Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts

Monday, June 9, 2025

Columnist at the Washington Post Lies About Poverty…Again

June 8, 2025 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty

I have a special page called Poverty Hucksters, which features people or institutions (such as the Obama Administration, Steven Greenhouse, and the United Nations) that have deliberately lied about poverty.

No person has ever been featured more than one time, but that changes today because Eduardo Porter outed himself as a poverty huckster while at the New York Times back in 2018.

Now, he’s done it again. Here’s a chart from his recent column in the Washington Post, augmented by my question about whether his numbers are accurate.

Simply stated, Porter’s chart is dishonest nonsense because it is not measuring poverty.

I’m not joking. If you read the fine print, what the chart really shows is the percentage of the population with less than half the median income.

Yet this conveniently ignores an all-important issue, which is whether a nation has a high median income (like the United States) or a low median income (like some of the nations in the chart that supposedly have much less poverty).

I debunked this dodgy methodology back in 2017.

…it’s total nonsense. …it’s a measure of income distribution. …Think about what this means. A country where everyone is impoverished will have zero or close-to-zero poverty because everyone is at the median income. But as I’ve explained before, a very wealthy society can have lots of “poverty” if some people are a lot richer than others. And since the United States is much richer than other nations, this means an American household with $35,000 of income can be poor, even though they wouldn’t count as poor if they earned that much elsewhere.

And here’s some of what I wrote in 2019.

It is indeed strange that so many folks on the left have decided to use an artificial and misleading definition of poverty. One that depends on the distribution of income rather than any specific measure of poverty. Which is insanely dishonest. It means that everyone’s income could double and the supposed rate of poverty would stay the same. Or a country could execute all the rich people and the alleged rate of poverty would decline.

Here’s a chart I shared back in 2020.

It shows that poor people in the United States would be middle class (or above!) in many European countries.

And since the U.S. has been growing much faster than Europe in recent years, an updated version of this chart would be even more dramatic.

I want to close by pointing out some remarkable, but surely accidental, passages from Porter’s column.

He openly admits America is far richer than most other developed nations

The United States is by many measures the most powerful, prosperous nation on earth, sitting on the frontier of innovation and consistently outpacing its peers in terms of economic growth over recent decades. …despite being poorer and further from the technological frontier, America’s social-democratic peers…spend more effort and taxpayer money… This raises the question: What’s the point of being the most powerful, affluent nation on earth?

Yet instead of arguing for other nations to be more like the United States (lower taxes, smaller welfare state, etc), the whole point of his column is to argue that America should copy the countries that have lower levels of income.

Amazing. And this isn’t the first time he’s urged a successful nation to copy less-successful countries.

One final point: It’s possible that Porter is not being explicitly dishonest in his column. He may have blindly looked at OECD numbers and simply regurgitated them, without bothering to look at the methodology.

P.S. Speaking of the OECD, any analysis of dishonest poverty data should include criticism of the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. That international bureaucracy is infamous for generating the dodgy data (see here, here, here, and here) that get cited by people like Porter.

Friday, February 28, 2025

Extra! Extra! Changes Coming to The Washington Post Opinion Page

Jeff Bezos’ Damascene conversion is ruffling feathers. 

By | Feb 27, 2025 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Media, Opinion

Just try to wrap your brain around what’s happened this week in the left-wing media: MSNBC canceled Joy Reid’s show and laid off a number of people working on the Rachel Maddow program for good measure. Just yesterday (Feb. 26), the owner of The Washington Post, Jeff Bezos, announced a change in the direction of the newspaper’s opinion page. Henceforth, the most influential newspaper in the nation’s capital will write “in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” according to Bezos. Opposing views “will be left to be published by others.”

The billionaire owner of the historic newspaper that defines the term “legacy media” and boasts the dystopian message “Democracy Dies in Darkness” on its masthead went on to say, “I am of America and for America, and proud to be so.”

The new edict, along with such rah-rah language, sent readers’ heads spinning: “Bezos has hired a new opinion editor, and we can expect more tripe in days to come. His explanation is such a transparent attempt at trying to save face under the banners of defending personal freedom and the free markets — or some such rubbish,” remarked one WaPo regular amid a bevy of unsubscribers. “Free market? I honestly thought I could hold out another couple of months with my subscription, silly me,” wrote another.

But that’s the nice thing about billionaires owning a newspaper. They can do what they want with it. The Post already lost an estimated 250,000 subscribers when it failed to endorse Kamala Harris for president – a controversial decision, to say the least. What’s a few more to Bezos? The Post has been drowning in red ink anyway.

Washington Post – Darkness on the Horizon?

It didn’t take long for The New York Times to dance on the grave of its archrival: “The new direction envisioned for The Post’s opinion section appears to be a rightward shift for the paper. Mr. Bezos’ new focus echoes what has long been the informal tagline of The Wall Street Journal’s conservative opinion pages: ‘Free markets, free people.’”

Play Video
Kick Back and Ditch the Matrix

As Washington Post Opinion Editor David Shipley exits stage left, Chief Executive Will Lewis made an effort to stanch the bleeding. He wrote in a memo that The Post was “not about siding with any political party.” Other Post staffers took to Bluesky, the leftist alternative to X, to say they would be carefully watching whether Bezos sticks his nose into their respective fiefdoms.

There is no doubt the leftist media and its legacy partners are under siege. This week, a federal judge refused to force the White House to restore The Associated Press’ access to presidential events. The White House Correspondents’ Association has had a lengthy stranglehold on which news outlets are permitted access to the chief executive and a coveted seat in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room. Their salad days are over as the White House communications team took the reins of power and opened the venue to new media outlets. Still, the AP says it will continue its fight. Another hearing on the matter is scheduled for March 20.

As American news consumers continue to broaden their information consumption to the many offerings on the web, it becomes more difficult for the old guard to maintain its once lofty perch. And as they flee to other sources, the left-wing media must either adapt or wither away to insignificance. This move by Bezos signals he believes the best course of action for The Washington Post is to adapt. And he just may be right.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Leesa K. Donner Executive Editor

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Media People are Arrogant, Overpaid, and Under Smart

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags:

When you read articles dealing with how much these news media talking heads are paid it just boggles my mind. Take Chris Wallace for instance. Talk about overpaid!

Chris Wallace left Fox News in a huff and signed a contract with CNN to be the point man on the cable network’s streaming service, CNN+. That venture lasted only days before the new owners pulled the plug, leaving the network stuck with finding some use for its expensive (“more than $6 million a year”) new employee. They came up with a Sunday evening interview program, titled Who’s Talking to Chris Wallace.”  As Radar Online reports, the results are dismal:.........

I don't know what his status is now, he might not be there any longer, but I stopped listening to him while he was still at Fox.  Here were my views at the time.  

/>
The fact is Chris Wallace is a loser because I think he's a duplicitous arrogant snot.  His salary is a loser because he's not drawing an audience of any size.  CNN is a loser because the new owners aren't aggressive enough in changing the direction of the network because I think they're not conservatives, they're liberals in sheep's clothing.  Otherwise they'd have come out and emphatically said the network was corrupted with leftist ideologues that were dishonest in their representation of the news and fired each and every one of their talking heads, along with the management people.  They didn't.  If this continues, and I think it will, CNN will be sold, at a bargain price, if it can be sold at all. 

Companies that deliver "news" have nothing to sell except their access to an audience, and they're fast running out of that asset.  Schadenfreude!
 
I would think they could get anyone to report over and over again leftist lies of omission, lies of commission, misdirection, obfuscation of facts, cherry picked facts, and logical fallacies pushed out of the myth making propaganda factories of the Democrat party, and for a lot less money. 
Recently a CNN Host cut off a Trump supporter because she didn't like the truth about Jack Tapper, and then self-righteously declared on her show no one can criticize her colleagues.  Well, Jake Tapper isn't all that fond of the truth either,  as  Jake Tapper Also Pulled the Plug Mid-Interview With a Trump Official at CNN

CNN’s Jake Tapper, who was conducting the interview with White House Senior Adviser Stephen Miller, cut the conversation off after 12 and a half minutes, telling Miller he was spewing rhetoric solely to gain approval from the President. “There’s one viewer that you care about right now and you’re being obsequious in order to please him,” Tapper said. “I think I’ve wasted enough of my viewers’ time.” 
 
Now, I think this is worth thinking about.   What if Ole Jake, who has a Trump hating history, decides during the debate Trump has wasted enough of the viewers time and cuts off his mic?
Well, they may be able to cut off anyone they wish on their shows, and spew out their hate for Trump, including ridiculous claims and outrageous lies, but the world is evaluating and criticizing the nitwits at CNN and as a result they're losing audience (here, here, here), massively, and at the rate they're they're going I think they'll be out of business soon, and then we will see just how much they're going to be worth in the unemployment line.   It would be interesting if their conduct during the debate exacerbates those losses. 
 
This isn't just a problem in the electronic media.  The Washington Post is having an ongoing a cry baby hissy fit crisis, for which America can be grateful.  They went on strike.  This is a paper that's had to lay off 240 people in 2023, because they're losing subscribers like water through a sieve, and it gets better all the time. 
 
Recently it was announced WaPo lost 77 million dollars, and changes were going to be made.  Of course the reason they losing money is because, according the the employees, there are too many white people in charge.  Not their work, like the lies listed in this article.  And they revolted over the pick of Rob Winnett....a white man.... and won.
 
Steven Hayward posted this piece, Media Free-Fall Continues saying:

The news over the weekend that Washington Post editor-designate Rob Winnett will not assume the job after a staff revolt inside the money- and reader-losing paper ratifies Andrew Sullivan’s famous thesis from a few years ago that “we all live on campus now.” Media organizations now resemble self-governing college faculties, with the same result.

I got to thinking how little I use my online Washington Post subscription any more, even for opposition research (which is why I still subscribe to the NY Times online), so I canceled it this morning. It is not even worth reading to keep up with leading leftist opinion and fake news coverage.  And so the collapse of media institutions continues:

This is a paper that lost 77 million dollars last year, and the management is intimidated by the employees.  Imagine that.  Do they really want CNN and WaPo fixed?  Forget it, you can't fix stupid, especially when stupid is compounded by invertebracy. 

There was a time when Walter Cronkite would declare, "And that's the way it is", and the world accepted that.  No longer, and as time is the great leveler of truth,  we now know Walter Cronkite was a fraud, just like Dan Rather, Mike Wallace, Tom Brokaw and the rest of that media cabal.   

History is everything, and we've come to a fork in the road and it's time to ask yourself, who do you think really represents a stable society? Who do you think represents an organized society? Who do you think represents policies for long term stable economics? Who do you think defends real personal freedoms? Who do you think represents law and order? Who do you think represents tyrannical government control over everyone's lives?  

Finally....who do you identify with, and who do you trust with the news?  Nuf Ced?


Saturday, February 3, 2024

The Washington Post Grades Biden’s Economy on a Curve

February 2, 2024 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty

I rarely comment about media bias, but sometimes there is an example that demands attention.

For today’s column, I want to examine a four-question quiz on the Biden economy put together by the Washington Post.

The first indication of bias is that every answer was the one that made Biden look good (or less bad).

Sort of like a quiz asking if communists killed 1 billion people, 500 million people, or 100 million. The fact that the right answer is that they “only” killed 100 million is hardly a ringing endorsement of Marx’s evil ideology.

But another problem is that some of the questions also were steroid-fueled examples of grading on a curve. For instance, based on Question #1, we’re supposed to be impressed that the United States has grown faster than Europe’s decrepit welfare states.

For what it’s worth, growing faster than France, Italy, and Greece is not exactly something to celebrate, as you might imagine.

Question #4 also is designed to make Biden look good by comparing job creation during his tenure to what happened under Trump and Obama.

Yet beating Obama is hardly a major achievement, and the Trump numbers are very distorted because Trump and Fauci shut down the economy during the pandemic.

Biden should have spectacular job numbers, if only because the pandemic meant there were still millions of missing jobs when he took office.

Yet his policies have contributed to relatively weak performance, particularly when looking at labor-force participation.

Suffice to say, Biden would not look good if his job numbers were compared were compared to market-friendly presidents like Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

There were two other questions, which also were biased but not to the absurd level as the ones described above.

  • Question #2 implies that Biden has done a good job because gas prices have only increased by 75 cents a gallon rather than going up by $1 or $2. Sort of like saying a diet is successful if you’re gaining two pounds a week rather than five pounds.
  • Question #3 implies that Biden has done a good job because wages have almost risen as fast as inflation. Needless to say, the fact that there as been zero inflation-adjusted wage growth is actually a damning indictment of Bidenomics.

Here’s how the Post described the quiz.


The past few years have been tumultuous, with a deadly pandemic, a recession, an inflation spike and overseas wars. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Americans give President Biden low marks on the economy. How bad are things? This quiz will help you calibrate your level of concern, and it will show you how your knowledge of economic reality stacks up against other Americans we asked and other Post readers.

The Post obviously wants readers to conclude that Biden deserves good marks for the economy. The fact that the paper had to engage in contortions tells you what you really need to know.

Seems like these cartoons about media bias need to be updated.

Friday, January 26, 2024

The L.A. Times is dying, and only Donald Trump can save it

Jordan Schachtel Jan 23, 2024 

At the beginning of the Trump era, The L.A. Times saw a 100% year-over-year increase in newspaper subscriptions. Now they're losing $40 million a year. The corporate media needs their Bad Guy back. There’s only one man who can save the jobs of the hive media minds who remain employed by The Los Angeles Times, and it’s not who they think it is..........To Read More.....

My Take - I don't agree with this author's analysis.  While a Trump Presidency may give them a boost, no one can save these corrupt institutions.  They've been exposed for their lies, their corruption, their treason, and while American can be easily fooled, once made aware of how they've been deceived, American will not forget or forgive.  They might be able to fool the younger generation for a while, but they don't read newspapers, books, or anything that make their little snowflake heads ache with critical thought.  End result will be the same. 


Friday, December 8, 2023

Washington Post Staffers Go On Strike From Destroying America

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Nolte: The Incredible Shrinking Washington Post Cuts 240 More Jobs

John Nolte 11 Oct 2023 

The disgraced and financially embattled far-left Washington Post is cutting ten percent of its staff, some 240 jobs.  Washingtonian magazine reported Tuesday:

The Washington Post plans to offer buyouts to employees to reduce its workforce by 240 people, interim CEO Patty Stonesifer told employees in a memo Tuesday. Calling it “difficult news,” Stonesifer said that in consultation with senior leadership, the brass have decided that “prior projections for traffic, subscriptions, and advertising growth for the past two years — and into 2024 — have been overly optimistic and we are working to find ways to return our business to a healthier place in the coming year.”

Wait, it gets better..............Lest anyone accuses me of lacking sympathy for those who work for a fascist company devoted to my destruction,..............Never forget that this is the Washington Post:

Never forget that the Washington Post employs the most dishonest “fact checker” on the planet, which is really saying something..........To Read More.....

 

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Nolte: Far-left Washington Post Has Lost 500,000 Subscribers

John Nolte

The Washington Post, a far-left propaganda outlet that spreads conspiracy theories and lies, has lost 500,000 of its subscribers, the Wall Street Journal reports.   What had been a subscription base of around three million at the beginning of 2021 — the month former President Trump left office — has since plummeted by around 20 percent to just around 2.5 million subscribers.This news comes on top of a New York Times report over the summer that said the Post is in serious financial trouble:..........To Read More.....


Tuesday, February 15, 2022

Washington Post's Fairy Tale on Pennsylvania Voter Fraud

Jeffrey Lord February 12th, 2022

You can’t make it up. Unless, of course, you’re at The Washington Post. The other day, Post columnist Greg Sargent wrote a column with the title:

GOP candidates add a repulsive new twist to Trump’s ‘big lie’

In which Sargent writes this of GOP Senate candidates in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio and Nevada, bold print for emphasis supplied:

It’s hardly surprising to hear that Republican Senate candidates are campaigning on the “big lie” that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud. This has become so routine that it’s no longer treated as newsworthy, which further normalizes it, a terrible development that we should resist.

Sargent goes on to say this happens because of -- but of course -- race. Then he says this:..........To Read More....

Saturday, January 15, 2022

The Washington Post Accused Conservatives of Russian Disinformation, Its Boss Was Spreading Chinese Disinformation

January 13, 2022 @ Sultan Knish Blog

If there’s one newspaper that could have had “disinformation” copyrighted and then collected royalties from every Russian conspiracy theory, it was the Washington Post.

The Washington Post gained power and influence and its circulation and its profits grew as the paper spread lies, smears, and conspiracy theories that pandered to the prejudices and coup impulses of an angry base of D.C. Democrat government bureaucrats, politicians, lobbyists, and contractors who fancied themselves to be the “resistance” to the 2016 election.

The Post's opinion section filled up with headlines like, "The Republicans have become the party of Russia", but its news desk was no better with a false claim, later retracted, that Giuliani had been warned by the FBI that he was the target of a “Russian influence operation”.

Day after day, the paper built a case that Republicans were a “threat to democracy” by “spreading Russian disinformation”, and urgently needed to be deplatformed and censored.

Max Boot, a Washington Post columnist, cheered Big Tech's censorship of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden while insisting that it was "Russian disinformation".

"Sorry, Republicans. Social media companies aren’t obligated to spread your lies," he gloated.

We now know that there was no Russian disinformation, but that the Washington Post’s Big Tech boss was actually the one profiting from spreading Chinese disinformation to Americans.

The Washington Post had been purchased by Jeff Bezos while Amazon’s federal contracts and lobbying expenditures began to grow. One of Amazon's biggest federal paydays was a $600 million cloud contract with the CIA. Then the Big Tech giant set its sights on a $10 billion military cloud contract known as JEDI. After the Trump administration noted favoritism toward Amazon, the contract was instead awarded to Microsoft, leading to an Amazon sore loser lawsuit. JEDI was then canceled and Amazon got a profitable piece of a new JWCC military cloud contract.

Meanwhile, Amazon was deep in bed with Communist China. Amazon’s marketplace is dominated by third party sellers and most of those third party sellers are based in China.

But a recently leaked internal Amazon document also revealed that the Big Tech giant was trading the Communist regime access to Americans in exchange for doing business in China.

While Amazon wanted the right to sell books to the Chinese, the Communist regime wanted to be able to push its propaganda through Chinabooks on the Amazon platform.

Jay Carney, formerly Obama's press secretary, now heading up Amazon's lobbying operation, was told before he flew out to Beijing that the key to persuading the Communist regime to allow Amazon to continue doing business was "the Chinabooks project.”

The China Books project is outwardly just another storefront, albeit stocked with books on Xi. The design may be crude but the agenda shows up at the beginning with a menu that highlights "Governance of China" and "Books on China's Battle Against the Pandemic". While the former category largely features Xi, the country’s Communist dictator, the latter is where the action is.

The various texts, political, personal, and even books on the pandemic for children, highlight the efforts of the Communist party and treat the battle against the virus as a vindication of the party.

The books often come through the Foreign Languages Press, an arm of the Chinese Communist Party that is used to spread disinformation and propaganda around the world. FLP is an imitation of the Soviet Union's Foreign Languages Publishing House. While the Soviet Union had shut down and freshened up its FLPH propaganda operation in the sixties, China, which copied it in the fifties, has kept FLP going with few changes to the operation.

Amazon sells a lot of books, but with the Chinabooks project it had partnered with an enemy nation’s propaganda campaign in order to be able to do business with the Communists.

And much of that propaganda campaign was aimed at Americans.

Even while Amazon’s CEO was partnering his company with China’s state propaganda arm, his newspaper was accusing Republicans of being in bed with Russia. The Washington Post’s smear campaign was true, not of Republicans, but of its owner and his Big Tech monopoly.

Even as Amazon swallows up American retail, it’s become little more than a front for China. Its products come from China, but so do the third party sellers who dominate its platform.

And yet Amazon also wields enormous influence over American policy and politics.

Despite its close relationship to Communist China and other enemies, Amazon controls the CIA’s cloud and will have a chunk of the military cloud. Some of our most sensitive information is in the hands of a corporation that doesn’t think twice about collaborating with our enemies.

Amazon did not hesitate to give China’s Communist party the key to spreading their disinformation to American audiences. What other digital doors might it help China open?

Beyond the sensitive role that Amazon plays in our military and intelligence apparatus is the political role that it enjoys courtesy of its chairman’s ownership of the Washington Post.

The Post sets the policy agenda for the Democrats and columnists like Jennifer Rubin function as mouthpieces for the Biden administration. The partnership has been extremely profitable for the paper as lefty audiences ate up its Russiagate disinformation campaign, sending subscription rates sky high and making its articles trend on Big Tech social media platforms.

Qatar’s biggest foreign influence operation, involving the death of Jamal Khashoggi, a Qatari terror operative embedded as a columnist in the Washington Post, was enormously successful and quickly became part of the Democrat foreign policy agenda. The transformation of an old friend of Osama bin Laden into a political martyr would not have been possible without the unquestioning acceptance that the Post’s disinformation campaigns have achieved among the Democrats and even among some less sensible Republicans.

Even after stepping down as CEO to become Amazon's executive chairman, Jeff Bezos still commands $180 billion worth of Amazon stock. The intertwining of the key media outlet of D.C. Democrats and one of the most powerful Big Tech monopolies in the country still remains.

So does the disinformation threat posed by the combination of Amazon and the Post.

Leftists most often accuse their enemies of their own sins. While the Washington Post colluded to censor its conservative political opponents to protect Biden’s electoral chances, Amazon stood to profit from Biden’s win, renewed relations with China, and a military cloud deal.

And while the Post claimed that Republicans were spreading Russian disinformation, it was actually the money behind its machine that was spreading Chinese disinformation.

The paper manufactured a threat by Republicans to cover up the threat that it poses to America.

As long as China calls the shots at Amazon, and the Big Tech monopoly and its paper call the shots in our retail sector and our nation’s capital, America remains in the grip of China.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.

Click here to subscribe to my articles. 

Thank you for reading.

Tags: , , ,
Author Image

About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Friday, August 20, 2021

Washington Post Gushes Over The Taliban Because They Are Not Trump - Yes, Seriously

Exactly who would look at the Taliban with a measure of admiration?! The paper in our nation’s capital, it seems.

By Brad Slager Aug 19, 2021

As the country is trying to come to terms with the level of absent leadership from our White House while a nation under our care spirals into a “Mad Max” dystopia seemingly overnight, there are a number of realities to grapple with as a result. One of the more frivolous but at the same time revelatory is that the Taliban leadership maintains a presence on some social media platforms. It is more than a case of curious optics that any Taliban spokesmen can have an operational Twitter account, as they overtake a nation in violent fashion within a week’s time frame. ............they resort to a level of fawning over the Taliban that creepily approaches fanboy status. It is something to behold.A movement rooted in traditional moral codes has become expert at wielding the West’s advanced communication technologies,” they say to launch their coverage. We have to take it on faith, we suppose, that “traditional moral codes” is a euphemism for justified killings. It is a curious use of the phrase in a discussion involving Donald Trump, considering the animosity leveled towards Americans of faith and The Evangelicals the past four to five years. Now suddenly moral codes almost sound noble.....To Read More....

Monday, February 3, 2020

Hacking the Hacks

By Daniel Greenfield 2 Comments Sunday, February 02, 2020 @ Sultan Knish Blog

What’s a four-letter word meaning digital intrusion and clueless liar with a press pass?

Nothing brings out the hacks like hacking takes. In the brave new digital age, hacking is everywhere and nowhere. The two kinds of hacks interface with stolen messages being passed along by hackers to hacks for their informational operations. The hacks usually claim not to know what the hackers were doing.

Sometimes the hacking was invented by the hacks.

The great collision of hack and hacker right now is all about the claim that Jeff Bezos, CEO of
Amazon, richest man alive, and, most importantly, owner of the Washington Post, had his sleazy affair exposed (resulting in the most expensive divorce settlement in human history) because he cares about human rights. The latest tawdry effort to ennoble the pictures of the WaPo owner’s private parts as a tool of foreign policy has enlisted the UN to accuse the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia of hacking his iPhoneX.

The collision of hack and hackery begins with a report by a UN Special Rapporteur (apparently you have to be a billionaire to get the UN to help you cover up your adulterous affair with a sleazy LA anchorwoman) which describes an "in-depth forensic level examination" of the phone and admits that it found no malware, no malicious software, and no evidence of jail-breaking tools.

Federal prosecutors soon let it slip that, as everyone had already known, the pictures came from the CEO’s mistress who passed them on to her brother, who then probably passed them to the tabloids.

But the UN and the media weren’t having any of it, and insisted that the Saudi crown prince personally hacked Jeff’s phone using Zionist software. Or, as the UN report puts it, "it is later established with reasonable certainty that the video's downloader infects Mr. Bezos' phone with malicious code." Earlier, the report had admitted that, "the contents of the downloader cannot be practically determined."

How can you establish with any kind of certainty the contents of software you didn’t examine?

In its truly pathetic conclusion, the report insists that, “Facebook confirms that ‘sending a specifically crafted MP4 [video] file to a WhatsApp user’ is a method for installing malicious spyware, exactly as was sent to Mr. Bezos." Except that the report had already admitted that it found no malicious code in the promotional video file that had been sent by the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia to Lauren Sanchez’s lover.

The UN report finds with “reasonable certainty” that a video downloader that experts couldn’t examine sent a specially crafted MP4 file just like the one they examined and found nothing special about.

The UN report blames "mobile spyware" from "NSO Group's Pegasus". The NSO Group is an Israeli-American security firm that helps friendly governments spy on terrorists and enemies. But Pegasus got into WhatsApp accounts with a “zero click” exploit. Nothing as clumsy as a tainted video file.

To buy the hacking story that the hacks are selling, you have to believe in a Saudi-Zionist conspiracy to steal pictures of Jeff’s private parts by using tactics as crude as any teenage Pakistani script kiddie. And yet, despite these crude efforts, the best experts Bezos could command have found no trace of them.

Occam’s Razor weeps.

If only Carlos Danger, who also claimed that he had been hacked, owned a major paper and the UN.

Meanwhile over in Brazil, the hackery of the hacks collided with actual hacking. And media hacks are outraged that one of their own, Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, who once defended Hamas and Hezbollah, was accused of guiding and inciting a hack of private messages between public officials, including a heroic judge turned Minister of Justice, who were investigating leftist corruption.

Operation Car Wash in Brazil had uncovered truly monumental corruption that brought down the hierarchy of the Workers’ Party (PT) which had been robbing the country blind through Petrobras.

Petrobras, the megacorp whose largest owner is the Brazilian government, had been turned into the private piggy bank of the friends of the working class with money flowing between corporations, oligarchs, and officials, which went into their pockets and funded the political campaigns of the Left.

Rather than exposing corruption, The Intercept’s top leftist hack had allegedly colluded with hackers to hack into the messages of the investigative judge who had helped bring down the leftist mafia. But the same international media which ignored the massive scale of the Petrobas corruption, has rushed out identical editorials clamoring that Greenwald is being persecuted for exposing Brazil’s corruption.

That’s like claiming that Jimmy Hoffa was killed and buried in cement to promote ethics in construction.

Greenwald isn’t just a radical hack funded by Pierre Omidyar, a mini-Soros Franco-Persian billionaire, his boyfriend, David Miranda, is a congressman from the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL). PSOL has formed coalitions with Communist and Marxist parties and is an occasional ally and rival of the larger Workers’ Party (PT) which also has Communist partners. Good thing the media won’t report that.

Set aside the question of the degree of Greenwald’s collusion with the hackers, one of whom had been previously accused of raping a teenage girl, and this is at best a case of interfering with an investigation. Greenwald was undermining the credibility of the investigation that had exposed the leftist mafia running Brazil while improving the political fortunes of his political allies on the Left. Including his lover.

That’s not exposing corruption. That is corruption.

Just to prove the point, Senator Elizabeth Warren tweeted, “The Bolsonaro government is pursuing state retaliation against Glenn Greenwald because of his work as a journalist to expose public abuse and corruption. Brazil should drop the charges immediately and stop its attacks on a free and open press.”

Greenwald was actually retaliating against a public official who was exposing abuse and corruption. The hacked messages he got his little hands on, at worst, accuse investigators of bias. That’s nothing compared to the massive amounts of bribes and corruption surrounding Operation Car Wash.

Nor does a leftist hack, working with hackers, who is funded by a foreign billionaire embody a free press.

The Intercept is a radical billionaire’s private influence operation. What financial interests might benefit from bringing down a conservative government and putting the Petrobas mafia back in power?

That’s a question that the media will carefully avoid approaching with a million-foot pole.

But what can the hacks tell us about the ethics of hacking? From the cases of Bezos and Greenwald, we can conclude that the media thinks that hacking conservatives is ethical, but not the owner of the Washington Post. The media hasn’t stopped fuming over the publication of the DNC emails, but was happy enough when Elliot Broidy, a Republican fundraiser and Trump ally, was hacked by Qatar.

Just as Bezos’ Washington Post colluded with Qatar, so did the media outlets who had Broidy’s emails carefully fed and spun to them by Qatari interests and lobbyists. That’s how the hacks of the press do it.

The media had no objections when Sarah Palin’s email was hacked. Hacks frantically scurried through searching for anything they could use. But when Colin Powell’s hacked emails revealed an affair, the media slowly backed away. Powell, by then, was an Obama ally and no longer a Republican. The hack that exposed the emails of Sidney Blumenthal was ignored despite the troubling light that the emails cast on the foreign policy of Hillary Clinton. Certainly no one in the media called it exposing corruption.

What’s the difference between Broidy and Blumenthal’s emails? Politics. Hacking a Trump ally or a Bolsonaro ally is journalism. Hacking a Hillary ally is an act of war. Against whom? Against the Left.

This is the age of informational warfare where media hacks and state hackers collude to create narratives. Espionage and fake news have come together as opposition research. Political parties hire foreign agents, state hackers pretend to be human rights activists, and the digital fog of war blinds all.

Out of this paranoid hall of mirrors where everything is backward, come bizarre stories that are clearly false and which exist only as informational warfare, narratives that have no relationship to reality, confirmed by experts who ignore the facts, because the old walls between truth and lies are gone. Journalism is dead. In its place is something else. A shadowy network of firms like Fusion GPS. A dark world of opposition research and narratives run by campaign operatives, security firms, intelligence agencies, and media operatives funded by billionaires who pretend to be everything they’re not.

And in that darkness, the hack and hacker have become one.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.
Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.
Thank you for reading.

Thursday, May 2, 2019

Backlash against Jeopardy! winner reveals Democrats hate winners (and number-crunchers)

May 1, 2019 By Jack Hellner

If anyone wants to see what is wrong with journalists' and other Democrats' thought processes, they should read Charles Lane's (another genius from the Washington Post) writing about the Jeopardy! champion. He thinks it is terrible that James Holzhauer seems to be much smarter than his opponents (it should be noted that he won by only $18 on Monday) and calls him a menace. It is just so unfair.

Heaven forbid that Holzhauer plays by the same rules as everyone else but seem to be a better player and smarter.   Lane complains that we pay too much attention to numbers now.

I hope the Washington Post doesn't keep track of its circulation and that it doesn't charge advertisers based on number of papers sold. I also hope Lane doesn't make more than other journalists. That would be unfair. I am one of the millions who are amazed and enjoying the winning streak.

Somehow, Lane thinks it is unfair that: ...........Maybe Lane thinks James needs to redistribute his winnings in the same way Democrats think we should redistribute money.  We certainly shouldn't reward success, unless, of course, it is politicians and others surrounding D.C. who get rich off the rest of us.  Then that is fair................. Read more

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Can Nick Sandmann Save the First Amendment?

David Catron February 21, 2019

Nick Sandmann is back in the news, literally with a vengeance. If there is anyone in the galaxy who doesn’t recognize the name, this is the high school teen viciously maligned by the media after a leftwing activist with a film crew attempted to provoke a confrontation with him as he waited for a bus near the Lincoln Memorial. Having committed the crimes of wearing a red MAGA cap and smiling, Sandmann was vilified by the media as a smug beneficiary of “white privilege” who had bullied a Native American veteran. This turned out to be a lie, of course.

Consequently, Sandmann’s parents are suing the Washington Post for $250 million pursuant to its participation in a “modern-day form of McCarthyism” and enthusiastically joining “a mainstream and social media mob of bullies which attacked, vilified, and threatened Nicholas Sandmann, an innocent secondary school child.” The pretext for this outrage was a deceptively edited video suggesting that Sandmann was the aggressor in the “confrontation” with alleged Vietnam veteran Nathan Phillips.

The full video revealed that the former was, in fact, the victim..........To Read More....