The
Supreme Court has decided an important property rights case in favor of the
private property owners and against the claim of the federal government by an
eight-to-one majority. Surprisingly, the Court’s liberal Justices, with the
exception of Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissenting, signed Chief Justice
John Roberts’s March 10 decision. In reversing the Tenth
Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court ruled, in Brandt Revocable Trust et al.
v. United States, that a right of way granted to a railroad in 1908 did not
revert to the federal government when the railroad abandoned the tracks in
2004.
The original right of way was over federal land, but 83
acres of that land were patented in 1976 in a land swap with the U. S. Forest
Service. The Department of Justice argued that even though those 83 acres had
been turned over to private owners, the right of way over that now-private land
had reverted to the federal government when the railroad stopped running.
Arguing for the Brandts, William Perry Pendley of Mountain States Legal Foundation
stated that the right of way was an easement granted for a particular use, and
therefore had expired when its intended use, operation of a railroad, had
ended.........Now, if only the Supreme Court would agree to take a case
from Mountain States on regulatory takings using the Endangered Species Act.....To Read More.....
No comments:
Post a Comment