Conspiracies and Theorists!

By Rich Kozlovich

Certain words are used so continuously no one bothers to think about what they really mean.  As an example, the words prejudice and racist have been bandied about for more years than I can remember, and constantly misused.  The word "prejudice" means to “pre-judge”.  The word racist means to have an intense dislike for someone merely because they are a member of another race.  Rarely are either of those used properly as epithets.  If a person dislikes someone because they act badly it isn’t because of prejudice or racism - it’s an evaluation - not a “pre-judgment”!  An evaluation of someone’s conduct isn’t racism.  It means they were evaluated and fell short.

That brings me to the phrase “conspiracy theorist”!  Why does that term carry such a negative connotation, implying it’s the thinking of ignorant loons?  One of the reasons can be attributed to the fact people don’t really understand what the words mean.  So let’s do a little dictionary work and then “re-evaluate” their usage.

Conspiracy – An evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot, a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, or it could be any concurrence in action that in combination will bring about a given result.

The basic understanding for the definition of a conspiracy is “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.”  As in "a conspiracy to destroy the government” or a “conspiracy to commit murder "!   However, in a broader sense it can also be a plot, a scheme, a plan , various machinations, a ploy, a trick, an effort to get a desired end result as "a conspiracy to manipulate the results through ruse, or subterfuge.  A conspiracy is involves the action of plotting, ergo, conspiring. 

 

Part of these ‘actions’ include collusion, intrigue, connivances, machinations, and a certain amount of collaboration between parties, which can amount to treason.  The word conspiracy came to us from late Middle English, Anglo-Norman French conspiracie, and  alteration of Old French conspiration, based on Latin conspirare ‘agree, plot’.

So based on that definition we must ask ourselves; is it irrational to consider what the progressives/liberals/leftists, in and out of government, have been doing since the 1890’s in North America anything less than a conspiracy?  

Forget Agenda 21 for the time being, this has been going on for decades, becoming especially severe since the 1920’s when Soviet agents, working at the beck and call of Joe Stalin, infiltrated the news media, Hollywood, unions, academia and government departments at all levels, especially the many agencies created by FDR during the Great Depression and WWII.  This even included the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency.  And we know this to be true from eyewitness testimony and what’s known as the VENONA intercepts.  One of those spies even lived in the White House, Harry Hopkins.

We have to get past the idea that Agenda 21 is anything new, it’s the same old treason in a green package.

Now let’s take a look at the word theory!

Theory - a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.

A theory requires provable facts.  Those who are Agenda 21 “conspiracy theorists” have those facts and they are incontestable, as this article clearly demonstrates, since the author of the article attempting to denegrate these “conspiracy theorists” is in harmony as to what Agenda 21 is designed to do.  The author merely lacks the insight and understanding of what the real world application of Agenda will entail and the consequences of that application.

Now let’s look at the word hypothesis!

Hypothesis - a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation, or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts, a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument. In short a hypothesis is a mere assumption or guess.

As far as I can tell......none of the anti-Agenda 21 “conspiracy theorists” are guessing at anything.  They are merely sharing the information they’ve gathered from the media, bureaucrats, elected officials and activists – all people attempting to impose Agenda 21 on the nation, and the more society becomes aware of those facts the less they like what they see, so the nation can thank all those “conspiracy theorists” for standing up to what clearly is a very real conspiracy.