They use our own values against us to destroy us.
By Rich Kozlovich
Since I'm not a Babylon Bee reader, and totally unaware of what they're all about, I was really confused when I saw this headline, Federal Judge Orders Price Of Eggs To Go Back Up, and the story why this judge ordered the price of eggs to go up saying:
"It's the court's position that egg prices must return to their previous elevated levels," District Judge Sandra Milo ruled. "Lower egg prices cause people to think President Trump is doing a good job, and that is a threat to our democracy. Therefore, egg prices must immediately go back up to their absurdly high levels. That's what the law clearly states." "I am a federal judge, and I have spoken," she added.
My first reaction was... really? Can this possibly be true? Well, of course it wasn't and now I know what Babylon Bee is all about.... satire! However, I think it wise to ask ourselves; was this satire entirely out of line with the thinking that's behind the rulings of so many of these rogue judges? Answer? No, it isn't.
One has to recognize that satire offers powerful insights into truth, and the fact these judges are making decisions that are as insane as this Babylon Bee satire. One judge demanded schools provide children with offensive books with graphic sexual content, books that were removed due to "concerns over "graphic violence, racism, and discrimination, depictions of self-harm or mental illness, and sexual content". But this judge didn't like that, calling it a violation of free speech. Is that twisting the intent of the Founding Fathers in the First Amendment the Constitution? Yes! Is it insane? I'd say so, yes!
Three judges on the West coast have ordered the Trump Administration "must" take in refugees, and pay for their housing. Not only unconstitutional, but insane. I'd say so.
For years I've been convinced, and written, that I think the federal judiciary is filled with not very bright, totally corrupt political hacks. Yet it's still shocking to see just how many rogue federal judges are out there, and seeing how they have managed to twist justice to suit their open advocacy for far left extremist outcomes, all in violation of their oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
"On one level, what all this amounts to is an attempted takeover of the Executive Branch by the Judicial Branch — a judicial coup d’état. These judges are usurping President Trump’s valid exercise of his Executive Branch powers through sheer judicial fiat — a raw assertion of power by one branch of the federal government against another."
What we're seeing here is a variation of the corrupt lawfare practices that attempted to destroy Donald Trump and all those who supported him, including his attorneys, twisting the law and the rule of law, hoping to put Trump in prison, much as has been done in Turkey, and in Brazil.
These activist judges are doing exactly the same thing by deliberately twisting the law to sabotage Trump’s whirlwind agenda in order to buy time for “The Resistance”. As the article points out judges care little for the Constitution quoting House Speaker Mike Johnson who as a lawyer described what went on with these activist judges during his legal career days saying:
"[I] often went up against activist judges in federal courts......“I had a judge once who looked over his glasses at me and said, ‘I know that’s what the Constitution says, but we’re doing something different here.’”
Don't delude yourself into believing that's a anomaly versus normality in the federal judicial system. The federal judiciary is filled with not that bright political hacks, and is in violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
District court judges are repeatedly failing to abide by Rule 65(c) which requires parties seeking an injunction to post a bond before an injunction can be issued, according to American Path Initiative senior legal fellow Daniel Huff. Huff, who served as a lawyer in the Trump White House and for the House and Senate Judiciary committees, said that without the security of the bond, the judges are ripping off taxpayers whose money is then tied up in legal wrangling.................
Make no mistake, this is the Third American Revolution, with these rogue judges representing a very real threat to democracy. Senator Chuck Grassley states these District judges decisions are unconstitutional, and he's putting them on notice saying:
“District judges’ abuse of nationwide injunctions has hobbled the executive branch and raised serious questions regarding the lower courts’ appropriate jurisdictional realm..... .. Since the courts and the executive branch are on an unsustainable collision course, Congress must step in and provide clarity..... [and] to “explore legislative solutions to bring the balance of power back in check.....”
- Unconstitutional: War erupts over local judges nullifying Trump decisions
- Bill Barr blasts judges for trying to 'usurp' presidential authority on most critical issue
Blatantly unconstitutional, says Senator Mike Lee and he's taking action to "restrain 'whims' of judges blocking Trump orders having filed a new bill Monday aiming to restrain the district court judges that have been issuing restraining orders blocking President Donald Trump's agenda. "America's government cannot function if the legitimate orders of our commander-in-chief can be overridden at the whim of a single district court judge."
The Judicial Insurrection Is Worse Than You Think - The point of all the injunctions and restraining orders is to preserve the supreme rule of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. At this point it’s not too much to say that the federal judiciary has plunged us into a constitutional crisis. The fusillade of injunctions and temporary restraining orders issued by district court judges in recent weeks against the Trump administration — on everything from foreign aid to immigration enforcement to Defense Department enlistment policy to climate change grants for Citibank — boggles the mind............
Daniel Greenfield, who I think is one of the finest thinkers in the nation, published this piece, Disobedience to Judges is Obedience to the Constitution saying how Judge Boasberg ordered that the planes carrying criminal illegal migrants, which were long gone and in international air space, were to be immediately returned. But since the Trump administration didn't just drop everything and obey him immediately, he was outraged, and the left screamed how Trump was destroying the checks and balances in the system. Apparently it's Boasberg's opinion Barack Obama appointed him to rule over the entire nation, and the planet. Well, Daniel makes this valid observation, "Trump isn’t defying checks and balances, he’s restoring them."
This is Part I in a series I'm going to publish. I'll have a lot more to say about Judge Boasberg in another article in this series.
No comments:
Post a Comment