It has often been said that only people who have the poorest, stupidest, worst ideas demand that they and their ideas be shielded from questions and criticism. Maybe that’s why diehard climate alarmists and renewable energy advocates insist that “the science is settled” … that their asserted (and fabricated) “97 consensus” eliminates the need for any further discussion … and that we must immediately begin the process of dismantling and eliminating all fossil fuel use in the United States. They know they and their ideas would not survive scrutiny.
Or as physicist John Droz puts it in this article:
Why are they so adamantly opposed to the creation of an independent, expert review of their “irrefutable” claims that the world faces an imminent and existential threat of manmade climate disaster? Why do they so vehemently oppose President Trump’s proposed Presidential Committee on Climate Science? WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE?
Thank you for posting John’s thought-provoking article, forwarding it to your friends and colleagues – and taking a moment to send Mr. Trump a short note, saying you support this committee. The links embedded below will make sending a note even easier than shouting “97% consensus.”
Best regards,
Paul
No comments:
Post a Comment