This appeared here and I wish to thank John for allowing me to publish his work. RK
Today,
after delays and much opposition from many quarters on different grounds, the
Johnson-Crapo housing finance overhaul is set to be voted on by the Senate
Banking Committee. If it clears, the vote will likely be narrow.
The
Competitive Enterprise Institute coordinated a letter
opposing the legislation signed by 26 leaders of conservative and
free-market groups. Here are four key reasons to why Johnson-Crapo, named for
Senate Banking Chairman Tim Johnson (D-S.D.) and and Ranking Member Mike Crapo
(R-Idaho), is such a monstrosity.
1.
The
bill proposes to create a new federal mortgage company would assume all
of the current liabilities of the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac. That’s $5 trillion added to our deficit right off the bat. It
creates huge new risk for taxpayers by doing this, and by putting taxpayers on
the hook for 90 percent of losses from mortgage instruments insured by the new
Federal Mortgage Insurance Corporation (Feddie Mic).
2.
The
bill violates shareholder rights and the Constitution by codifying an Obama
administration policy to empower the U.S. Government to sweep all of the
profits of Fannie and Freddie into the Treasury in perpetuity — even after the
taxpayers have been paid back.
3.
The
bill creates new housing “trust funds”, and has very little safeguards to keep
those funds from being diverted for political purposes. Recall that ACORN
misused housing funds for political activity before it was eventually folded
due to multiple scandals. This is a real risk.
4.
From
my recent piece
at National Review:
After years of minimizing the role
Fannie and Freddie played in the crisis, many liberals as well as longtime
housing “subsidy suckers” (in the parlance of the intrepid Washington Examiner
columnist Timothy P. Carney) in the real-estate and construction industries are
hailing the Johnson-Crapo “reform” and saying the GSE model has “failed.” But
it’s important to understand why they believe it has failed. Incredible as it
may seem, they believe the GSEs are being too stingy and see Johnson-Crapo’s
proposed Feddie Mic as a way of prying open government-backed credit spigots
even further.
Then
there is the opportunity cost to the U.S. economy of the Senate Banking
Committee wasting its time on Johnson-Crapo, and not pursuing constructive
legislation such as bipartisan relief from Dodd-Frank that has cleared the
House and the House Financial Services Committee. And it has been reported that
right after they deal with Johnson-Crapo, Johnson and Crapo will turn to rubber
stamping reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank, another boondoggle for big
business.
Johnson
and Crapo should either change course, or change the name of their committee to
the Senate Corporate Welfare Committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment