline and Punish', which Davis described as "arguably the most influential text in contemporary studies of the prison system" remains widely studied on college campuses along with Davis’ racial spin that long since entered politics and pop culture in the form of police defunding and other allied efforts to eliminate prisons, prosecutions and the justice system.

The two activist academics were not really interested in crime and the penal system as a field of research. They were bent on fomenting a civil war that would put the Left in power.

Foucault, a Marxist-trained philosopher, had been a co-founder of the Prison Information Group to support the Maoists imprisoned over the radical violence in France in 1968. Foucault had credited the riots with stimulating his interest in “the direction of penal theory”.

Angela Davis had bought the guns used in a murderous terrorist attack on a Marin County courthouse by the Black Panthers. The attack roughly coincided with Foucault’s visit to the United States during which he “investigated” the American prison system and the death of George Jackson: the Panther leader whom the Marin County attack had been meant to free.

Police defunding and the pro-crime movement came out of universities not out of an abstract interest in social justice, but to aid the leftist domestic terrorists trying to overthrow free nations.

The French Maoists and Black Panthers bonded by their shared experiences of being locked up for their crimes came to see prisons as “not only Marxist universities,but training camps” and criminals as the vanguard of the revolution. Like most Marxist ideas, it was academic radicals who developed these ideas into an ideology that could be popularized and mainstreamed.

The violence of the Black Lives Matter riots, founded by “trained Marxists” who viewed Davis as a role model, and the even more catastrophic wave of death spurred on by implementing their policy demands, defunding police, ending prosecutions and freeing criminals, cost thousands of lives. Those deaths, like the movement behind them, came out of universities.

Despite her Communism and domestic terrorism, Davis is a faculty member at UC Santa Cruz. But she’s not alone. Other former leftist terrorists have taken up academic positions including Bill Ayers and Susan Rosenberg. Ayers taught at the University of Chicago until he retired and he has promoted police defunding. Susan Rosenberg, on her release, was offered a position at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and co-chaired the fiscal sponsor of BLM.

Rosenberg has been described as an “anti-prison activist”. John Jay College, a formerly prestigious institution whose alumni include New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and whose students go on to serve in the FBI, the NYPD, and the Secret Service, endorsed its own version of police defunding. The public college partners on fellowships with the Vera Justice Institute committed to “ending mass incarceration”. Students are asked to envision the institute in terms of Foucault’s critiques of the prison system.

Within the span of two generations, future law enforcement personnel were being indoctrinated with the teachings of Marxist domestic terrorists and their political allies. The situation at John Jay is emblematic of what has happened to criminology departments across the country.

The country’s top criminology departments, like those at the University of Maryland, UC-Irvine and Rutgers, begin with the premise that the criminal justice system is racially biased.

The University of Maryland’s Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice has its Racial Democracy Crime and Justice Network Small Grants Program, UC-Irvine’s Criminology program has a graduate emphasis on “Race and Justice Studies”, while Rutgers’ School of Criminal Justice takes part in the university’s Fellows in Racial Justice program. One of those fellows brags that being a “convicted felon” who spent time in maximum security prison allows him to “empathize with the downtrodden” and led to his “fervent commitment to activism”.

That’s the state of criminology at universities, but the general state of universities is even worse. Black studies programs offer a prison abolition syllabus (which predictably includes both Foucault and Davis) tying together faculty from Harvard and Wesleyan among others. Rutgers, Notre Dame, the University of Texas, the University of Colorado, among many others, offer Black Lives Matter courses, whose villains are invariably white people and cops.

BLM protests were widely backed by 8 out of 10 college students. Many of the protests were organized on campuses and involved faculty like Melina Abdullah, a co-founder of BLM’s Los Angeles chapter, who has made a bid to take over the group. Abdullah, the granddaughter of a prominent German Marxist, is a black studies professor at California State University.

The fundamental message of Foucault and Davis, refracted through BLM, was broadcast through academia. The policies, police defunding, prison releases and decriminalization, and the violent riots, helped unleash an unprecedented crime wave. The ideas originally promoted by radicals in the 70s have led to a generation of progressive pro-crime DAs, many backed by George Soros, like Manhattan’s Alvin Bragg, Los Angeles’ George Gascon and Philly’s Larry Krasner, or Biden’s US Attorney in D.C., Michael Graves, who declined to prosecute in 67% of cases, who have dismantled the criminal justice system from within.

As a result of BLM and pro-crime policies, around 5,000 more people were murdered in 2020. And the rate of black people being murdered increased more than any other group. The CDC’s research showed that, “in 2020, one out of every 1,000 young Black males (15–34) was shot and killed.” Murder is the leading cause of death for black men from 20 to 44 years old.

All of this can be traced back to academia which promoted the idea that white people are racist oppressors and that the best way to fix that is to replace the police and the criminal justice system with social workers and apologies.

Restorative Justice, which proposes to replace crime and punishment with forgiveness for the perpetrator, originated in part from Goshen College in Indiana which now offers both a major and a minor in letting criminals go unpunished. Mariame Kaba, the contemporary godmother of police defunding, teaches at Barnard University. Kaba made her views plain in an op-ed titled, “Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police.” The world that Kaba would make is laid out on her site, ‘Transform Harm’, which is funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. It features a sociologist proposing that rapists write apology letters and a professor of gender studies claiming that sending Larry Nassar, who had sexually abused some 250 girls, to prison embodies “political whiteness”.

Even in the face of growing crime and violence, academia continues to double down on a pro-crime program initially conceived in support of Marxist terrorists, but which has become a general program of supporting and enabling criminals across society.

To fight crime, we must lock up criminals, but we must also end the taxpayer funding of pro-crime universities, departments and programs. While most criminals eventually face consequences for the robberies, rapes and murders that they commit, the academics who enable them never do. 

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.

 

Is Gavin Newsom The Next Biden?

  March 6, 2023 By Mychal Massie @ Daily Rant

Cultural-Marxist Democrats are the personification of satanic evil. Let me start with the lowest of the hanging fruit on the Democrats tree of moral opprobriousness.  They have a visceral hatred for propriety, especially when it comes to those for whom they have no respect, but keep as useful resources in their denigration of America.  Let me explain.

Consider their hared for Larry Elder.  Personally, I haven’t one shred of doubt that Larry would have been a game changer as governor of California and I don’t say that because he is my friend. I say it because he is a focused, highly intelligent man who loves California and genuinely cares about the people in the State.  Unlike Gavin Newsom who cares only for and about himself, as his duplicitous double standards have proven time and time again.

Everything Newsom is and represents has a negative impact upon the so-called African-Americans in California.  Larry’s policies would have benefited all Californians.

Something named Erika D. Smith took delight in left-handedly accusing Larry of being the “black face of white supremacy” saying “he supports systematically racist policies that would disproportionately harm Black people.”

Larry is pro-life; that means he’s about saving the lives of the unborn.  If there were ever a case for disparate impact lawsuit it’s the toll Margaret Sanger’s institute of selective death and extermination has had upon their targeted population group.

Hate-filled, racist Democrats are responsible for approximately 25 million of targeted group’s children – Smith claims Larry “would have made it disproportionately hard.”  What’s harder than more than one-third of a population group’s future generations being exterminated by the very people who have oppressed them for over 400 years while cleverly convincing them its Christians who are against them?

I’ve referenced Larry because the cultural Marxists, the Fabian Democrat Socialists and the neo-Leninists latest scheme to cast this designated population group into the abyss is to take $559 billion dollars from the taxpayers and give it out as reparations to a group of people (who don’t deserve them), from a group of people who have in no way ever done injury to them on a scale that would warrant same. And, let there be no doubt, Newsom may not have introduced the measure, but he’s 100 percent behind it and involved in it; and it wasn’t introduced without his blessing.

This is his potential secure all of the so-called crayon color vote card. Then He focuses on the illegal alien vote and let Democrats proven ability to steal elections do the rest.  Their goal of running the proverbial table with governorships, state legislatures and all three branches of government and the Supreme Court even if they have to pack it as Franklin Roosevelt threatened to do and Biden wants to do, would be theirs to lose.

But, Larry Elder and those like him are the bad guys, because we love America and know this is where dreams can become reality.

People can disagree with the scenario I’ve referenced; but you can be assured that if I’m thinking about this scenario, there are those within the Democrat stratagems who are already crushing the feasibility numbers of making this dream scenario reality.

The threat to their success is Buttigieg and his mishandling of the New Palestine train wreck in addition to his mishandling the other train wrecks and the other transportation nightmares he mishandled.  Biden isn’t really a threat to their plan, because he is a DMW. (Dead Man Walking)  In his deteriorating condition, he’s history whenever they want.  The fact that Republicans aren’t banging an around the clock drum comparing Buttigieg’s handling of every transportation issue since his appointment compared to the handling of Hurricane Karina and what the Democrats accused then President Bush of not doing, says to me that Karl Rove and the Republican hierarchy are handling this election campaign as they did in 2010 when they refused to run against Obamacare.

Buttigieg’s claim to fame is being a homosexual Transportation Secretary means little if his lack of accomplishments were brought under the bright lights of failure and incompetence.  He only gets credit for being a sexual deviant achiever from Hollywood liberals and the hags on The View.

In retrospect, it’s unfortunate for Californians; they had a chance to elect someone who is capable, understands how to get things done and who puts the people first, all of which is alien to Newsom and contradictory to his Machiavellian agenda.

In closing, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention this is the reason people need to take a good read of the Word of God.  The Great Tribulation must have a beginning point before it takes place after Christ raptures the Church.  I submit that from where I sit this would be a good time for people to examine where they stand spiritually.  Because where we stand politically is indicating to those of us who know and believe the Word of God, time is not the ally of the wicked.

About the Author

Mychal Massie

Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here

How the Atlanta Riots Were Funded

By Daniel Greenfield January 29, 2023 @ Sultan Knish Blog

Even after an ‘Atlanta Forest Defender’ shot a Georgia state trooper in the stomach and his comrades set off race riots in the city, the leftist group at the center of it all is still fundraising.

This comes months after the leftists threw Molotov cocktails at police and nearly burned an elderly driver to death. Multiple members of the ‘occupation’ have been arrested on domestic terrorism charges. And yet the IRS and Georgia’s Secretary of State have done nothing.

Even Twitter suspended ‘Scenes from the Atlanta Forest’, an account calling for a “Night of Rage” and “reciprocal violence to be done to the police and their allies”, but the IRS has yet to take action to stop the ‘Atlanta Forest Defenders’ from taking in tax-deductible donations.

In Atlanta, small business owners are sweeping away broken glass and police have recovered explosive devices from some of the rioters. Yet the ‘Atlanta Forest Defenders’ are still raising money through Open Collective: a 501(c)(3) nonprofit fundraising platform that Front Page Magazine had previously exposed for providing fundraising for assorted ecoterrorists including the ‘Just Stop Oil’ vandals who glued themselves to ‘The Girl with the Pearl Earring’ painting.

That is despite the fact that Open Collective’s terms of service prohibit illegal activities.

The Open Collective Foundation has received funding for digital infrastructure grants from the Ford Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society and Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Network.

Meanwhile ordinary people have been suffering through another wave of leftist terror.

In November, an elderly man passing by the area was attacked. When he stopped his truck, “these people started coming out of the woods in camouflage stuff and blocked me in.”

Then they set the truck on fire.

“It seemed to me like they were going to burn the truck with me in it.”

Nobody’s fundraising for the man who lost his truck and now suffers from a medical condition, but the IRS is continuing to enable this domestic terrorist campaign. In Atlanta, rioters had marched chanting, “If you build it, we will burn it.” The riots show that they mean it.

A previous affidavit for the arrest of Atlanta Forest Defenders describes them as “participating in actions as part of Defend the Atlanta Forest (DTAF), a group classified by the United States Department of Homeland Security as Domestic Violent Extremists”. It went on to describe a variety of crimes including, “throwing molotov cocktails, rocks and fireworks at uniformed police officers; arson of public buildings” and “shooting metal ball bearings at contractors”.

Members of the ‘occupation’ charged with domestic terrorism were ordered not to maintain “contact with Defend Atlanta Forest on social media”. Despite that, neither Georgia nor the IRS, have revisited the legal status of Defend the Atlanta Forest, its fund and its fiscal host.

While the Forest Defense Justice Fund is not a nonprofit, its fiscal host, the Network For Strong Communities, is a 501(c)(3). Beyond the Atlanta Forest Defenders, Network For Strong Communities also acts as a host for Atlanta Resistance Medics. Manuel Paez, the leftist who shot at a state trooper and was killed in turn, was a member of the Atlanta Resistance Medics.

The ‘medics’, similar to other riot support groups, provide aid to rioters during street violence. The group’s blog suggests that protesters “always be prepared to face tear gas every time you go to a protest” and advises that the “key to avoiding arrest is to always know where all the police are — and more importantly, to know where they aren’t.”

An article about the alleged shooter described the group’s “leaderless nature, its focus on direct action, as well as its anarchist and Marxist leanings”.

“Don’t burn The Communist Manifesto!” the shooter exclaimed at one point after finding a copy of the book in a fire pit. “I mean, Marx isn’t perfect, but he’s OK.”

That’s whom the media and the rioters have been mourning.

One of the initiatives of the Network for Strong Communities is the Atlanta Solidarity Fund which bailed out protesters and rioters: including those charged with domestic terrorism.

Another is Copwatch: which provided training for the Atlanta Forest Defenders.

The publicly listed leadership for the group consists of Adele “Earthworm” MacLean, a local activist affiliated with Cop Watch House and Food Not Bombs, both operating under the NSC umbrella. Marlon Kautz, who serves as its CFO, is a member of Cop Watch, works with the Solidarity Fund, and is the owner of the Teardown House which is the NSC’s registered address.

The house, decorated with graffiti reading “Black Lives Matter”, “No Cops”, “Build Up Resistance” and “Smash the State”, has been featured in a number of articles.

“We build infrastructure for community solidarity and popular struggle,” Kautz has said.

Kautz, a self-identified anarchist, and MacLean, who has been named as his partner, moved to Atlanta and bought the house to “create infrastructure” for activism.

After a decade of this, they finally hit the big time and are all over the national news.

Meanwhile Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has yet to do anything about NSC. The organization was briefly dissolved by his office for failing to pay its fees, but is now listed as being in compliance.

The IRS, which determined that NSC, was a “public charity” has failed to revisit that finding even in the wake of the ongoing violence tearing apart Georgia.

As discussed in David Horowitz’s and John Perazzo’s important booklet: “Internal Radical Service”, the IRS has allowed leftist nonprofits to abuse the tax code by financing violence and terror. While conservative nonprofits are subject to ruthless IRS scrutiny, the organization has failed to hold leftist nonprofits accountable after even the most grotesque abuses.

There’s no way to understand what happened in Atlanta without following the money trial. And there’s no way to stop them without ending the abuse of 501(c)(3) nonprofits by the Left. That’s why the David Horowitz Freedom Center is continuing to track the leftist money behind the violence and expose its enablers at the federal and state level. And until the IRS does its job, we are going to hold it accountable for the violence it’s enabling in Atlanta and across America.  

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.  Thank you for reading.

The Great Reset is the Plan to Remake Our Nation Into a Fascist State

By Dr. Jay Lehr | Aug 21, 2022 | Climate Change, Global, Politics @ America Out Loud

The Great Reset is the plan to remake our nation into a Communist-Fascist State, and Environmentalism has played a significant role.

It is time to face reality; Communism and Fascism are back. They reappeared nearly everywhere under the new name of Environmentalism. Those who put nature well above mankind primarily for the purpose of controlling if not subjugating us all in the name of nature, ecosystems, or Gaia. Their mechanism is now easy to recognize in both the climate change fraud and the COVID lockdowns.

Resource development becomes tantamount to a crime. Our food supply is under attack, and we must now question forced vaccinations. In an outstanding new book from Epoch Times titled “How the Spector of Communism Is Ruling Our World,” the authors state:

“Communist elements have commandeered much of the environmental movement to advance their own political agendas. Communism’s infiltration of Environmentalism has been underway virtually since the beginning of the environmental movement.”

An interesting data point was Gorbachev’s move directly from Russia’s communist party leader to forming a new environmental organization Green Cross International.

The Epoch Times book’s most lucid and penetrating statement, which I hope we can learn to recognize, is how Environmentalism conducts itself today:

“Communism must create or use an enemy that threatens all of humankind and intimidates the public around the world into handing over both individual liberty and state sovereignty. Creating global panic about looming environmental and ecological disasters is a route toward achieving its goal.” Global warming then climate change proved the perfect fraudulent environmental disaster.

In Marx’s Communist Manifest, he declared that Capitalism was an enemy of the environment and perhaps was the first to use the term ecosystem. He lined up his followers against those who could be accused of despoiling it. After Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik Party launched their 1917 coup in Russia, they dictated that all land, forests, water, minerals, animals, and plant resources become the property of the state to prevent the public from using them without authorization.

In the 1960s, popular radical books like SilentSpring and The Population Bomb tried to convince readers that all pesticides should be outlawed. Today that is happening in the Netherlands and other countries, and it has already brought Sri Lanka to starvation.

These books led to the first Earth Day in 1970, followed by the United Nations Conference on The Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972. Soon there was the formation of an alphabet soup of environmental groups stridently demonstrating and propagandizing the damage mankind kind was doing to our blue planet. They are nearly all Fascist/Communist arms of the Great Reset.  

Simultaneously in the US, however, we were addressing our real problems with the formation of an environmental protection agency that launched seven pieces of legislation to sensibly protect our surface water, our groundwater, our waste disposal, our mines, and our agriculture; before that decade ended. Unfortunately, at the EPA from 1980 on, no useful legislation was ever passed again. Only stringent rules were created to impede economic progress at a significant cost with no benefit to the environment or human health.

The true beginning of the current Socialist-Communist surge began in 1988 when the World Meteorological Society and the United Nations Environment Program created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It was at this point that the idea of man-caused global warming surfaced as the most important mechanism to defeat Capitalism by requiring a one-world government to take the reins of saving the Earth from extinction.

Two years later, as the Soviet Union was crumbling, Mikhail Gorbachev addressed an international conference on the environment in Moscow, where he called for the establishment of an international monitoring system and a covenant to protect unique environmental zones. A majority of the world’s environmentalists accepted his charge.

It was the beginning of rule by propaganda and the end of sound policy and scientific research in matters of the environment, with Global Warming leading the charge. Of course, when we did not seem to be warming, they cleverly change the term to Climate Change as certainly the climate is always changing.  

In 1998 an article titled, Green Cross: Gorbachev’s Enviro-Communism, by the late Natalie Grant Wraga, who grew up in the Soviet Union, said:

“Protection of the environment has become the principal tool for attack against the West and all it stands for. Protection of the environment may be used as a pretext to adopt a series of measures designed to undermine the industrial base of developed nations. It may also serve to introduce malaise by lowering their standard of living and implanting communist values.”

In Marx’s manifesto, the author resolved to “build a movement that can replace Capitalism with a society in which common ownership of the means of production replaces Capitalist ownership, and in which the preservation and restoration of ecosystems will be a fundamental part of all human activity.”

But Marx also predicted that Capitalism would fail by itself. It did not, and thus communist-minded environmentalists have had to keep up the battle against private business with a battle cry of ecological collapse. The prevalent but somewhat spurious theory of the relationship between living things and their environment is Eco-Socialism. It is not now a branch of Socialism.

The evil folks behind the Great Reset are bankers, financial managers, and industry Boards who think they will all benefit from the control Communism and Fascism grants them. Regular folks are now waking up to what is going on, and the arrogance of these folks allows them to ignore us. They will lose as a result. Watching the November 8 midterm election will give you cause to be optimistic and fight back.

Dr. Jay Lehr

Dr. Jay Lehr is a Senior Policy Analyst with the International Climate Science Coalition and former Science Director of The Heartland Institute. He is an internationally renowned scientist, author, and speaker who has testified before Congress on dozens of occasions on environmental issues and consulted with nearly every agency of the national government and many foreign countries. After graduating from Princeton University at the age of 20 with a degree in Geological Engineering, he received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Arizona. He later became executive director of the National Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers.

Achieving Victory Over the Marxist Democrat Big Lie

By Dr. Joel S. Holmes | Jul 26, 2021 | Politics

 

Everything the Marxist Democrats do is based on deception. And in warfare, deception is the key to victory.  Basically, nothing we constitutional Republicans do is based on deception. And this is a key reason we keep losing⏤battle after battle.  Last week we discussed the importance of deception on the battlefield. And note that our battle is not military or violent. It’s political, economic, and social (social including education).

For details about how to win by deception, without resorting to the Big Lie, tactics of Marxists, see my previous post at:  Why Conservative Patriots Lose to the Marxist Democrats (in two sentences).

Today, we deliver the second blow to the enemy.  And that in order to win, we need to understand exactly who the enemy is. What they want to do and what they are capable of doing.  In addition, we need to understand ourselves, and we need to up our game.

Again, Sun Tzu leads the way with advice. He wrote that without knowing the enemy… without knowing ourselves… there can be no victory:

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained, you will also suffer a defeat.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

In part, we don’t know what the enemy is doing, what they want to achieve, and what evil they are capable of because the mass media hides these things from us. 

The Marxist Democrats lie about everything. The basis of their power is the Big Lie—there is no difference between Democrats and Hitler, Democrats and Stalin, Democrats and Mao. If we don’t realize this, then we will keep losing...........To Read More....

Why Conservative Patriots Lose to the Marxist Democrats (in two sentences)

by Dr. Joel S. Holmes | Jul 15, 2021 | Constitution, Politics

Here in just two sentences (really), I will explain how the Marxist Democrats defeat Conservative Patriots and have pushed us halfway to hell. Let us begin by making it clear that the warfare we discuss is not military. It does not involve violence. It is political, social, and economic warfare. All within the law and the rule of law. That is what we stand for.

Here are the two sentences that explain everything.

In the Art of War, by Sun Tzu, we find sentence number 1:

“All warfare is based on deception.”And dear readers, everything the Marxist Democrats do, and I mean everything, is based on deception. Everything they spew is lies and smoke and mirrors.Looking at our ways and means in the battle, we see that nothing we do is based on deception. No matter what else happens, this is enough to ensure that we lose and they win.

Sentence number 2 is as follows:

The Marxist Democrats plan in secret, attack by surprise, and destroy something important to us… by then, it is almost too late to respond.  Take, for example, the nice coffee mug I have with an American flag printed on the side. I like it very much, so I make efforts to keep it in one piece so that it does not fall off the table, for example. Now let’s compare that to what happens if it accidentally is knocked off the table and broken into pieces. Once something is broken, it is very, very hard to repair it—particularly when compared to what is needed to keep it safe in the first place..........To Read More......

• Podcast: Five Battles that Must Be Won to Save America by Dr. Steve LaTulippe | Jul 15, 2021 | Constitution, Politics,

 

 

Black Lives Matter issues a new list of demands, including a permanent Trump ban from political office and social media News

Carlos Garcia May 04, 2021

Activists of the Black Lives Matter movement issued a new list of demands, including a call for a permanent ban of former President Donald Trump from holding political office and from using social media. The new list of seven demands was published on the Black Lives Matter website in an article that asked supporters to sign their name to the statement.  The first demand called for Trump to be "immediately convicted in the United States Senate." They also demanded he be "banned from holding elected office in the future."  A second demand called for more than half of Republicans to be expelled from Congress:

More than half the Republican representatives and multiple senators stoked Trump's conspiracy theories and encouraged the white supremacists to take action to overturn the election. We are supporting Rep. Cori Bush's resolution to expel them from Congress for their dangerous and traitorous actions. We also support steps to bar them from seeking another office.

A third demand asked for the Capitol police, law enforcement, and the military be investigated for any possible ties to white supremacist organizations.  A fourth called for Trump to be permanently banned from all digital media platforms, while a fifth made a familiar demand for the police to be defunded. A sixth said that lawmakers must not allow the Jan. 6 rioting at the U.S. Capitol to be used to stifle other protests, and their last demand called for more federal oversight over local law enforcement.........To Read More.....

Strangers in our Homeland

October 11, 2020 By Dale A. Fitzgibbons

America is the product of centuries of evolutionary political thought centered on natural human rights. Radical leftists now assault this land its patriots love, turning it into a place they scarcely recognize.

A revolutionary declaration.

Two hundred forty-four years ago the world experienced a singular and unparalleled transformative

It was 1776 and the start of the birthing of the American Union, founded on exacting principles asserted in the Declaration of Independence. These principles were a bold repudiation of the dominant organizing schema of nation-states, principalities, kingdoms, and empires, as they had existed since the dawn of history. It was the American Revolution.

There was, of course, the physical revolution, the revolt that started a year before at Lexington and Concord, when a volunteer militia confronted the crack soldiery of Britain’s world-class seasoned army. That conflict was fought with steel, gunpowder, lead, blood, and bravery. But the real revolution was an idea, articulated in these words: 

 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed......................

 The snake invades the garden

 First it was the soft socialism of progressivism that infiltrated the American consciousness with utopian promises of comfort and wealth for the masses through social engineering and centralized economic control. It was political snake oil, whispering seductively that economic happiness might be attainable without actually having to invest sweat equity to pursue it.

This softened the American psyche, ripening it for attack by the Cultural Marxists, with their nihilistic pseudo-religion, Critical Theory. The proponents of this noxious movement seek to destroy every institution, tradition, and principle that made America successful, and by any means necessary. In today’s tumultuous times, they have established a beachhead, shoving their morally-inverted Brave New World of good is bad, bad is good, legal is abusive, illegal is just, fairness is unfair, and unfairness is reasonable into the minds of the gullible. The malignancy has swept the academic world, the news media, the entertainment industry, the ruling establishment, and the power-crazed Democratic Party.

“America as founded is fundamentally corrupt, racist, and evil,” goes the Big Lie preached by these demagogues and parroted by their throngs of useful idiots. Its system of economic and personal freedom for all must be torn down and rebuilt as a bastion of socialism and radical egalitarianism ............. We have become strangers in a caricature of our homeland.............To Read More....

To Destroy America

As its Marxist pedigree makes clear, Black Lives Matter is committed to overthrowing our entire system.

September 1, 2020  Mike Gonzalez

The protests that sprang up in the wake of George Floyd’s killing in Minneapolis seemed like spontaneous outpourings of grief and anger. They weren’t entirely. Though many who joined their ranks may have been moved by outrage at the images of Floyd’s death, those operating behind the scenes have prepared for this moment for a long time.

Indeed, the leaders of the Black Lives Matter organizations fueling this summer’s disturbances were trained by self-described Marxist revolutionaries who have long used the plight of black Americans as justification for overthrowing America’s constitutional order. They frankly admit that such “organizing” is the key to their goal of world revolution. Our political leaders owe it to themselves and to their fellow Americans to understand this blueprint before rhetorically embracing, let alone implementing, the radical changes that the protesters and rioters are demanding.

The goal of upending the American system is, moreover, also evident among the consultants now conducting “anti-racism training” within major corporations and foundations. These facilitators of anti-white struggle sessions disdain the capitalist system and seek its replacement—and the mainstream media cheers them on. In a July New York Times article on the BLM movement, Douglas McAdams, professor emeritus at Stanford, wrote: “It looks, for all the world, like these protests are achieving what very few do: setting in motion a period of significant, sustained, and widespread social, political change. We appear to be experiencing a social change tipping point—that is as rare in society as it is potentially consequential.”............To Read More....

What the Black Lives Matter movement really is

July 12, 2020 By John R. Anderson

Based on the research I've conducted, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organization/movement is likely not what most people think it is.  Here are a few verified ideas to consider.

One may think of the BLM movement as a "grassroots" movement.  According to the BLM website, BLM is a "global organization active in US, UK, and Canada."  The website, Influence Watch, points out that George Soros, a Hungarian-born liberal with a net worth of $25.2 billion, is a major contributor to BLM, having donated "at least $33 million."  The same website states that since 2013, groups associated with the BLM movement have taken in $133 million.

On another point, it appears that BLM is rooted in Marxist philosophy.  From the New York Post (06/25/20), Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors describes herself and her co-organizer of BLM as "a trained Marxist."  The article goes on to say Cullors was a protégé of Eric Mann and that she "spent years" with him "absorbing the Marxist-Leninist ideology that shaped her worldview."

Consider what this might mean for the USA if BLM pushes its agenda and platform.  According to Investopedia, Marxism argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favor of communism.  Furthermore, Marxism is against the nuclear family in that it teaches a hierarchical system and keeps money within groups (families), opposed to distributed wealth.  The website ReviseSociology explains, "Marxists argue that the nuclear family performs ideological functions for Capitalism — the family acts as a unit of consumption and teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy.  It is also the institution through which the wealthy pass down their private property to their children, thus reproducing class inequality."  Furthermore, the website Brainscape points out, "[Marxists] dispute the idea that the way families are organized benefits everyone.  The website goes on to say, "[R]ather [Marxism] argue[s] that the family like many other institutions in capitalist societies, serves to maintain the power of those with wealth and preserve the existing economic system.".............To Read More.....