While Americans grapple with
the Obamacare debacle and 90 million are officially unemployed according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, there is another threat to our future as
environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth continue
their assault on the provision of electrical energy, the lifeblood of the
nation’s economy and our ability to function at home and on the job.
Recently, Sierra Club members
were told that they, “supporters, partners, and allies have worked tirelessly
to retire 150 coal-fired power plants since January 2010—a significant number
in the campaign to move the country beyond dirty and outdated fossil fuels.”
Among the many ongoing
lawsuits that the Sierra Club is pursuing is one against Navajo coal mining,
the Keystone XL pipeline, one seeking penalties for “ongoing violations” at
Montana’s Colstrip power plant. They filed a suit against the power rate
increase for Mississippi’s Kemper County coal plant.
In early October, The Wall
Street Journal published an article, “Mississippi
Plant Shows the Cost of ‘Clean Coal’.” It is testimony to the nonsense
about “clean coal.” The plant, the reporters note, was meant to demonstrate
that Mississippi Power Company’s Kemper County plant was “meant to showcase
technology for generating clean energy from low-quality coal” but it “ranks as
one of the most expensive U.S. fossil fuel projects ever—at $4.7 billion and
rising.”
“Mississippi Power’s 186,000
customers, who live in one of the poorest region of the country, are reeling
from double-digit rate increases,” adding that “the plant hasn’t generated a
single kilowatt for customers…”
Seven power plants in Pennsylvania
are under attack by the Sierra Club and EarthJustice which have filed a federal
lawsuit. The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce has exposed this common practice by environmental
groups to “sue and settle.”
“It works like this.
Environmental and consumer advocacy groups file a lawsuit claiming that the
federal government has failed to meet a deadline or has not satisfied some
regulatory requirement. The agency can then either choose to defend itself
against the lawsuit or settle it. Often times, it settles by putting in place a
‘court-ordered’ regulation desired by the advocacy group, thus circumventing
the proper rulemaking channels and basic transparency and accountability standards.”
High on the list of
government agencies that engage in this is the Environmental Protection Agency,
but others include Transportation, Agriculture, and Defense, along with the
Fish & Wildlife Service, and the Army Corps of Engineers. One recent victory
touted by Friends of the Earth is an EPA air pollution regulation is one that
affects ships navigating along the coasts of the United States and Canada, out
to 200 nautical miles, to “significantly reduce their emissions.”
Like the touted benefits of
wind and solar power, “clean coal” is another environmental myth that is
costing billions. Recently, the Global
Warming Foundation reported that “The world invested almost a billion
dollars a day in limiting global warming last year, but the total figure--$359
billion—was slightly down on last year, and barely half the $700 billion per
year that the World Economic Forum has said is needed to tackle climate
change.” The report cited was generated by the Climate Policy Initiative.
The problem with this is that
there is NO global warming. The Earth is in a perfectly natural cooling cycle
and has been for 15 to 16 years at this point. The notion of spending any money
on “climate change” is insanity. The climate is largely determined by the Sun
and other natural factors over which mankind has no control. The claim that
carbon dioxide is a contributing factor to climate has been decisively debunked
despite the years of lies emanating from the United Nations Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change. Indeed, during the current cooling cycle, the amount
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen!
For all their caterwauling
about fossil fuels, environmental groups have resisted the expansion of the use
of nuclear power that emits no so-called “greenhouse gas” emissions. The
Friends of the Earth recently declared that “The quickest way to end our costly
fossil fuel dependency is through energy efficiency and renewable power, not
new (nuclear) reactors that will suck up precious investment and take years to
complete.”
The Obama administration’s
record of bad loans to companies providing renewable power—wind and solar—is
testimony to the waste of billions of taxpayer dollars. In September, the
Department of Energy made $66 million in green-energy subsidies to 33
companies, half of it to companies by a single venture capital firm with close
ties to the White House.
The continued loss of
coal-fired plants has reduced their provision of electricity from over 50% to
around 47%. The resistance to the construction of nuclear facilities slows the
replacement of their loss, but plants utilizing natural gas have benefitted
greatly from the discovery of billions of cubic feet through the use of
hydraulic fracking technology holds the promise of maintaining the nation’s
needs. Need it be said that “fracking” has become a target of environmental
organizations?
Environmental organizations
are the enemies of energy in America and worldwide. Without its provision third
world nations cannot develop and the ability to provide the energy America
needs is put in jeopardy.
© Alan Caruba, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment