Some Things Can't Be Walked Back

By Rich Kozlovich

There's been a lot of heat brought on to Pam Bondi over the so-called release of the Epstein files, which was clearly a farce, and since she reviewed them before they were released, she knew it was a farce.  While it was true that release was sabotaged by the FBI, and they're continuing to defy Bondi's orders, one has to ask:  Why didn't she say that before she released what she had, and adding this is unacceptable and we're going in deeper and firing a lot of people over this?  She didn't until she started getting heat from those who expected more from her.

Now, Todd Baumann in his article, A ‘truckload’ of inconvenience, is saying "AG Pam Bondi’s unusual approach to the Epstein docs—showcasing the inconsequential and downplaying the significant—raises a lot of questions."  And I agree.   She played up the first meaningless batch, and then almost hid the delivery of what's expected to be the explosive batch.  And is still cryptic on any punitive actions taken by the DOJ.  Why?   

In August of 2024 I posted this video about Pam Bondi going after the Biden Crime family, and it looked good, and the consensus among her supporters was she had the same mad dog in the meat market mentality Matt Gaetz would have brought to the Justice Department.  But as time went by there were rumblings, so I did some research and on November 25th, before she was confirmed, I wrote this piece, The Bondi Conundrum: George Zimmerman!, saying

 

.........she's talented, smart, tough, competent, and a true Trump supporter, I don't see a mad dog in a meat market mentality, but she'll quite likely will be confirmed, and I noted I would have more on her as this story developed.  While she seemingly had all the right people against her, it appears she may have all the wrong people for her, the RINO's like her, even Ana Navarro of The View defends her.

 

Clearly my article demonstrated what I consider legitimate concerns, but then after chatting with a well known writer and author who was familiar with her, and then this piece appearing,  Pam Bondi Ready to Read the Riot Act, I kinda put my concerns on the back burner.

 

Perhaps that was an mistake.

 

In my article I show how she was part of the group that deliberately, and knowingly, railroaded George Zimmerman… and at the end I state:

“Pam Bondi was willing to imprison an obviously innocent man, "in order to achieve a racially equitable political outcome that would assist their careers."  This case was a window into the deepest recesses of her character.  It was unforgivable, and there's no walking back from it.”

For what it’s worth, there it is.