Was Stacey Abrams really the best the Dems could do?

By Russ Vaughn

The Democrat leadership's politically correct, virtue-signaling selection of failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams to be their mouthpiece to rebut President Donald Trump's State of the Union address Tuesday night seemed odd to me, so I decided to dig a little.

What I've found has me wondering even more why they would pick such a person to be the face of the Democratic Party in a national broadcast with a huge audience. Increasingly, it seems that the Dems have a fondness for phonies and failures, making it seem as if the Democrat leadership is unaware of that old wisdom, "Put your best foot forward." In this case, it appears that the particular foot they picked to boot Trump's butt has a case of political toenail fungus.

After but a preliminary search, I was wondering why on Earth the Georgia Democratic Party powers that be had selected a former tax attorney, who doesn't pay her taxes timely, to be the chief executive officer of the state, expected by voters to govern responsibly.

Why would they advance a person to head their state, whose major obligation to the citizenry is managing the financial affairs of their state, who obviously cannot responsibly manage her own financial affairs?

According to articles out there on the web, candidate Abrams owed some serious money to the IRS, more than $50,000.  She had student loan debt in excess of $90,000.  And what's even more damning was her personal credit card debt, pushing $80,000.. ..............This politically correct farce illustrates the madness that permeates the Democratic Party,..........If the Democrat leadership believes that Stacey Abrams represents the very best of this lame-brained bunch of petulant, pussy-hatted politicos, wouldn't you just love to see the financial statements on the rest of these new Democrat "leaders" who will control the trillion-dollar budgets and deficit spending of your nation?......... To Read More...