Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War

Deep state treason and Obama was in on it!

 By Rich Kozlovich

  

The title is a quote from William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, and what it meant was soldiers were released from any semblance of civilized behavior, including rape and plunder, like a pack of wild dogs. On Sunday Clarice Feldman published an article dealing with the events of the week, with subtitles dealing with each issue.  She starts out saying, " What a week! The 2016 and 2020 plots against Trump are now confirmed", which was followed by the first subtitle, "Dirty Deeds Done Down Low", opening the discussion saying;

The perfidious acts of then-CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and FBI Director James Comey could not be hidden forever, and, this week, much more was detailed in a CIA review released by its director John Ratcliffe and in a congressional hearing............

Rasmussen polls confirm that the Trump Collusion concoction “fabricated by Obama’s functionaries” benefited the Democrats in the 2018 midterms........[and]  the story about the FBI’s covering up Chinese efforts to interfere with the 2020 election should place the role of the then-heads of these agencies in the sociopathic hall of fame. 

All of which was supported by corrupt reporting by the Washington Post, claiming:

Suddenly, the revised piece asserted as fact that Vladimir Putin had orchestrated Trump’s election. It is almost certain that corrupt intelligence officials were dissatisfied with the original reporting which wasn't tailored to the narrative. They needed to preemptively sabotage Trump’s presidency, so they told the Washington Post to publish a version that reflected the Intelligence Community’s preferred narrative. To this day, no one has been held accountable for this fraud -- neither at the Washington Post, which later won Pulitzers for their lies, nor within the Intelligence Community, which orchestrated the deception.

According to Jim Hoft, Obama was in on it!  As CIA Director John Ratcliffe states:

All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump. Thank you to the career CIA officers who conducted this review and exposed the facts.

In this past week's P&D and The Week That Was I state the FBI blocked an investigation into the 2020 "Chinese mail-in voting scam to protect Chris Wray who likely lied to Congress".  The DOJ is pursuing that and before all of this is over, and if there's any justice in the world, Wray, Comey, Brennan, and Clapper should all be heading to prison.   After all, "no one is above the law."  The fact is we're seeing what clearly must evidence of perjury by Brennan and others.  Before Clinton perjury was considered a serious crime.  Will it be again?

 

Should John Brennan Be in Prison? Brennan’s lie about Hunter’s laptop echoed his earlier lies about Russian collusion. The statement of the “intelligence professionals” referred to “our view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue,” and added that “media reports say that the FBI has now opened an investigation into Russian involvement in this case.”  

 

 The statement ends with this: “It is high time that Russia stops interfering in our democracy.”  Sheesh. Yeah, it sure is. And it’s also high time that Brennan faces justice for his anti-American actions. But if he ever did, the left would raise such a hue and cry that all their other hysterical fits would look like a philosophical disquisition. 

 

Nevertheless, Bryan Dean Wright is 100% correct: John Brennan belongs in the slammer.

 

There are those who wish to just move on, forgive and forget.  Baloney!  What these people have done should not be forgiven, nor forgotten.  They still keep shooting off their mouths with falsehoods trying to manipulate the public with their lies, and the public has a right to know  the truth, and those attacked have a right to have the truth exposed, and justice served.  Then we can move on.  

 

However, what I think we can move on from right now is the idea there's no such thing as a conspiracy.  To quote Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana:  "Sounds to me like we need to get some new conspiracy theories because all the old ones turned out to be true."

 

Update: 7/9/25:   

• Yep -- it was Obama- Why are the Democrats so bent on locking up Trump? They tried everything, from Russia hoaxes to unleashing Fani to sham trials in New York City to feeding friendly newsmen negative information about Trump ....... This is from Margot Cleveland: "President Barack Obama. Not CIA Director John Brennan. Not Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. And not FBI Director James Comey. But President Barack Obama. The 44th president of the United States, directed the intelligence community to interfere in the peaceful transition of power to his successor -- Donald Trump. And for that Obama should forevermore be considered a pariah in presidential history"...........
• CIA Review Reveals Obama Pushed Intel Community To Launch Trump-Russia Witch Hunt - While Brennan, Clapper, and Comey all rightly deserve condemnation, Obama launched the plot and as president he holds greater responsibility for politicizing the intelligence community against his successor......
• FBI Launches Criminal Probes Into John Brennan, James Comey Over Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax - The FBI has launched a criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan as well as former FBI Director James Comey related to the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, according to Fox News.  The outlet reported, citing DOJ sources, that CIA Director John Ratcliffe has given evidence concerning Brennan to FBI Director Kash Patel and that an investigation into Comey is also underway. The investigation may involve potentially false statements made to Congress. 
• Brennan, Comey, and the Reckoning Long Overdue - For years, patriotic Americans have known something smelled rotten in the deep-state narrative about Trump and Russia. We knew it when CNN breathlessly paraded James Clapper in front of cameras. We knew it when John Brennan tried to look solemn while peddling dossiers, and we definitely knew it when Jim Comey told Congress he just “doesn’t recall” half of anything that happened on his watch. Now, the Department of Justice has officially confirmed that both former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation. Let that sink in: the architects of the most dishonest intelligence operation in modern political history might finally have to answer for it.......
• CIA review suggests Brennan misled Congress on Steele Dossier and 2016 intel, lawmakers want probe  - A new report by the CIA revealed new details about infirmities and failures with the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment of Russian influence in the 2016 election, criticizing now-former CIA Director John Brennan for his actions and raising the possibility he may have misled Congress. Brennan is currently a Senior National Security Analyst for NBC.......
• EXCLUSIVE: Brennan’s Fake Russia Collusion Assessment Even More Corrupt Than Current Report Shows – A still-classified staff report compiled by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) found the John Brennan-led 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (“ICA”) on Russian Election Interference significantly worse and significantly more corrupt than conveyed in the memorandum released last week by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, according to sources familiar with the report. The HPSCI staff report also reveals more details of the corruption, the sources told The Federalist...........
• Ex-CIA chief John Brennan may have opened himself up to perjury charges over Trump-Russia hoax – John Brennan, the disgraced former Obama CIA director, may have opened himself up to perjury charges after a new email was uncovered in a scathing internal review by CIA career professionals of the agency’s 2016 Trump-Russia collusion assessment. Brennan is said to be under renewed scrutiny by authorities over discrepancies between his sworn testimony to federal investigations and his written orders to underlings conducting the Intelligence Community Assessment commissioned by President Barack Obama in December 2016 that found Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump........
• Should John Brennan Be in Prison? – Former CIA top dog John Brennan is the poster child for the catastrophically widespread corruption of our intelligence apparatus, or at least of our intelligence apparatus before Donald Trump became president again. If this were indeed a land of impartial justice, and not one in which the prosecution of high-profile leftists would bring so much hysteria that Trump is a fascist dictator-in-the-making, that the firestorm could interfere with the implementation of his agenda, Brennan would be in prison today. That is the assessment of one of his former employees at the CIA, Bryan Dean Wright.

Anti-Trumper John Brennan Makes Wild Intelligence Community Claim

It’s a chilling prospect – but this is more than likely just another desperate election narrative. 

By Graham J Noble | Mar 11, 2024  Liberty Nation News Tags: Articles, Good Reads, Opinion, Politics

Editor's Note:  It's my view the author is being far to kind, and trusting to the heads, along with the rank and file of the Intelligence Community.   These organizations are in need of serious purging, starting right at the top.   It's my view some of them need to be prosecuted for crimes that border on treason, and/or RICO criminal activity.   If that's true, and I think it is, why in the world would any rational person expect them to all of a sudden get righteous?  RK

 

During a presidential campaign, it is standard practice for the US Intelligence Community (IC) to provide candidates with intelligence briefings. Why is this done? It ensures that whoever wins the election can walk into the Oval Office on day one already prepared to deal with developing or potential national security threats. Why, then, would a former CIA director suggest that Donald Trump, assuming he wins the 2024 GOP nomination, might get something less than a comprehensive briefing? And what does that imply about the IC’s possible willingness to jeopardize American security for political reasons?

John Brennan, who put the “derangement” in “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” and who is now, fittingly, an analyst for MSNBC, recently raised this possibility as he spoke with the network’s Nicolle Wallace.

“Now, I’m pretty certain that my former intelligence colleagues will provide briefings that are not going to do any type of damage to our sources and methods, in terms of providing information to Donald Trump that he could misuse,” Brennan told Wallace on March 7.

To be clear, the fact that Brennan made this ridiculous prediction does not mean that America’s Intelligence Community is planning to withhold vital information from the man who may well be the nation’s next commander-in-chief. However, the former CIA head is almost certainly still well-connected in the community. Have IC insiders told him, then, that Trump will be kept out of the loop about certain intelligence-related matters or is he perhaps already trying to persuade his old colleagues to keep the former and perhaps future president in the dark?

If the latter is true – and this, we do not know – then Brennan, as a now-private citizen, is meddling in national security matters without authorization. Congressional intelligence committees might want to take up the matter with Brennan directly.

Intelligence Community Thrown Under the Bus?

The reality is that the briefings any presidential candidate receives do not go into detail about “sources and methods” – basically, the ways in which the Intelligence Community obtained its intelligence, from where, and from whom. What Brennan is doing, then, is creating the perception that the IC does not trust Trump or that it considers him a threat to national security. In essence, Brennan is throwing the Intelligence Community under the bus – ascribing to it a political bias that might not really exist.

John Brennan (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

What if such a bias does exist within the IC, though? Would senior US intelligence officials put Americans at risk because they don’t like the president’s politics? Would they even consider putting that president in the position of making crucial foreign policy or defense decisions without having all the relevant information? We should all hope not. Given Brennan’s remarks, it is fair to say it’s a good thing for the country that he is no longer running things at America’s premier foreign intelligence agency.

Then again, the IC has been known to withhold intelligence from Trump in the past. In 2016, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was provided with what is known as a defensive briefing relating to the FBI investigation into her private email server. However, Trump was not informed that the Bureau was investigating his campaign over the now-debunked allegations that he was “colluding” with the Russians.

Brennan did acknowledge that Trump would be provided with reports that contained “analytic overviews and briefings about some of the world’s hotspots, letting Donald Trump know what the assessments are, at this point… “ He then alluded to Trump retaining documents after he left office in 2021. “So, I think it’s going to be analysis that will be devoid of the sources and methods – the sensitive things – that we are most concerned about: The types of things that were in all those documents that he had in the bathroom and other areas in Mar-a-Lago.”

Predictably, the former Intelligence Community official did not express concern about Joe Biden’s access to sensitive intel, even though he kept multiple boxes of government documents in his house, his garage, and at another office. Nor does Brennan apparently have any worries that the recent special counsel report on Biden’s classified documents scandal suggested the current commander-in-chief would never be criminally convicted because his cognitive decline – particularly a failing memory – would get him off the hook. One would think a former CIA director might have doubts about such a person getting classified intelligence briefings.

A Hail Mary Narrative

Brennan isn’t the only person raising this probably phony concern. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) made the same point on NBC News’s Meet the Press, recently. 

“But we’ve never had a situation where one of the candidates for president has been so criminally negligent when it comes to handling, if not worse, when it comes to handling classified information.” 

One candidate? Just one? Perhaps Schiff has never heard of either Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton. The congressman went on, “So I have to hope, and knowing the intelligence community as I do, that they will dumb down the briefing for Donald Trump,” continuing, “That is, they will give him no more information than absolutely necessary. Nothing that would reveal sources or methods. Because we can’t trust that he will do the right thing with that information.”

It is interesting that Schiff’s remarks almost exactly echoed Brennan’s. The cynic might wonder if this is a coordinated narrative.

The prospect of the Intelligence Community withholding vital information from Trump, if and when he returns to the White House, is more than simply worrisome. The word “treason” even comes to mind. But, in all likelihood, no current senior IC officials are even contemplating such a thing. At least, that is what anyone who considers themselves an American patriot would hope.

It is far more likely that Schiff and Brennan, driven as they are by what seems to be a pathological hatred of the 45th president, are testing out a new (well, actually not so new) line of attack – that Trump is unstable and unfit to be trusted with sensitive intelligence.

 

Read More From Graham J Noble

Ex-CIA analyst: Anti-Trump officials politicized intelligence, undermined U.S. security

By Bill Gertz The Washington Times Thursday, September 9, 2022

U.S. intelligence officials waged a politicized campaign to undermine President Trump and his administration, and the politicization undermined American security, according to a former U.S. intelligence analyst.  John A. Gentry, a former CIA analyst, stated in a journal article that former high-ranking intelligence officials were frequently used by sitting intelligence officials, to leak damaging information. Many “formers” directly or indirectly helped elect current President Biden and defeat Mr. Trump in the 2020 election.

“Current and former U.S. intelligence officers in unprecedentedly large numbers politicized intelligence in their opposition to candidate and then President Donald Trump,” Mr. Gentry stated in an article in the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence.

“The activists consistently refused, and still refuse, to accept responsibility for the politicization or the damage it caused to intelligence and broader national security.”

Mr. Gentry names many of those he says were politicized, including both high-ranking and mid-level former agency employees.

Former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, among others, aggressively pursued political agendas in opposition to Mr. Trump from 2016 to 2021, Mr. Gentry said, and their efforts, ongoing despite Mr. Trump leaving the White House in January, damaged the credibility of once-objective spy agencies................. To Read More.........

The NSA's spying on Tucker Carlson is the tip of the iceberg

July 10, 2021  By Robert J. Hutchinson

Well, everyone could see it coming.  It turns out that the National Security Agency (NSA) didn't just eavesdrop "incidentally" on the emails and text messages of Tucker Carlson, one of the few journalists in America willing to stand up to the Deep State.  Anyone with half a brain could see the lizard-like lawyering in the NSA's "non-denial denial."  As Bill Clinton famously put it, "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." 

"Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of the Agency," the NSA statement read, dodging the question of whether it had obtained and read his emails and texts, "and the NSA has never had any plans to try to take his program off the air."  Again, from what we know of lying government lawyers, the tenses are crucial: the NSA never "had" any plans................

This is banana republic–level subversion, spying on journalists to silence all opposition.  This is the kind of stuff the old "Democratic People's Republics" in Eastern Europe pulled, spying on citizens — the Stasi had the entire country wired with eavesdropping devices — and then threatening to use the information against them.............To Read More.....

 My Take - Now I'm constantly seeing the term "gaslighting" being used with reference to Biden's cabal of misfits.  NSA is clearly guilty of a serious federal crime, but it's Tucker Carlson whose a bad American for saying so.  What he should have done is go to those who are supporting these crimes so it could have been buried and never seen the light of day.  Now who could find fault with that kind of thinking....Right?

The mental gymnastics these leftist lunatics must have to do to make their corruption justified just boggles the mind.  Here's they're reality.  They're lying, they know they're lying, they know we know they're lying.  Therefore, since all parties involved are aware it's all lies it means no lie really is a lie, therefore they can keep lying, because everyone is in on the lies, that makes lying acceptable, honorable and the perfect example of how to be a true American!   See...mental gymnastics on an Olympic scale.

Weissmann: ‘Anti-American’ for Tucker Carlson to Complain About NSA Surveillance

Pam Key 8 Jul 2021

Andrew Weissmann, the lead prosecutor for former special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe, said Thursday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” that Fox News host Tucker Carlson was “anti-American” for questioning being monitored by the NSA.

Weissmann said, “If you think about what Tucker Carlson could have done here, he could have followed the same route that “The New York Times” and other respected journalists did when they were incidentally overheard and may have, in fact, not been incidentally had their call records obtained by the Department of Justice. They could have gone to the attorney general, and Tucker Carlson could have joined them to say what I’m concerned about here is not that there was incidental collection when I am calling a foreigner, including if you try to reach out to Vladimir Putin, you can pretty much be sure you’re going to be high risk of being intercepted.”

He continued, “He could have said, look, there’s a First Amendment issue, and I want to be sure there are safeguards, but he didn’t take that route. He did, as you said, and as frank pointed out, he wanted to use this for his own purposes and to sow distrust which is so anti-American. Instead of raising a legitimate issue about safeguards in the system when you’re dealing with journalists to make sure that this is not something that senior officials in the department are making sure this was done responsibly.

 

Former CIA Director John Brennan Calls for Mao-Like Public Humiliation Sessions for Trump Supporters Before They Are Accepted Back into Society

By Jim Hoft Published January 9, 2021 2215 Comments

Former CIA Director John Brennan wants Mao-like public humiliation sessions for Trump supporters before they will be accepted back into society.

Humiliation sessions for 75 million Americans!......To Read More....

•  White House Showcases List of Trump Presidency Accomplishments

Political Persecution Is Making a Comeback

Mao and Stalin would be proud of the efforts to dehumanize Trump supporters.

  By: Mark Angelides January 13, 2021 Articles, Liberty Rewind, Politics, Privacy & Tech, Social Issues 

How far can political persecution truly go in the United States of America? When it becomes verbal open-season on supporters of the current president, it is perhaps safe to say that things have gone too far. Not content with shutting down the voices of individuals and even entire social media companies, the radical left – aided by powerful anti-Trumpers – is seeking to ostracize millions of Americans. Naughty-list databases are being openly created and shared online for naming and shaming Trump supporters and administration officials; citizens are being doxed and harassed – and it is only just the beginning of what may soon be a case study in how not to unite a country.

Former CIA Director John Brennan made his position on what should happen to Trump supporters all too clear. He tweeted:

“Anyone now seeking national redemption by claiming to no longer support Trump must acknowledge how wrong it was to ignore & enable his corrupt, dishonest, & divisive agenda. Total denunciation of a despot’s legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining malignancy.”

John Brennan

 Is this the mark of a rational mind? With echoes of Stalinism and China’s Cultural Revolution, Brennan is asking for confession and self-abasement. Sadly, he’s not alone in this historically pertinent madness. ABC’s Political Director Rick Klein, in a now-deleted Jan. 7 tweet, wrote, “Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part. Cleansing the movement he commands is going to be something else.”

Brennan’s demands for denunciation by those who wish to be accepted have one purpose: public humiliation. Klein’s calls for a “cleansing” are not much better.

Students of history may have concerns about what comes next.

History Repeating?

Former California governor and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger released a video that is being praised by those in the legacy media who have stopped short – just barely – of making the same connection. He said, “Wednesday was the ‘day of broken glass’ right here in the United States,” making a parallel between the Capitol attack and Germany’s Kristallnacht. He continued:

“The mob did not just shatter the windows of the Capitol. They shattered the ideas we took for granted. They did not just break down the doors of the building that housed American democracy. They trampled the very principles on which our country was founded.”

Schwarzenegger’s comparison, however, is deeply flawed. The events that led up to Kristallnacht in November 1938 began many years before, with the new German chancellor isolating Jewish citizens. Then Germans were encouraged to boycott businesses owned by Jews. Eventually, this led to Jews being removed from civil service posts. The unfortunate souls were silenced, demeaned, and outcast. Kristallnacht was performed at the behest of the government who had been persecuting the victims; it was not, in any way, the citizens responding to what they see as top-down tyranny.

The former Republican governor proclaimed that “America will come back from these dark days and shine our lights once again. I believe, as shaken as we are by the events of recent days, we will come out stronger because we now understand what can be lost.” What precisely are the dark days he refers to? He could mean the thousands of Americans trapped in their homes as their businesses are torched by rioters and looters. Or he could just as easily be referring to the growing purge of conservatives on social media platforms. But neither of these very real darknesses would fit the narrative as well as the historically inaccurate comparison he was attempting to create.

Language Matters

One thing that has been thumped into the ears of American media consumers over the last five years is that what people say, the language they use, matters a lot. But it appears this applies only to a specific group of people. President Trump calls for a peaceful protest, and it is wilfully interpreted as a call for insurrection. Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and Kamala Harris tacitly encourage BLM/Antifa riots, and the precision of speech is deemed irrelevant.

Brennan urges public denouncement of American citizens, Klein calls for a cleansing of human beings for their political views, and – all of a sudden – words don’t matter quite so much.

Read more from Mark Angelides.

CLONING THE VOTE Soviet Style: Did DEMs Use HAMMER / SCORECARD To Repeatedly CLONE Blocks of Biden Votes?

By Mary Fanning, 12 November, 2020

 By WVW Broadcast Network National Security Authors Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | November 12, 2020 - Multiple injections into state election systems in 10 states of cloned, identically-sized blocks of Biden votes were used to steal the 2020 election from President Trump, according to Dennis Montgomery.  Montgomery is the CIA whistleblower who was granted immunity by the DOJ AND FBI for exposing illegal U.S. domestic surveillance.

The votes were created by SCORECARD and other technology and then replicated multiple times.  

Sidney Powell, the super attorney working with President Trump’s legal team to investigate the 2020 election results, told Maria Bartiromo of Fox News this morning that “we have evidence of the same number of ballots or same number of votes being injected into the Wisconsin system and into the Michigan system three different times. I think there were two different injections of exactly the same numbers in Michigan and then in Milwaukee it happened three times.”...........To Read More....

1.  Did American Patriots get HAMMERED by the globalist deep-staters?
2.  The HAMMER is the Key to the Coup With General McInerney and Mary Fanning
3. Worldview Radio Exclusive: Retired Three-Star General and National Security Expert Warn of the HAMMER (Software) That Flipped Votes to Carry Out a Coup D'etat on President Trump 
4. Whistleblower Tapes: Trump Wiretapped “A Zillion Times” By ‘The Hammer,’ Brennan’s and Clapper’s Secret Computer System
5.  DHS Cyber Director Chris Krebs And Deputy Director Matt Travis Tied To Clapper Who Commandeered HAMMER / SCORECARD
6.  A Constitutional Crisis
7.  DHS Cyber Director Chris Krebs And Deputy Director Matt Travis Tied To Clapper Who Commandeered HAMMER / SCORECARD
8. America's Election System: Gen. McInerney
9.  Digital Forensic Analysis Shows Dominion’s Server Connected to Iran and China: Affidavit

John Brennan ‘Imagines’ a Post-American Future

Could it have crossed your mind that a former CIA director would promote an American presidential candidate with a popular song about a world without America?

 

By Robert Curry

October 11, 2020

People doing interviews always ask me what went wrong, how did America get in this terrible condition? Generally, the question seems to assume that America is falling apart all of a sudden. There is no doubt that America’s crack-up is picking up speed, accelerating at a truly frightening rate, but the important point is that the crack-up has been in the works for a long time. 

Take, for example, John Brennan. This year he is for Joe Biden; in 1976, he voted for Gus Hall, the Communist Party USA’s presidential candidate. In 1980—in his master’s thesis at the University of Texas, Austin—Brennan denied the existence of “absolute human rights” and argued that censorship by the government was sometimes in order. Then he was promptly hired by the CIA! 

Evidently, he was the sort of person for whom that agency was then looking, because he rose rapidly through the ranks, eventually becoming Obama’s choice to be the director of the CIA and, it is increasingly clear, a key figure in the Obama-Hillary nefarious coup plot against President Trump. 

Before you learned that the CIA had hired Brennan, did you ever imagine in your wildest dreams that the CIA would hire an avowed anti-American? After all, Brennan had taken a stand against the First Amendment and against America by voting for Gus Hall before they hired him. Perhaps you might believe it possible of today’s CIA because we now know it is corrupted beyond repair, but the significant fact is that the CIA hired Brennan in 1980. That means the CIA had already begun to deteriorate. As a result, the perfect man to head Obama’s CIA was ready at hand in the CIA when Obama needed him. That speaks volumes about the CIA............To Read More......

 

Cartoon of the Day

Caught Red Handed: Brennan's Handwritten Notes Prove Obama Was Briefed on Scheme to Set Up Trump

Katie Pavlich Oct 06, 2020

Newly declassified documents show former CIA Director John Brennan took notes after briefing President Barack Obama on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's plans to frame then presidential candidate Donald Trump as a Russian asset. The briefing took place during the 2016 presidential election. 

Fox News has the exclusive: 

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Tuesday declassified documents that revealed former CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton’s purported “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server” ahead of the 2016 presidential election, Fox News has learned.

Ratcliffe declassified Brennan’s handwritten notes – which were taken after he briefed Obama on the intelligence the CIA received – and a CIA memo, which revealed that officials referred the matter to the FBI for potential investigative action.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence transmitted the declassified documents to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees on Tuesday afternoon.

"CITE [summarizing] alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service,” Brennan’s notes read.

The declassified documents come after other documents, released last week, show Clinton's initial plan.............To Read More.....

Durham Questioned Brennan for 8 Hours. Here's What We Know

Bronson Stocking Aug 22, 2020

U.S. Attorney John Durham's team is investigating the origins of the Russia investigation and the FBI's surveillance activities. Durham reportedly questioned former CIA Director John Brennan at CIA headquarters for eight hours on Friday, although Nick Shapiro, an adviser for Brennan, says the former spy chief was assured that he is not a target of Durham's criminal investigation...............

According to Shapiro, Brennan provided Durham with details regarding "the efforts made by the intelligence community to understand and disrupt the actions taken by Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election." Brennan's advisor recounts the 8-hour interview as if it were Brennan asking Durham all the questions................To Read More........

My Take - There are two things that really stand out to me in this piece. First:

"Brennan was a firm believer in the Trump-Russia collusion theory, and he continued to peddle the false narrative for years on MSNBC until the conspiracy theory was finally debunked by Robert Mueller's team"

Brennan was, along with a life long career in the intelligence community,  Director of the CIA, and we're expected to believe he actually believed in Russiagate?  Unlikely!  Second:

 "According to Shapiro, Brennan isn't under investigation, only a witness to the events under review."

They're kidding, right?  This guy is up to his nostrils in corruption and quite frankly, treason, and he's not being investigated?  Yeah, Right!!!!!!  He needs to be indicted, tried, sent to prison and only given some respite if he squeals.

You may wish to review my

John Brennan and the Plot to Subvert an American Election

By Roger Kimball • May 16, 2020

Let’s talk about John Brennan a bit. You remember John Brennan. He was Barack Obama’s director of the CIA. Once upon a time, he was an enthusiast for Gus Hall, the Communist candidate for president, for whom he voted in 1976. I can’t think of any better background for the head of the country’s premier intelligence service under Obama. In 2014, having put childish things behind him as St. Paul advised, Brennan spied on the Senate Intelligence Committee. He denied it indignantly. “Nothing could be further from the truth. We wouldn’t do that. That’s just beyond the scope of reason in terms of what we’d do.”

But that was before irrefutable evidence of the CIA’s spying transpired. Then Brennan apologized, sort of. Senators were outraged. They shook their little fists. “What did he know? When did he know it? What did he order?” asked one of the Lilliputians.

Guess what happened to John Brennan for spying on the Senate Intelligence Committee?

If you said “Nothing,” go to the head of the class and collect your gold star.

Nothing happened to Brennan for spying on U.S. senators.

If he could get away with that, what else could he get away with?

How about starting the bogus investigation into fictional “collusion” or “coordination” between the Russians and the campaign, and then the administration, of Donald Trump? How about that?.......To Read More........

What Did Obama Know — and When Did He Know It?

Editorial of The New York Sun | May 11, 2020
   
What did President Obama know and when did he know it? That famous formulation is emerging as the question in the wake of new disclosures in respect of a meeting that took place inside the Oval Office in the closing days of Mr. Obama’s presidency. The meeting included not only his national security adviser, Susan Rice, and the head of the FBI, James Comey, but also Vice President Biden, now the prospective Democratic nominee.

This is laid out in, among other places, a dispatch by Mollie Hemingway in the Federalist. Ms. Hemingway reckons the meeting is turning out to be, as her headline puts it, “key” to the “entire anti-Trump operation” launched two weeks before the end of the Obama administration. She’s not the only one laying this out; a veteran of the Sun, Eli Lake, now of Bloomberg, has been all over the story; the Wall Street Journal, as well.

Ms. Hemingway presents a terrific timeline. It starts on January 4, 2017, at a time when the FBI was scrambling, as the Federalist’s scribe puts it, to reopen a case against General Flynn. The January 5 meeting started as a briefing for the President and also included Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, the CIA director, John Brennan, and the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper..............

“What did the president know and when did he know it?” is the phrase that history offers up. It was first uttered during Senator Sam Ervin’s Watergate hearings by Senator Howard Baker, Republican of Tennessee. It starts to look ever more apt as investigators, put on the case by Attorney General Barr, finally start to focus on who it was who laid the long train of powder against the incoming Trump administration............ To Read More....

John Brennan: The Traitor-in-Chief

His long track record of lies, deceit, and catastrophic judgment.

Discover The Networks May 13, 2020

 Brad Johnson, a retired 25-year veteran officer of the CIA, laments that in recent years he has seen our nation’s Intelligence Community “turn away from its core responsibilities” – i.e., promoting “the safety and security of all Americans” – and embrace “a far more political agenda.” He notes, for example, that the Intelligence Community’s 2017 quadrennial report about global trends “overwhelmingly” supports “global government integration” and the “globalist movement,” which he describes as “a hardcore leftist philosophy that is deeply political” and antithetical to the concept of national sovereignty.

A particularly odious manifestation of this new globalist philosophy, says Johnson, was former CIA Director John Brennan’s so-called “modernization” plan, which “systematically dismantled and destroyed the CIA’s operations division — the heart of the agency’s central mission of using people to steal vital secrets around the world.” Brennan himself articulated this new mindset when he flatly told National Public Radio in an interview: “We don’t steal secrets.” “The Brennan plan,” says Johnson, “instead called for other nations’ intelligence services to provide the CIA with spies as intelligence collectors.” This approach made it impossible for the U.S. to keep its intelligence-gathering operations clandestine, thereby forfeiting the type of secrecy that is “fundamental to the credibility and reliability of the information” collected..........To Read More....

DiGenova: Comey and Brennan 'Are The Coup Leaders' and 'Obama Knew All About This'

By Michael W. Chapman January 2, 2020

Commenting on the corruption at the Justice Department and the FBI in 2016, former U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova said that then-President Barack Obama "knew all about" the FBI's spying on the Trump campaign and "was more than happy" to violate Americans' civil rights "so he could get Donald Trump."

DiGenova added that the two leaders of the coup to oust Trump are former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan. ........To Read More....

Why isn't Brennan or anyone else already behind bars?

December 14, 2019 By Mike Thau

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report contains so much to be outraged by that it’s hard to sustain the energy. And it goes way beyond his mind-numbing catalogue of FBI abuses.

To take just one example, as Tucker Carlson pointed out, Horowitz’s report verifies that Obama’s CIA director John Brennan outright lied when he testified that the Steele dossier played no role in the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. Brennan’s perjury here has been public knowledge for a long time now. Paul Sperry reported on it way back in February 2018.

But now Brennan’s lie under oath before Congress is officially documented in the IG report. Why isn’t the DoJ finally going after Brennan for it? What possible reason could there be to wait for Prosecutor John Durham to finish his investigation into the FBI’s Russia probe before nailing Brennan about his lie to Congress? .........To Read More....

Brennan Hears Barr's 'Chilling' Footsteps

October 5, 2019 By Daniel John Sobieski

James Clapper, the man who lied to Congress about spying on the American people was shocked back in April to hear William Barr testify before Congress that, yes, he thought that the Trump campaign had been spied upon by his political opponents. As Breitbart reported:

Well, I thought it was most stunning and scary. I was amazed at that and rather disappointed that the attorney general would say such a thing. The term “spying” has all kinds of negative connotations, and I have to believe he chose that term deliberately. 

And I think it’s incredible that if he has concerns, he would have easily on his first day on the job, after his confirmation, asked his own IG, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice, for a briefing on his preliminary, in the course of his investigation, that is, the IG’s investigation, whether there was any wrongdoing by the FBI.

Barr has more than that, it would seem and has sent chills up Clapper’s spine that the walls may be closing in, not on President Trump, but on Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan for their seditious roles in the attempted coup against the President. According to a Wall Street Journal report:

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says… that Attorney General William Barr appears to be investigating a high-confidence finding of the US intelligence community assessment of the 2016 election sends a "chilling message to the intelligence community."

Brennan may be hearing those footsteps get louder as well with his increasingly hysterical commentaries at MSNBC, which, along with CNN, is where liars and leakers go to die, warning President Trump to keep off the grass..........

As I wrote here recently, Brennan may have colluded with foreign spies to help Hillary Clinton. And the mind harkens back to the day when an op/ed in the Washington Post, that right-wing rag, called for Brennan to be fired for conducting illegal surveillance of the Senate Intelligence Committee and then lying about it:..........To Read More....

My Take - "Let's Make a Deal!" is coming to your local tv station soon.  Let's face it.  That Obama cabal of crooks, criminals, traitors and liars are in all in big trouble, and it won't be long before they will make deals to get of as much as they can. 

The mob guys are supposed to be tough, but they turned on some of the most violent and ruthless criminals in the world to save themselves from prison.  Jimmy Hoffa was a tough guy who spent his life beating up tough guys and hanging around tough guys, and he would have agreed to anything to get out of prison. . 

Do you think this crowd is tougher?  "Let's Make a Deal" is coming soon!!!!!!! Stay tuned to your favorite station. 

Who Ran Crossfire Hurricane?

Barr’s investigators should focus on John Brennan and Gina Haspel.      
           

by Jed Babbin June 3, 2019

Crossfire Hurricane” — the melodramatic code name for the FBI/CIA spy operation on candidate Trump and his early presidency — was run for the FBI by then-FBI Director James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, Special Agent Peter Strzok, and a few others.
Then-CIA director John Brennan ran it for the CIA. Brennan had to have help, but who was it? A lot of evidence points to the CIA’s then-chief of station in London in 2016-2017, and now the Director of Central Intelligence, Gina Haspel...........

............Barr said that since he became attorney general he had been asking why the counter-intelligence investigation was begun and hasn’t yet gotten a satisfactory answer..........Durham will face the most determined stonewalling by the CIA on all of this. Both Haspel and Brennan have a lot to lose, so she will be fighting tooth and nail against any of Durham’s requests for documents and testimony. Durham, and Barr, will have to force the issue..........Barr and Durham have an enormous — and enormously important — task before them. They should not hesitate to go to the president whenever they are stonewalled by the CIA or FBI. His executive order is just the beginning of his necessary involvement in their investigation.............To Read More....

My Take - The fact of the matter is the CIA and the FBI no longer have the right to withhold or redact any document requested by Barr and his investigators.  The President of the United states has ordered them to turn over just about anything these investigators want. 

Donald Trump is the President of the United States, that makes him the nation's chief executive and the CIA and the FBI answer to him.  If they continue down this resistant path they're going to be fired, and if the President of the United States has to go directly to CIA and FBI headquarters to demand the documents they want - a lot of people are going to be fired and some may end up in jail. 

We need to get this.  The President of the United States can see any and every classified document in the United States, in it's unredacted form.  He also can declassify any document classified by any subordinate in the federal government.  That's the way it works.  He's the boss!!!!!

The intelligence community has been corrupted so badly they seem to have forgotten that.  The time has now come for them to start remembering things correctly....or else! 

And I disagree with Barr.  This is treason, even if it fails to meet the legal definition of treason. 

Trump Let the Dogs Out

Those responsible for the coup attempt against the president can run but they can no longer hide.

Jed Babbin 27, 2019

The Democrats, stumbling down the road to impeachment, were stunned by President Trump’s executive order on Thursday.

The order is in two parts. First, it directs the intelligence agencies to cooperate with Attorney General William Barr’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia counterintelligence investigation that was the vehicle used to spy on candidate Trump’s campaign and President Trump’s administration when it was new.

The second part of the order delegates to Barr the president’s authority to declassify — or reduce the level of classification of — anything that the intelligence agencies will give him ................

Predictably, the people who are at greatest risk of exposure and danger of indictment erupted at Trump’s order.

For example, Obama’s CIA chief, John Brennan, told an interviewer,“I see it as a very, very serious and outrageous move on the part of Mr. Trump, once again, trampling on the statutory authorities of the Director of National Intelligence and the heads of the independent intelligence agencies.”

Brennan continued: “And it’s unclear to me what Mr. Barr is actually going to do. Is he investigating a crime? Well, what’s the predication of that crime? Or he is just going to be looking for information… that Mr. Trump can just give to his defenders on the right and cherry-pick information that could be taken out of context?”...............To Read More.....

My Take - Does Brennan realize his argument is a clear demonstration of exactly what the Democrats in the House are actually doing versus what he claims the President and Barr may do?  As for the President "trampling on the statutory authorities of the Director of National Intelligence and the heads of the independent intelligence agencies”, that's a load of horsepucky. 

The President of the United States is the nations chief executive, and those people work for him.  Furthermore, the President of the United States has the authority to declassify anything he sees fit to declassify, and the hired help has no authority to override such a decision.  They will comply or be fired.  It's also clear these agencies are nothing more than cockroach nests of corruption.  These vermin are hiding in the cracks and crevices of these agencies in order to escape the light of day, and are in need some serious "pest control" to flush them out in the open.  

As for this investigation impacting the 2020 election - of course it will!  Why wouldn't exposing the corruption of the Obama cabal of traitors not impact the 2020 election?  The only real question is this?  Who's going to start screaming - "let's make a deal" first, and who's going jail.  As for Brennan, Comey, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, Hillary and Bill - I can't imagine how they're going to stay out of jail - unless of course they can squeal on Obama and throw him under the bus. 

Is it any wonder why society despises government.  

Obama Appointees in the Communist Orbit

May 24, 2019 By Karin McQuillan

This week Rush Limbaugh repeated a quote from James Comey in a New York Magazine interview:

“I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now. I’m not even sure how to characterize myself politically. Maybe at some point, I’ll have to figure it out.”

It’s hard to pin too much on that quote. Perhaps Comey was joking by calling his vote for Jimmy Carter a vote for a Communist, in mockery of his supposedly fellow Republicans.

Joking about support for Communism is not all that funny in the Obama administration. Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan actually did vote for a Communist presidential candidate. Brennan and Comey are two of the central players in the Russia Collusion Hoax.

Obama choose Communists and Marxists for the highest, most powerful positions in our land, including his closest political advisors, and his head of the CIA. These facts are not in dispute. Most are openly admitted by the people in question, as necessary damage control. Our press chooses not to report them...........Is it any surprise that collusion with Russia, according to Victor David Hanson, was a feature of the Obama presidency? ....... Read more