Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Media Complicity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media Complicity. Show all posts

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Nolte: The Incredible Shrinking Washington Post Cuts 240 More Jobs

John Nolte 11 Oct 2023 

The disgraced and financially embattled far-left Washington Post is cutting ten percent of its staff, some 240 jobs.  Washingtonian magazine reported Tuesday:

The Washington Post plans to offer buyouts to employees to reduce its workforce by 240 people, interim CEO Patty Stonesifer told employees in a memo Tuesday. Calling it “difficult news,” Stonesifer said that in consultation with senior leadership, the brass have decided that “prior projections for traffic, subscriptions, and advertising growth for the past two years — and into 2024 — have been overly optimistic and we are working to find ways to return our business to a healthier place in the coming year.”

Wait, it gets better..............Lest anyone accuses me of lacking sympathy for those who work for a fascist company devoted to my destruction,..............Never forget that this is the Washington Post:

Never forget that the Washington Post employs the most dishonest “fact checker” on the planet, which is really saying something..........To Read More.....

 

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

The Revelations Of Government Censorship Keep Coming In Missouri v. Biden

June 04, 2023 @ Manhattan Contrarian 

A little over a year ago, on May 5, 2022, two states (Missouri and Louisiana) and several individual plaintiffs filed suit against the federal government for illegally and improperly suppressing free speech on social media platforms, in violation of the First Amendment. The case goes by the name Missouri v. Biden. The individual plaintiffs include, for example, Drs. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, prominent medical researchers and epidemiologists who dissented from the government’s Covid response orthodoxy and saw their speech ruthlessly suppressed as a consequence.

This case is probably the most important civil rights case proceeding in the federal courts today. If you get your news from such sources as the New York Times, Washington Post, or major television networks, you likely have never heard of it. (One site that has been on top of this case is the Hot Air website.)

The case was brought in the Western District of Louisiana, and the judge assigned is Terry Doughty. Counsel for the plaintiffs include the AG’s offices of Missouri and Louisiana, and also the New Civil Liberties Alliance.

Early on in the case (June 14, 2022) the plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction, asking to have the court order the government to cease its illegal conduct. Here, from the June 2022 motion, is the gist of the relief that the plaintiffs requested at the outset:

[A] preliminary injunction preventing Defendants, and their agents, officers, employees, contractors and all those acting in concert with them, from taking any steps to demand, urge, encourage, pressure, or otherwise induce any social-media company or platform for online speech, or any employee, officer, or agent of any such company or platform, to censor, suppress, remove, de-platform, suspend, shadow-ban, de-boost, restrict access to content, or take any other adverse action against any speaker, content, or viewpoint expressed on social media.

The plaintiffs also at that time asked for discovery, so that they could uncover the extent of the government’s censorship regime. The court granted broad discovery, and there has been extensive discovery in the intervening year, the results of which have been quite shocking.

During May 2023 the parties completed their briefing on the motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs’ Reply brief was filed on May 22, and the court then held a hearing for something like 4 hours on May 26. As far as I can determine, no transcript of the court hearing has yet been made publicly available. However, there are some substantial quotes from the hearing available on the Twitter account of Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey.

The Plaintiffs’ Reply brief is some 125 pages long, but let me give you a few choice quotes so you can get an idea what was going on between the government and the social media lords. In the early days of the Biden White House, the censorship efforts focused on Covid 19 matters (although it did not take long for the Biden team to branch out into other things, from climate change to claims of election fraud to transgender issues). As to Covid 19, the government tries to justify its conduct on the basis that it was not pressuring platforms to suppress speech, but only trying to “better understand” what was going on. From plaintiffs’ Reply brief, pages 20-21:

No rational reader could interpret [White House functionary] Flaherty’s emails as a mere exercise in armchair philosophy, and the platforms certainly did not do so. They got the clear message: the White House’s demand that they “do more” to censor. . . . The very first email the White House sent [to Facebook], barely two days into the Biden Administration, demanded not to “better understand,” but to remove supposed “misinformation.” Citing a post about Hank Aaron’s death after taking the COVID vaccine, Clarke Humphry wrote at 1:04 a.m. on January 23, 2021: “Wanted to flag the below tweet and am wondering if we can get moving on the process for having it removed ASAP.” . . .

Shortly thereafter, Flaherty launched his campaign of badgering, harassment, and pressure—all designed toward a single end: to push platforms (especially Facebook) to take more aggressive action against viewpoints disfavored by the White House. When Facebook reported to the White House on steps it was taking to “Combat[] Vaccine Misinformation,” Flaherty responded with a barrage of questions seeking detailed information about Facebook’s censorship practices, including “How are you handling things that are dubious, but not provably false?” Id. ¶¶ 42-43. Like all subsequent questions, the tenor of these questions was not merely to “better understand” Facebook’s practices, but to scrutinize and pressure them to take more aggressive action. Flaherty drove this point home by accusing Facebook of fomenting “political violence” by not censoring enough speech: “especially given the Journal’s reporting on your internal work onpolitical violence spurred by Facebook groups, I am also curious about the new rules as part of the ‘overhaul.’” Id. ¶ 44. Facebook, again, got the message—its response explained to Flaherty that it was removing content that the White House disfavored, and it promised to begin “enforcing this new policy immediately.” Id. ¶ 45.

It goes on and on with dozens and dozens of further examples. Here are a couple more from page 25:

100 (Facebook assuring the White House, in response to their demands about Tucker Carlson’s content, that it “will continue to be demoted even though it was not ultimately fact checked”); id. 104 (Twitter suspended Alex Berenson immediately after the President said, “They’re killing people”)

I can’t even keep track of the large number of government agencies and government-funded apparatchiks who have gotten in on the censorship game. Besides the White House itself, there has been everything from CDC, to Fauci’s group (NIAID), to the Surgeon General, to something called CISA, to the Stanford Internet Observatory, to the Virality Project — and I’m sure that I have only scratched the surface.

At the oral argument, the judge reserved more than an hour for himself to ask questions to the parties’ attorneys. Reportedly, most of the questions went to the government. Here are a few, as reported at the Twitter account of the Missouri AG:

The judge . . . asked Biden's lawyers if the First Amendment covered Americans' right to say that Biden is responsible for high gas prices and inflation. Their answer? It depends.

The judge questioned the feds on several hypotheticals, asking if the First Amendment applied. He asked if an American citizen questioning the safety or efficacy of masks or a vaccine was protected under the First Amendment. The feds' answer? "It COULD be" but often won’t be.

With regard to the Covid 19 information that was suppressed at the instance of the White House — things like the inefficacy of lockdowns and masks, the benefits of therapeutic drugs, and the dangers and side effects of vaccines — nearly all of it has proven to be true. The censorship regime is all about only letting one narrative see the light of day. Somehow, hundreds of people get involved in this, and they all are able to convince themselves that they are the good guys.

The judge reserved decision after the hearing, but from the reports on the proceedings, it would appear that a strong order will be issued shortly.

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Why the right is forbidden to defend itself from leftist attacks

September 28, 2022 By D. Parker 

Have you ever noticed that the anti-liberty left can only use subjective accusations in their "don't say Nazi" game? Have you ever noticed that the anti-liberty left barely conceal their authoritarian attitude when they demand that only they are allowed to bring up and discuss this subject? 

With the election of Italy's first female prime minister, conservative Giorgia Meloni, and since it's a day ending in Y, the enemies of liberty on the nation's left are spewing their usual fascist and National Socialist German Workers' Party epithets. 

You've got to love how this was encapsulated in this headline from the Washington Post: "Nazi analogies are dangerous. But they are increasingly relevant today." Translation: It's never "appropriate" Translation: It's never "appropriate" for the pro-freedom right to defend itself from the anti-liberty left's biggest historical lie (because they need to keep on gaslighting the public).  But it's entirely appropriate for the enemies of liberty on the left to employ the lie, since it's tactically advantageous for them........To Read More...

 

Saturday, September 18, 2021

The 2020 Election: What Really Happened?

Controversy has swirled around the 2020 election for almost a year now. What really happened? Did the Democrats steal the presidential election? And if so, how?

Mollie Hemingway has been investigating issues surrounding the election since the beginning of 2021. She is one of the best and most fearless analysts and writers now working. (For just one example, see the acceptance speech that she delivered earlier this week upon being awarded the 2021 Bradley Prize.) Mollie has written a book titled Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections, which you can buy from Barnes & Noble at the link. (Mollie is not a fan of Amazon.)

Rigged is scrupulously researched and includes no tinfoil-hat speculation. It promises to be the best book about the 2020 election. Its publication date is October 12, and I recommend it highly............To Read More....

 

Tuesday, September 14, 2021

Matt Gaetz Needs an Apology From the Media

Did the big-box outlets already know he was innocent as they gnawed on his bones?

Like hyenas at the broken-leg buffet on the Serengeti, the media gorged for months on the delicious, salacious story of Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL). But now that the truth is out, will a mea culpa follow – and did the big-box outlets already know he was innocent as they gnawed on his bones? The Department of Justice recently indicted 62-year-old Stephen Alford as the mastermind behind an evil extortion plot to make millions off the young congressman’s family. Alford, believing $25 million would be easily pocketed to protect Gaetz’s reputation, misjudged the lawmaker. As the DOJ states in the pesky paperwork:

“Stephen M. Alford did knowingly and willfully devise, and intent to devise, a scheme to defraud and for obtaining money and property by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and for the promise of executing such scheme, did cause, and attempt to cause, a wire communication to be transmitted in interstate commerce.”

It would seem to have been prudent to listen to the rising star in Republican politics when he told media outlets his dad had been wearing a wire, and that “No part of the allegations against me are true, and the people pushing these lies are targets of the ongoing extortion investigation.”

Well, Oops, What a Racket

Rep. Gaetz has been adamant in stating his innocence since the first un-credited report surfaced. He continually denied and decried accusations of sex trafficking, lewd and lurid sexual exploits with consenting women and underage girls, and a slew of unseemly and illegal activities unbecoming of a rising political star. Finally, under intense scrutiny by activist pundits, the media was rewarded with a response from Gaetz last spring on Twitter:

“Over the past several weeks, my family and I have been victims of organized criminal extortion involving a former DOJ official seeking $25 million while threatening to smear my name. We have been cooperating with federal authorities in this matter.”

Alford is not one to leave unattended with your wallet. The Fort Walton man was previously convicted of defrauding the United States Air Force over a land swap, grand theft of $100,000, and was released on ten years’ probation in 2019.

Apparently, his biggest mistake to date was attempting to extort the Gaetz family. If convicted, Alford could be eating bologna sandwiches, wearing prison moccasins, looking over his shoulder in the shower, and dreaming about getting out in 25 years or so. A relieved Gaetz stated on Twitter: “Those he was working with to extort me on a pile of lies should be next.”  But maybe there is yet another group of folks complicit with political goal-oriented reporting.

Wipe Off the Egg and Report the Truth Now

Hard-left and mainstream outlets gushed while repeating anonymous allegations that any normal person would find disturbing and disgusting. They filled themselves on rumors, innuendos, and whisper campaigns, not caring whether Gaetz was telling the truth and was, in fact, a victim of a political and criminal hit. Perhaps now the activist media will give Mr. Gaetz a line or two of facts, not fiction, and demand sources and citations for questionable and potentially combustible, career-ending stories. But don’t hold your breath for an en masse media mea culpa – you may turn bluer than them.

Read more from Sarah Cowgill.

 

Thursday, July 15, 2021

The Democrats’ Topsy-Turvy Spin Machine

The media can’t cover for Joe Biden’s “Gong Show” administration indefinitely.

By

The guessing game of how long the levitation of the Biden presidency can be taken seriously seems to be entering a new phase. The deluge of illegal entries into the United States at the southern border is now running at a rate of closer to 3 million than 2 million a year and yet we still see and hear the bobbling talking head of the Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas assuring us, “The southern border is closed.” 

The media has provided almost no coverage of this calamitous invasion. A recent Trafalgar poll found that 56 percent of Americans don’t think Joe Biden is “fully executing the duties of his office,” yet the docile White House press corps continues to ask him about his ice cream and other such probing questions of national interest. Apart from a rising stock market and a quieter atmosphere, the record of the new administration is one of almost complete failure. 

The oceanic influx of unskilled labor at the southern border cannot fail to aggravate unemployment and depress the incomes for the vulnerable sectors of what, under President Trump, was a fully employed workforce. The administration has reduced domestic oil production and squandered the country’s status as an energy self-sufficient state. These are all familiar issues to those who follow public affairs, but the 95 percent Democratic-supporting media preserve the cocoon of a fairyland Biden presidency, whose bumbling chief flatters himself with comparisons to Franklin D. Roosevelt..........To Read More....

Friday, June 18, 2021

The Biden-Putin Geneva Summit Shows America & The West as LEADERLESS

That Russia “did not want a new Cold War” is a hopeful thing. After all, Putin may never, as charged, have stolen the 2016 American Election, but certainly stole what was supposed to be Joe’s Big Show at the Geneva Summit 

By ——--June 17, 2021

Cover Story | 7 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

With the Mainstream Media missing the boat as usual, it was the televised visuals that proved Russian President Vladimir Putin left U.S. President Joe Biden in the dust in what was supposed to be a joint press conference but was held separately following the 2021 G-7 Summit.

Putin not only got to stage his presser FIRST, but held it INSIDE the historic Villa la Grange, an 18th-century building overlooking Lake Geneva (where it was certainly nice and cool), in front of a blue wall with “Geneva 2021” logos all over it behind him, while Biden was giving his out in the summer heat (standing in the sun, not in the shade—during which, he had to take off his jacket, saying he had to take off his “coat”!!!).

So, Putin was boss! He was there inside. Biden was cast outside, like a dog! And the logo “Geneva 2021” in the background was only visible in Putin’s press conference. In other words, he was able to monopolize the situation while Biden was neutralized.

Only Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and other ‘journalists’ of his ilk could claim that the bumbling Biden came out on top.

The worst visual of the day wasn’t when Biden lost his cool in the glaring sunshine to lecture a CNN reporter:

“When a CNN journalist asked why Mr Biden was confident Mr Putin would change his behaviour, the US president became visibly irritated, retorting: “If you don’t understand that, you’re in the wrong business.” He later apologised for being a “wise guy”. (BBC, June 16, 2021)..........To Read More....

 

Friday, February 12, 2021

Report: Joe Biden’s Vow to Expand Title IX Seeks to ‘Shape Sexual Norms of Future Generations’

Dr. Susan Berry

A new report at the Institute for Family Studies warns Joe Biden’s promise to expand Title IX campus sex assault protections will attempt to empower his radical administration’s bureaucrats to “shape the sexual norms of future generations.”  Manhattan Institute Fellow Kay S. Hymowitz observed that, in 2011, the Obama administration launched its “Dear Colleague” letter to college and university deans to express its horror at what it claimed were “statistics on sexual violence” that “are both deeply troubling and a call to action for the nation.”

“A report prepared for the National Institute of Justice found that about 1 in 5 women are victims of completed or attempted sexual assault while in college,” the letter stated............. However, the statistics published by the Obama-era Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are “wildly at odds with the official crime statistics,” asserted American Enterprise Institute (AEI) resident scholar and former philosophy professor Christina Hoff Sommers, in a fact-check video:.............

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the actual rate of sexual assault on college campuses is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or .03 in 5. The rate of rape and sexual assault for non-students is actually 1.2 times higher than for students – 7.6 per 1,000.

“Where did the CDC find more than a million and nearly 14 million victims of sexual violence that professional criminologists somehow overlooked?” Sommers posed the question in the video. “It found them by using a poorly constructed telephone survey with a low response rate and a non-representative sample of respondents. No one interviewed was asked if they had been raped or sexually assaulted."........

 Biden’s plan to further expand involvement of his education department’s Office for Civil Rights in campus sex assault accusations will broaden the already existing “byzantine web of federal agencies, laws, regulations, guidance letters, state laws, and Title IX offices” that claim to be protecting students from sexual assault, harassment, and sexual discrimination...........To Read More

My Take - Eliminate the Department of Education. 

Saturday, January 30, 2021

The D.C. Occupation Will Continue Until Democracy is Saved

January 24, 2021 @ Sultan Knish Blog

On a cold, windy day with a small group of spectators watching from behind barbed wire, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. swore another in a long series of false oaths before his motorcade passed between a long row of soldiers with their backs to him looking outward for threats.

No inauguration has been this empty in a century of American history. And at no inauguration have the spectators been outnumbered by a raw display of armed force. American presidents have been inaugurated in wartime and during actual national emergencies with a better turnout.

Through world wars and wars on terror, Washington D.C. has remained a national capital where the hundreds of millions of taxpayers who labor to pay for its grand edifices, free museums, and lavish lifestyles could briefly come to enjoy a little of the life lived by the ruling class in the Imperial City. Now the ruling class has made it clear that it doesn’t want peasants entering D.C.

Even as Biden’s team prepped the executive orders that would end the national emergency at the border and shut down construction of the wall, new walls topped by razor wire were rising across the imperial city. The new Fortress of Government sealed off two miles of the National Mall and parts of downtown D.C. and filled it with more soldiers than are deployed in Iraq.

The Secret Service designated green and red zones. Some 25,000 National Guard members were dispatched from Vermont, Maine, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Arkansas, Missouri, South Carolina, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Colorado to prepare for a fake invasion that never came. But the armored vehicles and heavy weaponry did come. President Trump had wanted a military parade that would show America’s strength to the world. Biden held his own military parade to intimidate his fellow Americans.

Democrats had deployed more soldiers in D.C. than they had in Iraq and Afghanistan while authorizing them to use lethal force and investigating their politics before the deployment. The radical leftists who had resisted using the military to fight terrorism or secure the border from invasion were eager to deploy the military against the people of the United States of America.

The handfuls of ordinary people who arrived, as Americans always do, to attend the inauguration of a new president were confronted with heavy weapons and barbed wire.

D.C. had become a Baghdad and Berlin of checkpoints, choking off access to much of the city, closing roads, bridges, and metro stations. Soldiers could be seen on every corner, and the 25,000 troops were bolstered by 4,000 Marshalls, and a motley crew of local forces, including 200 members of the NYPD, 40 members of the Chicago police, New Jersey and Maryland state troopers, Miami-Dade cops, and other law enforcement officers who were needed back home.

24 people were shot in Chicago this weekend and murders are already up 125% this year in New York City. Those officers could have done more good at home, but Democrats don’t care about murder victims in urban areas, instead redeploying officers to D.C. in a show of force.

Biden took office in a city under military occupation whose businesses were closed and boarded up. The D.C. government had tried to force hotels to shut down. The hotels didn’t close, but there were hardly any people. Instead the hotels were filled with soldiers tramping through their lobbies. Any tourists that did come found nothing to see except barricades and barbed wire.

Sometimes what you don’t see is more important than what you do see.

Filling D.C. with soldiers meant that no one was going to measure Biden’s crowds. The only crowds were heavily armed and had been ordered to come. The complete lack of enthusiasm for the new one-party state that was getting its Mussolini on was the dog that didn’t bark.

Questioning Biden’s election has been deemed to be incitement. It’s enough to get you censored, deplatformed, and fired by the companies standing behind him. The election challenges have been used as the pretext for a military occupation of Washington D.C. But the cloud of a disputed election, like the winter clouds overhead, still hung over the inauguration.

There were no crowds, just soldiers. After the military and police contingent, the second largest group there for the inauguration weren’t Biden’s civilian supporters, but his propagandists. With few people, the media had to work twice as hard to manufacture the illusion that this was a popular leader taking office instead of a usurper imposed by Amazon, Google, Facebook, and the rest of the political, cultural, and economic oligarchy which owns the media on America.

CNN, a subsidiary of AT&T, had already gushed about, "Joe Biden's arms embracing America". MSNBC, a subsidiary of Comcast, compared Biden to God. "He heals the brokenhearted and binds up their wounds." The only wounds being bound up were those of the ruling class which had temporarily lost electoral power to an army of flyover country workers and peasants, only to reclaim it with sedition, wiretapping, abuse of power, billions of dollars, and soldiers in the street.

Popular leaders, elected or unelected, might have troops in their cities, but they also have adoring crowds to cheer them on. Biden’s only cheers were coming from employees of huge corporations whose jobs depend on praising him as the greatest thing since SuperPACs.

Biden couldn’t manage the cheering crowds that greeted even the most mediocre presidents on their arrival. The band might as well have struck up a rousing chorus of, “Hail to the Thief.”

Jokes like that are all but illegal these days even though they were ubiquitous during the Bush and Trump administrations. But jokes only need to be banned when they’re too close to the truth. The hysterical fascist theater with troops in the streets and fawning praise on the lips of the press are all efforts to overcompensate for the hollow man taking a false oath on a bible.

This isn’t the pageantry of Stalin or Hitler. It’s the weary theater of Brezhnev, a senescent leader of a decaying regime being propped up by desperate threats of force by the nomenklatura. Even though the media has told us more about Biden’s dogs than it has about any of the Americans killed by Islamic terrorists enabled by the open borders that Biden just reinstated, no one cares.

Biden isn’t a charismatic leader. He isn’t moving the cause forward. He’s a placeholder for a ruling class that wants homes in Dupont Circle that it buys by selling out America to China, by ruining our economy with environmental consulting gigs and racial contract quotas, and for all the manifold ways which the swamp is coming back as Biden’s wetlands restoration project.

“Hail to the Thief” is as much their anthem as it is Biden’s. They fought to keep hold of D.C., the center of their power base not because they care about its history or that of this country, but because it’s where they network, collaborate, and do their dirty little deals at our expense.

The troops in the street are their warning to the rest of the country about who is really in charge.

And it isn’t Joe Jr, who, along with his criminal family, will be allowed to dip their beaks in cash and cocaine until they’re sopping wet, along with every aide, staffer, and associate. Biden will be fawned over, his idiot wife will be dubbed a doctor, and the investigations involving his son and brother will be swiftly dropped. And when the time is right, Kamala Harris will step into his place.

When the Soviet Union was entering its last days, one leader quickly made way for another. The parade of old Communist hacks in their dotage became a procession of political funerals. Generations after the revolution and the purges, the only thing anyone in Moscow believed in was the power and decadence of the ruling class. That and the threat America posed to them.

These are still the only three things that Washington D.C.’s ruling class believes in anymore.

Democrats and their media claim that this charade is a “victory for democracy”.

"We’ve seen a force that would shatter our nation rather than share it, would destroy our country if it meant delaying democracy. And this effort very nearly succeeded. But while democracy can be periodically delayed, it can never be permanently defeated," Amanda Gorman, the Harvard youth poetess, sonorously recited her tin-eared Maoist verses at the inauguration.

But where is this democracy? Where are the adoring crowds, the joyous mobs celebrating and the people cheering the tremendous victory of the democracy of Google, Facebook, Amazon, AT&T, Comcast and their D.C. lobbyists and associates over the Rust Belt and the flyovers?

Biden and the Democrats celebrated their democratic victory with barbed wire, troops in the streets, political terror, and the threat of even more political repression to come.

"There is a broader societal issue that is going to take years to detox the disinformation," Ben Rhodes, the Obama adviser who had boasted of creating a media echo chamber, ranted on Comcast's MSNBC. On that same state TV news network, John Brennan warned that "because of this growth of polarization in the United States" members of the Biden team would be "moving in laser-like fashion" to "root out an insidious threat to our democracy".

Democracy is in a state of permanent emergency that requires locking down D.C., filling it with soldiers, walls, and barbed wire, and investigating political crimes. And D.C. will do everything it can to end the threat that Americans pose to democracy even if its ruling class has to live in its green zone surrounded by troops and barbed wire until democracy is saved from Americans.

Biden, we are told by the political interests and corporations advocating this, is incredibly popular. But the crowds of his devotees can’t be allowed to come to Washington D.C. Anyone who doubts that Biden is incredibly popular is inciting violence and will have to be rooted out as an insidious threat to our democracy. The more people doubt Biden’s popularity, the longer D.C. will have to be under military occupation until finally no one doubts his legitimacy in office.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

This article first appeared exclusively at Front Page Magazine.
 

Tags: , ,  

Author Image

About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Did Americans Come to Love Big Brother?

By Victor Davis Hanson @ American Greatness

Millions of Americans may come to resemble Winston Smith, the defeated hero of Nineteen Eighty-Four, who at last accepts the calm.  

In less than a month, there will likely be no more President Trump for the media to obsess over. No more false stories about him overfeeding koi fish or headlines screeching that Trump told Americans to inject bleach to combat COVID-19. No more Trump-fixated media worries over how to best accentuate bad news and downplay good. 

There will be no more frenzied mockery that Trump was lying about a vaccination delivery date in 2020. Instead, imagine a happier world of 2021 where Dr. Anthony Fauci is the genius behind the vaccination. Joe Biden is the master logistician who inoculated the nation. And COVID-19 disappeared with Trump to Mar-a-Lago. 

There will be no more news blackouts of the first lady, no more snide suggestions that the elegant and quite stunning Melania Trump lacked the beauty and grace of Vogue cover star Michelle Obama and the education and academic authority of Jill Biden.

There will now be no more media bombshells about “Russian collusion” mythologies. There is only the effort to downplay the real, frightening, China collusion narratives. And they involve U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), Hunter Biden and the Biden family, and a host of American corporations, universities, and multibillionaires. Nothing to see here, move on.

There will be no more anger over Trump’s use of the term “China virus.” There is only the deadly suppressed truth of the COVID-19 virus that originated in Wuhan, and Beijing’s outright lies about the virus ensured its spread and lethality. No matter, troublemakers. Bill Gates and Michael Bloomberg will reassure us that a non-authoritarian China did as well as it could. 

There will be no more media “walls are closing in” frenzies that Trump is crazy and should be removed under the 25th Amendment. There will be only the underground whispers that he seemed a lot more hale than incoming President Joe Biden. 

The real question is not how or even whether the media can exist without its obsessions with Trump, but what will it now do with Joe Biden? To put it another way, the media assumes that its creation of a new fake hero can become even more believable than the construct of its old false villain. 

For over a year, the media gave Biden—the Left’s only last-chance hope to end the Trump presidency—a complete pass. We were told that the tens of thousands who crammed Trump rallies were rubes, while the few dozen who honked their horns at Joe Biden’s occasional virtual car stops were ecstatic. 

The press largely refrained from asking Biden any “gotcha” questions. They gave no tough interviews. He gave no spontaneous press conferences. They conducted no probing investigations into Biden, Inc.’s financial quid pro quos with foreign governments, and offered no honest inquiries about Biden’s health and cognitive abilities. Heroes, we gather, need not stoop to answer such ankle-biting.

On the one hand, many journalists now crow that the media’s asymmetrical coverage helped get Biden elected and yet, on the other, they’re all wondering, at least for a few seconds, now what?

The Media Cannot Protect Biden For Long

First, if candidate Joe Biden was rarely scrutinized in the past, he will be vetted in the present—not by the American media, but by foreign leaders, spontaneous crises, and his own restive radical base. 

Second, leaks, rumors, and smears about Biden’s health and competency will not originate from a nonexistent Trump camp. They will emanate from Biden’s own new left-wing Democratic Party. 

Progressives, after all, see the over-the-hill Biden mission of providing a centrist campaign veneer now done. It is past time for Kamala Harris and the one true Left to assume power. How will such left-wing gossip and leaks about Biden’s cognitive decline be attributed to Trump golfing in sunny Florida?

Third, if things in general begin to go bad, whom or what exactly can the media blame?

If Biden reverses the Trump Middle East calculus and violence ensues, whose fault will it be? Or will it even be said to be bad?

Will the out-of-office Trump be blamed for reentering the disastrous Iran Deal, for bringing the radical Palestinians back to the center of Middle East negotiations, for alienating moderate Arab states to withdraw recognition of Israel, for ostracizing and alienating Israel in the fashion of the policies of the Obama administration? 

Or will all that and more be claimed just as wildly successful as Obama’s “shovel-ready jobs,” “cash for clunkers,”“Russian reset” and “Asian pivot”?

If Biden resets with China, and empowers the post-COVID-19 Chinese imperial agenda, whom will the media blame? Or will it fault anyone or anything at all when we are at last “managing decline,” as good globalist realists should?

If Biden stops the construction of the border wall, issues blanket amnesties, and sees new massive influxes at the border in the time of COVID-19, whom will the media blame? Or will we be willing to lend our ICUs and ERs, as we should, to the truly needy?

If by 2022 Biden raises taxes, cuts back on U.S. gas and oil production, issues new regulations, and stalls the post-COVID-19 recovery, whom will the media blame? Or will they claim Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can now decide to have children, given the New Green Deal has given all our unborn a viable future at last?

If defunding or cutting back the police, if releasing criminals in mass from jails, and if not arresting those who commit misdemeanors and “minor” felonies, all result in a 1970s-like crime wave, whom will the media blame?

Or will it be a “crime wave” at all, rather than a “liberating experience” from the police, and the achievement of “social justice”? 

Memory-Hole Rules

Easy answers to these questions all are found in the reality that there is no more media. We are left now only with a Pravda fusion of progressive communiques, Silicon Valley censorship and cancel culture, and hard-Left media propaganda that will make new “good” news just as fake but far more palatable than the old false, but depressing bad news. 

Real news is volatile; wokespeak is a sedative. 

For four years, the media has told the American people that Trump—our version of the class enemy “Emmanuel Goldstein” in George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four—was the cause of all its problems: a Satanic creature known to exercise all sorts of insidious powers and master of conspiracies and deceptions.

Trump single-handedly invented Russian collusion. Trump himself caused the impeachment melodrama. Trump alone spread the pandemic. Enemy of the people, Trump by himself mishandled the lockdowns, and birthed the rioting and violence in the streets. Only the omnipotent Trump-Goldstein could cause the economic recession at home, and supposed chaos abroad. 

But what if, post Trump, many of these crises continue, or get worse—or heaven forbid—began to wane due to Trump’s past policies? Are they even crises then?

Wokespeak’s answer to all these questions is likely again to be found in Nineteen Eighty-Four

Under memory-hole rules, just as everything good under the prior administration is now “bad,” so everything bad under the new administration will be presented as “good.” 

Americans in the new calm of all good news, and no bad news, then will supposedly come to appreciate that our Ministry of Truth’s Wokespeak—our version of Orwell’s “Newspeak”—was for our own good. 

Will it be easier to sleep when President Xi Jinping smiles at us on CNN, when we read in the New York Times how Joe Biden is reining in Benjamin Netanyahu, and when MSNBC hosts a town hall with John Kerry and Javad Zarif to announce a new and improved Iran Deal? 

When you are tired, and stuck in commute traffic, would you rather hear yet another NPR theory about how the sinister Donald Trump never paid his taxes and made millions while in office—or listen to a softer, upbeat voice narrate how the Biden Foundation is helping needy, undocumented workers?

So will Americans, exhausted by Trump-Goldstein, at least confess that the Ministry of Truth’s new rosy fantasies are not as nerve-wracking and depressing as its old angry hate-Trump propaganda? 

In other words, too many Americans may come to resemble Winston Smith, the defeated hero of Nineteen Eighty-Four, who at last accepts the false calm—in his appreciation that all the devilish enemies of the past have faded away and there is only the tranquility of media triumph: “Everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.”

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Pundits gaslight the American people on violent riots

Will Lloyd September 05, 2020

Though Joe Biden has now accepted that violence is occurring in many major American cities and has started blaming Donald Trump for it, many of his supporters haven’t gotten the memo. A new trend among some high-profile left-wingers is to gaslight Americans by posting daytime photos of well-to-do areas of cities undamaged by the riots as proof that the riots aren’t real. Meanwhile, tear gas and fires engulf entire blocks at nighttime.

Josh Campbell, a former FBI agent and CNN contributor, kicked off the trend by tweeting September 1: ‘Good morning from wonderful Portland, where the city is not under siege and buildings are not burning to the ground. I also ate my breakfast burrito outside today and so far haven’t been attacked by shadowy gangs of Antifa commandos.’..........To Read More.....

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

Mobs’ depravity downplayed by MSM

August 31, 2020 By K.E. Campbell

Among all the leftist lunacy and outright criminality happening openly on a daily basis, here's a revealing thought experiment based on just two recent incidents.

Imagine it's circa 2012. A guillotine is being pushed through a city street in America. Situated supine on said Reign-of-Terror era execution apparatus is an effigy of President Obama. A large crowd comprising members of some "deplorable right wing" group, say the Tea Party (ah, remember when protests were just that, protests, and were actually and completely peaceful?), surrounds it while celebrating and posing near it. Some in the crowd are wearing or otherwise displaying insignia about a particular race or another.

Now, while picturing that, add this: Somewhere nearby and close in time is a U. S. senator, say, Charles Schumer (D-NY) for the sake of this exercise, walking with his wife toward a hotel, minding his own business. The same or similar crowd, a mob actually of a 100 or so, swarm the couple and shout profanities at them. The senator and his wife manage, with the aid of police, to flee, shaken but physically unscathed. Afterward the senator is quoted as saying, among other things, "I truly believe this with every fiber of my being, had they gotten at us they would have gotten us to the ground, we might not have been killed, might just have been injured by being kicked in the head, or kicked in the stomach until we were senseless.”

Ask yourself: How would the mainstream media outlets have covered these events? And leftist commentators? How about athletes and Hollywood personalities? What would have been the tone of the media coverage? How many times and in how many ways would Republicans, party leaders and/or some radio personality be blamed and maligned (rather than the people who actually did it)? How many days would pass before it faded from public view?.....To Read More....