Obama’s Foreign Policy and His Legal Vulnerability

Should his cynical mendaciousness enjoy further immunity? In a 2015 Investor’s Business Daily article, it was noted that “History will not be kind to President Obama’s effectiveness in fighting terrorism. His record is terrible…”

Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr. December 29, 2017

Many of the deepest concerns about President Obama’s Middle East and terror policies have been justified by recent revelations. This raises a serious question: should legal action be taken when an Administration forges a path that diverges sharply from widely accepted norms, is accomplished in an intentionally deceptive manner, and produces unsuccessful and harmful results?..........

1. The withdrawal from Iraq led to the empowerment of ISIS
2. the consistent favoritism towards Iran did not diminish that nation’s belligerence, its hatred for America, or its’ financing of global terror.
3. The former White House’s bizarre support for the overthrow of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak resulted in his replacement with a Muslim Brotherhood regime (itself eventually overturned)
4. the unprecedented negotiations with the Taliban did nothing to soften that terrorist entity’s stance.....
5. Obama’s inexplicable assistance in the deposing of Libya’s Gaddafi, who posed no threat, and the resulting chaos in that section of North Africa.
6. The Administration’s overt misleading of the American public about the cause of the subsequent Benghazi disaster added to the voters’ mistrust.........
7. There exists no cogent explanation concerning Obama’s apology speech in Cairo,
8. his release of terrorists from Guantanamo,
9.  his orders to intelligence services to eliminate the phrase “jihad,”
10. his stonewalling of investigations into the terrorist links of the Moslem Brotherhood,
11. and his orders to federal agencies to ignore Hezbollah’s drug running..........To Read More.....