Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Thursday, October 20, 2022

Global Warming, Social Justice and Commercial Tyranny

By Rich Kozlovich

For many years I have been pointing out that Global Warming was a hoax. Back in the early days people just rolled their eyes, snickered and accused those who challenged this insanity as being"deniers".  Okay, I can accept that, as long as we can agree on what they're claiming we're denying.  Years ago an account asked me if I believed in global warming.  I said, "yes, I do, and I also believe in global cooling, I just don't believe mankind has a thing to do with it. "

Did we "deniers" deny the Earth's climate changes?  No!  The Earth's climate has changed over and over again throughout it's existence.  

Did we deny the climate was changing now?  No!  We merely denied the Earth was doomed or that CO2 had anything to do with any climatic changes, and as time went by we stated the warming trend they touted so much stopped, and that stopped 25 years ago. 

 So what were we in denial over?  

We are now denying, and have always denied, CO2 was causing catastrophic climate change and the claim we needed to abandon the use of fossil fuels.  And everything that's happened, and happening now, is evidence we were right.  Their claims have all been horsepucky, as it turns out all these "points of no return" have come and gone, and we're still here!  Imagine that Al Gore and King Charles III

Let's face it when it comes to climate predictions, they just about have a monopoly on being wrong, and people are now pretty much ignoring what I call The Thunberg Syndrome, but one might ask,  how could I have been so sure about this from the beginning so many years ago? Well, it was easy. 

Most things aren’t as complicated as they appear, and nothing is ever as it initially appears.....ever. The key to understanding complex problems is having the ability to reduce them to their simplest possible terms. Find the root of the issue and you will find the answer. In this case, as in most cases, the answer lies in history, and when it comes to claims by environmentalists, history taught me they're probably lying.  So I start from there and question everything, and guess what.  Everything they tout usually ends up being lies of commission or lies of omission, and claim of  97% of scientists agree is an excellent example.

First off, we have to start with the understanding the Earth has no “normal” temperature. These scare mongers were asked over and over again:  What's the Earth’s temperature supposed to be? They had no answer because the Earth has been shifting temperatures all over the place for thousands of years. How did that happen? Clearly these are a “normal” cycles, and/or changes. My friend James Marusek discusses these cycles in his article, Solar “Grand Minima” Threat Analysis.

There was one piece of logic I found absolutely compelling. We know that the Medieval and Roman Warming periods were both substantially warmer than today. What caused them? Well, I think it must be concluded they couldn't have been manmade, ergo, these climatic changes must have been normal.  

  • Question:  Did any of the terrible things they are predicting for today occur then? 
    • Answer:  There's absolutely nothing in the historical record that any of the disasters they are predicting for today  occurred then. 
  • Question: If these things didn’t occur then; why should be expect them to occur today? 
    • Answer: Clearly the answer is we shouldn’t!

I haven’t linked much on Global Warming lately, and I think that's because the truth of this has taken on a life of its own, but something has been happening that made me I realize we need to start harping about this a lot more now.

What we're seeing is a lot of corrosive, tyrannical and what seems to me to be illegal and unconstitutional activity by the Biden administration, being supported by commercial enterprises in an attempt to force America into an acceptance of social engineering and environmental justice demands, with banks even cancelling accounts of those who express views they don't like.

I think we need to become more active is resisting any minor attempt promoting the lie of anthropogenic (man made) climate change.  Notice it's no longer global warming, it's climate change, because again, the warming trend has ended and there's evidence we may be going into a solar minimum, and if so, we'll be experiencing serious levels of cold temperatures.  And unlike the warming patterns of the past where societies thrived as a result of warming, cooling kills.

If we go back to the climate trend of the 70's and start experiencing some really cold weather, they will claim, as they did then, it's humanities fault and we're doomed by another Ice Age which will be unstoppable unless......watch out now.....here it comes......we destroy capitalism!

There's a limit to what can be "achieve[ed] by force with the typical levers of government power, it is now poised to accomplish with nominally public-private enterprise partnerships. This new strategy has confused the conservative and libertarian response. If such heavy-handedness were attached to the arm of the state, free-market organizations and policymakers would mobilize quickly against it. Coming primarily from the private sector, however, has forestalled an effective response to the ESG agenda."

What we're seeing here is Corporate Totalitarianism in the promotion of each and every leftist narrative in existence, all with the intent of forcing "acceptable behavior on humanity.   Behavior that in reality are impositions leftists can't impose by force, at least in America, but that may change, so in the meanwhile, here's what's happening:

How insane is it when organizations that have thrived on capitalism are working to destroy capitalism?  Also, who gets to decide what are acceptable views?  Where is that a part of a society that prides itself on free speech, which is protected by law? 

What are these "community standards" they're always touting?  Well, there's a reason they use all these ethereal phrases regarding "their community standards", while at the same time never actually defining their community standards.  That way anything that displeases them at the moment can become a violation of these ill defined elusive standards. 

Here was my experience with LinkedIn. 

We have to get this once and for all.  Anyone promoting Anthropogenic Climate Change is either deliberately being fraudulent for personal reasons, a secular semi-pagan religious green fanatic, or, they're as dumb as tree moss. 

I think that sums it up nicely.  Have a good day!

No comments:

Post a Comment