This appeared here
and I would like to thank John for allowing me to publish his work. RK
Over
the weekend, President Obama hailed the third anniversary of the enactment of
the Dodd-Frank “financial reform.” In his weekly radio address, the president also hailed the
confirmation of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray,
which occurred last week after Senate Republicans caved to Majority Leader
Harry Reid’s “nuclear option” threat to end the filibuster.
The
president began his address, “Three years ago this weekend, we put in place
tough new rules of the road for the financial sector so that irresponsible
behavior on the part of the few could never again cause a crisis that harms
millions of middle-class families.” And he concluded, “If we keep moving
forward with our eyes fixed on that North Star of a growing middle class, I’m
confident we’ll get to where we need to go.”
Sorry,
Mr. President, but just the opposite is true. Dodd-Frank has declared certain
large financial institutions to be “Systemically Important Financial
Institutions,” enshrining too-big-to-fail in law. And the volumes of
regulations emanating from the law’s 2,500-plus pages have harmed community
banks, credit unions, small businesses, farms and manufacturers that had
nothing to do with the crisis.
Here
are some articles my colleagues and I have written on Dodd-Frank’s devastating
toll as well as some its just plain silly, but still destructive, provisions:
- I write in National Review and American Spectator on the new database the
CFPB is building that rivals the National Security Agency in collecting
personal financial data. The articles make the point the CFPB is even less
accountable than the NSA, because at least the NSA gets it funding from
Congress, rather than the Federal Reserve.
- My colleague
Iain Murray explains in “The Corner” of National Review
Online how the Treasury Department is extending the SIFI or too-big-too
fail principle beyond banks to many types of businesses.
- Provisions in
Dodd-Frank regulating trade and the energy sector?! Believe it or not,
yes?! I point out in National Review the flaws and lack of justification
for provisions jammed into Dodd-Frank that force energy companies to
disclose every payment they make to foreign governments and manufacturers
to disclose if any of the gold, tin, or tungsten they use may have come
from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These provisions were inspired
by celebrity activists but are hurting the very regions of the world they
were meant to help, as well as driving up energy prices in the U.S.
economy.
- In a rare
instance of bipartisanship on deregulation, lopsided and, in some cases,
unanimous majorities of the House Agriculture and House Financial Services
Committees bucked the Obama administration to provide relief from
Dodd-Frank’s stringent derivatives regulations. I document here in OpenMarket how both sides pointed
out that these provisions were hurting farms, airlines and factories that
had nothing to do with the financial crisis.
If
the president truly wants to focus on the “north star” of helping the middle
class prosper, he should work to repeal Dodd-Frank, end bailouts and lift
barriers to more competition in the banking system from credit unions or well-run companies such as Wal-Mart. More to come on these items.
No comments:
Post a Comment